Combination Cytoreductive Surgery, Radiotherapy, or Ablation for De Novo Metastatic Prostate Cancer: The IP2-ATLANTA Internal Pilot, Phase 2, Randomised Controlled Trial.

IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Martin J Connor, Taimur T Shah, Johanna Sukumar, Dolan Basak, Francesca Fiorentino, Catherine Heath, Gail Horan, Nicholas Johnson, Vincent Khoo, Bijjan Khoubehi, Natalia Klimowska-Nassar, Stephen Mangar, John McGrath, Consuelo Nohpal de la Rosa, Derek Price, Bhavan Rai, Naveed Sarwar, Andrew Smith, John N Staffurth, Henry Tam, Kamal Thippu Jayaprakash, Mathias Winkler, T Dudderidge, Hashim U Ahmed
{"title":"Combination Cytoreductive Surgery, Radiotherapy, or Ablation for De Novo Metastatic Prostate Cancer: The IP2-ATLANTA Internal Pilot, Phase 2, Randomised Controlled Trial.","authors":"Martin J Connor, Taimur T Shah, Johanna Sukumar, Dolan Basak, Francesca Fiorentino, Catherine Heath, Gail Horan, Nicholas Johnson, Vincent Khoo, Bijjan Khoubehi, Natalia Klimowska-Nassar, Stephen Mangar, John McGrath, Consuelo Nohpal de la Rosa, Derek Price, Bhavan Rai, Naveed Sarwar, Andrew Smith, John N Staffurth, Henry Tam, Kamal Thippu Jayaprakash, Mathias Winkler, T Dudderidge, Hashim U Ahmed","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2025.05.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Cytoreduction of the primary prostate cancer, involved lymph nodes, and metastases may confer improved cancer control in de novo synchronous metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Herein, we aimed to examine the safety and feasibility of novel cytoreductive therapies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We report the internal pilot of IP2-ATLANTA, a phase 2, multicentre, three-arm, randomised controlled trial. Patients with histologically diagnosed mHSPC of performance status 0-2 were randomly allocated (1:1:1) to the standard of care control group or one of two intervention arms, and stratified by CHAARTED-defined metastatic burden, intent to treat pelvic lymph nodes, and use of docetaxel and stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR; three or fewer metastases). The minimally invasive ablative therapy (MIAT) arm included cytoreductive prostate ablation with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND), if involved, followed by SABR for metastases. The radical arm included treatment of the prostate with external beam radiotherapy along with pelvic lymph node radiotherapy (PLNRT), if involved, or cytoreductive radical prostatectomy with PLND, if involved, both followed by SABR for metastases. Systemic therapy was lifelong androgen deprivation therapy with docetaxel or an androgen receptor targeted agent. Repeat pretreatment prostate magnetic resonance imaging and biopsy were carried out. Pilot coprimary endpoints were complete pathological response, randomisation feasibility, and safety.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Between April 26, 2019 and February 6, 2021, 108 patients met the eligibility criteria, of whom 81 underwent randomisation (75% [81/108, 95% confidence interval {CI} 65.7-82.8]), exceeding the target recruitment rate. The median follow-up period was 25 mo (interquartile range [IQR] 20-30), age 69.0 yr (IQR 62-74), and prostate-specific antigen 80.50 ng/ml (IQR 20.25-261.78). Metastatic burden was balanced (low 51%; high 49%). Performance status was 0 in 74/81 (91%) patients, with 69/81 (85%) receiving doublet systemic therapy. Cytoreductive interventions performed were as follows: MIAT ± PLND in 23/27 (85%), prostatectomy ± PLND in 5/26 (19%), and radiotherapy ± PLNRT in 14/26 (54%). Among patients with prostate tissue for histopathological assessment, a complete pathological response occurred in 11% (6/53 [95% CI 4.3-23.0]; 11% [3/27] MIAT; 12% [3/26] radical). Grade 3 or worse adverse events were reported in 18% (5/28) of the control group, 7% (2/26) of the MIAT group, and 15% (4/26) of the patients receiving radiotherapy or prostatectomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>Randomisation to combination cytoreductive surgery, radiotherapy, and ablation was feasible. Cytoreductive treatment combinations were well tolerated and deserve further evaluation. The majority of patients still have viable residual prostate cancer after systemic therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.05.010","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Cytoreduction of the primary prostate cancer, involved lymph nodes, and metastases may confer improved cancer control in de novo synchronous metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Herein, we aimed to examine the safety and feasibility of novel cytoreductive therapies.

Methods: We report the internal pilot of IP2-ATLANTA, a phase 2, multicentre, three-arm, randomised controlled trial. Patients with histologically diagnosed mHSPC of performance status 0-2 were randomly allocated (1:1:1) to the standard of care control group or one of two intervention arms, and stratified by CHAARTED-defined metastatic burden, intent to treat pelvic lymph nodes, and use of docetaxel and stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR; three or fewer metastases). The minimally invasive ablative therapy (MIAT) arm included cytoreductive prostate ablation with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND), if involved, followed by SABR for metastases. The radical arm included treatment of the prostate with external beam radiotherapy along with pelvic lymph node radiotherapy (PLNRT), if involved, or cytoreductive radical prostatectomy with PLND, if involved, both followed by SABR for metastases. Systemic therapy was lifelong androgen deprivation therapy with docetaxel or an androgen receptor targeted agent. Repeat pretreatment prostate magnetic resonance imaging and biopsy were carried out. Pilot coprimary endpoints were complete pathological response, randomisation feasibility, and safety.

Key findings and limitations: Between April 26, 2019 and February 6, 2021, 108 patients met the eligibility criteria, of whom 81 underwent randomisation (75% [81/108, 95% confidence interval {CI} 65.7-82.8]), exceeding the target recruitment rate. The median follow-up period was 25 mo (interquartile range [IQR] 20-30), age 69.0 yr (IQR 62-74), and prostate-specific antigen 80.50 ng/ml (IQR 20.25-261.78). Metastatic burden was balanced (low 51%; high 49%). Performance status was 0 in 74/81 (91%) patients, with 69/81 (85%) receiving doublet systemic therapy. Cytoreductive interventions performed were as follows: MIAT ± PLND in 23/27 (85%), prostatectomy ± PLND in 5/26 (19%), and radiotherapy ± PLNRT in 14/26 (54%). Among patients with prostate tissue for histopathological assessment, a complete pathological response occurred in 11% (6/53 [95% CI 4.3-23.0]; 11% [3/27] MIAT; 12% [3/26] radical). Grade 3 or worse adverse events were reported in 18% (5/28) of the control group, 7% (2/26) of the MIAT group, and 15% (4/26) of the patients receiving radiotherapy or prostatectomy.

Conclusions and clinical implications: Randomisation to combination cytoreductive surgery, radiotherapy, and ablation was feasible. Cytoreductive treatment combinations were well tolerated and deserve further evaluation. The majority of patients still have viable residual prostate cancer after systemic therapy.

联合细胞减少手术、放疗或消融治疗新发转移性前列腺癌:IP2-ATLANTA内部试验,2期,随机对照试验
背景和目的:原发性前列腺癌、累及淋巴结和转移的细胞减少可能会改善新发同步转移性激素敏感前列腺癌(mHSPC)的癌症控制。在此,我们的目的是检查新的细胞减少疗法的安全性和可行性。方法:我们报告了IP2-ATLANTA的内部试点,这是一项2期、多中心、三组、随机对照试验。组织学诊断为表现状态0-2的mHSPC患者被随机(1:1:1)分配到标准护理对照组或两个干预组之一,并根据chared定义的转移负担、治疗盆腔淋巴结的意图、使用多西他赛和立体定向消融体放疗(SABR;三个或更少的转移)。微创消融治疗(MIAT)组包括伴有盆腔淋巴结清扫(PLND)的前列腺细胞减少消融,随后进行SABR治疗转移灶。根治性治疗组包括外束放射治疗和盆腔淋巴结放射治疗(PLNRT),或细胞减减性根治性前列腺切除术和盆腔淋巴结放射治疗(PLND)。全身治疗是用多西他赛或雄激素受体靶向药物进行终身雄激素剥夺治疗。重复预处理前列腺磁共振成像及活检。试验的主要终点是完全病理反应、随机化可行性和安全性。主要发现和局限性:在2019年4月26日至2021年2月6日期间,108例患者符合入选标准,其中81例接受了随机化(75%[81/108,95%可信区间{CI} 65.7-82.8]),超过了目标招募率。中位随访时间为25个月(四分位数范围[IQR] 20-30),年龄69.0岁(IQR 62-74),前列腺特异性抗原80.50 ng/ml (IQR 20.25-261.78)。转移性负担平衡(低51%;高49%)。74/81(91%)患者的表现状态为0,69/81(85%)患者接受了双重全身治疗。细胞减少干预:MIAT±PLND 23/27(85%),前列腺切除术±PLND 5/26(19%),放疗±PLNRT 14/26(54%)。在前列腺组织进行组织病理学评估的患者中,11%的患者出现完全的病理反应(6/53 [95% CI 4.3-23.0];11% [3/27];12% [3/26] radical)。对照组中有18%(5/28)、MIAT组中有7%(2/26)、放疗或前列腺切除术患者中有15%(4/26)报告了3级及以上不良事件。结论和临床意义:随机化联合细胞减少手术、放疗和消融是可行的。细胞减少治疗组合耐受性良好,值得进一步评估。大多数患者在接受全身治疗后仍有残存的前列腺癌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
128
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: Journal Name: European Urology Oncology Affiliation: Official Journal of the European Association of Urology Focus: First official publication of the EAU fully devoted to the study of genitourinary malignancies Aims to deliver high-quality research Content: Includes original articles, opinion piece editorials, and invited reviews Covers clinical, basic, and translational research Publication Frequency: Six times a year in electronic format
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信