Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology最新文献_第10页

Husserl's Missing Multistability 胡塞尔缺失的多重稳定性

Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology Pub Date : 2016-08-11 DOI: 10.5840/TECHNE20168356

Robert Rosenberger

引用次数: 3

Ihde’s Missing Sciences: Postphenomenology, Big Data, and the Human Sciences Ihde的《缺失的科学:后现象学、大数据和人文科学

Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology Pub Date : 2016-08-02 DOI: 10.5840/TECHNE201672754

Daniel Susser

引用次数: 2

Variations Upon Ihde’s Husserl’s Missing Technologies 伊赫德的胡塞尔的《遗失的技术》的变体

Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology Pub Date : 2016-07-30 DOI: 10.5840/TECHNE201672752

Y. V. D. Eede

引用次数: 0

Dispose After Expiration Date: On Don Ihde’s Husserl's Missing Technologies 过期处理:论唐·伊德的《胡塞尔丢失的技术

Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology Pub Date : 2016-07-30 DOI: 10.5840/techne201672753

E. Mendieta

引用次数: 0

Reply to My Interlocutors 回复我的对话者

Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology Pub Date : 2016-07-30 DOI: 10.5840/TECHNE201672855

D. Ihde

引用次数: 3

Ihde, Technoscience, and the Resilience of Phenomenology 《技术科学与现象学的弹性》

Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology Pub Date : 2016-07-27 DOI: 10.5840/techne201672550

Shannon Vallor

引用次数: 1

Beyond Technological Mediation: A Normative Practice Approach 超越技术调解:规范实践方法

Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology Pub Date : 2016-07-21 DOI: 10.5840/TECHNE201671949

C. B. Burken

{"title":"Beyond Technological Mediation: A Normative Practice Approach","authors":"C. B. Burken","doi":"10.5840/TECHNE201671949","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5840/TECHNE201671949","url":null,"abstract":"Several philosophers of technology have argued that technology mediates human actions. For example, in the branch of post-phenomenology, authors such as Don Ihde and Peter-Paul Verbeek have described the mediating aspects of technology in terms of morality of technology (more prominent in Verbeek) as well as in the sense that technology changes our perception of ourselves and the world (more prominent in Ihde). In this article, different existing types of mediation are presented, critiqued, and enriched. The four types are illustrated by referring to military high-Tech environments with a focus on visual data and imaging technologies. These technologies can mediate actions (1) by inviting certain behavior, (2) through amplification and reduction, (3) through built-in norms, and (4) through interpretation. The four types of mediation mainly focus on the technology or technological artifact itself. What these approaches fail to grasp, however, is the specific user practices in which most technologies function. In this article, it is argued that to understand the mediating aspects of technology more fully, attention should be paid to the specific user context in which the technology functions. Therefore, an enriched understanding of the four types of mediation of technology is proposed by taking the lens of normative practices and analyzing the different types of mediation through this lens. The Kunduz Airstrike Incident, which took place in 2009 in Afghanistan, is a case in which a visual data sharing device called Rover played a prominent role. This case is used in this article to illustrate how technology mediates human actions in military practice.","PeriodicalId":123735,"journal":{"name":"Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114188697","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

Information Privacy and Social Self-Authorship 信息隐私和社会自我创作

Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology Pub Date : 2016-07-19 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.2706669

Daniel Susser

{"title":"Information Privacy and Social Self-Authorship","authors":"Daniel Susser","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2706669","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2706669","url":null,"abstract":"The dominant approach in privacy theory defines information privacy as some form of control over personal information. In this essay, I argue that the control approach is mistaken, but for different reasons than those offered by its other critics. I claim that information privacy involves the drawing of epistemic boundaries — boundaries between what others should and shouldn’t know about us. While controlling what information others have about us is one strategy we use to draw such boundaries, it is not the only one. We conceal information about ourselves and we reveal it. And since the meaning of information is not self-evident, we also work to shape how others contextualize and interpret the information about us that they have. Information privacy is thus about more than controlling information; it involves the constant work of producing and managing public identities, what I call “social self-authorship.” In the second part of the essay, I argue that thinking about information privacy in terms of social self-authorship helps us see ways that information technology threatens privacy, which the control approach misses. Namely, information technology makes social self-authorship invisible and unnecessary, by making it difficult for us to know when others are forming impressions about us, and by providing them with tools for making assumptions about who we are which obviate the need for our involvement in the process.","PeriodicalId":123735,"journal":{"name":"Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114776929","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

A Cultural Semiotic Aesthetic Approach for a Virtual Heritage Project: Part A—The Semiotic Foundations of the Approach 虚拟遗产项目的文化符号学美学方法:第一部分:该方法的符号学基础

Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology Pub Date : 2016-06-07 DOI: 10.5840/TECHNE201653147

C. Voutounos, A. Lanitis

引用次数: 1

Toward a Digital Hermeneutics: Virtual Worlds as Philosophical Tools: How to Philosophize with a Digital Hammer, by Stefano Gualeni 《走向数字解释学:作为哲学工具的虚拟世界:如何用数字锤子进行哲学思考》，作者:Stefano Gualeni

Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology Pub Date : 2016-04-05 DOI: 10.5840/TECHNE20162013

Alberto Romele

引用次数: 0