{"title":"过程简化的研究","authors":"A. Dandekar, D. Perry, L. Votta","doi":"10.1109/ICSP.1996.565022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the major problems with software development processes is their complexity. Hence, one of the primary motivations in process improvement is the simplification of these complex processes. We report a study to explore various simplification approaches and techniques. We used the available process documentation, questionnaires and interviews, and a set of process visualization tool fragments (pfv) to gain an understanding of the process under examination. We then used three basic analysis techniques to locate candidates for simplification and improvement: value added analysis, time usage analysis, and alternatives analysis. All three approaches proved effective in isolating problem areas for improvement. The proposed simplifications resulted in a savings of 20% in cost, 20% in human effort, 40% in elapse time, and a 30% reduction in the number of activities.","PeriodicalId":115379,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of Software Process 1996","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A study in process simplification\",\"authors\":\"A. Dandekar, D. Perry, L. Votta\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSP.1996.565022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the major problems with software development processes is their complexity. Hence, one of the primary motivations in process improvement is the simplification of these complex processes. We report a study to explore various simplification approaches and techniques. We used the available process documentation, questionnaires and interviews, and a set of process visualization tool fragments (pfv) to gain an understanding of the process under examination. We then used three basic analysis techniques to locate candidates for simplification and improvement: value added analysis, time usage analysis, and alternatives analysis. All three approaches proved effective in isolating problem areas for improvement. The proposed simplifications resulted in a savings of 20% in cost, 20% in human effort, 40% in elapse time, and a 30% reduction in the number of activities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":115379,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of Software Process 1996\",\"volume\":\"97 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of Software Process 1996\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSP.1996.565022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of Software Process 1996","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSP.1996.565022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
One of the major problems with software development processes is their complexity. Hence, one of the primary motivations in process improvement is the simplification of these complex processes. We report a study to explore various simplification approaches and techniques. We used the available process documentation, questionnaires and interviews, and a set of process visualization tool fragments (pfv) to gain an understanding of the process under examination. We then used three basic analysis techniques to locate candidates for simplification and improvement: value added analysis, time usage analysis, and alternatives analysis. All three approaches proved effective in isolating problem areas for improvement. The proposed simplifications resulted in a savings of 20% in cost, 20% in human effort, 40% in elapse time, and a 30% reduction in the number of activities.