European urology oncology最新文献

{"title":"Clinical Implementation of Urinary Biomarkers for Surveillance of Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC): Considerations from the European Association of Urology NMIBC Guideline Panel.","authors":"Fredrik Liedberg, Paramananthan Mariappan, Paolo Gontero","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although high-level evidence is currently lacking, noninferiority randomised controlled trials in predefined risk groups in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer are under way to scientifically prove the safety of urinary biomarker-guided follow-up. To facilitate recommendations for clinical use, it is essential to comply with the EU certification for in vitro diagnostics and to demonstrate cost effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142344432","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comparative Cardiovascular Safety of Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Antagonists and Agonists Among Patients Diagnosed with Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Real-world Evidence Studies.","authors":"Savan Patel, Kexin Zhu, Chintan V Dave, Mina Ghajar, Yingting Zhang, Biren Saraiya, Elisa V Bandera, Farzin Khosrow-Khavar","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists and agonists are cornerstone treatments in prostate cancer. However, evidence regarding the comparative cardiovascular safety of these drugs from clinical trials is inconclusive. The objective of this study was to systematically assess the risk of adverse cardiovascular events of GnRH antagonists compared with GnRH agonists across real-world evidence studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science (2008-2023). We included real-world evidence studies comparing the risk of cardiovascular outcomes of GnRH antagonists with those of GnRH agonists among patients with prostate cancer. We conducted a meta-analysis of effect estimates across studies at a low or moderate risk of bias, assessed via the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool, using random-effect models.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Among ten included studies, four were classified as having a moderate and six as having a serious risk of bias. Across three studies at a moderate risk of bias in the primary analysis, degarelix was associated with an increased risk (pooled relative risk [RR]: 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14-1.51) of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). An augmented risk was observed in two studies among patients with a history of cardiovascular disease (pooled RR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.11-1.56) compared with one study among patients without a history of cardiovascular disease (RR: 1.15, 95% CI: 0.83-1.59).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>Real-world evidence studies indicate that degarelix, compared with GnRH agonists, is associated with a modest increased risk of MACEs, particularly among patients with a history of cardiovascular disease. However, residual confounding due to the treatment of high-risk patients with degarelix may account for these findings. Additional large studies with detailed data on tumor characteristics and cardiovascular risk factors are needed to confirm these findings.</p><p><strong>Patient summary: </strong>In this systematic evaluation of evidence among patients diagnosed with prostate cancer in routine care, degarelix was associated with higher cardiovascular adverse outcomes than gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142344433","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Determining Long-term Prostate Cancer Outcomes for Active Surveillance Patients Without Early Disease Progression: Implications for Slowing or Stopping Surveillance.","authors":"Kevin Shee, James Nie, Janet E Cowan, Lufan Wang, Samuel L Washington, Katsuto Shinohara, Hao G Nguyen, Matthew R Cooperberg, Peter R Carroll","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.008","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Active surveillance (AS) of prostate cancer (PCa) is the standard of care for low-grade disease, but there is limited guidance on tailoring protocols for stable patients. We investigated long-term outcomes for patients without initial progression and risk factors for upgrade.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Men on AS with Gleason grade group (GG) 1 PCa on three serial biopsies, ≥5 yr without progression, and ≥10 yr of follow-up were included. Outcomes were upgrade (GG ≥2), major upgrade (GG ≥3), progression to treatment, metastasis, PCa-specific survival, and overall survival. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate the associations between patient characteristics and risk of upgrade.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>A total of 774 men met the inclusion criteria. At 10, 12, and 15 yr, upgrade-free survival rates were 56%, 45%, and 21%; major upgrade-free survival rates were 88%, 83%, and 61%; treatment-free survival rates were 86%, 83%, and 73%; metastasis-free survival rates were 99%, 99%, and 98%; and overall survival rates were 98%, 96%, and 95%, respectively. PCa-specific survival was 100% at 15 yr. On a multivariable analysis, year of diagnosis, age, body mass index (BMI), and biopsy core positivity were associated with upgrade (all p < 0.01), whereas age and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density were associated with major upgrade.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>Patients without progression for 5 yr on AS had modest rates of upgrade and low rates of metastasis, and mortality at 15 yr of follow-up. Year of diagnosis, older age, increased BMI, and increased biopsy core positivity were associated with upgrade, whereas older age and greater PSA density were associated with an increased risk of major upgrade. A subset of these patients may benefit from deintensification of AS protocols.</p><p><strong>Patient summary: </strong>There are little reported data or clinical guidelines for patients with PCa who are stable for many years on active surveillance (AS). We show, in a large cohort, that PCa patients without progression for 5 yr on AS have modest rates of upgrade and very low rates of metastasis, and mortality rates at 15 yr of follow-up, and that older age, increased body mass index, and increased PCa volume are associated with an increased likelihood of future upgrade. This study supports continued AS in this patient population and deintensification in select patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142344434","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Lights and Shadows of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)-exposed and BCG-unresponsive Definitions: A Practical Overview.","authors":"Luca Afferi, Andrea Gallioli, Damiano Stracci, Agostino Mattei, Christian Fankhauser, Marco Moschini, Peter C Black, Benjamin Pradere, Jorge Huguet Pérez, Oscar Rodriguez-Faba, Joan Palou, Alberto Breda","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.010","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>According to the current definitions of recurrence of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer after bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), patients in the BCG-exposed and late relapse categories might benefit from further instillations. Patients with BCG-unresponsive disease could be included in clinical trials, but otherwise radical cystectomy is the preferred treatment. BCG-intolerant disease still represents an area of debate, with limited evidence regarding the best treatment for these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142344435","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Immune-based Approach for Renal Cell Carcinoma: Pros, Cons, and Future Directions.","authors":"Laura Marandino, Riccardo Campi, Daniele Amparore, Zayd Tippu, Laurence Albiges, Umberto Capitanio, Rachel H Giles, Silke Gillessen, Alexander Kutikov, James Larkin, Robert J Motzer, Phillip M Pierorazio, Thomas Powles, Morgan Roupret, Grant D Stewart, Samra Turajlic, Axel Bex","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Immune-oncology strategies are revolutionising the perioperative treatment in several tumour types. The perioperative setting of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is an evolving field, and the advent of immunotherapy is producing significant advances.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To critically review the potential pros and cons of adjuvant and neoadjuvant immune-based therapeutic strategies in RCC, and to provide insights for future research in this field.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>We performed a collaborative narrative review of the existing literature.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Adjuvant immunotherapy with pembrolizumab is a new standard of care for patients at a higher risk of recurrence after nephrectomy, demonstrating a disease-free survival and overall survival benefit in the phase 3 KEYNOTE-564 trial. Current data do not support neoadjuvant therapy use outside clinical trials. While both adjuvant and neoadjuvant immune-based approaches are driven by robust biological rationale, neoadjuvant immunotherapy may enable a stronger and more durable antitumour immune response. If neoadjuvant single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors demonstrated limited activity on the primary tumour, immune-based combinations may show increased activity. Overtreatment and a risk of relevant toxicity for patients who are cured by surgery alone are common concerns for both neoadjuvant and adjuvant strategies. Biomarkers helping patient selection and treatment deintensification are lacking in RCC. No results from randomised trials comparing neoadjuvant or perioperative immune-based therapy with adjuvant immunotherapy are available.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adjuvant immunotherapy is a new standard of care in RCC. Both neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy strategies have potential advantages and disadvantages. Optimising perioperative treatment strategies is nuanced, with the role of neoadjuvant immune-based therapies yet to be defined. Given strong biological rationale for a pre/perioperative approach, there is a need for prospective clinical trials to determine clinical efficacy. Research investigating biomarkers aiding patient selection and treatment deintensification strategies is needed.</p><p><strong>Patient summary: </strong>Immunotherapy is transforming the treatment of kidney cancer. In this review, we looked at the studies investigating immunotherapy strategies before and/or after surgery for patients with kidney cancer to assess potential pros and cons. We concluded that both neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy strategies may have potential advantages and disadvantages. While immunotherapy administered after surgery is already a standard of care, immunotherapy before surgery should be better investigated in future studies. Future trials should also focus on the selection of patients in order to spare toxicity for patients who will be cured by surgery alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142344436","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Risk of Progression of High-grade Primary T1 Non-muscle-invasive Bladder cancer in a Contemporary Cohort.","authors":"Olga M Pijpers, Lisa M C van Hoogstraten, Sebastiaan Remmers, Irene J Beijert, Jorg R Oddens, J Alfred Witjes, Lambertus A Kiemeney, Katja K H Aben, Joost L Boormans","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) receive bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) instillations to reduce the risk of progression. For patients with very high-risk NMIBC, immediate radical cystectomy may be considered, as patients who experience disease progression despite BCG treatment have a worse prognosis. However, guideline-recommended stratification for the risk of progression is based on data from patients who were not exposed to BCG. We evaluated the risk of progression in a contemporary cohort of patients with primary high-grade/grade 3 (HG/G3) T1 NMIBC (n = 1268) who received at least one BCG instillation and underwent at least one cystoscopic evaluation. The primary endpoint was the 1-yr risk of progression for all patients and for the subgroup that received adequate BCG, defined as at least five induction instillations and at least two instillations provided as a second BCG course within 6 mo. Progression was defined as detrusor muscle invasion or lymph node or distant metastasis. The 1-yr risk of progression was 6.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.2-8.0) for patients with primary HG/G3 T1 NMIBC who started BCG treatment, and 4.6% (95% CI 3.3-6.4) 1 yr after the first instillation of the second BCG course for patients who received adequate BCG (n = 746). In conclusion, the contemporary risk of progression for patients with HG/G3 T1 NMIBC who receive BCG appears to be low, especially for patients who receive adequate BCG treatment. PATIENT SUMMARY: Our study shows that for patients with a high-grade bladder tumor who received in-bladder BCG (bacillus Calmette-Guérin), the risk of disease progression was 6.5% at 1 yr after their first BCG instillation. For patients who continued with BCG maintenance treatments, the risk of progression was 4.6% after the first BCG maintenance instillation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142344437","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria for the Workup and Treatment of Local Intraprostatic Recurrence of Prostate Cancer Following Definitive Radiotherapy.","authors":"Luca F Valle, Tommy Jiang, Ashton Rosenbloom, Nicholas G Zaorsky, Clara Hwang, Abhishek Solanki, Daniel Dickstein, Timur Mitin, Thomas Schroeder, Louis Potters, Shane Lloyd, Tim Showalter, Hilary P Bagshaw, R Jeffrey Karnes, Karen E Hoffman, Paul L Nguyen, Amar U Kishan","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.005","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background and objective: &lt;/strong&gt;Local intraprostatic radiorecurrence of prostate cancer (IPR-PC) can be associated with an aggressive natural history and impact long-term disease-specific survival. While appropriate local salvage intervention can be curative, best practices for workup and local salvage of intraprostatic recurrence are poorly defined. The American Radium Society (ARS) Genitourinary Appropriate Use Criteria Committee sought to develop evidence-based recommendations to address this gap.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;PubMed and Embase were searched to retrieve a comprehensive set of relevant peer-reviewed articles on four topics relevant to the workup and treatment of IPR-PC. The literature was evaluated and summarized by three investigators, and clinical variants were created for each of the four topics. The ARS Genitourinary AUC multidisciplinary expert panel voted on the most appropriate procedures for each variant, and a modified Delphi approach was used to summarize recommendations.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Key findings and limitations: &lt;/strong&gt;The panel concluded that radiographic staging via prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging should be performed to exclude patients with metastatic disease and identify the local extent of radiorecurrence. Biopsy is required before local salvage to avoid excessive toxicity in patients whose radiographic recurrence represents a treatment effect. Consideration of local salvage is preferred in lieu of noncurative hormonal manipulation alone, although shared decision-making is critical. Salvage reirradiation approaches are recommended to limit toxicity. Hormonal therapy may be beneficial for radiosensitization when radiotherapeutic salvage is pursued, but only of short duration, and classic androgen deprivation therapies are preferred over novel hormonal agents. Focal salvage should be pursued when confidence in focal recurrence can be confirmed via multiple radiographic and tissue sampling modalities, although the toxicity associated with whole-gland salvage appears to be very tolerable. Several radiotherapeutic salvage regimens exist, most of which can be carried out in six or fewer fractions. The data informing this guideline are limited to individuals initially treated with conventionally fractionated external beam radiotherapy and with workup for recurrence before the PSMA PET era.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions and clinical implications: &lt;/strong&gt;This consensus guideline provides evidence-based guidance on the appropriate procedures for workup and treatment of IPR-PC. Prospective evidence to enrich these guidelines is eagerly anticipated.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Patient summary: &lt;/strong&gt;We summarize evidence for the best workup and treatment for patients with local recurrence of prostate cancer after radiotherapy. A panel of experts evaluated previous studies and voted on the procedures that should be performed and ","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142282705","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Frailty and Renal Cell Carcinoma: Integration of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment into Shared Decision-making.","authors":"Alessio Pecoraro, Giuseppe Dario Testa, Laura Marandino, Laurence Albiges, Axel Bex, Umberto Capitanio, Ilaria Cappiello, Lorenzo Masieri, Carme Mir, Morgan Roupret, Sergio Serni, Andrea Ungar, Giulia Rivasi, Riccardo Campi","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Frailty, a geriatric syndrome characterized by decreased resilience and physiological reserve, impacts the prognosis and management of older adults significantly, particularly in the context of surgical and oncological care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide an overview of frailty assessment in the management of older patients with a renal mass/renal cell carcinoma (RCC), focusing on its implications for diagnostic workup, treatment decisions, and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>A narrative review of the literature was conducted, focusing on frailty definitions, assessment tools, and their application in geriatric oncology, applied to the field of RCC. Relevant studies addressing the prognostic value of frailty, its impact on treatment outcomes, and potential interventions were summarized.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Frailty is a poor prognostic factor and can influence decision-making in the management of both localized and metastatic RCC. Screening tools such as the Geriatric Screening Tool 8 (G8) and the Mini-COG test can aid clinicians to select older patients (ie, aged ≥65 yr) for a further comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) performed by dedicated geriatricians. The CGA provides insights to risk stratify patients and guide subsequent treatment pathways. As such, the involvement of geriatricians in multidisciplinary tumor boards emerges as an essential priority to address the complex needs of frail patients and optimize clinical outcomes. Herein, we propose a dedicated care pathway as a first key step to implement frailty assessment in clinical practice and research for RCC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Frailty has emerged as a crucial factor influencing the management and outcomes of older patients with RCC. Involvement of geriatricians in diagnostic and therapeutic pathways represents a pragmatic approach to screen and assess frailty, fostering individualized treatment decisions according to holistic patient risk stratification.</p><p><strong>Patient summary: </strong>Frailty, a decline in resilience and physiological reserve, influences treatment decisions and outcomes in elderly patients with renal cell carcinoma, guiding personalized care. In this review, we focused on pragmatic strategies to screen patients with a renal mass suspected for renal cell carcinoma, who are older than 65 yr, for frailty and on personalized management algorithms integrating geriatric input beyond patient- and tumor-related factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142282707","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Risk of Biochemical Recurrence and Metastasis in Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy After a 10-year Disease-free Interval.","authors":"Benedikt Hoeh, Felix Preisser, Fabio Zattoni, Alexander Kretschmer, Thilo Westhofen, Jonathan Olivier, Timo F W Soeterik, Roderick C N van den Bergh, Philipp Mandel, Markus Graefen, Derya Tilki","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.08.008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2024.08.008","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing is used to follow up prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP). Research on PSA thresholds for identifying PCa patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) who are at a higher risk of progression yielded inconclusive results. This study aims to investigate the risk of late BCR in PCa patients treated with RP and long postoperative (120 mo) undetectable PSA follow-up, and to identify prognostic factors for late BCR within this patient cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PCa patients treated with curative RP (1992-2012) and free of BCR during the first 120 mo following RP were retrospectively identified within five European tertiary centers; BCR was defined as two consecutive PSA values of ≥0.2 ng/ml. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models tested for an association between BCR and patient or tumor characteristics.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>The study cohort consisted of 4639 patients, of whom 243 (5.2%) developed BCR at a medium follow-up of 147 mo. Of those with BCR, 23 (9.5%) subsequently developed metastatic progression. In Kaplan-Meier models, BCR-free survival differed according to advanced tumor status. In multivariable Cox regression models, pT stage (pT3a: hazard ratio [HR]: 1.46; pT3b: HR: 2.42), pathological Gleason score (pGS 3 + 4: HR: 1.71; pGS ≥4 + 3: HR: 2.47), surgical margin (R1/Rx: HR: 1.72), and pNx stage (pNx: HR: 0.72) represented independent predictors for BCR (all p < 0.05). Conversely, age, PSA at diagnosis, and year of surgery failed to achieve independent predictor status for BCR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>Among PCa patients with an uneventful follow-up of at least 10 yr after RP, still one in 20 patients subsequently develop late BCR. Nevertheless, late BCR and subsequent progression to metastasis (0.3%) rates in patients with pT2 stage and pGS ≤3 + 4 were strikingly low, implicating that abandoning follow-up beyond an uneventful period of 10 yr is justifiable within this cohort of patients.</p><p><strong>Patient summary: </strong>In this study, prostate cancer patients treated with a radical prostatectomy and at least 10 yr of uneventful prostate-specific antigen testing were identified within five European centers. Relying on these patients, the rate of subsequent late biochemical recurrence was calculated and risk factors were identified for biochemical recurrence following 10 yr of uneventful prostate-specific antigen testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142282710","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Evaluating the Impact of a Shared Decision-making Intervention for Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma: The SDM-RCC Study Protocol.","authors":"Cato C Bresser, Mirjam M Garvelink, Birgitta M M van den Berg, Franklin C K Dolk, Paul B van der Nat, Harm H E van Melick","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of the SDM-RCC study is to evaluate the impact of a comprehensive shared decision-making (SDM) intervention for patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) on the decision-making process and outcomes. The intervention includes online patient decision aids (PtDAs) and training of health care professionals (HCPs) in the use of PtDAs and SDM. The study is a multicenter, prospective pretest-posttest cohort in six Dutch hospitals, focusing on patients with localized or metastatic RCC. The primary outcome is the observed quality of the decision-making process, measured using OPTION-5 scores. Secondary outcomes include perceived quality of the decision-making process, decision quality, and implementation of the intervention (user statistics and interviews). Quantitative analysis will be performed on questionnaire data, while qualitative analysis will be performed on interviews using coding based on established frameworks. The study results could improve understanding of the decision-making process for RCC patients from patient, HCP, and observer perspectives. The SDM tool implemented is expected to support the decision-making process. PATIENT SUMMARY: We are conducting a trial on the effects of a tool to support shared decision-making by patients with kidney cancer who are facing treatment decisions. This paper outlines the protocol that will be used for the trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142282706","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}