Ethics & International Affairs最新文献_第10页

Contributors 贡献者

IF 1.3 3区哲学

Ethics & International Affairs Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1017/s0892679421000174

引用次数: 0

EIA volume 35 issue 2 Cover and Back matter 环境影响评估第35卷第2期封面及封底

IF 1.3 3区哲学

Ethics & International Affairs Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1017/s0892679421000277

引用次数: 0

Subversive Future Seeks Like-Minded Model: On the Mismatch between Visions of Food Sovereignty Futures and Quantified Scenarios of Global Food Futures 颠覆性的未来寻求志同道合的模型:关于粮食主权未来愿景与全球粮食未来量化情景之间的不匹配

IF 1.3 3区哲学

Ethics & International Affairs Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1017/S0892679421000071

Y. Saghai

{"title":"Subversive Future Seeks Like-Minded Model: On the Mismatch between Visions of Food Sovereignty Futures and Quantified Scenarios of Global Food Futures","authors":"Y. Saghai","doi":"10.1017/S0892679421000071","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0892679421000071","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Will we, by 2050, be able to feed a rapidly growing population with healthy and sustainably grown food in a world threatened by systemic environmental crises? There are too many uncertainties for us to predict the long-term evolution of the global agri-food system, but we can explore a wide range of futures to inform policymaking and public debate on the future of food. This is typically done by creating scenarios (story lines that vividly describe what different futures could look like) and quantifying them with computer simulation models to get numerical estimates of how different aspects of the global agri-food system might evolve under different hypotheses. Among the many scenarios produced over the last twenty years, one would expect to see the future advocated by the food sovereignty movement, which claims to represent roughly two hundred million self-described “peasants” (small farmers) worldwide. This movement defends a vision of the future based on relocalized, sustainable, and just agri-food systems, self-governed through direct and participatory democratic processes. Yet, food sovereignty is conspicuously absent from quantified scenarios of global food futures. As part of the roundtable, “Ethics and the Future of the Global Food System,” this essay identifies seven obstacles that undermine the creation of food sovereignty scenarios by examining two attempts at crafting such scenarios.","PeriodicalId":11772,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & International Affairs","volume":"243 1","pages":"51 - 67"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77419370","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Rethinking the Nature of States and Political Violence 重新思考国家与政治暴力的本质

IF 1.3 3区哲学

Ethics & International Affairs Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1017/S0892679421000125

Adam Henschke

引用次数: 1

Contributors 贡献者

IF 1.3 3区哲学

Ethics & International Affairs Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1017/s0892679421000496

Péter Bálint

引用次数: 0

The Neglected North Korean Crisis: Women's Rights 被忽视的朝鲜危机:妇女权利

IF 1.3 3区哲学

Ethics & International Affairs Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1017/s0892679421000010

Sea Young Kim, Leif-Eric Easley

引用次数: 0

EIA volume 35 issue 2 Cover and Front matter 环境影响评估第35卷第2期封面和正面事项

IF 1.3 3区哲学

Ethics & International Affairs Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1017/s0892679421000265

引用次数: 0

Introduction: Is a Military Really Worth Having? 简介:军队真的值得拥有吗?

IF 1.3 3区哲学

Ethics & International Affairs Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1017/S0892679421000368

Péter Bálint

{"title":"Introduction: Is a Military Really Worth Having?","authors":"Péter Bálint","doi":"10.1017/S0892679421000368","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0892679421000368","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Just war theory has traditionally focused on jus ad bellum (the justice of war) and jus in bello (justice in war). What has been neglected is the question of jus ante bellum, or justice before war. In particular: Under what circumstances is it justifiable for a polity to prepare for war by militarizing? When (if ever) and why (if at all) is it morally permissible or even obligatory to create and maintain the potential to wage war? What are the alternatives to the military? And if we do have militaries, how should they be arranged, trained, and equipped? These considerations are not about whether war making is justified, but about whether war building is justified. In Ethics, Security, and the War-Machine, Ned Dobos argues that we have not sufficiently calculated the true (noneconomic) costs of the military, and that if we did, having a standing defense force would not seem like as good an idea. Dobos pushes us to reflect on something we have taken for granted: that one of the biggest institutions in our society, which is supposed to keep us safe and allow us to lead our own lives, may in fact pose great dangers and risks to us physically, morally, and culturally. The essays in this symposium take Dobos's work as a starting point and show the importance, complexity, and richness of this new strand of ethical inquiry.","PeriodicalId":11772,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & International Affairs","volume":"42 1","pages":"343 - 352"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78796223","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Deconstructing Nonviolence and the War-Machine: Unarmed Coups, Nonviolent Power, and Armed Resistance 解构非暴力与战争机器:非武装政变、非暴力力量与武装抵抗

IF 1.3 3区哲学

Ethics & International Affairs Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1017/S0892679421000423

C. Finlay

{"title":"Deconstructing Nonviolence and the War-Machine: Unarmed Coups, Nonviolent Power, and Armed Resistance","authors":"C. Finlay","doi":"10.1017/S0892679421000423","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0892679421000423","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Proponents of nonviolent tactics often highlight the extent to which they rival arms as effective means of resistance. Erica Chenoweth and Maria Stephan, for instance, compare civil resistance favorably to armed insurrection as means of bringing about progressive political change. In Ethics, Security, and the War-Machine, Ned Dobos cites their work in support of the claim that similar methods—organized according to Gene Sharp's idea of “civilian-based defense”—may be substituted for regular armed forces in the face of international aggression. I deconstruct this line of pacifist thought by arguing that it builds on the wrong binary. Turning away from a violence-nonviolence dichotomy structured around harmfulness, I look to Richard B. Gregg and Hannah Arendt for an account of nonviolent power defined by non-coercion. Whereas nonviolent coercion in the wrong hands still has the potential to subvert democratic institutions—just as armed methods can—Gregg's and Arendt's conceptions of nonviolent power identify a necessary bulwark against both forms of subversion. The dangers of nonviolent coercion can be seen in the largely nonviolent attempts at civil subversion by supporters of Donald Trump during Trump's attempts to overturn the results of the U.S. presidential election in 2020, while the effectiveness of noncoercive, nonviolent power is illustrated by the resistance of U.S. democratic institutions to resist them.","PeriodicalId":11772,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & International Affairs","volume":"17 1","pages":"421 - 433"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86165837","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

EIA volume 35 issue 3 Cover and Back matter 环评第35卷第3期封面及封底

IF 1.3 3区哲学

Ethics & International Affairs Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1017/s0892679421000484

引用次数: 0