Health Services Insights最新文献

{"title":"Hidden in Plain Sight: A Scoping Review of Professional Grief in Healthcare and Charting a Path for Change.","authors":"Carolyn S Phillips, Katie Trainum, Megan C Thomas Hebdon","doi":"10.1177/11786329251344772","DOIUrl":"10.1177/11786329251344772","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Healthcare workers frequently experience emotional distress from repeated exposure to patient death, yet professional grief remains poorly recognized and inadequately supported. The COVID-19 pandemic further magnified these challenges, bringing professional grief into sharper focus. The purpose of this scoping review was to comprehensively examine professional grief among healthcare workers (HCWs) across different professions and specialties, map existing literature, identify research gaps, and provide educational, clinical, and policy recommendations. This scoping review followed Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Databases searched included PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO for literature from 2004 to 2024. Studies were screened based on inclusion criteria focusing on professional grief experiences of HCWs dealing with patient deaths. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method studies were included. Eighty-one publications were reviewed, with most studies published since 2020, highlighting increased attention post-COVID-19. Key findings identified significant individual (eg, early career vulnerability, lack of formal education), interpersonal (eg, patient demographics, relationship quality), and systemic factors (eg, emotional suppression culture, workload constraints) influencing professional grief. Existing interventions were predominantly peer-based and lacked demonstrated efficacy in reducing grief intensity. Measurement inconsistencies revealed discrepancies between qualitative and quantitative assessments of grief intensity, indicating a need for specialized measurement tools tailored to professional contexts. Professional grief among HCWs is multifaceted and deeply influenced by cultural, educational, and systemic barriers. Comprehensive strategies addressing these barriers must include structured educational curricula, ongoing clinical support programs, validated grief measurement tools, and institutional policies promoting open emotional expression. These approaches are essential to fostering resilience, enhancing professional well-being, and improving patient care outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12876,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Insights","volume":"18 ","pages":"11786329251344772"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12174799/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144325319","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Patient-Reported Experiences in Vascular Surgery: A Qualitative Analysis of Care Quality.","authors":"Maram Darwish, Katrin Abdelgafar, Sian Jackson, James Coulson, Kathleen Withers, David C Bosanquet","doi":"10.1177/11786329251342283","DOIUrl":"10.1177/11786329251342283","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The complexity of treatment pathways and the chronic nature of diseases in vascular surgery necessitate a patient-centred approach to improve care quality and health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore vascular patients' experiences, identifying key factors influencing their satisfaction and adherence to treatment.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Qualitative design using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventeen semi-structured interviews were conducted with vascular patients (10 males and 7 females) from 3 vascular units in Wales. Proportional random sampling was used for participant selection based on recent vascular care, age, sex, and clinical backgrounds. Interviews were conducted in person, recorded, and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was employed to identify key themes. NVivo 10 software facilitated data management.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six themes were identified: (i) communication and information delivery, (ii) patient involvement in decision-making, (iii) pain management, (iv) psychological and emotional support, (v) healthcare environment and systemic processes and (vi) continuity of care and post-discharge experience. While patients generally appreciated the professionalism of the healthcare staff, notable disparities emerged in communication, particularly for patients with lower health literacy or during waiting periods. Inconsistencies in discharge planning and follow-up care highlighted systemic inequities. Across all units, patients reported a lack of formal psychological support. Involvement in decision-making varied, with some patients feeling adequately included, while others experienced exclusion and anxiety.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings reveal key areas for improvement, with communication serving as a foundational element that enhances patient involvement in decision-making, psychological support, and continuity of care. Addressing these interconnected areas, with a focus on effective communication and health equity, may help close care gaps and improve outcomes for all vascular patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12876,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Insights","volume":"18 ","pages":"11786329251342283"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12138208/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144233951","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Exploring the Routine Recording of Health-Related Social Needs in U.S. Acute Care Hospitals.","authors":"Sinyoung Park, Hanadi Y Hamadi, Samira Abdul, Aaron Spaulding, Jing Xu, Mei Zhao","doi":"10.1177/11786329251342849","DOIUrl":"10.1177/11786329251342849","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Addressing social determinants of health in patient care helps hospitals better understand the non-medical factors influencing patients' health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study was to evaluate the correlation between hospital characteristics, county determinants, and the systematic recording of health-related social needs among general and surgical acute care hospitals in the United States. It focused on the hospital's routine collection of data on patients' health-related social needs, such as transportation, housing, and food insecurity.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional retrospective study design was utilized.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All hospitals that completed the American Hospital Association Annual survey (n = 2254) were included in the study. A series of multinomial logistic analyses were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The relative risk of hospitals routinely collecting health-related social needs data is 67% lower in for-profit hospitals and 90% higher in not-for-profit hospitals compared to government hospitals. Hospitals that are part of a system are 1.5 times more likely to routinely collect data on social needs. In addition, counties with higher household income have a statistically significant higher relative risk of hospitals collecting data on social needs, though the magnitude of the difference is small. The relative risk of hospitals collecting social needs data, but not routinely, is 2 times higher in teaching hospitals and 3 times higher among system hospitals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our research strongly indicates that understanding and addressing these inherent hospital-related factors are essential for effectively integrating social determinants of health into routine healthcare data collection practices. Establishing more robust guidelines and standardization in these practices may enhance hospitals' ability to document and utilize health-related social needs information, ultimately driving improved patient outcomes and supporting more equitable care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12876,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Insights","volume":"18 ","pages":"11786329251342849"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12126681/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144198952","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Knowledge and Prevalence of Cervical Cancer Screening Among Women Receiving Prenatal Care in Accra, Ghana: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Victor Akuoku, Michael Darko Ashaley","doi":"10.1177/11786329251337851","DOIUrl":"10.1177/11786329251337851","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary purpose of this study was to assess the knowledge and prevalence of cervical cancer screening (CCS) among women attending prenatal care clinics in the Okaikwei North Municipal Assembly (ONMA) in the Greater Accra region, Ghana. The study also aimed to examine whether there were differences in CCS knowledge between the women attending the prenatal care clinics.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study utilized a cross-sectional, quantitative approach and a two-stage cluster sampling method.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study involved 393 women receiving prenatal care at three health facilities in the district, namely NK Salem Medical Centre Hospital (NMCH), Achimota Hospital (AH), and Lapaz Community Hospital (LCH).</p><p><strong>Primary outcome: </strong>Level of Knowledge and Prevalence of CCS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sampled participants from the three hospitals were Achimota (36.6%), Lapaz Community (32.1%), and NK Salem (31.3%). The mean age (SD) was 29.7 (±3.8) years. The age group 21 to 30 years formed the majority (57.8%). The prevalence of CCS among women receiving prenatal care was 7.4%; although most of them had heard about CCS, a proportion (46.5%) of them did not know CCS was, and only 33.9% knew Pap Smear as the test for detecting cervical cancer. A very small proportion (19.8%) of the women receiving prenatal care had CCS knowledge. There was a statistically significant difference in mean knowledge by 1.47 between women receiving prenatal care at AH and LCH, as well as by 1.82 between NMCH and LCH.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was a very low knowledge and prevalence of CCS in the district. Knowledge of CCS differed significantly between the health facilities in the district.</p>","PeriodicalId":12876,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Insights","volume":"18 ","pages":"11786329251337851"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12081976/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144093368","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A Qualitative Study on the Design and Implementation of a First Responder Operational Stress Injury Clinic.","authors":"Sarah E MacLean, Nicole E Edgar, Chloe Ahluwalia, Valerie Testa, Simon Hatcher","doi":"10.1177/11786329251333019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329251333019","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>First responders (police, firefighters, and paramedics) are routinely exposed to potentially psychologically traumatic events (PPTE). While the prevalence of mental disorders is difficult to estimate, research has demonstrated that first responders report higher rates of mental health disorders than the general population. They also report significant barriers to accessing mental healthcare, including concerns about the confidentiality of mental health services and stigma by co-workers and organizational leadership. One way to address these barriers to seeking care is through the establishment of a first responder specific mental health clinic. The objective of this qualitative study was to assess how to best implement such a service for first responders in Ottawa, Canada. We conducted 14 in-depth semi-structured qualitative interviews with key interest holders from first responder services, unions/associations, and the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) which explored elements of service delivery and organizational barriers and facilitators to implementing the clinic. Interviews were analyzed and coded using thematic analysis by two independent coders. Four main themes were identified: implementation context (perceived need, workplace culture), design of the clinic (service delivery, confidentiality, cost, and communication about the clinic), the implementation process (barriers and facilitators to implementation), and the broader impact of the implementation of the clinic. Findings show that it is the right time to implement first responder specific clinical services as services begin to prioritize the mental health needs of their members. To increase uptake by first responders, confidentiality and cultural competency of care providers is paramount.</p>","PeriodicalId":12876,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Insights","volume":"18 ","pages":"11786329251333019"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12059418/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143977366","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Use of Clinical Pathways in Emergency Departments: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Innocent Tawanda Mudzingwa, Sarah Jane Prior, Phoebe Griffin, Emma Tavender, Viet Tran","doi":"10.1177/11786329251328527","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329251328527","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Clinical pathways (CPWs) are evidence-based, standardised, clinical management plans that are designed to deliver a sequence of clinical interventions to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of healthcare. The aim of this study was to identify and summarise the current available evidence on the use of CPWs in emergency departments (EDs).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A literature search was conducted in Scopus, Embase, Emcare, and PubMed academic databases. The search strategy was guided by Arksey and O'Malley's framework and results reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews Checklist. Studies were included if they reported empirical data either qualitatively or quantitatively, studied the use of CPW practices, and reported on the use of at least one CPW activity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-four articles were eligible for the scoping review. Variation and quality of treatment, resource utilisation and time to treatment were identified as the three main patient and organisational outcomes from the use of CPWs. Three main categories of barriers to use were identified: Organisational environment factors, Healthcare professional-related factors, and CPW operational issues.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CPW implementation has wide positive patient and organisational outcomes in the ED. Whilst no single strategy would result in implementing CPWs in the ED settings successfully, broad engagement with clinicians of all disciplines who use the pathways and involvement of multidisciplinary teams in implementation is vital to increase visibility of the CPW.</p>","PeriodicalId":12876,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Insights","volume":"18 ","pages":"11786329251328527"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12062697/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144003199","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Better Together? A Mediation Analysis of French General Practitioners' Performance in Multi Professional Group Practice.","authors":"Anna Zaytseva, Pierre Verger, Bruno Ventelou","doi":"10.1177/11786329251331128","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329251331128","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Integrated primary care teams remain a debatable policy in family medicine that could be a convenient response to French shortages in medical density.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyse how general practitioners (GPs) respond to insufficient GP supply in their practice area in terms of quantity and quality of care, and how this response is mediated by enrolment in integrated primary care teams - multi-professional group practices (MGPs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used structural equation modelling on 3 representative cross-sectional surveys (2019-2020) of 1209 French GPs. Quantity and quality of care were approximated by latent variables comprising respectively GPs' demand absorption capacity and frequencies of vaccine recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the absence of potential mediators, low GP density was negatively associated with quantity (-0.221, unstandardized direct effects), but not with the quality of care. In the presence of mediators, low GP density was associated with higher work-related stress (0.120), which was consecutively associated with deteriorated demand absorption capacity (-0.202). Higher use of e-health tools was associated with greater involvement in vaccine recommendations (0.357). GPs in MGPs tended to use more e-health tools than those practicing outside MGPs (0.032), with a favourable effect on vaccine recommendations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lower level of work-related stress is the key mediator in handling patients' requests. When correcting for self-selection into MGPs, we found no significant mediation effect of enrolment in MGPs on the quantity of care but rather an effect on the quality of care. Our results pinpoint an added value of an enrolment in an MGPs to care quality that advocates for its further development.</p><p><strong>Jel classification: </strong>I14, I18.</p>","PeriodicalId":12876,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Insights","volume":"18 ","pages":"11786329251331128"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12056331/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144019584","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A Qualitative Study Examining the Unintended Consequences from Implementing a Case Management Team to Reduce Avoidable Hospital Readmission in Singapore.","authors":"Shilpa Surendran, Stephen So, Toon Wei Lim, David Bruce Matchar","doi":"10.1177/11786329251337533","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329251337533","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Countries are implementing interventions to reduce avoidable hospital readmissions. However, evaluating such interventions are potentially complex. These interventions can cause unintended consequences, and they are among the most common causes of the intervention's failure. The objective of this study was to identify the unintended consequences from implementing a pilot case management team to reduce avoidable hospital readmissions at a tertiary hospital in Singapore.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted five in-depth semi-structured interviews with stakeholders who were involved in the planning, development, and implementation of the intervention in addition to analysing 12 intervention documents. Deductive thematic analysis using Rogers' diffusion of innovation theory was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data analysis generated seven subthemes: ineffective targeting of patient population, fund constraints, lack of patient ownership, limited post discharge follow up, comprehensive care approaches, role overlap and patient confusion. The absence of a readmission risk assessment tool resulted in care plan needs assessments being conducted for all admitted patients, rather than targeting those who would benefit most. This broad approach overwhelmed care coordination efforts. The initial plan to form a specialised intervention team responsible for care plan needs assessments could not be fully established due to funding constraints. As a result, the intervention team functioned more as a consulting service, providing recommendations to the primary team, which retained decision-making authority. Overlapping roles with existing case managers caused patient confusion, prompting the intervention team to step back and support care plan needs assessment remotely.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, results suggest that intervention team recognised a problem and participated in the intervention. This became the foundation for implementing change. However, the unintended consequences undermined the intervention from achieving its objectives and as a result the intervention was stopped. Decision-makers should pay attention to these unintended consequences to inform effective implementation and refine future interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12876,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Insights","volume":"18 ","pages":"11786329251337533"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12049621/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144005433","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"What Drove Clients' Decisions to Pause Personal Homecare Services Before and During the Pandemic?","authors":"Prakathesh Rabeenthira, Katherine A P Zagrodney, Emily C King, Kathryn A Nichol, Sandra M McKay","doi":"10.1177/11786329251335877","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329251335877","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With an increasing reliance on homecare and a scarcity of providers, there is potential to gain insight from existing administrative data to optimize planning and care delivery. To enable more accurate predictions of service use, it is important to understand the degree to which various factors influence clients' difficult decisions to temporarily pause their receipt of necessary homecare services.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We utilized a large, longitudinal, administrative dataset to examine the relative effects of client-level factors on the outcomes of (1) placing a hold on homecare services and (2) the length of a homecare service hold, through stratified regression analyses separated by pre-, early-, and mid-pandemic periods.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Descriptive summaries of the samples consisted of graphical representation and frequencies (proportions) or means. The relationship between client sociodemographic and homecare utilization factors on the service hold initiation and length were evaluated using mixed-effects logistic and linear regression, respectively, stratified by pre-, early-, and mid-pandemic periods. Odds ratios (OR) for hold initiation and exponentiated estimates for hold length were calculated with corresponding 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings provide a better understanding of the decisions made by a large sample of homecare clients to pause their homecare services in pre-, early-, and mid-pandemic scenarios. Frequency and length of service holds more than doubled in the early-pandemic period; although hold frequencies then returned to pre-pandemic rates, hold durations remained slightly longer. There were notable differences over time, but generally, clients with higher care needs had a reduced likelihood of placing a hold on homecare services. Shorter homecare tenure and previously cancelling individual homecare visits were also good indicators of future service decisions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings are relevant for organizations providing homecare services, policymakers, and those interested in predicting homecare utilization for resource allocation planning with the goal of optimal care delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":12876,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Insights","volume":"18 ","pages":"11786329251335877"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12041690/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144015395","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Arabic Version of the Perceived Access to Health Care Questionnaire: Validation, Factor Analysis, and Rasch Modeling.","authors":"Walid Al-Qerem, Anan Jarab, Judith Eberhardt, Fawaz Alasmari, Alaa Hammad, Sarah Abu Hour, Lujain Al-Sa'di, Rama AlKhateeb","doi":"10.1177/11786329251336833","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329251336833","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Access to healthcare is a critical determinant of individual and population health outcomes. However, few validated tools exist to evaluate healthcare access among Arabic-speaking populations.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to validate the Arabic version of the Perception of Access to Health Care Services Questionnaire (PAHSQ) and assess its psychometric properties, including reliability and construct validity, using factor and Rasch analyses.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted with 485 participants (53.4% female) recruited from hospitals and pharmacies in Jordan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Rasch analysis were employed to evaluate the construct validity and item performance of the 30-item, six-factor model. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Arabic PAHSQ exhibited strong psychometric properties. CFA confirmed the suitability of the six-factor model (χ²/df = 3.2, RMSEA = 0.07, CFI = 0.93, TLI = 0.92). Cronbach's alpha values for the six dimensions ranged from 0.82 to 0.93. Rasch analysis demonstrated acceptable infit and outfit values for all items, with item thresholds correctly oriented. Key findings highlighted significant disparities in healthcare access, particularly among participants with low income and no insurance coverage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Arabic PAHSQ is a reliable and valid tool for assessing healthcare access among Arabic-speaking populations. Its use can inform targeted interventions, guide resource allocation, and support health equity initiatives. Further research should explore its applicability across diverse Arabic-speaking regions and incorporate qualitative methodologies to capture more subtle access barriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":12876,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Insights","volume":"18 ","pages":"11786329251336833"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12041685/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144013497","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}