肖恩·d·摩尔。斯威夫特,书和爱尔兰金融革命:讽刺和主权的殖民爱尔兰。巴尔的摩:约翰霍普金斯大学出版社,2010。288页。65.00美元(布)。

Anne L. Murphy
{"title":"肖恩·d·摩尔。斯威夫特,书和爱尔兰金融革命:讽刺和主权的殖民爱尔兰。巴尔的摩:约翰霍普金斯大学出版社,2010。288页。65.00美元(布)。","authors":"Anne L. Murphy","doi":"10.1086/660963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"regicides, William Goffe and John Dixwell, who fled abroad at the Restoration, is no mere afterthought. Major, as editor, recognizes that these republican refugees after 1660 were as much exiles as their royalist counterparts before 1660 and that a comparison between the experiences of the two groups is entirely valid. In fact, Major and Peacey are the two contributors who address most directly the question of how their subjects coped psychologically with the actual experience of exile. But there is a crucial difference. Whereas most royalist exiles had been able to live openly in foreign lands, Goffe and Dixwell spent decades living secret lives within the Stuarts’s colonial territories in New England, knowing that exposure would probably send them to the gallows or the block. One can only suppose that they thought that their enemies’ earlier periods of exile had been altogether easier.","PeriodicalId":132502,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of British Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sean D. Moore. Swift, the Book and the Irish Financial Revolution: Satire and Sovereignty in Colonial Ireland . Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010. Pp. 288. $65.00 (cloth).\",\"authors\":\"Anne L. Murphy\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/660963\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"regicides, William Goffe and John Dixwell, who fled abroad at the Restoration, is no mere afterthought. Major, as editor, recognizes that these republican refugees after 1660 were as much exiles as their royalist counterparts before 1660 and that a comparison between the experiences of the two groups is entirely valid. In fact, Major and Peacey are the two contributors who address most directly the question of how their subjects coped psychologically with the actual experience of exile. But there is a crucial difference. Whereas most royalist exiles had been able to live openly in foreign lands, Goffe and Dixwell spent decades living secret lives within the Stuarts’s colonial territories in New England, knowing that exposure would probably send them to the gallows or the block. One can only suppose that they thought that their enemies’ earlier periods of exile had been altogether easier.\",\"PeriodicalId\":132502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of British Studies\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of British Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/660963\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of British Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/660963","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

弑君者威廉·戈夫和约翰·迪克斯威尔在复辟时期逃到国外,这不仅仅是事后的想法。作为编辑,梅杰认识到1660年之后的共和派难民和1660年之前的保皇党难民一样流亡,将这两个群体的经历进行比较是完全合理的。事实上,梅杰和皮西是两位撰稿人,他们最直接地探讨了他们的主题是如何在心理上应对流亡的实际经历。但有一个关键的区别。大多数保皇党流亡者都能公开地生活在异国他乡,而戈夫和迪克斯威尔却在斯图亚特王朝在新英格兰的殖民领土上秘密生活了几十年,他们知道暴露自己可能会被送上绞刑架或断头台。人们只能猜测,他们认为他们的敌人在流放的早期要容易得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sean D. Moore. Swift, the Book and the Irish Financial Revolution: Satire and Sovereignty in Colonial Ireland . Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010. Pp. 288. $65.00 (cloth).
regicides, William Goffe and John Dixwell, who fled abroad at the Restoration, is no mere afterthought. Major, as editor, recognizes that these republican refugees after 1660 were as much exiles as their royalist counterparts before 1660 and that a comparison between the experiences of the two groups is entirely valid. In fact, Major and Peacey are the two contributors who address most directly the question of how their subjects coped psychologically with the actual experience of exile. But there is a crucial difference. Whereas most royalist exiles had been able to live openly in foreign lands, Goffe and Dixwell spent decades living secret lives within the Stuarts’s colonial territories in New England, knowing that exposure would probably send them to the gallows or the block. One can only suppose that they thought that their enemies’ earlier periods of exile had been altogether easier.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信