European Journal of Anaesthesiology最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Goal-direct analgesia: can analgesia nociception index effectively reduce intra-operative opioids? 目的-直接镇痛:镇痛痛觉指数能否有效减少术中阿片类药物?
IF 4.2 2区 医学
European Journal of Anaesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-02 DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002096
Alireza Danesh, Hamid R Vahabzadeh-Monshie, Alberto J de Armendi, Amir L Butt
{"title":"Goal-direct analgesia: can analgesia nociception index effectively reduce intra-operative opioids?","authors":"Alireza Danesh, Hamid R Vahabzadeh-Monshie, Alberto J de Armendi, Amir L Butt","doi":"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002096","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002096","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":"42 2","pages":"182-183"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142914055","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Intra-operative norepinephrine via peripheral venous catheter is safe: A short scientific report. 外周静脉导管术中去甲肾上腺素是安全的:一篇简短的科学报道。
IF 4.2 2区 医学
European Journal of Anaesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-11 DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002080
Renate Schmucki, Christoph A Rüst, Miodrag Filipovic
{"title":"Intra-operative norepinephrine via peripheral venous catheter is safe: A short scientific report.","authors":"Renate Schmucki, Christoph A Rüst, Miodrag Filipovic","doi":"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002080","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002080","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":"42 2","pages":"172-173"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142914056","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A comparison between invasive and noninvasive measurement of the Hypotension Prediction Index: A post hoc analysis of a prospective cohort study. 有创和无创测量低血压预测指数的比较:一项前瞻性队列研究的事后分析。
IF 4.2 2区 医学
European Journal of Anaesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-16 DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002082
Santino R Rellum, Eline Kho, Jimmy Schenk, Björn J P van der Ster, Alexander P J Vlaar, Denise P Veelo
{"title":"A comparison between invasive and noninvasive measurement of the Hypotension Prediction Index: A post hoc analysis of a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Santino R Rellum, Eline Kho, Jimmy Schenk, Björn J P van der Ster, Alexander P J Vlaar, Denise P Veelo","doi":"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002082","DOIUrl":"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002082","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical trials and validation studies demonstrate promising hypotension prediction capability by the Hypotension Prediction Index (HPI). Most studies that evaluate HPI derive it from invasive blood pressure readings, but a direct comparison with the noninvasive alternative remains undetermined. Such a comparison could provide valuable insights for clinicians in deciding between invasive and noninvasive monitoring strategies.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Evaluating predictive differences between HPI when obtained through noninvasive versus invasive blood pressure monitoring.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Post hoc analysis of a prospective observational study conducted between 2018 and 2020.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single-centre study conducted in an academic hospital in the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adult noncardiac surgery patients scheduled for over 2 h long elective procedures. After obtaining informed consent, 91 out of the 105 patients had sufficient data for analysis.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the difference in area under the receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve (AUC) obtained for HPI predictions between the two datasets. Additionally, difference in time-to-event estimations were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AUC (95% confidence interval (CI)) results revealed a nonsignificant difference between invasive and noninvasive HPI, with areas of 94.2% (90.5 to 96.8) and 95.3% (90.4 to 98.2), respectively with an estimated difference of 1.1 (-3.9 to 6.1)%; P  = 0.673. However, noninvasive HPI demonstrated significantly longer time-to-event estimations for higher HPI values.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Noninvasive HPI is reliably accessible to clinicians during noncardiac surgery, showing comparable accuracy in HPI probabilities and the potential for additional response time.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03795831) https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795831.</p>","PeriodicalId":11920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"131-139"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11676597/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142460959","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in peri-operative care: Dispelling myths and unveiling insights with essential considerations for anaesthesiologists. 胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂在围手术期护理:消除神话和揭示与麻醉学家的基本考虑的见解。
IF 4.2 2区 医学
European Journal of Anaesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-29 DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002103
Larissa Paggers, Dieter Mesotten, Hendrik Stragier
{"title":"Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in peri-operative care: Dispelling myths and unveiling insights with essential considerations for anaesthesiologists.","authors":"Larissa Paggers, Dieter Mesotten, Hendrik Stragier","doi":"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002103","DOIUrl":"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002103","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the growing use of glucagon-like-peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor (GLP-1R) agonists as anti-obesity medication it is becoming increasingly important to examine its consequences in the peri-operative period. GLP-1R agonists are known for their effects of glucose-lowering and gastroparesis the latter causing some safety concerns regarding induction of anaesthesia, more specifically the risk of pulmonary aspiration. This article gathers the available evidence on this subject in addition to the already established guidelines. Current evidence makes us assume there is indeed an increased level of gastroparesis, but there are no studies to date with evidential confirmation of a presumed elevated risk of pulmonary aspiration. Future perspectives should focus on the actual risk of pulmonary aspiration and the possible implementation of ultrasound in the preoperative assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":11920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"140-151"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142767195","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Continuous peri-operative glucose monitoring in noncardiac surgery: A systematic review. 非心脏手术围术期连续葡萄糖监测:系统综述。
IF 4.2 2区 医学
European Journal of Anaesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-07 DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002095
Alessandro Putzu, Elliot Grange, Raoul Schorer, Eduardo Schiffer, Karim Gariani
{"title":"Continuous peri-operative glucose monitoring in noncardiac surgery: A systematic review.","authors":"Alessandro Putzu, Elliot Grange, Raoul Schorer, Eduardo Schiffer, Karim Gariani","doi":"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002095","DOIUrl":"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002095","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glucose management is an important component of peri-operative care. The usefulness of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in noncardiac surgery is uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically assess the glycaemic profile and clinical outcome of patients equipped with a CGM device during the peri-operative period in noncardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Electronic databases were systematically searched up to July 2024.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>Any studies performed in the peri-operative setting using a CGM device were included. Closed-loop systems also administering insulin were excluded. Analyses were stratified according to diabetes mellitus status and covered intra-operative and postoperative data. Outcomes included glycaemic profile (normal range 3.9 to 10.0 mmol l -1 ), complications, adverse events, and device dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six studies (1016 patients) were included. Twenty-four studies were not randomised, and six used a control arm for comparison. In bariatric surgery, diabetes mellitus patients had a mean ± SD glucose of 5.6 ± 0.5 mmol l -1 , with 15.4 ± 8.6% time below range, 75.3 ± 5.5% in range and 9.6 ± 6.7% above range. During major surgery, diabetes mellitus patients showed a mean glucose of 9.6 ± 1.1 mmol l -1 , with 9.5 ± 9.1% of time below range, 56.3 ± 13.5% in range and 30.6 ± 13.9% above range. In comparison, nondiabetes mellitus patients had a mean glucose of 6.4 ± 0.6 mmol l -1 , with 6.7 ± 8.4% time below range, 84.6 ± 15.5% in range and 11.2 ± 4.9% above range. Peri-operative complications were reported in only one comparative study and were similar in CGM and control groups. Device-related adverse events were rare and underreported. In 9.21% of cases, the devices experienced dysfunctions such as accidental removal and issues with sensors or readers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Due to the limited number of controlled studies, the impact of CGM on postoperative glycaemic control and complications compared with point-of-care testing remains unknown. Variability in postoperative glycaemic profiles and a device dysfunction rate of 1 in 10 suggest CGM should be investigated in a targeted surgical group.</p>","PeriodicalId":11920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"162-171"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11676603/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142602317","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Metabolic acidosis in patients with diabetes 2 undergoing cardiac surgery: The impact of SGLT2 inhibitor use: a retrospective cohort study. 接受心脏手术的 2 型糖尿病患者的代谢性酸中毒:使用 SGLT2 抑制剂的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
IF 4.2 2区 医学
European Journal of Anaesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-24 DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002090
Hege K Brekke, Gunhild Holmaas, Marianne C Astor, Egil Steien, Rune Haaverstad, Fatemeh Z Ghavidel, Marit Farstad
{"title":"Metabolic acidosis in patients with diabetes 2 undergoing cardiac surgery: The impact of SGLT2 inhibitor use: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Hege K Brekke, Gunhild Holmaas, Marianne C Astor, Egil Steien, Rune Haaverstad, Fatemeh Z Ghavidel, Marit Farstad","doi":"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002090","DOIUrl":"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002090","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2-i) lower blood sugar and reduce cardiovascular events and kidney failure. However, there have been increasing reports of euglycaemic diabetic ketoacidosis (eDKA) linked to SGLT2-i medicines.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Investigating the association between SGLT2-i use and the incidence of metabolic acidosis in patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing cardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective observational cohort study comprising 121 patients, with 38 in the SGLT2-i group and 83 in the control group.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A 2-year period at Haukeland University Hospital, a tertiary regional hospital in Western Norway.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing cardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Collection of clinical and laboratory data, including acid/base balance parameters, surgery details and SGLT2-i use.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Base excess and anion gap measurements as indicators of ketosis development. A subgroup analysis in patients without renal failure (glomerular filtration rate > 60 ml min -1  m -2 ) .</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lower base excess levels and increased anion gaps were observed in the SGLT2-i group compared with controls at various time points postoperatively, with no significant differences in serum lactate levels.Twelve hours postoperatively, 41% of SGLT2-i patients without renal failure had a base excess -3 mmol l -1 or less after correction for serum lactate (indicating ketosis) compared with only 8% in the control group ( P  < 0.001). The anion gap was elevated in the SGLT2-i group compared to the control group at 12 h postoperatively ( P  = 0.018).Multivariable regression analysis identified SGLT2-i use as an independent factor associated with a lower base excess after correction for lactate levels ( P  < 0.001). Cessation of SGLT2-i medication did not correlate with the degree of acidosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While taking SGLT2 inhibitors, diabetic patients undergoing heart surgery are at an increased risk of ketosis and possibly metabolic acidosis. This emphasises the importance of careful observation and effective treatment strategies within this group.</p>","PeriodicalId":11920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"152-161"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142497443","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Advancing the utility of bedside airway assessment: Awake-check videolaryngoscopy. 推进床边气道评估的应用:清醒检查视频喉镜检查。
IF 4.2 2区 医学
European Journal of Anaesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-02 DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002084
Jane L Orrock, Patrick A Ward, Alistair F McNarry
{"title":"Advancing the utility of bedside airway assessment: Awake-check videolaryngoscopy.","authors":"Jane L Orrock, Patrick A Ward, Alistair F McNarry","doi":"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002084","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002084","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":"42 2","pages":"186-187"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142913993","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Emergency anesthesia procedures. 紧急麻醉程序。
IF 4.2 2区 医学
European Journal of Anaesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-02 DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002093
{"title":"Emergency anesthesia procedures.","authors":"","doi":"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002093","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002093","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":"42 2","pages":"188"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142914053","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Chronic pain after surgery = chronic postsurgical pain? 术后慢性疼痛=术后慢性疼痛?
IF 4.2 2区 医学
European Journal of Anaesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-02 DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002101
Ulrike M Stamer
{"title":"Chronic pain after surgery = chronic postsurgical pain?","authors":"Ulrike M Stamer","doi":"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002101","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002101","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":"42 2","pages":"178-180"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142913995","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Deep anaesthesia may increase postoperative delirium and consequently subsequent mortality: A secondary analysis of data from the Balanced randomised trial. 深度麻醉可能增加术后谵妄和随后的死亡率:对平衡随机试验数据的二次分析。
IF 4.2 2区 医学
European Journal of Anaesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-02 DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002100
Jim Young, Timothy G Short, Luzius A Steiner, Salome Dell-Kuster
{"title":"Deep anaesthesia may increase postoperative delirium and consequently subsequent mortality: A secondary analysis of data from the Balanced randomised trial.","authors":"Jim Young, Timothy G Short, Luzius A Steiner, Salome Dell-Kuster","doi":"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002100","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002100","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":"42 2","pages":"184-186"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142914041","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信