制定最佳实务指引,以优化临床质素注册处呈报病人报告的措施,以提高质素。

IF 2.5 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Health Services Insights Pub Date : 2025-08-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/11786329251347343
Rasa Ruseckaite, Chethana Mudunna, Ilana Ackerman, Belinda Gabbe, Susannah Ahern
{"title":"制定最佳实务指引,以优化临床质素注册处呈报病人报告的措施,以提高质素。","authors":"Rasa Ruseckaite, Chethana Mudunna, Ilana Ackerman, Belinda Gabbe, Susannah Ahern","doi":"10.1177/11786329251347343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical quality registries (CQRs) systematically monitor the quality of healthcare by routinely collecting and reporting health-related information. The collection of patient reported measures (PRMs) by CQRs provides a personal perspective on the expectations and impacts of treatment. Reporting of CQR-collected PRMs for quality improvement (QI) is highly variable.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop a best practice guide (BPG) for CQRs, clinicians and health services to support high-quality and transparent reporting of PRM data for QI purposes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The project comprised four stages. The first sought to describe how PRMs were reported for QI purposes in Australia and internationally. The second stage included seven focus groups with 20 Australian CQRs to identify existing practices, issues and impacts regarding PRMs reporting. During stage 3, findings from the literature and focus groups were used to draft a preliminary BPG. Finally, expert workshops involving PRMs experts, consumers, clinicians and representatives from CQRs were convened to refine a preliminary BPG.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 61 international and 45 Australian CQRs that reported PRMs for QI purposes. PRMs were used for shared decision-making in clinical encounters, for developing clinical decision aids, to revise treatment guidelines and to monitor complications after hospital discharge. Several themes emerged from the focus groups. These included: purpose and context, funding and resource requirements, consumer involvement, clinician training, instrument selection and administration, outlier identification, visualisation and interpretation of the data. A preliminary BPG was refined during the workshop discussions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An increasing number of CQRs use PRMs to enhance QI reporting, however there are no published guidelines currently to support this. Through identifying existing practices, methods and techniques that CQRs use to report PRMs, we developed a practical guideline to support CQRs and standardise their PRMs reporting for QI purposes, with the overarching goal of optimising the value of PRM data within CQRs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12876,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Insights","volume":"18 ","pages":"11786329251347343"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12374099/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a Best Practice Guide to Optimise the Reporting of Patient Reported Measures by Clinical Quality Registries for Quality Improvement Purposes.\",\"authors\":\"Rasa Ruseckaite, Chethana Mudunna, Ilana Ackerman, Belinda Gabbe, Susannah Ahern\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11786329251347343\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical quality registries (CQRs) systematically monitor the quality of healthcare by routinely collecting and reporting health-related information. The collection of patient reported measures (PRMs) by CQRs provides a personal perspective on the expectations and impacts of treatment. Reporting of CQR-collected PRMs for quality improvement (QI) is highly variable.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop a best practice guide (BPG) for CQRs, clinicians and health services to support high-quality and transparent reporting of PRM data for QI purposes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The project comprised four stages. The first sought to describe how PRMs were reported for QI purposes in Australia and internationally. The second stage included seven focus groups with 20 Australian CQRs to identify existing practices, issues and impacts regarding PRMs reporting. During stage 3, findings from the literature and focus groups were used to draft a preliminary BPG. Finally, expert workshops involving PRMs experts, consumers, clinicians and representatives from CQRs were convened to refine a preliminary BPG.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 61 international and 45 Australian CQRs that reported PRMs for QI purposes. PRMs were used for shared decision-making in clinical encounters, for developing clinical decision aids, to revise treatment guidelines and to monitor complications after hospital discharge. Several themes emerged from the focus groups. These included: purpose and context, funding and resource requirements, consumer involvement, clinician training, instrument selection and administration, outlier identification, visualisation and interpretation of the data. A preliminary BPG was refined during the workshop discussions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An increasing number of CQRs use PRMs to enhance QI reporting, however there are no published guidelines currently to support this. Through identifying existing practices, methods and techniques that CQRs use to report PRMs, we developed a practical guideline to support CQRs and standardise their PRMs reporting for QI purposes, with the overarching goal of optimising the value of PRM data within CQRs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Services Insights\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"11786329251347343\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12374099/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Services Insights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329251347343\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329251347343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:临床质量登记处(CQRs)通过常规收集和报告健康相关信息来系统地监测医疗质量。CQRs收集的患者报告措施(PRMs)提供了对治疗期望和影响的个人观点。cqr收集的PRMs用于质量改进(QI)的报告是高度可变的。目标:为CQRs、临床医生和卫生服务机构制定最佳实践指南(BPG),以支持用于QI目的的高质量和透明的PRM数据报告。方法:本研究分为四个阶段。第一篇文章试图描述在澳大利亚和国际上如何将PRMs报告为QI目的。第二阶段包括7个焦点小组和20个澳大利亚CQRs,以确定关于PRMs报告的现有做法、问题和影响。在第三阶段,从文献和焦点小组的发现被用来起草初步的BPG。最后,召开了包括PRMs专家、消费者、临床医生和CQRs代表在内的专家研讨会,以完善初步的BPG。结果:我们确定了61个国际cqr和45个澳大利亚cqr报告了用于QI目的的PRMs。PRMs用于临床相遇时的共同决策、制定临床决策辅助工具、修订治疗指南和监测出院后的并发症。焦点小组讨论了几个主题。这些包括:目的和背景、资金和资源需求、消费者参与、临床医生培训、仪器选择和管理、异常值识别、数据可视化和解释。在研讨会讨论期间,对初步的BPG进行了完善。结论:越来越多的CQRs使用PRMs来加强QI报告,然而目前没有出版的指南来支持这一点。通过识别CQRs用于报告PRM的现有实践、方法和技术,我们开发了一个实用指南,以支持CQRs并将其PRM报告标准化,以达到QI目的,其总体目标是优化CQRs中PRM数据的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Development of a Best Practice Guide to Optimise the Reporting of Patient Reported Measures by Clinical Quality Registries for Quality Improvement Purposes.

Development of a Best Practice Guide to Optimise the Reporting of Patient Reported Measures by Clinical Quality Registries for Quality Improvement Purposes.

Development of a Best Practice Guide to Optimise the Reporting of Patient Reported Measures by Clinical Quality Registries for Quality Improvement Purposes.

Development of a Best Practice Guide to Optimise the Reporting of Patient Reported Measures by Clinical Quality Registries for Quality Improvement Purposes.

Background: Clinical quality registries (CQRs) systematically monitor the quality of healthcare by routinely collecting and reporting health-related information. The collection of patient reported measures (PRMs) by CQRs provides a personal perspective on the expectations and impacts of treatment. Reporting of CQR-collected PRMs for quality improvement (QI) is highly variable.

Objectives: To develop a best practice guide (BPG) for CQRs, clinicians and health services to support high-quality and transparent reporting of PRM data for QI purposes.

Methods: The project comprised four stages. The first sought to describe how PRMs were reported for QI purposes in Australia and internationally. The second stage included seven focus groups with 20 Australian CQRs to identify existing practices, issues and impacts regarding PRMs reporting. During stage 3, findings from the literature and focus groups were used to draft a preliminary BPG. Finally, expert workshops involving PRMs experts, consumers, clinicians and representatives from CQRs were convened to refine a preliminary BPG.

Results: We identified 61 international and 45 Australian CQRs that reported PRMs for QI purposes. PRMs were used for shared decision-making in clinical encounters, for developing clinical decision aids, to revise treatment guidelines and to monitor complications after hospital discharge. Several themes emerged from the focus groups. These included: purpose and context, funding and resource requirements, consumer involvement, clinician training, instrument selection and administration, outlier identification, visualisation and interpretation of the data. A preliminary BPG was refined during the workshop discussions.

Conclusion: An increasing number of CQRs use PRMs to enhance QI reporting, however there are no published guidelines currently to support this. Through identifying existing practices, methods and techniques that CQRs use to report PRMs, we developed a practical guideline to support CQRs and standardise their PRMs reporting for QI purposes, with the overarching goal of optimising the value of PRM data within CQRs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Services Insights
Health Services Insights HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信