Effectiveness and safety of concomitant use of direct oral anticoagulants and antiarrhythmic drugs: a systematic review of observational studies.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Fabian Maximilian Meinert, Jenny Dimakos, Thomas Günther Riemer, Antonios Douros
{"title":"Effectiveness and safety of concomitant use of direct oral anticoagulants and antiarrhythmic drugs: a systematic review of observational studies.","authors":"Fabian Maximilian Meinert, Jenny Dimakos, Thomas Günther Riemer, Antonios Douros","doi":"10.1007/s00228-025-03883-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Concomitant use of antiarrhythmic drugs (AAs) may affect the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) through pharmacokinetic interactions and other factors. Our systematic review aimed to provide an in-depth methodological assessment and synthesis of the available real-world evidence in the area.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched MEDLINE/PubMed and EMBASE from January 2011 to October 2024 for observational studies assessing the effectiveness (risk of stroke) and safety (risk of major bleeding) associated with concomitant use of DOACs and AAs. We assessed the risk of bias using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 17 relevant studies including overall 2,613,693 patients. For stroke, all six studies showed no increased risk associated with concomitant use of DOACs and AAs. For major bleeding, seven studies showed an increased risk associated with concomitant use of DOACs and AAs (up to 187%), four studies showed heterogeneous results depending on the specific AA, and six studies showed no increased risk. When considering only higher-quality studies (n = 6), there was no association with the risk of stroke (n = 3). There were associations with an increased risk of major bleeding for concomitant use of DOACs and diltiazem (n = 2) or verapamil (n = 1), while findings for concomitant use of DOACs and amiodarone were inconsistent (n = 3).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on the synthesis of higher-quality real-world evidence, concomitant use of AAs does not seem to impact the effectiveness of DOACs. Findings on safety possibly depend on the specific AA, with diltiazem showing the highest risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":11857,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"1409-1419"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12443910/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-025-03883-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Concomitant use of antiarrhythmic drugs (AAs) may affect the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) through pharmacokinetic interactions and other factors. Our systematic review aimed to provide an in-depth methodological assessment and synthesis of the available real-world evidence in the area.

Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE/PubMed and EMBASE from January 2011 to October 2024 for observational studies assessing the effectiveness (risk of stroke) and safety (risk of major bleeding) associated with concomitant use of DOACs and AAs. We assessed the risk of bias using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool.

Results: We identified 17 relevant studies including overall 2,613,693 patients. For stroke, all six studies showed no increased risk associated with concomitant use of DOACs and AAs. For major bleeding, seven studies showed an increased risk associated with concomitant use of DOACs and AAs (up to 187%), four studies showed heterogeneous results depending on the specific AA, and six studies showed no increased risk. When considering only higher-quality studies (n = 6), there was no association with the risk of stroke (n = 3). There were associations with an increased risk of major bleeding for concomitant use of DOACs and diltiazem (n = 2) or verapamil (n = 1), while findings for concomitant use of DOACs and amiodarone were inconsistent (n = 3).

Conclusions: Based on the synthesis of higher-quality real-world evidence, concomitant use of AAs does not seem to impact the effectiveness of DOACs. Findings on safety possibly depend on the specific AA, with diltiazem showing the highest risk.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

直接口服抗凝剂和抗心律失常药物同时使用的有效性和安全性:观察性研究的系统回顾。
导读:同时使用抗心律失常药物(AAs)可能会通过药代动力学相互作用等因素影响直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)的有效性和安全性。我们的系统综述旨在对该地区现有的真实证据进行深入的方法学评估和综合。方法:从2011年1月至2024年10月,我们系统地检索了MEDLINE/PubMed和EMBASE,以评估DOACs和AAs合用的有效性(卒中风险)和安全性(大出血风险)。我们使用非随机干预研究的偏倚风险(ROBINS-I)工具评估偏倚风险。结果:我们纳入了17项相关研究,共纳入2613693例患者。对于中风,所有六项研究均显示同时使用DOACs和AAs没有增加风险。对于大出血,7项研究显示DOACs和AAs同时使用增加了风险(高达187%),4项研究显示不同的结果,取决于特定的AA, 6项研究显示没有增加风险。当只考虑高质量的研究(n = 6)时,与卒中风险没有关联(n = 3)。同时使用DOACs和地尔硫卓(n = 2)或维拉帕米(n = 1)与大出血风险增加相关,而同时使用DOACs和胺碘酮的结果不一致(n = 3)。结论:基于高质量真实证据的综合,同时使用AAs似乎不会影响doac的有效性。安全性的研究结果可能取决于特定的AA,地尔硫卓显示出最高的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology publishes original papers on all aspects of clinical pharmacology and drug therapy in humans. Manuscripts are welcomed on the following topics: therapeutic trials, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, pharmacogenetics, drug metabolism, adverse drug reactions, drug interactions, all aspects of drug development, development relating to teaching in clinical pharmacology, pharmacoepidemiology, and matters relating to the rational prescribing and safe use of drugs. Methodological contributions relevant to these topics are also welcomed. Data from animal experiments are accepted only in the context of original data in man reported in the same paper. EJCP will only consider manuscripts describing the frequency of allelic variants in different populations if this information is linked to functional data or new interesting variants. Highly relevant differences in frequency with a major impact in drug therapy for the respective population may be submitted as a letter to the editor. Straightforward phase I pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic studies as parts of new drug development will only be considered for publication if the paper involves -a compound that is interesting and new in some basic or fundamental way, or -methods that are original in some basic sense, or -a highly unexpected outcome, or -conclusions that are scientifically novel in some basic or fundamental sense.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信