The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Disability最新文献

Intellectual Disability and the Dimensions of Belonging 智力残疾和归属感的维度

The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Disability Pub Date : 2022-02-14 DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.47

Allison C. Carey

引用次数: 0

The Able Body and the Pursuit of Power 有能力的身体和对权力的追求

The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Disability Pub Date : 2022-02-14 DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.5

B. Hughes

{"title":"The Able Body and the Pursuit of Power","authors":"B. Hughes","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.5","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter argues that able power is and has been embodied in what Plato called “those of the best,” men who claim to ennoble the world with their eugenic superiority. Able power, legitimated by this view of congenital superiority, represented the disabled body in a pejorative language of humiliating tropes, the most common of which, in the terminology of antiquity, were deformity, defectiveness, and monstrosity. In modernity, able power absorbs scientific and pseudoscientific ideology into its agenda of legitimation by superimposing on top of the ancient and debilitating ideological categories medical terms that pathologize disabled people and ethnic others who are caught in the civilizing web of White European colonialism. The colonizing predilection of Western able power and its racist representations of non-Western ethnicities as inferior and defectively embodied is explored in a “historical sociology” of disability. Antique and modern imperialisms are examined. In these two moments, able power deploys economic and military might to subdue inferior persons abroad while simultaneously oppressing “dysgenic” bodies at home. The focus is on these two sociological moments because they, it is argued, represent the policies and practices of able power and the “ideology of able-bodiedness” at its most aggressive and violent.","PeriodicalId":127198,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Disability","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114421230","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Disability and Social Participation 残疾与社会参与

The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Disability Pub Date : 2022-02-14 DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.43

Carrie L. Shandra

{"title":"Disability and Social Participation","authors":"Carrie L. Shandra","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.43","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.43","url":null,"abstract":"Participation is considered a key component of many disability frameworks, yet the concept of social participation remains amorphous and contested. This chapter reviews how common disability frameworks conceptualize activities, roles, and environments in relation to participation. It then discusses challenges to measuring (social) participation through the elements of activities, roles, and environments and describes how time diary data can be used to understand daily life with disability. Finally, it analyzes the nationally representative American Time Use Survey to compare how individuals with and without disabilities spend time in 15 activity categories, across six physical locations and eight types of social interactions. Results indicate that people with disabilities spend more time at home, less time in public places, and less time in transportation than people without disabilities. They also spend more time alone and have less contact with others. However, these results depend upon activity type, illustrating the importance of integrating social and environmental contexts in empirical and theoretical models of participation differences by disability status.","PeriodicalId":127198,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Disability","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131785288","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Disability and Family Care Work over the Life Course 残疾和家庭护理工作的生命历程

The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Disability Pub Date : 2022-02-14 DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.18

J. D. Stevens

{"title":"Disability and Family Care Work over the Life Course","authors":"J. D. Stevens","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.18","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.18","url":null,"abstract":"As rates of disability have risen over the last decade for all age groups, families have taken on more care responsibilities. Current theoretical frameworks of disability and care work are largely unconnected, limiting the ability of researchers to account for experiences of care work and receipt. How can sociologists blend these disparate theoretical and empirical literatures to develop a more comprehensive understanding of care work in the context of disability? This chapter proposes the Life Course Disability Care Work Integrated Model (LCDCW) as a potential theoretical framework informed by life course theory, a sociopolitical model of disability, and theories of care work that could unite the literatures. The model enables researchers to identify overlapping and unique structural and interpersonal barriers to care for care workers and care recipients in the context of disability. The chapter then reviews the empirical literature on people’s experiences with disability receiving and providing family care to highlight the framework’s usefulness, emphasizing the unique and shared contexts that shape care relationships and the problems that arise therein. The empirical literature review identifies that people with disability are providers and recipients of care, an essential link between disability and care work literatures. The conclusion summarizes the main contributions of the review, highlights existing gaps in the literature and opportunities for future research, and illustrates how disability and family care work scholarship can influence disability-related policy and programs.","PeriodicalId":127198,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Disability","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131474496","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Disability, Education, and Work in a Global Knowledge Economy 全球知识经济中的残疾、教育和工作

The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Disability Pub Date : 2021-12-08 DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.46

S. Tomlinson, Stacy Hewitt

引用次数: 0

Disability and Precarious Work 残疾和危险工作

The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Disability Pub Date : 2021-12-08 DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.26

Lisa A. Schur, D. Kruse

{"title":"Disability and Precarious Work","authors":"Lisa A. Schur, D. Kruse","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.26","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.26","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines the prevalence, causes, and consequences of precarious work among people with disabilities. New US evidence from the government’s Current Population Survey, and reviews of prior studies, show that workers with disabilities are more likely than those without disabilities to be in precarious jobs. This is explained in part by many people with disabilities choosing precarious jobs due to the flexibility these jobs can provide. Other people with disabilities, however, face prejudice and discrimination in obtaining standard jobs and must resort to taking precarious jobs with less security, lower pay and benefits, little or no training and opportunities for advancement, and few, if any, worker protections. Workers with disabilities tend to have worse outcomes on these measures than workers without disabilities in every type of employment arrangement. The disability pay gap is higher in precarious jobs than in full-time permanent jobs. The mixed evidence suggests that precarious jobs create good employment outcomes for some workers with disabilities but bad outcomes for others. While continued efforts are needed to decrease barriers to traditional employment for people with disabilities, efforts are also needed to bring higher pay and greater legal protections to precarious workers, which would especially benefit workers with disabilities.","PeriodicalId":127198,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Disability","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131513217","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Barriers to Access in the Norwegian Criminal Justice System 挪威刑事司法系统中的准入障碍

The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Disability Pub Date : 2021-12-08 DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.41

P. Kermit, Terje Olsen

{"title":"Barriers to Access in the Norwegian Criminal Justice System","authors":"P. Kermit, Terje Olsen","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.41","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.41","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter presents and discusses barriers that Deaf people who have Norwegian Sign Language as their first language face in encounters with the Norwegian criminal justice system. Since this system is based exclusively on spoken language, and mainly depends on the individual law professional’s ability to establish critical, self-reflective practices in each case, Deaf people’s legal safety, as demanded by the rule of law, cannot be taken for granted. Establishing a public, independent, professionalized sign language interpreter service in Norway, however, has helped to reduce risks for Deaf people. Independent interpreters can demand changes in the criminal justice system’s practices, thus making these practices more accessible to Deaf people. Empirical examples illustrating the interaction between Deaf people, law professionals, and interpreters are presented and analyzed. This interaction is less characterized by conflict and more by cooperation and mutual recognition, where both Deaf people and law professionals state their confidence and trust in their interpreters. The chapter concludes that structural change and organization, such as the establishment of an independent public interpreter service in Norway, trump general and well-meant inclusive intentions in organizations such as the Norwegian criminal justice system when it comes to secure Deaf peoples’ rights and the prevention of miscarriage of justice.","PeriodicalId":127198,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Disability","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128444752","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Disability Rights Movement 残疾人权利运动

The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Disability Pub Date : 2021-12-08 DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.44

R. Scotch, Kara Sutton

引用次数: 0

Framing Disability in Fashion 在时尚中塑造残疾

The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Disability Pub Date : 2021-11-10 DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.15

J. Foster

引用次数: 2

Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment Outcomes 职业康复与就业成果

The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Disability Pub Date : 2021-11-10 DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.20

Fabrico E. Balcazar, N. Ramírez

引用次数: 0