{"title":"Passing Through: Feminist Digital Pedagogy and Failure in the General Education Classroom","authors":"Lauren M. Rosenblum, Laurel Harris","doi":"10.1353/tnf.2019.0002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tnf.2019.0002","url":null,"abstract":"abstract:In this article, we consider how a pedagogical approach that allows for failure can be at once valuable and fraught with consequences for marginalized students and faculty in general education classes. As feminist scholars and teachers, we embrace bell hooks's pedagogical ambition to \"restore the spirit of risk—to be fast, wild, to be able to … transform.\" In seeking the transformative possibilities of risk, we turned to digital pedagogy as a practice promoting what Katherine D. Harris calls \"productive failure.\" Experimental digital projects are often avoided in large general education classes due to the messiness of these projects and the demands on students and faculty to manageably navigate course requirements. Nevertheless, the experimental possibilities of the digital humanities appealed to us as a means of reconstructing the general education literature classroom as the egalitarian, conversational, and transformative space we hope to foster as feminist educators. We thus collaborated on developing an online critical edition of Nella Larsen's 1929 novel Passing in two large, introductory core literature classes—one taught at Adelphi University in the fall and the other at Rider University in the spring. This project created the atmosphere of community we were seeking, but it failed to be as inclusive as we intended or to make student learning as visible as it needed to be. Our experience leads us to question how to use digital humanities approaches to feminist ends. It further sheds light on the institutional inequalities that shape our successes and failures.","PeriodicalId":138207,"journal":{"name":"Transformations: The Journal of Inclusive Scholarship and Pedagogy","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133768672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Roving Reflections: Three American Scholars, the Tenth Rule of Janteloven, and 392 First Days of Class","authors":"Brianne Jaquette, Ruth Fairbanks, Rachel Cohen","doi":"10.1353/TNF.2019.0004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/TNF.2019.0004","url":null,"abstract":"abstract:In this article, the authors address the lack of scholarship about teaching abroad—beyond scholarship about student teaching—by adding to the conversation their perspectives of being Fulbright Roving Scholars in American Studies in Norway. We argue that the benefit of teaching abroad is the chance not only to learn about new cultures but also to create spaces where we can question our own assumptions about teaching, about culture, and about how to be global citizens. Reflection is one of the most critical tools for engaging with these experiences, and we consider the role that reflection played in coming to understand the changes made to our teaching practice during and after our year abroad. In the body of the text, we reflect upon issues such as social norms in Norway, teacher expectations of student participation, conversations about race, trends in immigration, and attitudes toward gun violence. We emphasize the need to break from norms of teaching experience, even without the opportunity to teach abroad, in order to change habits and bring new perspectives into the classroom, and we conclude by emphasizing the importance of teaching community to growing as a teacher.","PeriodicalId":138207,"journal":{"name":"Transformations: The Journal of Inclusive Scholarship and Pedagogy","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128530503","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Teaching Women's Writing: A Case Study in Creative Praxis","authors":"R. Lipperini","doi":"10.1353/TNF.2018.0018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/TNF.2018.0018","url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Creative writing assignments as textual interventions and \"deformances\" of original texts, and as alternatives to traditional composition assignments, can strengthen students' sense of unfamiliar and marginalized subject positions encountered in the literature classroom. Entering into a long-standing debate over the value of creative writing pedagogy in the literature classroom, this article takes an in-depth look at the trials and triumphs of a semester in the classroom teaching \"The Woman Question in Nineteenth-Century American Fiction\" through a creative praxis. It includes a detailed review of the creative assignment prompts alongside the students' submissions. Writing creatively encouraged students to develop an intersectional and inclusive view of women's writing. Finally, creative praxis, by encouraging students to pull apart a text and rebuild it themselves, offers alternative ways of producing the same desired outcomes of traditional literary analysis: critical and astute close readings, effective use of evidence, and thoughtful and persuasive arguments.","PeriodicalId":138207,"journal":{"name":"Transformations: The Journal of Inclusive Scholarship and Pedagogy","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123122692","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Abrogated Authority: A Failed Experience with Research in an Introductory Geology Classroom","authors":"N. Arens","doi":"10.1353/TNF.2018.0012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/TNF.2018.0012","url":null,"abstract":"abstract:An authentic research experience—where the outcome is unknown at the outset—is essential to the development of real-world scientists. However, most \"canned\" laboratory activities at the undergraduate level have well-planned outcomes that are known to the teacher and surmised by the students. With the goal of better preparing science students for research and others as informed consumers of science, I added such an authentic research experience to my college-level introductory geology class. Students developed the research question, devised methods, gathered and analyzed data, drew inferences, and presented results on a topic with conclusions unknown at the outset. For most classes, the project worked because at least some students were willing and able to take intellectual authority as leaders and to guide their peers. However, when students were unable to transfer authority from the professor to themselves and their data, the project failed. This article describes the prerequisites of success (naturally emerging peer leadership) and the seeds of failure in one case study of authentic research in the college introductory science classroom.","PeriodicalId":138207,"journal":{"name":"Transformations: The Journal of Inclusive Scholarship and Pedagogy","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124248278","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Radical Imagination as Pedagogy: Cultivating Collective Study from Within, on the Edge, and Beyond Education","authors":"Erin Dyke, E. Meyerhoff, Keno Evol","doi":"10.1353/TNF.2018.0010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/TNF.2018.0010","url":null,"abstract":"abstract:In our exploration of radical imagination as pedagogy, we theorize education as a particular mode of study that has historically been bound up with oppressive modes of life, including capitalism and colonialism. We argue that alternative modes of study have existed alongside, and in conflict with, education and its associated modes of life. These alternatives have been intertwined with the radical imagination, a collective practice that arises from within social movements against imaginaries that uphold the status quo. Inspired by Black radicalism, movements for Indigenous resurgence, and other intellectual traditions that theorize and mobilize a radical imagination, we reflect on our experiences of attempting to create subversive spaces of collective study, from within and beyond education institutions. In our analysis of our experiences in case studies of teaching a university course, organizing a radical education union, and projects of collective Black study beyond formal education institutions, we find that the practice of radical imagination-as-pedagogy is premised on affective and relational labor—labor that has been historically invisibilized, feminized/sentimentalized, and devalued in education, even in writing on critical pedagogies. Working across our examples, we consider the key role of relationships and affect for movement-building toward education justice. We conclude by offering strategies for cultivating a radical imagination within and beyond classrooms.","PeriodicalId":138207,"journal":{"name":"Transformations: The Journal of Inclusive Scholarship and Pedagogy","volume":"2013 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127301404","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A Collaborative Dialogue on the N-Word in a University Classroom","authors":"L. Gee, Sarah Wood","doi":"10.1353/TNF.2018.0015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/TNF.2018.0015","url":null,"abstract":"abstract:This article is a collaboration between a black student and white teacher about the use of the n-word in a university classroom. The authors share their personal contexts, reactions, and thought-processes around the incident and the classroom conversations that followed. Further, the student asks and answers questions about her experience as a black student on a primarily white campus with the hope that instructors will become more informed about the impact of language and demographic disparity in the classroom.","PeriodicalId":138207,"journal":{"name":"Transformations: The Journal of Inclusive Scholarship and Pedagogy","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129980369","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Move Slow and Fix Things: Teaching Computer Science Majors to Decode Discrimination and Design Diverse Futures","authors":"C. Sharpe, J. Rothenberg","doi":"10.1353/TNF.2018.0014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/TNF.2018.0014","url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Our course, \"Designing for Diversity: Anthropology and New Technologies,\" teaches how and why people experience technology as discriminatory in order to guide students to imagine more inclusive futures for the design and development of new technologies. We recognized that while interest and enrollment in computer science has increased dramatically over the last five years, few courses centered on the human-user and ethical issues related to designing and building technology. We created this course as a new opportunity to engage our students interested in entering the technology industry with principles of ethnography, disability studies, and critical race, feminist, and queer theories. With these new frameworks, students pursued small research projects that would prove valuable for future software engineers and the future of technology development. By training future technologists to recognize and remedy the encoding of bias into technology, this course offers a prototype for teaching students how to envision more desirable futures for technology in relation to gender, race, and disability. In this way, our pedagogy draws on a design perspective that addresses the future as something that will be both imagined and made to be ethical and inclusive.","PeriodicalId":138207,"journal":{"name":"Transformations: The Journal of Inclusive Scholarship and Pedagogy","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116347612","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"This Will Change Everything: Teaching the Climate Crisis","authors":"J. Foran, Summer Gray, C. Grosse, T. Lequesne","doi":"10.1353/TNF.2018.0017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/TNF.2018.0017","url":null,"abstract":"abstract:We argue that US sociologists have been woefully remiss in incorporating the climate crisis into our research agendas and, even more, into our teaching. After laying out the gravity of the situation we issue a call for sociologists to consider whether they wish to continue this striking denial of responsibility to our students and to knowledge production. We then present four ways that we have infused our understanding of climate change, climate crisis, and climate justice into courses on global issues, social movements, inequality, and much more. We believe that \"climate justice\"—the key concept that drives our concern as scholar-activists working closely with undergraduate students—allows for a proper sociological emphasis on structured inequality and relational/intersectional thinking. The article also points interested readers to resources that we have created, and invites them to contribute to a new project on writing case studies for teaching the climate crisis.","PeriodicalId":138207,"journal":{"name":"Transformations: The Journal of Inclusive Scholarship and Pedagogy","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133283723","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Assessment Failure: Lessons for the Reflective Practitioner","authors":"Neil O’Boyle","doi":"10.1353/TNF.2018.0011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/TNF.2018.0011","url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Anyone who has ever taught in a higher education institution for at least a semester will undoubtedly have experienced a 'little' teaching failure: a computer malfunction, a PowerPoint slide that contains out-of-date information, a 'real-life' example that doesn't quite work. Occasionally, however, some of us are unfortunate enough to experience 'big' teaching failures—when a lesson simply flops or, worse, a whole class does. Following the perspective of the reflective practitioner, which encourages educators to reflect critically on their teaching practices, the motivation behind this short essay is to reflect on a personal experience of a biggish teaching failure—namely, an assignment that simply didn't work. In order to better understand this teaching failure, and to draw out some broad pedagogical lessons from it, I compare it to an assignment that has worked extremely well over the years, and which I still use regularly in one of my classes. Rather conveniently, both assignments have been given to undergraduate students midway through a Communication Studies program, and both involve the analysis of advertising—meaning that the subject matter and level of student learning are similar in both cases.","PeriodicalId":138207,"journal":{"name":"Transformations: The Journal of Inclusive Scholarship and Pedagogy","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114864743","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Challenge of Providing High-Quality Feedback Online: Building a Culture of Continuous Improvement in an Online Course for Adult Learners","authors":"Emily Hodge, Susan Chenelle","doi":"10.1353/TNF.2018.0013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/TNF.2018.0013","url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Scholars of online learning have acknowledged the additional challenges an online format poses to relationship building and providing effective feedback. This article describes the authors' experiences providing feedback to adult learners in an online educational leadership course, the challenges they encountered in providing this feedback in a timeframe and manner to which students were receptive, and their research into how to build a culture of continuous improvement in an online course for adult learners. The authors conclude that effective online feedback occurs when course projects are sequenced to provide opportunities for students to receive and engage with feedback formatively, when instructors set clear expectations about feedback timelines, and when instructors take advantage of the variety of feedback mechanisms online environments can provide, including peer and instructor feedback, as well as self-reflection.","PeriodicalId":138207,"journal":{"name":"Transformations: The Journal of Inclusive Scholarship and Pedagogy","volume":"119 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129400869","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}