First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2007)最新文献_第2页

A Survey of the Practice of Design -- Code Correspondence amongst Professional Software Engineers 设计实践的调查——专业软件工程师的代码对应

First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2007) Pub Date : 2007-09-20 DOI: 10.1109/ESEM.2007.69

Ariadi Nugroho, M. Chaudron

引用次数: 100

Correlation between bug notifications, messages and participants in Debian's bug tracking system 在Debian的bug跟踪系统中，bug通知、消息和参与者之间的相关性

First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2007) Pub Date : 2007-09-20 DOI: 10.1109/ESEM.2007.65

M. Pérez-Francisco, P. B. Pérez, G. Robles

引用次数: 27

Using Software Dependencies and Churn Metrics to Predict Field Failures: An Empirical Case Study 使用软件依赖关系和流失度量来预测现场故障:一个实证案例研究

First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2007) Pub Date : 2007-09-20 DOI: 10.1109/ESEM.2007.13

Nachiappan Nagappan, T. Ball

引用次数: 215

Conceptual Differences Among Functional Size Measurement Methods 功能尺寸测量方法的概念差异

First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2007) Pub Date : 2007-09-20 DOI: 10.1109/ESEM.2007.43

Çigdem Gencel, Onur Demirörs

引用次数: 36

A Replicate Empirical Comparison between Pair Development and Software Development with Inspection 结对开发与带检查的软件开发的重复经验比较

First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2007) Pub Date : 2007-09-20 DOI: 10.1109/ESEM.2007.33

Monvorath Phongpaibul, B. Boehm

{"title":"A Replicate Empirical Comparison between Pair Development and Software Development with Inspection","authors":"Monvorath Phongpaibul, B. Boehm","doi":"10.1109/ESEM.2007.33","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESEM.2007.33","url":null,"abstract":"In 2005, we studied the development effort and effect of quality comparisons between software development with Fagan's inspection and pair development. Three experiments were conducted in Thailand: two classroom experiments and one industry experiment. We found that in the classroom experiments, the pair development group had less average development effort than the inspection group with the same or higher level of quality. The industry experiment's result showed pair development to have a bit more effort but about 40% fewer major defects. However, since this set of experiments was conducted in Thailand, the results may be different if we conducted the experiment in other countries due to the impact of cultural differences. To investigate this we conducted another experiment with computer science graduate students at USC in Fall 2006. Unfortunately, the majority of the graduate students who participated in the experiment were from India, a country in which the culture is not much different from Thailand. As a result, we cannot compare the impact of cultural differences in this paper. However, the results showed that the experiment can be replicated in other countries where the cultures are similar.","PeriodicalId":124420,"journal":{"name":"First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2007)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2007-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129778024","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 45

Fine-Grained Software Metrics in Practice 实践中的细粒度软件度量

First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2007) Pub Date : 2007-09-20 DOI: 10.1109/ESEM.2007.32

M. English, J. Buckley, Tony Cahill

{"title":"Fine-Grained Software Metrics in Practice","authors":"M. English, J. Buckley, Tony Cahill","doi":"10.1109/ESEM.2007.32","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESEM.2007.32","url":null,"abstract":"Modularity is one of the key features of the Object- Oriented (00) paradigm. Low coupling and high cohesion help to achieve good modularity. Inheritance is one of the core concepts of the 00 paradigm which facilitates modularity. Previous research has shown that the use of the friend construct as a coupling mechanism in C+ + software is extensive. However, measures of the friend construct are scarse in comparison with measures of inheritance. In addition, these existing measures are coarse-grained, in spite of the widespread use of the friend mechanism. In this paper, a set of software metrics are proposed that measure the actual use of the friend construct, inheritance and other forms of coupling. These metrics are based on the interactions for which each coupling mechanism is necessary and sufficient. Previous work only considered the declaration of a relationship between classes. The software metrics introduced are empirically assessed using the LEDA software system. Our results indicate that the friend mechanism is used to a very limited extent to access hidden methods in classes. However, access to hidden attributes is more common.","PeriodicalId":124420,"journal":{"name":"First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2007)","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2007-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115179269","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 34

A Survey of Enterprise Software Development Risks in a Flat World 平坦世界中的企业软件开发风险调查

First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2007) Pub Date : 2007-09-20 DOI: 10.1109/ESEM.2007.74

Jesal Bhuta, Sudeep Mallick, S. Subrahmanya

引用次数: 15

Relevant Information Sources for Successful Technology Transfer: A Survey Using Inspections as an Example 成功技术转移的相关信息来源:以检查为例的调查

First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2007) Pub Date : 2007-09-20 DOI: 10.1109/ESEM.2007.60

Andreas Jedlitschka, M. Ciolkowski, C. Denger, B. Freimut, Andreas Schlichting

{"title":"Relevant Information Sources for Successful Technology Transfer: A Survey Using Inspections as an Example","authors":"Andreas Jedlitschka, M. Ciolkowski, C. Denger, B. Freimut, Andreas Schlichting","doi":"10.1109/ESEM.2007.60","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESEM.2007.60","url":null,"abstract":"A systematic approach to decision making in software engineering is required, for instance, if an organization aims at achieving CMMI level three. Rational decision making regarding the selection and introduction of SE technologies requires adequate information about their suitability for the intended organizational context. Research is often unable to provide such information, and this could be one reason why promising techniques are sometimes not adopted in practice. From a research point of view, successful technology transfer requires knowing which information decision makers in industry need, and where they actually look for it. With this knowledge, empirical research can strive to produce the needed information in order to increase the likelihood of successful technology adoption. To address these questions, we conducted an online survey among German software industry decision makers. To focus the survey, we used inspections as an exemplary technology. We invited 9653 companies to participate, from which we received 92 fully completed questionnaires. Our main findings are that information regarding the impact of technologies on product quality, cost, and development time, as well as on technology cost-benefit ratio is considered most important among decision makers. The preferred sources of information are colleagues, textbooks, and industry workshops.","PeriodicalId":124420,"journal":{"name":"First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2007)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2007-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123622640","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 62

Test Inspected Unit or Inspect Unit Tested Code? 测试测试单元还是测试单元测试代码?

First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2007) Pub Date : 2007-09-20 DOI: 10.1109/ESEM.2007.52

Atul Gupta, P. Jalote

引用次数: 9

An Empirical Study on MBASE and LeanMBASE MBASE和LeanMBASE的实证研究

First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2007) Pub Date : 2007-09-20 DOI: 10.1109/ESEM.2007.53

S. Koolmanojwong, B. Boehm

引用次数: 8