Ronald Kool, Alice Dragomir, Girish S Kulkarni, Gautier Marcq, Rodney H Breau, Michael Kim, Ionut Busca, Hamidreza Abdi, Mark Dawidek, Michael Uy, Gagan Fervaha, Fabio L Cury, Nimira Alimohamed, Jonathan Izawa, Claudio Jeldres, Ricardo Rendon, Bobby Shayegan, Robert Siemens, Peter C Black, Wassim Kassouf
{"title":"Benefit of Neoadjuvant Cisplatin-based Chemotherapy for Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients Treated with Radiation-based Therapy in a Real-world Setting: An Inverse Probability Treatment Weighted Analysis.","authors":"Ronald Kool, Alice Dragomir, Girish S Kulkarni, Gautier Marcq, Rodney H Breau, Michael Kim, Ionut Busca, Hamidreza Abdi, Mark Dawidek, Michael Uy, Gagan Fervaha, Fabio L Cury, Nimira Alimohamed, Jonathan Izawa, Claudio Jeldres, Ricardo Rendon, Bobby Shayegan, Robert Siemens, Peter C Black, Wassim Kassouf","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.01.014","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.01.014","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) improves survival for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) treated with radical cystectomy. Studies on the potential benefit of NAC before radiation-based therapy (RT) are conflicting.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effect of NAC on patients with MIBC treated with curative-intent RT in a real-world setting.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>The study cohort consisted of 785 patients with MIBC (cT2-4aN0-2M0) who underwent RT at academic centers across Canada. Patients were classified into two treatment groups based on the administration of NAC before RT (NAC vs no NAC).</p><p><strong>Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: </strong>The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) with absolute standardized differences (ASDs) was used to balance covariates across treatment groups. The impact of NAC on complete response, overall, and cancer-specific survival (CSS) after RT in the weighted cohort was analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results and limitations: </strong>After applying the exclusion criteria, 586 patients were included; 102 (17%) received NAC before RT. Patients in the NAC subgroup were younger (mean age 65 vs 77 yr; ASD 1.20); more likely to have Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1 (87% vs 78%; ASD 0.28), lymphovascular invasion (32% vs 20%; ASD 0.27), higher cT stage (cT3-4 in 29% vs 20%; ASD 0.21), and higher cN stage (cN1-2 in 32% vs 4%; ASD 0.81); and more commonly treated with concurrent chemotherapy (79% vs 67%; ASD 0.28). After IPTW, NAC versus no NAC cohorts were well balanced (ASD <0.20) for all included covariates. NAC was significantly associated with improved CSS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.14-0.56; p < 0.001) and overall survival (HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.38-0.84; p = 0.005). This study was limited by potential occult imbalances across treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>If tolerated, NAC might be associated with improved survival and should be considered for eligible patients with MIBC planning to undergo bladder preservation with RT. Prospective trials are warranted.</p><p><strong>Patient summary: </strong>In this study, we showed that neoadjuvant chemotherapy might be associated with improved survival in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer who elect for curative-intent radiation-based therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1350-1357"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139702215","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Félix Guerrero-Ramos, Joost L Boormans, Siamak Daneshmand, Paolo Gontero, Ashish M Kamat, Morgan Rouprêt, Antoni Vilaseca, Shahrokh F Shariat
{"title":"Novel Delivery Systems and Pharmacotherapeutic Approaches for the Treatment of Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer.","authors":"Félix Guerrero-Ramos, Joost L Boormans, Siamak Daneshmand, Paolo Gontero, Ashish M Kamat, Morgan Rouprêt, Antoni Vilaseca, Shahrokh F Shariat","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.05.012","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.05.012","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Therapeutic options for patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) have traditionally been limited to intravesical immunotherapy or chemotherapy. A considerable number of new options have been investigated in recent years. Our aim was to review the efficacy and toxicity of novel therapeutic options (results already reported or currently under investigation) for patients with NMIBC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed the efficacy of various novel therapeutic options by examining key endpoints in diverse settings, including recurrence, progression, overall survival, disease-specific survival, and complete response. We identified the principal advantages and limitations for each option. Safety was predominantly evaluated as the incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events. Our investigation focused on evidence from scientific articles and congress abstracts published in English within the past 5 yr.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>To date, pembrolizumab, nadofaragene firadenovec, and the combination of BCG with N-803 have received US Food and Drug administration approval for the treatment of BCG-unresponsive carcinoma in situ of the bladder (with or without papillary tumours). Five phase 3 trials are recruiting BCG-naïve patients with high-risk NMIBC. There is increasing interest in an ablative rather than an adjuvant approach for patients with intermediate-risk NMIBC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>Novel drugs and device-assisted drug delivery systems are on the verge of changing the treatment of NMIBC. Novel intravesical options seem to have the same efficacy with fewer adverse events in comparison to systemic therapies.</p><p><strong>Patient summary: </strong>We reviewed new therapy options for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Two agents (pembrolizumab and nadofaragene firadenovec) have been approved to date. Ongoing trials are assessing direct delivery of drugs in solution into the bladder. This route seems to have similar efficacy and fewer side effects than intravenous immunotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1267-1279"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141287972","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Eduard Roussel, Michele Marchioni, Carlotta Palumbo, Umberto Capitanio
{"title":"Can Sarcomatoid Features Guide the Use of Adjuvant Atezolizumab Following Nephrectomy? Probably Not.","authors":"Eduard Roussel, Michele Marchioni, Carlotta Palumbo, Umberto Capitanio","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.08.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.08.002","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1162-1163"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142046489","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Emmy Boerrigter, Joanneke K Overbeek, Guillemette E Benoist, Diederik M Somford, Paul Hamberg, Jolien Tol, Brian Scholtes, Annelieke E C A B Willemsen, Laurien M Buffart, Roy P C Kessels, Niven Mehra, Inge M van Oort, Nielka P van Erp
{"title":"A Prospective Randomised Trial to Determine the Effect of a Reduced Versus Standard Dose of Enzalutamide on Side Effects in Frail Patients with Prostate Cancer.","authors":"Emmy Boerrigter, Joanneke K Overbeek, Guillemette E Benoist, Diederik M Somford, Paul Hamberg, Jolien Tol, Brian Scholtes, Annelieke E C A B Willemsen, Laurien M Buffart, Roy P C Kessels, Niven Mehra, Inge M van Oort, Nielka P van Erp","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.02.009","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.02.009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Enzalutamide is a potent androgen receptor signalling inhibitor, effectively used for the treatment of different stages of prostate cancer. Side effects occur frequently at the registered dose, whilst a lower dose might be equally effective. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the effect of a reduced dose of enzalutamide on side effects in frail patients with prostate cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicentre randomised trial compared the standard enzalutamide dose of 160 mg once daily (OD) with a reduced dose of 120 mg OD in frail patients with prostate cancer. Fatigue, cognitive side effects, and depressive symptoms were measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) questionnaire, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function (FACT-Cog) questionnaire, and Geriatric Depression Scale-15 (GDS-15). Linear mixed-effect models were used to study differences in side effects over time between both groups.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>In total, 52 patients were included in the analysis (25 reduced dose and 27 standard dose). Patients treated with the reduced dose had significantly lower fatigue after 24 wk than those with the standard dose (difference FACIT-Fatigue 6.2; 95% confidence interval 1.4-11.0; p = 0.01). Patients treated with the reduced dose showed stable fatigue, cognitive side effects, and depressive symptoms over time, whilst patients with the standard dose showed significantly worse side effects after 24 wk than at baseline.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>A reduced dose of enzalutamide results in less fatigue, cognitive side effects, and depressive symptoms in frail patients with prostate cancer than the standard dose, without any indication of interference with efficacy endpoints.</p><p><strong>Patient summary: </strong>In this report, we looked at the side effects of enzalutamide at two dose levels. We found that, in frail patients, three tablets a day result in less fatigue than four tablets a day. Patients treated with four tablets a day showed an increase in fatigue, cognitive side effects, and depression. We conclude that a lower dose of three tablets can be used to alleviate side effects without indications for less efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1376-1383"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140131080","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Julien Sarkis, Cecile M Champy, Nicolas Doumerc, Franck Bruyere, Morgan Rouprêt, Nicolas Branger, Louis Surlemont, Constance Michel, Thibaut Waeckel, Bastien Parier, Jean-Baptiste Beauval, Pierre Bigot, Hervé Lang, Maxime Vallee, Julien Guillotreau, Jean-Jacques Patard, Clément Sarrazin, Stéphane de Vergie, Olivier Belas, Romain Boissier, Richard Mallet, Frédéric Panthier, Fayek Taha, Quentin-Côme Le Clerc, Lionel Hoquetis, François Audenet, Louis Vignot, Philippe Paparel, Alexis Fontenil, Jean-Christophe Bernhard, Alexandre Ingels
{"title":"Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Hilar and Nonhilar Renal Masses: Comparison of Perioperative, Oncological, and Functional Results in a Multicentre Prospective Cohort (NEPRAH Study, UroCCR 175).","authors":"Julien Sarkis, Cecile M Champy, Nicolas Doumerc, Franck Bruyere, Morgan Rouprêt, Nicolas Branger, Louis Surlemont, Constance Michel, Thibaut Waeckel, Bastien Parier, Jean-Baptiste Beauval, Pierre Bigot, Hervé Lang, Maxime Vallee, Julien Guillotreau, Jean-Jacques Patard, Clément Sarrazin, Stéphane de Vergie, Olivier Belas, Romain Boissier, Richard Mallet, Frédéric Panthier, Fayek Taha, Quentin-Côme Le Clerc, Lionel Hoquetis, François Audenet, Louis Vignot, Philippe Paparel, Alexis Fontenil, Jean-Christophe Bernhard, Alexandre Ingels","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.06.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.06.003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>A hilar location for a renal tumour is sometimes viewed as a limiting factor for safe partial nephrectomy. Our aim was to evaluate perioperative, oncological, and functional outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for hilar tumours (RAPN-H) in comparison to RAPN for nonhilar tumours (RAPN-NH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an observational, multicentre cohort study using prospectively collected data from the French Research Network on Kidney Cancer (UroCCR). The registry includes data for 3551 patients who underwent RAPN for localised or locally advanced renal masses between 2010 and 2023 in 29 hospitals in France. We studied the impact of a hilar location on surgery, postoperative renal function, tumour characteristics, and survival. We also compared rates of trifecta achievement (warm ischaemia time [WIT] <25 min, negative surgical margins, and no perioperative complications) between the groups. Finally, we performed a subgroup analysis of RAPN without vascular clamping. Variables were compared in univariable analysis and using multivariable linear, logistic, and Cox proportional-hazards models adjusted for relevant patient and tumour covariates.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>The analytical population included 3451 patients, of whom 2773 underwent RAPN-NH and 678 underwent RAPN-H. Longer WIT (β = 2.4 min; p < 0.01), longer operative time (β = 11.4 min; p < 0.01) and a higher risk of postoperative complications (odds ratio 1.33; p = 0.05) were observed in the hilar group. Blood loss, the perioperative transfusion rate, postoperative changes in the estimated glomerular filtration rate, and trifecta achievement rates were comparable between the groups (p > 0.05). At mean follow-up of 31.9 mo, there was no significant difference in recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58-1.2; p = 0.3), cancer-specific survival (HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.48-2.6; p = 0.79), or overall survival (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.52-1.53; p = 0.69).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>Patient and tumour characteristics rather than just hilar location should be the main determinants of the optimal surgical strategy for hilar tumours.</p><p><strong>Patient summary: </strong>We found that kidney tumours located close to major kidney blood vessels led to a longer operation and a higher risk of complications during robot-assisted surgery to remove the tumour. However, tumours in these locations were not related to a higher risk of kidney function loss, cancer recurrence, or death.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1487-1496"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141467312","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alec Zhu, James A Proudfoot, Elai Davicioni, Ashley E Ross, Valentina I Petkov, Sarah Bonds, Nicki Schussler, Nicholas G Zaorsky, Angela Y Jia, Daniel E Spratt, Edward M Schaeffer, Yang Liu, Mary O Strasser, Jim C Hu
{"title":"Use of Decipher Prostate Biopsy Test in Patients with Favorable-risk Disease Undergoing Conservative Management or Radical Prostatectomy in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Registry.","authors":"Alec Zhu, James A Proudfoot, Elai Davicioni, Ashley E Ross, Valentina I Petkov, Sarah Bonds, Nicki Schussler, Nicholas G Zaorsky, Angela Y Jia, Daniel E Spratt, Edward M Schaeffer, Yang Liu, Mary O Strasser, Jim C Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.06.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.06.007","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The extent of prostate cancer found on biopsy, as well as prostate cancer grade and genomic tests, can affect clinical decision-making. The impact of these factors on the initial management approach and subsequent patient outcomes for men with favorable-grade prostate cancer has not yet been determined on a population level. Our objective was to explore the association of Decipher 22-gene genomic classifier (GC) biopsy testing on the initial use of conservative management versus radical prostatectomy (RP) and to determine the independent effect of GC scores on RP pathologic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 87 140 patients diagnosed with grade group 1 and 2 prostate cancer between 2016 and 2018 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry data were linked to GC testing results (2576 tested and 84 564 untested with a GC). The primary endpoints of interest were receipt of conservative management or RP, pathologic upgrading (pathologic grade group 3-5), upstaging (pathologic ≥T3b), and adverse pathologic features (pathologic upgrading, upstaging, or lymph node invasion). Multivariable logistic regressions quantified the association of variables with outcomes of interest.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>GC tested patients were more likely to have grade group 2 on biopsy (51% vs 46%, p < 0.001) and lower prostate-specific antigen (6.1 vs 6.3, p = 0.016). Conservative management increased from 37% to 39% and from 22% to 24% during 2016-2018 for the GC tested and untested populations, respectively. GC testing was significantly associated with increased odds of conservative management (odds ratio [OR] 2.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9-2.4, p < 0.001). The distribution of biopsy GC risk was as follows: 45% low risk, 30% intermediate risk, and 25% high risk. In adjusted analyses, higher GC (per 0.1 increment) scores (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.17-1.31, p < 0.001) and percent positive cores (1.07, 95% CI 1.02-1.12, p = 0.009) were significantly associated with the receipt of RP. A higher GC score was significantly associated with all adverse outcomes (pathologic upgrading [OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.12-1.49, p < 0.001], upstaging [OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.05-1.62, p = 0.020], and adverse pathology [OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.12-1.45, p < 0.001]). Limitations include observational biases associated with the retrospective study design.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>Men who underwent GC testing were more likely to undergo conservative management. GC testing at biopsy is prognostic of adverse pathologic outcomes in a large population-based registry.</p><p><strong>Patient summary: </strong>In this population analysis of men with favorable-risk prostate cancer, those who underwent genomic testing at biopsy were more likely to undergo conservative management. Of men who initially underwent radical prostatectomy, higher genomic risk but not tumor volume was asso","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1504-1512"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141554500","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Re: Guillaume Ploussard, Eric Barret, Gaëlle Fiard, et al. Transperineal Versus Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsies for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Final Results of the Randomized PERFECT trial (CCAFU-PR1). Eur Urol Oncol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2024.01.019.","authors":"Fu-Xiang Lin, Yi Yu, Zhan-Ping Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.05.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.05.002","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1549-1550"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141075905","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Maintaining Mental Health: Mindfulness Techniques for Clinicians.","authors":"Madhumita Parmar, Phillip M Pierorazio","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.019","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.019","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Urologists suffer from one of the highest rates of burnout, with negative effects for both physicians and patients. We share simple mindfulness-based strategies as invaluable tools for improving mental health, regulating physical and emotional responses to stressors, and strengthening resilience.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1183-1184"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142461481","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Andrew E Amini, Alexandra E Hunter, Aya Almashad, Aileen J Feng, Neel D Patel, Margaret R O'Dea, Shelley R McCormick, Linda H Rodgers, Keyan Salari
{"title":"Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Prostate Cancer Screening in Carriers of Pathogenic Germline Mutations: Interim Results from the Initial Screening Round of the Prostate Cancer Genetic Risk Evaluation and Screening Study.","authors":"Andrew E Amini, Alexandra E Hunter, Aya Almashad, Aileen J Feng, Neel D Patel, Margaret R O'Dea, Shelley R McCormick, Linda H Rodgers, Keyan Salari","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.01.015","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.01.015","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The risk of early-onset and clinically aggressive prostate cancer is elevated in carriers of certain rare pathogenic germline mutations. The utility of augmenting traditional prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening measures with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in this population is not yet known.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate MRI-based screening in comparison with traditional PSA-based screening among individuals at an elevated genetic risk for prostate cancer.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Male germline carriers of pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in any of 19 prostate cancer risk genes between the ages of 35 and 74 yr with no prior history of prostate cancer were recruited. Intervention Enrolled participants underwent screening with annual PSA, digital rectal examination (DRE), and triennial multiparametric MRI. Individuals with abnormal DRE, elevated age-adjusted PSA (>1.5 ng/ml for 35-49 yr, >2.0 ng/ml for 50-54 yr, and >3.0 ng/ml for 55-74 yr), or suspicious multiparametric MRI (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System [PI-RADS] ≥3 lesion) were offered prostate biopsy. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Endpoints were diagnosis of any and clinically significant prostate cancer, and alternative screening strategies were compared by a decision curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results and limitations: </strong>To date, 101 males have completed the first round of screening. The greatest proportion of participants are carriers of BRCA2 (n = 44), BRCA1 (n = 35), and ATM (n = 7) variants. Twenty-one have undergone biopsy, resulting in the detection of nine cases of cancer (seven clinically significant). For the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer, abnormal MRI (PI-RADS ≥3) demonstrated 100% sensitivity (7/7) with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 100%, whereas PSA-based screening alone had 57% (4/7) sensitivity with an NPV of 73%. Of six screening strategies evaluated in the decision curve analysis, MRI-based screening alone achieved superior net benefit at all threshold probabilities compared with PSA screening-detecting one additional cancer case per 7.5 patients, while avoiding more unnecessary biopsies at the same threshold probability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Disease prevalence is high among carriers of prostate cancer-associated pathogenic germline mutations. Early results suggest that MRI-based screening enhances early detection of clinically significant disease beyond PSA screening alone.</p><p><strong>Patient summary: </strong>In this study, we present the interim results from the PROGRESS prostate cancer screening trial. We found that in certain germline carriers of prostate cancer risk mutations, magnetic resonance imaging-based screening enhances detection of prostate cancer while reducing biopsies triggered, in comparison with traditional prostate-specific antigen screening strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1358-1366"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140059065","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}