European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology最新文献

{"title":"Use of drugs for hypertension or heart failure and the risk of death in COVID-19: association with loop-diuretics.","authors":"Johan Fastbom, Gudrun Jonasdottir Bergman, Johanna Holm, Håkan Hanberger, Kristoffer Strålin, Sten Walther, Joakim Alfredsson, Maria State, Natalia Borg, Anastasia Nyman Iliadou","doi":"10.1007/s00228-024-03709-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00228-024-03709-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To study the association between the use of drugs for hypertension or heart failure, particularly diuretics, and risk of death in COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cohort study, based on record linked individual-based data from national registers, of all Swedish inhabitants 50 years and older (n = 3,909,321) at the start of the first SARS-CoV-2 wave in Sweden. The association between use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB), thiazides, loop diuretics, aldosterone antagonists, beta blocking agents and calcium channel blockers at the index date 6 March 2020, and death in COVID-19 during 7 March to 31 July 2020, was analysed using Cox-proportional hazards regression, adjusted for a wide range of possible confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Use of loop diuretics was associated with higher risk [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.26; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.17-1.35] and thiazides with reduced risk (0.78; 0.69-0.88) of death in COVID-19. In addition, lower risk was observed for ACEI and higher risk for beta-blocking agents, although both associations were weak. For ARB, aldosterone antagonists and calcium channel blockers no significant associations were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this nationwide cohort of nearly 4 million persons 50 years and older, the use of loop diuretics was associated with increased risk of death in COVID-19 during the first SARS-CoV-2 wave in Sweden. This contrasted to the decreased risk observed for thiazides. As treatment with loop diuretics is common, particularly in the elderly, the group most affected by severe COVID-19, this finding merit further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11857,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11393138/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141442372","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Time-course and dose-effect of omalizumab in treating chronic idiopathic urticaria/chronic spontaneous urticaria.","authors":"Aiping Zhao, Ke Zhang, Zhen Wang, Kaihe Ye, Zhaosi Xu, Xiao Gong, Guanghu Zhu","doi":"10.1007/s00228-024-03725-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00228-024-03725-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Several studies have shown that subcutaneous injections of omalizumab can treat chronic idiopathic/spontaneous urticaria (CIU/CSU) patients by only assessing the efficacy on specific endpoints. This study aimed to quantitatively analyze different doses of omalizumab in CIU/CSU and compare it with ligelizumab.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Literature searches were performed in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. A model-based meta-analysis (MBMA) was utilized to develop a model incorporating time since the initiation of treatment and dose for omalizumab, with the change from baseline in Urticaria Activity Score (CFB-UAS7) as the primary efficacy endpoint. The time-course and dose-effect relationship throughout the omalizumab treatment period was analyzed, and the findings were compared with those of the investigational ligelizumab.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model equation for the CFB-UAS7 was established as E = -E_max × time/(ET₅₀ + time) × (b₀ + b₁ × dose). The estimated values of the model parameters <math><msub><mi>E</mi> <mi>max</mi></msub> </math> , <math> <msub><mrow><mi>ET</mi></mrow> <mn>50</mn></msub> </math> , <math><msub><mi>b</mi> <mn>0</mn></msub> </math> , and <math><msub><mi>b</mi> <mn>1</mn></msub> </math> were -1.16, 1.26 weeks, -9.90, and -0.0361 mg^-1, respectively. At week 12 after the first dose, the model-predicted CFB-UAS7 for 150 mg and 300 mg of omalizumab were -16.0 (95% CI, -17.2 to -14.8) and -21.7 (95% CI, -22.9 to -20.5), respectively. In the PEARL-1 trial, the CFB-UAS7 for 72 mg and 120 mg of ligelizumab were -19.4 (95% CI, -20.7 to -18.1) and -19.3 (95% CI, -20.6 to -18.0), respectively. In the PEARL-2 trial, these values were -19.2 (95% CI, -20.5 to -17.9) and -20.3 (95% CI, -21.6 to -19.0), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Omalizumab showed a significant dose-dependent effect in the treatment of CSU. Both 72 mg and 120 mg ligelizumab might have the potential to outperform 150 mg (but not 300 mg) omalizumab.</p>","PeriodicalId":11857,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141534048","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Effect of low-molecular-weight heparin calcium combined with magnesium sulfate and labetalol on coagulation, vascular endothelial function and pregnancy outcome in early-onset severe preeclampsia.","authors":"Yang Liu, Miao Zhou, Hao Cheng, Jing Du","doi":"10.1007/s00228-024-03712-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00228-024-03712-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This paper was aimed at unveiling the effect of low-molecular-weight heparin calcium (LMWH) combined with magnesium sulfate and labetalol on coagulation, vascular endothelial function, and pregnancy outcome in early-onset severe preeclampsia (EOSP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pregnant women with EOSP were divided into the control group and the study group, each with 62 cases. Patients in the control group were treated with labetalol and magnesium sulfate, and those in the study group were treated with LMWH in combination with the control grou Blood pressure (systolic blood pressure [SBP] and diastolic blood pressure [DBP]), 24-h urine protein, coagulation indices [D-dimer (D-D), plasma fibrinogen (Fg), prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), and prothrombin time (TT)], endothelial function [endothelin (ET-1) and nitric oxide (NO)], oxidative stress indices [oxidized low-density lipoproteins (ox-LDL), lipid peroxidation (LPO), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and malondialdehyde (MDA)], pregnancy outcome, and adverse effects occurred in the two groups were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After treatment, lower SBP, DBP, and 24-h urine protein levels; lower Fg and D-D levels; higher PT, APPT, and TT levels; higher NO levels; lower ET-1 levels; lower ox-LDL, MDA, and LPO levels; higher SOD levels; and lower incidence of adverse pregnancy and adverse reactions were noted in the study group in contrast to the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EOSP patients given with LMWH combined with magnesium sulfate and labetalol can effectively reduce the patient's blood pressure and urinary protein level; improve coagulation function, oxidative stress, and vascular endothelial function indices; reduce the adverse pregnancy outcomes; and improve the safety of treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":11857,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141431649","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Use of antibiotics in the early COVID-19 pandemic in Poland, the Netherlands and Spain, from erraticism to (more) logic.","authors":"Aleksandra Opalska, Helga Gardarsdottir, Marcel Kwa, Jadwiga Wójkowska-Mach, Monica Sabate, Maria Elena Ballarin, Mark de Groot, Hubert Leufkens","doi":"10.1007/s00228-024-03726-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00228-024-03726-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the Spring of 2020, the world was hit with unparalleled impact by the coronavirus pandemic. Antibiotics were widely used, even without good rationale. The aim of our study was to compare the use of antibiotics in patients with confirmed COVID-19 from three hospitals across Europe (Poland, the Netherlands and Spain) between two subsequent periods in the early days of the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We analysed data (antibiotics used and variation in the use of antibiotics, patients, admission and disease-related characteristics) from 300 patients admitted in three hospitals (University Hospital in Cracow, University Medical Center in Utrecht and Vall d'Hebron University Hospital in Barcelona) with confirmed infection of SARS-CoV-2 during Q1 2020 and Q4 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was ample variation in terms of patient mix and outcomes across the 3 hospitals. The majority of patients (225 out of 300) in all 3 hospitals received at least 1 antibiotic during the hospitalisation period. A minority of patients (68 out of 300) had their bacterial test results positive during their hospitalisation period. Throughout the 2 study periods, third-generation cephalosporins (ceftriaxone in 170 out of 300 patients) emerged as the most commonly used class of antibiotics. There was an apparent shift towards more rational utilisation of antibiotics, in all three hospitals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study shows that during the early stage of COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, antibiotics were frequently used in three European teaching hospitals despite the relatively low incidence of microbiologically confirmed bacterial infections. While in the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic antibiotic prescribing was full of trial and error, we could also confirm a learning curve over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":11857,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11393094/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141626335","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Impact of CYP2D6*2, CYP2D6*35, rs5758550, and related haplotypes on risperidone clearance in vivo.","authors":"Elisabet Størset, Line Skute Bråten, Magnus Ingelman-Sundberg, Inger Johansson, Espen Molden, Marianne Kristiansen Kringen","doi":"10.1007/s00228-024-03721-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00228-024-03721-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The CYP2D6 gene exhibits significant polymorphism, contributing to variability in responses to drugs metabolized by CYP2D6. While CYP2D6*2 and CYP2D6*35 are presently designated as alleles encoding normal metabolism, this classification is based on moderate level evidence. Additionally, the role of the formerly called \"enhancer\" single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs5758550 is unclear. In this study, the impacts of CYP2D6*2, CYP2D6*35 and rs5758550 on CYP2D6 activity were investigated using risperidone clearance as CYP2D6 activity marker.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A joint parent-metabolite population pharmacokinetic model was used to describe 1,565 serum concentration measurements of risperidone and 9-hydroxyrisperidone in 512 subjects. Risperidone population clearance was modeled as the sum of a CYP2D6-independent clearance term and the partial clearances contributed from each individually expressed CYP2D6 allele or haplotype. In addition to the well-characterized CYP2D6 alleles (*3-*6, *9, *10 and *41), *2, *35 and two haplotypes assigned as CYP2D6*2-rs5758550G and CYP2D6*2-rs5758550A were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Each evaluated CYP2D6 allele was associated with significantly lower risperidone clearance than the reference normal function allele CYP2D6*1 (p < 0.001). Further, rs5758550 differentiated the effect of CYP2D6*2 (p = 0.005). The haplotype-specific clearances for CYP2D6*2-rs5758550A, CYP2D6*2-rs5758550G and CYP2D6*35 were estimated to 30%, 66% and 57%, respectively, relative to the clearance for CYP2D6*1. Notably, rs5758550 is in high linkage disequilibrium (R² > 0.85) with at least 24 other SNPs and cannot be assigned as a functional SNP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CYP2D6*2 and CYP2D6*35 encode reduced risperidone clearance, and the extent of reduction for CYP2D6*2 is differentiated by rs5758550. Genotyping of these haplotypes might improve the precision of genotype-guided prediction of CYP2D6-mediated clearance.</p>","PeriodicalId":11857,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11393095/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141497498","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Consumers' knowledge and experiences of adverse drug reaction reporting in Australia: a national survey.","authors":"Mohammed Gebre Dedefo, Renly Lim, Gizat M Kassie, Elizabeth Roughead, Lisa Kalisch Ellett","doi":"10.1007/s00228-024-03729-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00228-024-03729-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to investigate the current knowledge and experiences of consumers in Australia on adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting and their reasons for reporting or not reporting ADRs, with a focus on the use of digital tools for ADR reporting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among adults who had taken medicine in Australia. A structured questionnaire with multiple choice or Likert scale responses with an option for participants to provide free-text responses and pretested for face validity was used. Consumer characteristics, knowledge, and ADR reporting practices were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 544 survey responses were included in the analysis. The majority of respondents were women (68%), and 22% were aged between 65 and 74 years. Fifty-eight percent (n = 317) of respondents knew that they could report ADRs to either the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), state or territory government health department, or healthcare professionals. Three-quarters (n = 405) of respondents stated that they had experienced an ADR; of these, 36% reported an ADR to either the TGA, state or territory government health department, or healthcare professionals. Among those who reported ADRs, 58% were unaware that they could use digital tools to report ADRs. The main reason for not reporting was that they did not think the ADR was serious enough to report (39%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Over half of consumers knew that they could report ADR; however, improved consumer awareness about using digital tools for ADR reporting and increased ADR reporting is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":11857,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11393011/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141589946","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"No evidence of clinical efficacy of oxomemazine in cough, according to a systematic review.","authors":"Trystan Bacon, Clara Blanchard, Estelle Dubois, Hélène Vaillant-Roussel, Rémy Boussageon","doi":"10.1007/s00228-024-03716-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00228-024-03716-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cough is a prevalent symptom driving patients to seek medical attention in general practice. Despite its widespread use, the clinical efficacy of oxomemazine, the second most reimbursed molecule in France for symptomatic cough treatment, remains uncertain. This study aims to systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of oxomemazine in cough.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted according to the Rebuild the Evidence Base (REB) protocol. Clinical trials comparing the efficacy of oxomemazine versus placebo or active comparator in cough were searched for. Trials with insufficient data were excluded. Searches were conducted across major databases (Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase) and trial registries (World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov). RCTs comparing oxomemazine versus placebo or active comparators in cough were sought. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's RoB2 tool. The protocol was preregistered on PROSPERO under the number CRD42022345496 (15). This study received no funding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No RCTs were at low risk of bias. Therefore, no meta-analysis was conducted, in accordance to the pre-specified protocol.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review highlights the lack of evidence regarding the efficacy of oxomemazine in cough treatment and underscores the need for further well-designed clinical trials to inform its clinical utility in primary care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":11857,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141626334","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Risk of renal impairment in atypical antipsychotics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Leong Tung Ong, Nicholas Ming Zher Chee, Audrey Joe Chii Loh","doi":"10.1007/s00228-024-03714-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00228-024-03714-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Atypical antipsychotics are associated with several adverse effects including metabolic syndrome, weight gain, QTc interval prolongation, and extrapyramidal effects. This study aims to investigate the risk of renal impairment in patients receiving atypical antipsychotics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted via PubMed and Ovid SP and Web of Science to retrieve studies reporting the risk of renal impairment in patients receiving atypical antipsychotic treatment. The pooled risk ratio (RR) of renal impairment and the subgroup analysis was calculated using the random-effects generic inverse variance method in Cochrane Review Manager.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4 studies involving 514,710 patients (221, 873 patients on atypical antipsychotics/CKD and 292, 837 controls) were included in this meta-analysis. Patients on atypical antipsychotics exhibited an increased risk of renal impairment, with a pooled risk ratio of 1.34 (95%CI 1.23-1.47). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that atypical antipsychotic use was associated with an increased risk of both acute kidney injury (AKI) (RR 1.51, 95%CI 1.34-1.71) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) (RR: 1.23, 95%CI 1.12-1.35).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients receiving atypical antipsychotics have an increased risk of renal impairment. Quetiapine carries the highest risk of renal impairment encompassing both AKI and CKD.</p>","PeriodicalId":11857,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141445909","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Is atezolizumab plus bevacizumab as first-line therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma superior to lenvatinib? a systematic review and meta‑analysis.","authors":"Gang Zhu, Longfei Zeng, Liu Yang, Xin Zhang, Jinquan Tang, Yong Pan, Bo Li, Mengchen Chen, Tao Wu","doi":"10.1007/s00228-024-03718-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00228-024-03718-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This meta-analysis was dedicated to evaluating the effectiveness and safety of Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab (Atez/Bev) and Lenvatinib (LEN) as first-line systematic therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The prospective protocol for this study was registered with the PROSPERO (Registration number: CRD42022356874). Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, EMBASE database Cochrane Library, and Web Science to determine all clinical controlled studies that reported Atez/Bev and LEN for treating u-HCC. We. evaluated as primary end-point overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), as well as other outcomes such as tumor response and adverse events (AEs).Quality assessment and data extraction of studies were conducted independently by three reviewers. Mean difference (MD) and odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a fixed-effects or random-effects model. The meta-analysis was performed with RevMan 5.3 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>12 retrospective cohort studies (RCSs) involving a total of 4948 patients were finally included. The results showed that compared with LEN, Atez/Bev can improve the patient's PFS (HR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.72 ~ 0.88; p < 0.0001) and reduce the rate of overall AEs (OR = 0.46 95% CI: 0.38 ~ 0.55, p < 0.00001) and grade ≥ 3 AEs (OR = 0.43; 95% CI: 0.36 ~ 0.51, p < 0.00001), while there is no difference between OS and treatment responses rate (objective response rate, disease control rate, complete response, partial response, progressive disease, and stable disease) between two groups. In addition, the subgroup analysis shows that Atez/Bev can promote the OS of patients with viral hepatitis. (HR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.67 ~ 0.95; p = 0.01), while LEN has an advantage in improving OS in patients with Child-Pugh grade B liver function (HR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.50 ~ 2.63; p < 0.00001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current evidence shows that compared with LEN, Atez/Bev has more advantages in PFS and safety in treating u-HCC and can improve the OS of patients with viral. LEN has advantages in improving the OS of patients with grade B liver function. However, more multicenter randomized controlled experiments are needed in the future to verify our results.</p>","PeriodicalId":11857,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141440325","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Effect of subcutaneous vs. intravenous tocilizumab in patients with severe COVID-19: a systematic review.","authors":"Yun Li, Xianlin Li, Xiaojun Zheng","doi":"10.1007/s00228-024-03719-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00228-024-03719-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically evaluate the efficacy of subcutaneous tocilizumab in the treatment of patients with severe COVID-19 and provide evidence for the rational use of subcutaneous tocilizumab in patients with severe COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This meta-analysis was carried out in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CNKI, SinoMed, and Wanfang Medical Network electronic databases up to 11 January 2023 to identify relevant studies. To obtain the most recent clinical studies of subcutaneous injection of tocilizumab for the treatment of patients with severe COVID-19, we also searched the preprint platforms medRxiv and ChinaXiv. Furthermore, we searched ClinicalTrials.gov for relevant unpublished studies. The studies were screened based on the PICOS principle. The included studies were classified and evaluated for quality based on research type. The RevMan 5.3 software was used to conduct the meta-analysis, and a descriptive analysis was performed to examine relevant outcome indicators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five observational studies were obtained, involving a total of 498 patients (240 patients in the subcutaneous injection group and 258 patients in the intravenous injection group). All of the studies were of the highest quality. The meta-analysis of the included studies revealed that the mortality rate of patients who received subcutaneous tocilizumab to treat COVID-19 was not significantly higher than that of the intravenous injection group [23.3% (45/193) vs. 18.4% (39/212), RD = 0.06, 95% CI = - 0.01 ~ 0.13, P = 0.11]. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the proportion of patients requiring mechanical ventilation between the two groups [24.5% (35/143) vs. 22% (35/159), RD = 0.03, 95% CI = - 0.07 ~ 0.12, P = 0.56].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The meta-analyses do not provide evidence that subcutaneous and intravenous tocilizumab formulations for the treatment of severe COVID-19 infection differ regarding their effectiveness. Considering that the meta-analyses cannot replace an appropriately powered non-inferiority study, subcutaneous formulations still need to be used with caution and only when intravenous formulations are in short supply. At present, there is a lack of randomized controlled trials of subcutaneous injection of tocilizumab for the treatment of severe COVID-19, and more clinical research should be conducted.</p>","PeriodicalId":11857,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141456043","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}