The Potential Impact of Primary Care-Based Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Point of Care Testing for Viral Acute Respiratory Infections in the UK: Modified Delphi Study.

IF 2.5 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Health Services Insights Pub Date : 2025-09-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/11786329251374554
Simon de Lusignan, Sarah Nathens, Jamie Erskine, Anjali Ramkeesoon, Norbert Farkas, Michael R Barer, Tristan W Clark, Liz Cross, Bruce Daniel, Christopher George, Abid Hussain, David Thorne, Terry Whalley
{"title":"The Potential Impact of Primary Care-Based Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Point of Care Testing for Viral Acute Respiratory Infections in the UK: Modified Delphi Study.","authors":"Simon de Lusignan, Sarah Nathens, Jamie Erskine, Anjali Ramkeesoon, Norbert Farkas, Michael R Barer, Tristan W Clark, Liz Cross, Bruce Daniel, Christopher George, Abid Hussain, David Thorne, Terry Whalley","doi":"10.1177/11786329251374554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing for viral acute respiratory infections (ARI) at the Point of Care (POC) has demonstrated clinical and economic value in secondary care, yet its impact in primary care remains uncertain. United Kingdom (UK) guidelines make conflicting recommendations on the use of testing in primary care settings.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study provides expert consensus on the potential clinical and economic implications of rapid PCR testing at the POC in primary care settings.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A modified Delphi consensus panel approach was employed, with consensus statements developed from existing literature and evaluated through two rounds of questionnaires. Open-ended questions were posed to explore potential barriers to implementation, evidence generation, and suitable settings for testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multistakeholder panel of 9 experts was purposely recruited, representing stakeholders from seven areas. A narrative literature review was conducted to generate consensus on the potential value of implementing rapid PCR testing at the POC for ARIs in primary care settings. Two Delphi rounds were completed, with participants rating their level of agreement with presented statements on a Likert scale from 1 to 5.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen statements were generated based on the results of a narrative literature review, with eight achieving consensus and further evidence generation recommendations developed for six statements. Two statements were removed due to non-agreement and two were merged into a single statement, which later achieved consensus. The lack of cost and clinical effectiveness data was ranked as the greatest barrier to implementation. Primary care settings with high and low risk patients, such as general practices and care homes, were considered ideal for implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is potential value in rapid multiplex viral PCR testing for ARIs in primary care settings and care homes. While existing evidence and expert consensus indicate a likely benefit, further real-world evidence trials are recommended to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of this approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":12876,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Insights","volume":"18 ","pages":"11786329251374554"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12477359/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329251374554","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing for viral acute respiratory infections (ARI) at the Point of Care (POC) has demonstrated clinical and economic value in secondary care, yet its impact in primary care remains uncertain. United Kingdom (UK) guidelines make conflicting recommendations on the use of testing in primary care settings.

Objectives: This study provides expert consensus on the potential clinical and economic implications of rapid PCR testing at the POC in primary care settings.

Design: A modified Delphi consensus panel approach was employed, with consensus statements developed from existing literature and evaluated through two rounds of questionnaires. Open-ended questions were posed to explore potential barriers to implementation, evidence generation, and suitable settings for testing.

Methods: A multistakeholder panel of 9 experts was purposely recruited, representing stakeholders from seven areas. A narrative literature review was conducted to generate consensus on the potential value of implementing rapid PCR testing at the POC for ARIs in primary care settings. Two Delphi rounds were completed, with participants rating their level of agreement with presented statements on a Likert scale from 1 to 5.

Results: Seventeen statements were generated based on the results of a narrative literature review, with eight achieving consensus and further evidence generation recommendations developed for six statements. Two statements were removed due to non-agreement and two were merged into a single statement, which later achieved consensus. The lack of cost and clinical effectiveness data was ranked as the greatest barrier to implementation. Primary care settings with high and low risk patients, such as general practices and care homes, were considered ideal for implementation.

Conclusion: There is potential value in rapid multiplex viral PCR testing for ARIs in primary care settings and care homes. While existing evidence and expert consensus indicate a likely benefit, further real-world evidence trials are recommended to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of this approach.

在英国,基于初级保健的多重聚合酶链反应护理点检测对病毒性急性呼吸道感染的潜在影响:修正的德尔菲研究。
背景:在医疗点(POC)检测病毒性急性呼吸道感染(ARI)的多重聚合酶链反应(PCR)已经证明了其在二级保健中的临床和经济价值,但其对初级保健的影响仍不确定。联合王国的指导方针就在初级保健机构中使用检测提出了相互矛盾的建议。目的:本研究就初级保健机构POC快速PCR检测的潜在临床和经济意义提供了专家共识。设计:采用改进的德尔菲共识小组方法,从现有文献中得出共识陈述,并通过两轮问卷进行评估。提出了开放式问题,以探讨实施的潜在障碍、证据的产生和测试的合适环境。方法:特意招募了一个由9名专家组成的多利益相关者小组,代表七个领域的利益相关者。我们进行了一项叙述性文献综述,以就在初级保健机构的POC对ARIs实施快速PCR检测的潜在价值达成共识。完成了两轮德尔福测试,参与者用李克特量表从1到5来评价他们对陈述的同意程度。结果:根据叙述性文献综述的结果产生了17个陈述,其中8个达成共识,并为6个陈述提出了进一步的证据生成建议。两项声明因意见不一致而被删除,两项合并为一项声明,后来达成共识。缺乏成本和临床效果数据被列为实施的最大障碍。有高风险和低风险患者的初级保健机构,如全科诊所和护理院,被认为是理想的实施场所。结论:多重病毒PCR快速检测ARIs在初级保健机构和养老院有潜在的应用价值。虽然现有证据和专家共识表明可能有益,但建议进一步进行实际证据试验,以评估该方法的成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Services Insights
Health Services Insights HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信