Hernia最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Non-hiatal diaphragmatic hernias: results of transabdominal and transthoracic surgical approaches at a fourth-level hospital. 非腹腔膈疝:一家四级医院经腹和经胸手术方法的结果。
IF 2.6 2区 医学
Hernia Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-20 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03065-1
Manuel José Torres-Jurado, María Teresa Gómez-Hernández, Andrés E Valera-Montiel, Laura Vicente-González, Omar Abdel-Lah-Fernández, Felipe Carlos Parreño-Manchado, Marcelo Fernando Jiménez-López
{"title":"Non-hiatal diaphragmatic hernias: results of transabdominal and transthoracic surgical approaches at a fourth-level hospital.","authors":"Manuel José Torres-Jurado, María Teresa Gómez-Hernández, Andrés E Valera-Montiel, Laura Vicente-González, Omar Abdel-Lah-Fernández, Felipe Carlos Parreño-Manchado, Marcelo Fernando Jiménez-López","doi":"10.1007/s10029-024-03065-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10029-024-03065-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to elucidate the clinical and demographic profiles, as well as perioperative outcomes, of patients undergoing surgery for non-hiatal diaphragmatic hernias. Additionally, it aims to analyse these outcomes based on the surgical approach employed (transthoracic versus transabdominal).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, observational study was conducted at a single center and involved patients diagnosed with non-hiatal diaphragmatic hernia who underwent either emergency or elective surgery between July 2007 and March 2023. Clinical characteristics and perioperative outcomes of these patients were compared using appropriate statistical tests.The research protocol for this observational, retrospective, and comparative study followed the Declaration of Helsinki's ethical requirements. The need for Clinical Research Ethics Committee approval was waived according to our institutional law because the study was a retrospective cohort study based on anonymous data of patients. Informed consent was waived because this study involved the secondary analysis of patient medical records. Additionally, this study followed the STROBE guidelines for reporting observational studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 22 patients being 59.1% men, with median age of 61 years. The predominant clinical presentation was restrictive lung disease (40.9%). The majority of cases (68%) had traumatic aetiology with a median defect size of 4 cm (range of 3-8 cm). Elective surgery was performed in 15 cases (68.1%) and transthoracic approach was employed in 13 patients (54.5%). Postoperative major morbidity reached 27.2% and mortality within 30 days was 9.1%. Emergency surgeries accounted for 44.4% of transabdominal interventions, compared to 23% in the transthoracic subgroup (p = 0.376). There were no statistically significant differences between the transabdominal and trasnthoracic approaches in terms of global postoperative complications (88.8% vs. 84.6%, p = 1), major complications (44.4% vs 15.4%, p = 0.734), mortality (11.1% v 7.6%, p = 1) and recurrence (11.1% vs 7.6%, p = 1). Postoperative stay was significantly shorter in the transthoracic subgroup (6 days vs. 14 days, p = 0.011).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Non-hiatal diaphragmatic hernias are characterized by significant postoperative major morbidity and mortality rates, standing at 27.2% and 9.1%, respectively, accompanied by a recurrence rate of 9.1%. Both transthoracic and transabdominal approaches demonstrate comparable short- and long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141065049","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comment to: Peritoneal flap technique for abdominal wall expansion in the management of complex ventral hernias. 发表评论:腹膜瓣技术用于腹壁扩张治疗复杂腹股沟疝。
IF 2.6 2区 医学
Hernia Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03128-3
Pedro Ducatti de Oliveira E Silva, Renato Miranda de Melo, Cássio Eduardo da Silva Gontijo
{"title":"Comment to: Peritoneal flap technique for abdominal wall expansion in the management of complex ventral hernias.","authors":"Pedro Ducatti de Oliveira E Silva, Renato Miranda de Melo, Cássio Eduardo da Silva Gontijo","doi":"10.1007/s10029-024-03128-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10029-024-03128-3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141859626","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
TACKoMesh - A randomised controlled trial comparing absorbable versus non-absorbable tack fixation in laparoscopic IPOM + repair of primary incisional hernia using post-operative pain and quality of life - Reliatack™ versus Protack™. TACKoMesh - 一项随机对照试验,比较腹腔镜 IPOM + 原发性切口疝修补术中可吸收与不可吸收的粘扣带固定,并评估术后疼痛和生活质量 - Reliatack™ 与 Protack™。
IF 2.6 2区 医学
Hernia Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-23 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03111-y
J James Pilkington, James Pritchett, Catherine Fullwood, Annie Herring, Fiona L Wilkinson, Aali Jan Sheen
{"title":"TACKoMesh - A randomised controlled trial comparing absorbable versus non-absorbable tack fixation in laparoscopic IPOM + repair of primary incisional hernia using post-operative pain and quality of life - Reliatack™ versus Protack™.","authors":"J James Pilkington, James Pritchett, Catherine Fullwood, Annie Herring, Fiona L Wilkinson, Aali Jan Sheen","doi":"10.1007/s10029-024-03111-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10029-024-03111-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a clinical need to better understand and improve post-operative pain for patients undergoing laparoscopic repair of incisional hernia. The aim of this single-centre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial was to compare post-operative pain between absorbable and non-absorbable tack fixation in patients undergoing IPOM + repair. Patients with primary incisional hernia (size 3-10 cm), were randomised to either Reliatack™ (n = 27), an articulating-arm device deploying absorbable polymer tacks, or Protack™ (n = 36), a straight-arm device deploying permanent titanium tacks. The primary outcome was reported pain on activity using a visual analogue scale at post-operative day 30. Clinical and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were assessed pre-operatively (day 0), and at 1-, 6-, 30- and 365-days post-surgery. No significant differences in reported pain 'on activity' were found at any timepoint. Less reported pain 'at rest' was found on post-operative day-1 with absorbable tacks (p = 0.020). Significantly longer mesh-fixation time (p < 0.001) and the use of more knots for fascial closure (p = 0.006) and tacks for mesh-fixation (p = 0.001) were found for the absorbable tack group. There were no differences in other clinical and PROMs between groups. For the whole trial cohort (n = 63) several domains in the Short-Form-36 showed a reduction from baseline scores at day 30 that improved at day 365. At post-operative day 30, 75.0% of patients reported 'a lot of pain' since discharge. This study found no difference in reported pain when choosing absorbable or non-absorbable tack fixation. The utility of \"early\" post-operative pain assessment as a comparator following incisional hernia repair needs clarification.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142035778","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Umbrella review of systematic reviews on the efficacy and safety of using mesh in the prevention of parastomal hernias. 关于使用网片预防腹股沟旁疝气的有效性和安全性的系统性综述。
IF 2.6 2区 医学
Hernia Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-23 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03137-2
Sameh Hany Emile, Justin Dourado, Peter Rogers, Anjelli Wignakumar, Nir Horesh, Zoe Garoufalia, Rachel Gefen, Steven D Wexner
{"title":"Umbrella review of systematic reviews on the efficacy and safety of using mesh in the prevention of parastomal hernias.","authors":"Sameh Hany Emile, Justin Dourado, Peter Rogers, Anjelli Wignakumar, Nir Horesh, Zoe Garoufalia, Rachel Gefen, Steven D Wexner","doi":"10.1007/s10029-024-03137-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10029-024-03137-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This umbrella review aimed to summarize the findings and conclusions of published systematic reviews on the prophylactic role of mesh against parastomal hernias in colorectal surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PRISMA-compliant umbrella overview of systematic reviews on the role of mesh in prevention of parastomal hernias was conducted. PubMed and Scopus were searched through November 2023. Main outcomes were efficacy and safety of mesh. Efficacy was assessed by the rates of clinically and radiologically detected hernias and the need for surgical repair, while safety was assessed by the rates of overall complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>19 systematic reviews were assessed; 7 included only patients with end colostomy and 12 included patients with either ileostomy or colostomy. The use of mesh significantly reduced the risk of clinically detected parastomal hernias in all reviews except one. Seven reviews reported a significantly lower risk of radiologically detected parastomal hernias with the use of mesh. The pooled hazards ratio of clinically detected and radiologically detected parastomal hernias was 0.33 (95%CI: 0.26-0.41) and 0.55 (95%CI: 0.45-0.68), respectively. Six reviews reported a significant reduction in the need for surgical repair when a mesh was used whereas six reviews found a similar need for hernia repair. The pooled hazards ratio for surgical hernia repair was 0.46 (95%CI: 0.35-0.62). Eight reviews reported similar complications in the two groups. The pooled hazard ratio of complications was 0.81 (95%CI: 0.66-1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of surgical mesh is likely effective and safe in the prevention of parastomal hernias without an increased risk of overall complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142035779","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ergonomic differences in mesh placement and mesh fixation between laparoscopic and robotic inguinal hernia repair with mesh. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术和机器人腹股沟疝修补术在网片放置和网片固定方面的人体工程学差异。
IF 2.6 2区 医学
Hernia Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03168-9
Kelsey R Tieken, Ka-Chun Siu, Jihyun Ma, Anthony Murante, Tiffany N Tanner, Vishal M Kothari, Ivy N Haskins
{"title":"Ergonomic differences in mesh placement and mesh fixation between laparoscopic and robotic inguinal hernia repair with mesh.","authors":"Kelsey R Tieken, Ka-Chun Siu, Jihyun Ma, Anthony Murante, Tiffany N Tanner, Vishal M Kothari, Ivy N Haskins","doi":"10.1007/s10029-024-03168-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-024-03168-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>General differences in surgeon ergonomics between laparoscopic and robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repairs (LIHR vs. RIHR) have been previously studied. However, specific differences in the ergonomics of mesh placement (MP) and mesh fixation (MF) are undetermined. Our aim was to determine if there are differences in the ergonomics of MP and MF between the surgical approaches. We hypothesize that we will identify differences, with the potential for worse ergonomics during LIHR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data was collected from fifteen LIHR and fifteen RIHR. All cases were elective, primary inguinal hernias completed by a fellowship-trained minimally invasive surgeon. Surface electromyography (EMG) of four upper extremity muscle groups, including the upper trapezius (UT), anterior deltoid (AD), flexor carpi radialis (FCR) and extensor digitorum (ED), was recorded bilaterally during MP and MF. Muscle activation as a percent of maximum voluntary contraction (%MVC<sub>RMS</sub>) and muscle fatigue denoted as the median frequency of muscle activations (Fmed) were calculated for each muscle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EMG analysis showed increased %MVC<sub>RMS</sub> in LIHR compared to RIHR cases, with significant findings in the left UT, right UT, ED, and FCR for MP and MF and the left FCR during MP. Muscle fatigue was decreased in LIHR compared to RIHR cases, with significant differences in left FCR and right ED and AD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite greater muscle activations during LIHR, RIHR had greater muscle fatigue. It is possible that short periods of high muscle activation are ergonomically protective during minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair. Identifying these differences may aid in development of procedure-specific interventions to improve ergonomics.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142345769","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comment on: Biosynthetic meshes in contaminated fields: where are we now? A systematic review and meta‑analysis in humans. 评论污染田中的生物合成网格:我们现在在哪里?对人类的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 2.6 2区 医学
Hernia Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-16 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03074-0
J Li, Z Ji
{"title":"Comment on: Biosynthetic meshes in contaminated fields: where are we now? A systematic review and meta‑analysis in humans.","authors":"J Li, Z Ji","doi":"10.1007/s10029-024-03074-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10029-024-03074-0","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140944826","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Computed tomography for evaluation of abdominal wall hernias-what is the value of the Valsalva maneuver? 计算机断层扫描评估腹壁疝--瓦尔萨尔瓦手法的价值何在?
IF 2.6 2区 医学
Hernia Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-14 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03036-6
S Ghafoor, A T Hoppe, M Lange, A Tognella, M Bueter, K Lehmann, H Alkadhi, D Stocker
{"title":"Computed tomography for evaluation of abdominal wall hernias-what is the value of the Valsalva maneuver?","authors":"S Ghafoor, A T Hoppe, M Lange, A Tognella, M Bueter, K Lehmann, H Alkadhi, D Stocker","doi":"10.1007/s10029-024-03036-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10029-024-03036-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the differences in the visibility and size of abdominal wall hernias in computed tomography (CT) with and without Valsalva maneuver.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective study included consecutive patients who underwent abdominal CTs with Valsalva maneuver between January 2018 and January 2022. Inclusion criteria was availability of an additional non-Valsalva CT within 6 months. A combined reference standard including clinical and surgical findings was used. Two independent, blinded radiologists measured the hernia sac size and rated hernia visibility on CTs with and without Valsalva. Differences were tested with a Wilcoxon signed rank test and McNemar's test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final population included 95 patients (16 women; mean age 46 ± 11.6 years) with 205 hernias. Median hernia sac size on Valsalva CT was 31 mm compared with 24 mm on non-Valsalva CT (p < 0.001). In 73 and 82% of cases, the hernias were better visible on CT with Valsalva as compared to that without. 14 and 17% of hernias were only visible on the Valsalva CT. Hernia visibility on non-Valsalva CT varied according to subtype, with only 0 and 3% of umbilical hernias not being visible compared with 43% of femoral hernias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Abdominal wall hernias are larger and better visible on Valsalva CT compared with non-Valsalva CT in a significant proportion of patients and some hernias are only visible on the Valsalva CT. Therefore, this method should be preferred for the evaluation of abdominal wall hernias.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141317012","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Proposal for encoding the surgical treatment in abdominal wall pathology based on a multidimensional analysis of history. 基于病史多维分析的腹壁病理学手术治疗编码提案。
IF 2.6 2区 医学
Hernia Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-22 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03086-w
Walther R Minatti, Anabela Rosales, Emiliano Mugianesi, Diego J Bertani
{"title":"Proposal for encoding the surgical treatment in abdominal wall pathology based on a multidimensional analysis of history.","authors":"Walther R Minatti, Anabela Rosales, Emiliano Mugianesi, Diego J Bertani","doi":"10.1007/s10029-024-03086-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10029-024-03086-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a multidimensional method that allows to identify different treatment concepts, techniques, protagonists, and their connections in surgical pathology of the abdominal wall throughout its historical development, serving as a basis or guide for the future.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>First, an extensive and rigorous review of the literature was conducted to search for and group the different treatments described in the most common abdominal wall pathologies, including both groin and ventral hernias. Then, all treatment approaches were chronologically ordered and grouped according to their author, surgical approach, and method of approach. With all the information gathered, a table was created following a rational and multidimensional criterion that allows for the encoding of the set.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>21 treatment modalities were identified and distributed into 8 groups. Additionally, 3 types of authors were detected: the creator, the innovator, and the popularizer. The assignment of values to different dimensions allowed us to obtain an alphanumeric code representative of the set.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multidimensional historical analysis allows analytical objectivity and set encoding. Its practical scope should be investigated.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141440433","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is there a link between Spigelian and inguinal hernias? A case series. 斯皮格林疝和腹股沟疝之间有联系吗?一个病例系列。
IF 2.6 2区 医学
Hernia Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-27 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03061-5
R Lorenz, U Vollmer, J Conze, F Loch, K Paul-Promchan, R Mantke, C Paasch, R Wiessner
{"title":"Is there a link between Spigelian and inguinal hernias? A case series.","authors":"R Lorenz, U Vollmer, J Conze, F Loch, K Paul-Promchan, R Mantke, C Paasch, R Wiessner","doi":"10.1007/s10029-024-03061-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10029-024-03061-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Spigelian hernias are among the rare primary ventral hernias. Diagnosis is often difficult, as many cases are asymptomatic. Spigelian and inguinal hernias are usually considered separately in current scientific literature. With this case series, we want to illustrate a possible relationship between the neighboring hernia types.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this article, we report on a case series of Spigelian hernias that were operated on in five hernia centers in the period from January 1st, 2021 to October 31st, 2023. We have summarized all patient characteristics with previous operations and the result of the secondary operation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We report a case series with 24 Spigelian hernias, 15 of which have a connection to previous inguinal hernias. In these cases, however, it is not certain whether these are primarily overlooked or occult hernias or whether these Spigelian hernias have arisen secondarily, as a result of previous hernia surgery. With this case series, we would like to point out a possible connection between Spigelian hernia and inguinal hernia. Further studies are needed to shed more light on this entity and explain its genesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141456387","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP): an underestimated problem after incisional hernia treatment. 慢性手术后疼痛(CPSP):切口疝治疗后一个被低估的问题。
IF 2.6 2区 医学
Hernia Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-25 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03027-7
A Widder, L Reese, J F Lock, A Wiegering, C-T Germer, H L Rittner, U A Dietz, N Schlegel, M Meir
{"title":"Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP): an underestimated problem after incisional hernia treatment.","authors":"A Widder, L Reese, J F Lock, A Wiegering, C-T Germer, H L Rittner, U A Dietz, N Schlegel, M Meir","doi":"10.1007/s10029-024-03027-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10029-024-03027-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) is a potential long-term problem following open incisional hernia repair which may affect the quality of life of patients despite successful anatomical repair of the hernia. The aim of this manuscript was to identify the incidence and outcome of patients following open incisional hernia repair in respect of risk factors to develop CPSP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective analysis of patients who underwent open incisional hernia repair between 2015 and 2021 was performed. Pre-existing conditions (e.g., diabetes mellitus and malignancy), hernia complexity, postoperative complications, and postoperative pain medication were analyzed using the local database. Quality of life and CPSP were assessed using the EuraHS Quality of Life (QoL) questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 182 cases were retrospectively included in a detailed analysis based on the complete EuraHS (QoL) questionnaire. During the average follow-up period of 46 months, this long-term follow-up revealed a 54.4% incidence of CPSP and including a rate of 14.8% for severe CPSP (sCPSP) after open incisional hernia surgery. The complexity of the hernia and the demographic variables were not different between the group with and without CPSP. Patients with CPSP reported significantly reduced QoL. The analgesics score which includes the need of pain medication in the initial days after surgery was significantly higher in patients with CPSP than in those without (no CPSP: 2.86 vs. CPSP: 3.35; p = 0.047).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The presence of CPSP after open incisional hernia repair represents a frequent and underestimated long-term problem which has been not been recognized to this extent before. CPSP impairs QoL in these patients. Patients at risk to develop CPSP can be identified in the perioperative setting by the need of high doses of pain medication using the analgesics score. Possibly timely adjustment of pain medication, even in the domestic setting, could alleviate the chronicity or severity of CPSP.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140287301","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信