Assessment Failure: Lessons for the Reflective Practitioner

Neil O’Boyle
{"title":"Assessment Failure: Lessons for the Reflective Practitioner","authors":"Neil O’Boyle","doi":"10.1353/TNF.2018.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Anyone who has ever taught in a higher education institution for at least a semester will undoubtedly have experienced a 'little' teaching failure: a computer malfunction, a PowerPoint slide that contains out-of-date information, a 'real-life' example that doesn't quite work. Occasionally, however, some of us are unfortunate enough to experience 'big' teaching failures—when a lesson simply flops or, worse, a whole class does. Following the perspective of the reflective practitioner, which encourages educators to reflect critically on their teaching practices, the motivation behind this short essay is to reflect on a personal experience of a biggish teaching failure—namely, an assignment that simply didn't work. In order to better understand this teaching failure, and to draw out some broad pedagogical lessons from it, I compare it to an assignment that has worked extremely well over the years, and which I still use regularly in one of my classes. Rather conveniently, both assignments have been given to undergraduate students midway through a Communication Studies program, and both involve the analysis of advertising—meaning that the subject matter and level of student learning are similar in both cases.","PeriodicalId":138207,"journal":{"name":"Transformations: The Journal of Inclusive Scholarship and Pedagogy","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transformations: The Journal of Inclusive Scholarship and Pedagogy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/TNF.2018.0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

abstract:Anyone who has ever taught in a higher education institution for at least a semester will undoubtedly have experienced a 'little' teaching failure: a computer malfunction, a PowerPoint slide that contains out-of-date information, a 'real-life' example that doesn't quite work. Occasionally, however, some of us are unfortunate enough to experience 'big' teaching failures—when a lesson simply flops or, worse, a whole class does. Following the perspective of the reflective practitioner, which encourages educators to reflect critically on their teaching practices, the motivation behind this short essay is to reflect on a personal experience of a biggish teaching failure—namely, an assignment that simply didn't work. In order to better understand this teaching failure, and to draw out some broad pedagogical lessons from it, I compare it to an assignment that has worked extremely well over the years, and which I still use regularly in one of my classes. Rather conveniently, both assignments have been given to undergraduate students midway through a Communication Studies program, and both involve the analysis of advertising—meaning that the subject matter and level of student learning are similar in both cases.
评估失败:反思从业者的经验教训
任何曾经在高等教育机构教过至少一个学期的人,毫无疑问都经历过“小”教学失败:电脑故障,ppt幻灯片包含过时的信息,“现实生活”中的例子不太奏效。然而,偶尔,我们中的一些人不幸地经历了“重大”教学失败——当一节课简单地失败,或者更糟的是,整个班级都失败了。遵循反思性实践者的观点,鼓励教育者批判性地反思他们的教学实践,这篇短文背后的动机是反思一个更大的教学失败的个人经历——也就是说,一个作业根本没有奏效。为了更好地理解这一教学失败,并从中得出一些广泛的教学经验,我将其与多年来非常有效的作业进行了比较,并且我仍然经常在我的一个课堂上使用它。相当方便的是,这两项作业都是在传播学课程的中途布置给本科生的,而且都涉及广告分析——这意味着这两项作业的主题和学生的学习水平是相似的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信