Proceedings of Software Process 1996最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Interrater agreement in SPICE-based assessments: some preliminary results 基于spice的评估中评估者的一致性:一些初步结果
Proceedings of Software Process 1996 Pub Date : 1996-12-02 DOI: 10.1109/ICSP.1996.565032
K. E. Emam, Dennis R. Goldenson, Lionel Briand, P. Marshall
{"title":"Interrater agreement in SPICE-based assessments: some preliminary results","authors":"K. E. Emam, Dennis R. Goldenson, Lionel Briand, P. Marshall","doi":"10.1109/ICSP.1996.565032","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSP.1996.565032","url":null,"abstract":"The international SPICE Project intends to deliver an ISO standard on software process assessment. This project is unique in software engineering standards in that there is a set of empirical trials, the objectives of which are to evaluate the prospective standard and provide feedback before standardization. One of the enduring issues being evaluated during the trials is the reliability of assessments based on SPICE. One element of reliability is the extent to which different teams assessing the same processes produce similar ratings when presented with the same evidence. We present some preliminary results from two assessments conducted during the SPICE trials. In each of these assessments two independent teams performed the same ratings. The results indicate that in general there is at least moderate agreement between the two teams in both cases. When we take into account the severity of disagreement then the extent of agreement between the two teams is almost perfect. Also, our results indicated that interrater agreement is not the same for different SPICE processes. The findings reported in this paper provide guidance for future studies of interrater agreement in the SPICE trials and also indicate some potential issues that need to be considered within the prospective standard.","PeriodicalId":115379,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of Software Process 1996","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1996-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131898087","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28
A study in process simplification 过程简化的研究
Proceedings of Software Process 1996 Pub Date : 1996-12-02 DOI: 10.1109/ICSP.1996.565022
A. Dandekar, D. Perry, L. Votta
{"title":"A study in process simplification","authors":"A. Dandekar, D. Perry, L. Votta","doi":"10.1109/ICSP.1996.565022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSP.1996.565022","url":null,"abstract":"One of the major problems with software development processes is their complexity. Hence, one of the primary motivations in process improvement is the simplification of these complex processes. We report a study to explore various simplification approaches and techniques. We used the available process documentation, questionnaires and interviews, and a set of process visualization tool fragments (pfv) to gain an understanding of the process under examination. We then used three basic analysis techniques to locate candidates for simplification and improvement: value added analysis, time usage analysis, and alternatives analysis. All three approaches proved effective in isolating problem areas for improvement. The proposed simplifications resulted in a savings of 20% in cost, 20% in human effort, 40% in elapse time, and a 30% reduction in the number of activities.","PeriodicalId":115379,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of Software Process 1996","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1996-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122101546","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信