Abrogated Authority: A Failed Experience with Research in an Introductory Geology Classroom

N. Arens
{"title":"Abrogated Authority: A Failed Experience with Research in an Introductory Geology Classroom","authors":"N. Arens","doi":"10.1353/TNF.2018.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:An authentic research experience—where the outcome is unknown at the outset—is essential to the development of real-world scientists. However, most \"canned\" laboratory activities at the undergraduate level have well-planned outcomes that are known to the teacher and surmised by the students. With the goal of better preparing science students for research and others as informed consumers of science, I added such an authentic research experience to my college-level introductory geology class. Students developed the research question, devised methods, gathered and analyzed data, drew inferences, and presented results on a topic with conclusions unknown at the outset. For most classes, the project worked because at least some students were willing and able to take intellectual authority as leaders and to guide their peers. However, when students were unable to transfer authority from the professor to themselves and their data, the project failed. This article describes the prerequisites of success (naturally emerging peer leadership) and the seeds of failure in one case study of authentic research in the college introductory science classroom.","PeriodicalId":138207,"journal":{"name":"Transformations: The Journal of Inclusive Scholarship and Pedagogy","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transformations: The Journal of Inclusive Scholarship and Pedagogy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/TNF.2018.0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

abstract:An authentic research experience—where the outcome is unknown at the outset—is essential to the development of real-world scientists. However, most "canned" laboratory activities at the undergraduate level have well-planned outcomes that are known to the teacher and surmised by the students. With the goal of better preparing science students for research and others as informed consumers of science, I added such an authentic research experience to my college-level introductory geology class. Students developed the research question, devised methods, gathered and analyzed data, drew inferences, and presented results on a topic with conclusions unknown at the outset. For most classes, the project worked because at least some students were willing and able to take intellectual authority as leaders and to guide their peers. However, when students were unable to transfer authority from the professor to themselves and their data, the project failed. This article describes the prerequisites of success (naturally emerging peer leadership) and the seeds of failure in one case study of authentic research in the college introductory science classroom.
被废除的权威:地质学入门课堂研究的失败经验
真实的研究经历——结果一开始是未知的——对现实世界的科学家的发展至关重要。然而,在本科阶段,大多数“固定的”实验活动都有精心策划的结果,老师知道这些结果,学生也能猜到。为了让理科生更好地为研究做好准备,让其他人成为科学的知情消费者,我在大学水平的地质学入门课程中加入了这样一段真实的研究经历。学生们提出研究问题,设计方法,收集和分析数据,得出推论,并在一开始就不知道结论的情况下提出研究结果。对于大多数班级来说,这个项目是有效的,因为至少有一些学生愿意并且能够以知识权威为领导,指导他们的同龄人。然而,当学生们无法将权力从教授转移到他们自己和他们的数据时,项目失败了。这篇文章描述了成功的先决条件(自然出现的同伴领导)和失败的种子,在一个案例研究中,在大学入门科学课堂的真实研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信