Ethics & International Affairs最新文献_第6页

Solidarity in Place? Hope and Despair in Postpandemic Membership 团结一致?大流行后成员国的希望与绝望

IF 1.3 3区哲学

Ethics & International Affairs Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1017/S0892679422000491

Ayelet Shachar

{"title":"Solidarity in Place? Hope and Despair in Postpandemic Membership","authors":"Ayelet Shachar","doi":"10.1017/S0892679422000491","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0892679422000491","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Initially portrayed as the “great equalizer,” the COVID-19 pandemic has proved anything but. This essay recounts the sobering social disparities and vulnerabilities that the pandemic has exposed, especially when it comes to the inequalities that are baked into existing membership regimes, before turning to narratives of hope and democratic renewal. My discussion shines a spotlight on the relationship between borders, (im)mobility, and struggles for recognition and inclusion that have long been central to the practice of citizenship. Focusing on pathways to the acquisition of full membership status for those who are currently denied it, I will deploy logics and policies that have already begun to take shape in different parts of the world, with the goal of amplifying their effects and multiplying their scale. I identify three possible trajectories for postpandemic recovery, two of which offer ways to enhance equality of status and public standing by enlarging the circle of membership: first, through contribution (or what I will term “jus contribuere”), and second, by highlighting what we might call “solidarity in place.” The third reaction, which we might call the “stratification of membership,” pulls in the opposite direction by sharply redrawing the lines—legal, economic, social—that have distinguished insiders from outsiders, and exacerbated patterns of stratification and inequality of status and opportunity that predate the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":11772,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & International Affairs","volume":"6 1","pages":"487 - 504"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85701606","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Sharing Responsibility: The History and Future of Protection from Atrocities, Luke Glanville (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2021), 240 pp., cloth $39.95, eBook $39.95. 《共同责任:暴行保护的历史与未来》，卢克·格兰维尔著(普林斯顿，新泽西州:普林斯顿大学出版社，2021年)，240页，布面39.95美元，电子书39.95美元。

IF 1.3 3区哲学

Ethics & International Affairs Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1017/S0892679422000223

M. Labonte

引用次数: 1

EIA volume 36 issue 1 Cover and Front matter 环境影响评估第36卷第1期封面和正面事项

IF 1.3 3区哲学

Ethics & International Affairs Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1017/s0892679422000077

引用次数: 0

EIA volume 36 issue 1 Cover and Back matter 环境影响评估第36卷第1期封面和封底

IF 1.3 3区哲学

Ethics & International Affairs Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1017/s0892679422000089

引用次数: 0

EIA volume 36 issue 3 Cover and Back matter 环境影响评估第36卷第3期封面和封底

IF 1.3 3区哲学

Ethics & International Affairs Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1017/s0892679422000442

引用次数: 0

Communities and Climate Change: Why Practices and Practitioners Matter 社区与气候变化:为什么实践和从业者很重要

IF 1.3 3区哲学

Ethics & International Affairs Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1017/S089267942200020X

Marco Grix, K. Watene

{"title":"Communities and Climate Change: Why Practices and Practitioners Matter","authors":"Marco Grix, K. Watene","doi":"10.1017/S089267942200020X","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S089267942200020X","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Communities most vulnerable to the effects of climate change, such as reduced access to material resources and increased exposure to adverse weather conditions, are intimately tied to a considerable amount of cultural and biological diversity on our planet. Much of that diversity is bound up in the social practices of Indigenous groups, which is why these practices have great long-term value. Yet, little attention has been given to them by philosophers. Also neglected have been the historical conditions and contemporary realities that constrain these practices and devalue the knowledge of their practitioners. In this essay, we make the case for preserving a diverse range of social practices worldwide, and we argue that this is possible only by strengthening the communities of practitioners who enact them in the contexts in which they are adaptive. By concentrating on Indigenous communities, we show how focusing on practices can transform how Indigenous and other local communities are represented in global climate-change conversations and policy as a matter of justice. More specifically, we argue that practice-centered thinking and local practices provide critical insights for determining the extent to which climate policies protect and enable transformative change.","PeriodicalId":11772,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & International Affairs","volume":"17 1","pages":"215 - 230"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74326154","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

EIA volume 36 issue 3 Cover and Front matter 环境影响评估第36卷第3期封面和封面事项

IF 1.3 3区哲学

Ethics & International Affairs Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1017/s0892679422000430

引用次数: 0

Parties, Democracy, and the Ideal of Anti-factionalism: Past Anxieties and Present Challenges 政党、民主和反派性的理想:过去的焦虑和现在的挑战

IF 1.3 3区哲学

Ethics & International Affairs Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1017/S089267942200051X

D. Ragazzoni

{"title":"Parties, Democracy, and the Ideal of Anti-factionalism: Past Anxieties and Present Challenges","authors":"D. Ragazzoni","doi":"10.1017/S089267942200051X","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S089267942200051X","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This essay weaves together the history of political and legal thought, contemporary democratic theory, and recent debates in legal scholarship to examine the ambivalent relationship between political parties and democracy. Celebrated as a structural necessity for the mechanics of democratic government, political parties are also handled with suspicion for their hybrid nature—neither entirely public nor completely private—and for their always-possible regression into factions. Anti-factionalism, I show, has been a powerful ideal driving constitutional imagination and practice over the centuries, from antiquity (with its emphasis on parts and its horror over factions), to the age of democratic revolutions (with its signature anxieties about divisions), up through the present. However, this long historical process has not extinguished the long-lived concern with the nature and implications of party spirit, nor has it made party democracy completely safe from revamped forms of factionalism. Two manifestations of factional politics stand out in the contemporary political landscape: authoritarian regime changes and populist constitutionalism. While the former is easy to diagnose but hard to prevent, the latter exemplifies a torsion of the constitutional and democratic imagination from within. Despite their differences, both scenarios remind us that constitutions need to envision mechanisms to prevent parties from undermining the liberal democratic order they have been designed to serve. At the same time, they call for renewed attention to the study of parties in the domains of democratic theory and constitutional scholarship.","PeriodicalId":11772,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & International Affairs","volume":"13 1","pages":"475 - 485"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77577977","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

EIA volume 36 issue 2 Cover and Front matter 环境影响评估第36卷第2期封面和正面事项

IF 1.3 3区哲学

Ethics & International Affairs Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1017/s0892679422000259

引用次数: 0

Healing Liberal Democracies: The Role of Restorative Constitutionalism 治愈自由民主:恢复性宪政的作用

IF 1.3 3区哲学

Ethics & International Affairs Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1017/S089267942200048X

Rosalind Dixon, David E. Landau

{"title":"Healing Liberal Democracies: The Role of Restorative Constitutionalism","authors":"Rosalind Dixon, David E. Landau","doi":"10.1017/S089267942200048X","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S089267942200048X","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This brief essay contrasts two modes of constitutional change: abusive constitutional projects that seek to erode democracy and restorative constitutional projects that aim to repair eroded democratic constitutional orders. Constitutional democracies are eroded and restored via the same mechanisms: formal processes of constitutional amendment and replacement, legislative amendment, changes to executive policies and practices (or respect for conventions), and processes of judicial decision-making. Under the right conditions, abusive uses of these mechanisms for antidemocratic ends can be reversed by prodemocratic or restorative uses. The more difficult question is what kinds of political discourses are most likely to sustain successful processes of democratic rebuilding. In recent work, we have pointed to the role sometimes played by liberal democratic discourses as purported justifications for processes of abusive constitutional change: we label this the rise of “abusive constitutional borrowing.” Less well understood are the kind of discourses likely to sustain successful democratic healing or rebuilding. Often, the most popular discourse is a restorative one, which focuses on repairing damage caused by authoritarians and returning to a constitutional status quo ante. In this essay, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of restorative constitutionalism as a response to prior episodes of democratic erosion.","PeriodicalId":11772,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & International Affairs","volume":"141 1","pages":"427 - 435"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78766042","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0