The Journal of British Studies最新文献_第10页

Garry Campion. The Good Fight: Battle of Britain Propaganda and the Few . Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010. Pp. xvii + 314. $90.00 (cloth); $30.00 (paper). 加里剪秋罗属植物。《正义之战:不列颠之战:宣传与少数》贝辛斯托克:Palgrave Macmillan出版社，2010。第17 + 314页。90.00美元(布);30.00美元(纸)。

The Journal of British Studies Pub Date : 2011-10-01 DOI: 10.1086/661004

J. Purcell

引用次数: 0

Sean D. Moore. Swift, the Book and the Irish Financial Revolution: Satire and Sovereignty in Colonial Ireland . Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010. Pp. 288. $65.00 (cloth). 肖恩·d·摩尔。斯威夫特，书和爱尔兰金融革命:讽刺和主权的殖民爱尔兰。巴尔的摩:约翰霍普金斯大学出版社，2010。288页。65.00美元(布)。

The Journal of British Studies Pub Date : 2011-10-01 DOI: 10.1086/660963

Anne L. Murphy

引用次数: 0

David George Mullan. Narratives of the Religious Self in Early Modern Scotland . St. Andrews Studies in Reformation History. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2010. Pp. 464. $134.95 (cloth). 大卫·乔治·穆兰。近代早期苏格兰宗教自我叙事。圣安德鲁斯宗教改革历史研究。伯灵顿，佛蒙特州:阿什盖特，2010。464页。134.95美元(布)。

The Journal of British Studies Pub Date : 2011-10-01 DOI: 10.1086/660954

B. Hindmarsh

引用次数: 0

Voices and Silences of Memory: Civilian Internees of the Japanese in British Asia during the Second World War 记忆的声音与沉默:第二次世界大战期间在英属亚洲的日本平民被拘留者

The Journal of British Studies Pub Date : 2011-10-01 DOI: 10.1086/661602

Felicia M. Yap

引用次数: 5

Kevin Sharpe. Image Wars: Promoting Kings and Commonwealths in England, 1603–1660. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2010. Pp. 512. $55.00 (cloth). 凯文·夏普。形象战争:1603-1660年英格兰国王和联邦的提升。纽黑文，康涅狄格州:耶鲁大学出版社，2010。512页。55.00美元(布)。

The Journal of British Studies Pub Date : 2011-10-01 DOI: 10.1086/660964

A. Bellany

引用次数: 0

Tatiana C. String. Art and Communication in the Reign of Henry VIII . Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008. Pp. 170. $114.95 (cloth). Tatiana C. String。亨利八世统治时期的艺术与传播。Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008。170页。114.95美元(布)。

The Journal of British Studies Pub Date : 2011-10-01 DOI: 10.1086/660966

M. Polito

引用次数: 0

D. A. Low. Fabrication of Empire: The British and the Uganda Kingdoms, 1890–1902 . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Pp. xix + 382. $110.00 (cloth). d·a·洛。帝国的制造:英国和乌干达王国，1890-1902。剑桥:剑桥大学出版社，2009。第19 + 382页。110.00美元(布)。

The Journal of British Studies Pub Date : 2011-10-01 DOI: 10.1086/661010

J. Hodge

引用次数: 0

Evil Counsel: The Propositions to Bridle the Impertinency of Parliament and the Critique of Caroline Government in the Late 1620s 邪恶的忠告:1620年代末遏制议会不正当性的主张与对卡罗琳政府的批判

The Journal of British Studies Pub Date : 2011-10-01 DOI: 10.1086/661000

Noah Millstone

{"title":"Evil Counsel: The Propositions to Bridle the Impertinency of Parliament and the Critique of Caroline Government in the Late 1620s","authors":"Noah Millstone","doi":"10.1086/661000","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/661000","url":null,"abstract":"I n November 1629, King Charles and his Privy Council discovered a particularly nasty rumor: the council, it was said, had decided to resolve England’s mounting political crisis by altering the kingdom’s frame of government and making “an Innovation” in its fundamental laws. The supposed plan would eliminate parliamentary intransigence and solve the crown’s revenue problems by making the king “an absolute tyrant.” In reality, no such plan existed. Nevertheless, the council found that handwritten copies of the supposed plan were being sold by London manuscript dealers. In tracing these copies to their source, the council uncovered a circle of aristocrats, lawyers, and antiquaries who were playing a dangerous game. The alleged plan, The Propositions for your Majesty’s Service containing two parts: the one to secure your state and bridle the impertinency of Parliaments; the other to increase your Majesty’s revenue, much more than it is (henceforth, the Propositions), was an extraordinary and sophisticated attempt at political communication. A handful of disaffected figures, including the earls of Bedford, Clare, and Somerset, Sir Robert Cotton, John Selden, and “sundry other","PeriodicalId":132502,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of British Studies","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127179390","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 24

The Citizens of Morley College 莫利学院的公民

The Journal of British Studies Pub Date : 2011-10-01 DOI: 10.1086/661021

A. Poole

{"title":"The Citizens of Morley College","authors":"A. Poole","doi":"10.1086/661021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/661021","url":null,"abstract":"I n October 1885, four young men presented themselves at the side door of the Royal Victoria Hall, Waterloo Road, Lambeth. They were enrolled in the first regular scientific classes that were being attempted as an experiment inspired by interest shown in the hall’s Friday night “penny science lectures.” The experiment proved a success and soon led to the establishment of Morley College for Working Men and Women, an institution dedicated to bringing to the working classes courses of study in liberal arts subjects. This was not the first attempt to introduce higher education to workers. There were, by the latter half of the nineteenth century, a number of institutions for adult education. The Mechanics Institute had been established by George Birkbeck in Glasgow in 1823; lyceums and Useful Knowledge Societies had more or less flourished through the nineteenth century; the Working Men’s College (dedicated to teaching the liberal arts to working men) had been established in Great Ormond Street in 1854 by Rev. F. D. Maurice, Thomas Hughes, John Ludlow, and Charles Kingsley, all Christian Socialists; and Oxford and Cambridge universities had been running extension lectures since 1867. But the sudden enfranchisement of so many working men by the Second Reform Act of 1867 made education for all these new voters a serious subject for debate. By the time the four young men came to the side door of the Royal Victoria Hall, educating working men was less a virtuous ideal and more a pressing imperative. For many, the only questions were what sort of education ought they receive and who was to set the curriculum. A good deal has been written on the subject of the education proffered to Britain’s working men in the latter quarter of the nineteenth century. Much of the debate turns on different aspects of a single issue: was worker education a way of offering higher learning to those hitherto denied the opportunity to engage in nonvocational, academic inquiry? Was adult worker education more a means whereby workers’ efforts to acquire learning was harnessed and shaped by elitist","PeriodicalId":132502,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of British Studies","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127142715","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Remembering the 1605 Gunpowder Plot in Ireland, 1605–1920 回顾1605年爱尔兰的火药阴谋，1605 - 1920

The Journal of British Studies Pub Date : 2011-10-01 DOI: 10.1086/661200

James McConnel

{"title":"Remembering the 1605 Gunpowder Plot in Ireland, 1605–1920","authors":"James McConnel","doi":"10.1086/661200","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/661200","url":null,"abstract":"W riting in November 1873 of the commemoration of the 1605 Gunpowder Plot (the conspiracy hatched by Guy Fawkes and other English Catholics to blow up parliament and thereby assassinate King James I), the Dublin-based liberal newspaper, the Freeman’s Journal, observed that, whereas in England the “dubious incident” was now remembered “only in connexion with a funny effigy and a schoolboy’s half-holiday,” in Ireland Protestants still found in “the miserable conspiracy of three centuries since a pretext of keeping fellow-countrymen asunder in distrust and hate.” The newspaper’s comments had been prompted by events two days earlier, when the “Sons of William” had assembled outside Portadown—“one of the most inflammable localities in Ulster”—determined to march to the sound of their “execrable” music through the Catholic residential area known as “the Tunnel” (named after a local underground walkway). But Portadown had been the scene of a riot in July 1873, and the Royal Irish Constabulary (RIC) had been forewarned that a similar incident might occur on 5 November. As a result, 110 additional constables were drafted from counties Armagh and Down to ensure that peace was maintained, while on the day itself, the RIC fixed bayonets and stopped the quarter-mile-long Orange procession from gaining access to the Tunnel, whereupon the great majority of Orangemen withdrew and entered the town from a different direction. However,","PeriodicalId":132502,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of British Studies","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131074332","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 10