功能尺寸测量方法的概念差异

Çigdem Gencel, Onur Demirörs
{"title":"功能尺寸测量方法的概念差异","authors":"Çigdem Gencel, Onur Demirörs","doi":"10.1109/ESEM.2007.43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although functional size measurement (FSM) methods have gone a long way, they still provide challenges for software managers. A major challenge is related to the comparison of the well established FSM methods. This paper identifies the conceptual similarities and differences among Mkll FPA, COSMIC FFP and IFPUG FPA methods based on a case study, which involves implementation of the methods to measure the functional size of a military inventory management project integrated with a document management system.","PeriodicalId":124420,"journal":{"name":"First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2007)","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"36","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conceptual Differences Among Functional Size Measurement Methods\",\"authors\":\"Çigdem Gencel, Onur Demirörs\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ESEM.2007.43\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although functional size measurement (FSM) methods have gone a long way, they still provide challenges for software managers. A major challenge is related to the comparison of the well established FSM methods. This paper identifies the conceptual similarities and differences among Mkll FPA, COSMIC FFP and IFPUG FPA methods based on a case study, which involves implementation of the methods to measure the functional size of a military inventory management project integrated with a document management system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":124420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2007)\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"36\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2007)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESEM.2007.43\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2007)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESEM.2007.43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

摘要

尽管功能大小度量(FSM)方法已经走过了很长的路,但它们仍然给软件管理人员带来了挑战。一个主要的挑战是与已建立的FSM方法的比较有关。本文通过一个案例研究,分析了Mkll FPA、COSMIC FFP和IFPUG FPA方法在概念上的异同,并结合文献管理系统实现了军事库存管理项目功能规模的度量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conceptual Differences Among Functional Size Measurement Methods
Although functional size measurement (FSM) methods have gone a long way, they still provide challenges for software managers. A major challenge is related to the comparison of the well established FSM methods. This paper identifies the conceptual similarities and differences among Mkll FPA, COSMIC FFP and IFPUG FPA methods based on a case study, which involves implementation of the methods to measure the functional size of a military inventory management project integrated with a document management system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信