Digital JournalismPub Date : 2026-07-23DOI: 10.1080/21670811.2026.2706052
Steen Steensen,Bente Kalsnes,Håvard Kiberg,Gunhild Ring Olsen,Lasha Kavtaradze
{"title":"News Diversity Across Platforms. A Large-Scale Analysis of the Norwegian News Media Market","authors":"Steen Steensen,Bente Kalsnes,Håvard Kiberg,Gunhild Ring Olsen,Lasha Kavtaradze","doi":"10.1080/21670811.2026.2706052","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2026.2706052","url":null,"abstract":"This article examines how topic diversity in Norwegian news media varies across proprietary and social media platforms. Drawing on a comprehensive dataset of 224,905 articles published in 2023 by 22 Norwegian news outlets, and corresponding posts on Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok, the study employs Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic modeling to identify and compare thematic patterns. Results reveal systematic adaptations to platform-specific logics: while the outlets’ online news sites maintain broad topical diversity, they favour politics and human-interest stories on Facebook, personalised and entertainment-oriented content on Instagram, and sensationalist, event-driven topics on TikTok. Statistical diversity measures confirm that the outlets’ social media posts display lower topical diversity than their online articles. These findings demonstrate that editorial strategies align with distinct platform logics, contributing to a segmented news environment. The study argues that such differentiation has implications for the democratic role of journalism, as audiences encounter increasingly platform-tailored representations of news.","PeriodicalId":11166,"journal":{"name":"Digital Journalism","volume":"218 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2026-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149003583","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Digital JournalismPub Date : 2026-07-22DOI: 10.1080/21670811.2026.2706053
Petra Petruccio,Julia Niemann-Lenz,Tim Schatto-Eckrodt
{"title":"AI Automated Publishing in Social Media Journalism: Is News Content on Facebook Becoming Softer?","authors":"Petra Petruccio,Julia Niemann-Lenz,Tim Schatto-Eckrodt","doi":"10.1080/21670811.2026.2706053","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2026.2706053","url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated the impact of AI-driven automated publishing services (APSs) on the editorial character of news content disseminated via Facebook. While previous research suggests that human editors adapt news to social media logic, which often results in news softening, the specific influence of APSs on this process remains unexplored. As German newsrooms increasingly implement APSs, editorial decisions are partially transferred to algorithms that select, adapt, and publish news based on publishers’ content feeds. This automation raises concerns about potential erosion of journalistic standards and the systematic alteration of news content on social media platforms. Our analysis encompasses 2.6 million Facebook posts from 44 German news outlets; the posts were published between 2018 and 2023. We found that, in 2023, 57% of these outlets used APSs; however, they primarily used a semi-automated approach that allows manual oversight of topic selection and stylistic adaptation. Notably, APSs are associated with a marginally higher likelihood of sharing politically relevant content that generally contains less emotional language, contradicting the prevailing expectations of news softening. These results suggest that algorithmic efficiency, paired with human oversight and configurable editorial settings, can support news quality and serve journalism’s democratic function.","PeriodicalId":11166,"journal":{"name":"Digital Journalism","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2026-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149003593","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Digital JournalismPub Date : 2026-07-21DOI: 10.1080/21670811.2026.2700581
Zhengyi Liang,Jaeho Cho
{"title":"Complicating Wisdom of Crowds: News Sources Reveal Political Bias in Wikipedia Biographies","authors":"Zhengyi Liang,Jaeho Cho","doi":"10.1080/21670811.2026.2700581","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2026.2700581","url":null,"abstract":"With the rise of partisan media and ideologically segregated news feeds on social media, balanced information is much needed for citizens to reference when they engage in politics. This paper seeks to explore whether Wikipedia, a peer-production platform, can be an alternative source that offers politically balanced information. By analyzing news references in the Wikipedia biographies of U.S. elected officials, we find evidence of a moderate but significant liberal bias, with liberal media sources cited more extensively than conservative ones across the pages of both Democrats and Republicans. We then discover that the bias in terms of the use of news citations is significantly associated with workload diversity and communication influence during the process of crowd editing. Our findings contribute to the emerging literature on bias in peer-production communities and shed light on the influence of digital media on collaborative knowledge production. Furthermore, our results challenge the belief that political neutrality can be safely assumed from collaborative editing, offering implications for digital journalism on how to produce more balanced, two-sided information.","PeriodicalId":11166,"journal":{"name":"Digital Journalism","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2026-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149003584","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Digital JournalismPub Date : 2026-07-20DOI: 10.1080/21670811.2026.2704019
Minna Koivula,Pinja Päivänen,Mikko Villi
{"title":"Data, Institutional Logics and Journalism’s Chase After the Paying Subscriber","authors":"Minna Koivula,Pinja Päivänen,Mikko Villi","doi":"10.1080/21670811.2026.2704019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2026.2704019","url":null,"abstract":"Digital data has become pervasive in news organizations’ operating environment, yet the institutional logics literature in journalism studies has not adequately accounted for data’s increased role in the field. Consequently, this study asks what is the role of digital data for the instantiation of institutional logics in the everyday work of journalists, and, more broadly, how journalism as an institution adapts to the prevalence of data. Empirically, we make use of observational material from two Finnish newsrooms, comprising over 110 h of fieldwork. Our findings show that journalists use data to justify their actions and to legitimate their organization’s standing, but that data also induces more work for them. In aggregate, the findings reflect how in an environment saturated by data, journalists in our case studies tended to invoke the market logic over other logics (e.g., professional). Additionally, we draw attention to quantified notions of management in newsrooms and suggest methodological refinements to the study of institutional logics in journalism.","PeriodicalId":11166,"journal":{"name":"Digital Journalism","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2026-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149003592","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Digital JournalismPub Date : 2026-07-18DOI: 10.1080/21670811.2026.2704009
Kostiantyn Yanchenko,Tetiana Gordiienko
{"title":"Adapt or Give Up: How Ukrainian Newsrooms Responded to the Termination of USAID Media Development Aid","authors":"Kostiantyn Yanchenko,Tetiana Gordiienko","doi":"10.1080/21670811.2026.2704009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2026.2704009","url":null,"abstract":"The dismantling of USAID in 2025 triggered one of the largest disruptions to media development efforts in decades. While posing serious risks to the sustainability of independent journalism worldwide, this event also underscored the need to better understand how media organizations reliant on foreign aid adapt to its sudden withdrawal. Drawing on the literature on media development and organizational adaptation, this study investigates the strategies, constraints, and outcomes of adaptation among Ukrainian digital newsrooms. Semi-structured interviews with 27 senior representatives from a diverse range of Ukrainian media organizations revealed that the effects of USAID’s funding termination were distributed unevenly, leading to substantial variations in the newsrooms’ capacity to adapt. The interaction between environmental (external) and organizational (internal) factors influenced the choice and effectiveness of specific adaptation strategies. The study findings also show how the withdrawal of USAID aid destabilized the wider media-support environment, weakening cross-sectoral networks and exposing media organizations to political and commercial pressures. The article will be of interest to researchers and media development practitioners, particularly in contexts affected by armed conflicts and funding cuts.","PeriodicalId":11166,"journal":{"name":"Digital Journalism","volume":"2019 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2026-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149003625","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Digital JournalismPub Date : 2026-07-16DOI: 10.1080/21670811.2026.2700585
Toni G. L. A. van der Meer,Michael Hameleers
{"title":"Is Misinformation All Around Us? Citizens’ Perceptions of Misinformation Nearness Regarding Its Span, Availability, and Accessibility","authors":"Toni G. L. A. van der Meer,Michael Hameleers","doi":"10.1080/21670811.2026.2700585","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2026.2700585","url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates to what extent and how people perceive misinformation as a proximate phenomenon that has infiltrated their everyday digital news domains. Via a survey (US and the Netherlands, N = 1396), that uniquely tasked people with providing hyperlinks to both misinformation and credible information, we explored the perceived span, availability, and accessibility of misinformation. First, citizens’ understanding of misinformation seems to be subject to concept creep as it extends beyond strictly false content by including biased and politically motivated information. Second, when identifying sources of misinformation, respondents more often pointed to mainstream and widely accessible sources, such as partisan news outlets and social media, rather than fringe or extremist sources. Third, misinformation is perceived to be easily obtainable, while credible information remains more accessible. These findings underscore high levels of perceived misinformation nearness among citizens, which could be concerning as it is found to correlate with estimations of misinformation as more threatening and omnipresent. This study highlights the challenges audiences experience when curating their digital news diets in ways that avoid contamination by misinformation and inaccuracies.","PeriodicalId":11166,"journal":{"name":"Digital Journalism","volume":"94 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2026-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149003619","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Digital JournalismPub Date : 2026-07-14DOI: 10.1080/21670811.2026.2700590
Nisha Sridharan
{"title":"“Living Amoeba of an Organization”: Organizational Bricolage as an Adaptive Strategy in Digital Journalism","authors":"Nisha Sridharan","doi":"10.1080/21670811.2026.2700590","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2026.2700590","url":null,"abstract":"Journalism’s future is often narrated through disruption and decline, yet this framing obscures the everyday creativity through which newswork persists under constraint. This article advances organizational bricolage as a lens for understanding adaptation in journalism, shifting attention from crisis-driven reactions to the generative practices through which journalists and newsrooms continually reconfigure themselves. Drawing on a multi-site ethnographic case study of three Monothematic News Organizations, the study shows how bricolage operates both at inception and in daily practice. Through anchoring in recognizable journalistic values, augmenting with nonprofit and alternative repertoires, and differentiating from antagonistic elements, MNOs craft legitimacy, resilience, and distinct editorial identities. Far from being resistant to change, journalists emerge as bricoleurs, improvising with the resources at hand to sustain mission-driven reporting. Theoretically, the study positions bricolage as a critical framework for rethinking adaptation, not as a reactive adjustment, but as an ongoing institutional formation. Practically, it highlights how bricolage enables small, precarious outlets to produce durable and innovative journalism, while also revealing its limitations amid the influence of funders, platform dominance, and systemic inequality. In doing so, the article reframes journalism as a profession that endures not despite uncertainty, but through continual acts of recomposition.","PeriodicalId":11166,"journal":{"name":"Digital Journalism","volume":"88 1","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2026-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149210852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Digital JournalismPub Date : 2026-07-14DOI: 10.1080/21670811.2026.2700594
Stephanie Geise,Yi Xu
{"title":"Through Different Lenses: Comparing AI-Generated Imagery and Press Photography in Visual War Representation","authors":"Stephanie Geise,Yi Xu","doi":"10.1080/21670811.2026.2700594","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2026.2700594","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11166,"journal":{"name":"Digital Journalism","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2026-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148899001","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Digital JournalismPub Date : 2026-07-13DOI: 10.1080/21670811.2026.2700586
Kenza Lamot,Tim Groot Kormelink,Tessel Bogaard
{"title":"Time Well Spent? Exploring Emotional Engagement with News Through Native Experience Sampling","authors":"Kenza Lamot,Tim Groot Kormelink,Tessel Bogaard","doi":"10.1080/21670811.2026.2700586","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2026.2700586","url":null,"abstract":"Audience analytics have become ubiquitous in contemporary newsrooms, yet metrics alone may offer a limited understanding of engagement. In response to calls to complement metrics with alternative methods, this study develops an innovative native experience sampling method (NESM) that simultaneously assesses the behavioral, emotional, and evaluative dimensions of engagement. Using pop-up questionnaires on the websites of Dutch and Belgian news brands NRC, Noordhollands Dagblad, and De Standaard (N = 1,241), we measured readers' emotional responses and perceptions of worthwhileness as they read an article. Our findings argue that for an article to be considered “Time Well Spent,” it must not only be consumed but also felt and valued: it should move readers (provoke an emotional response, whether positive or negative) and be purposeful and rewarding, addressing a distinct user need.","PeriodicalId":11166,"journal":{"name":"Digital Journalism","volume":"55 1","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2026-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149210835","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Digital JournalismPub Date : 2026-07-09DOI: 10.1080/21670811.2026.2700587
Huong Ha, Hong Tien Vu
{"title":"“Shamed,” “Embarrassed,” and “Skeptical”: How Inadvertently Sharing Fake News Influences Users’ Perceptions of the Information Environment and Social Media Use","authors":"Huong Ha, Hong Tien Vu","doi":"10.1080/21670811.2026.2700587","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2026.2700587","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11166,"journal":{"name":"Digital Journalism","volume":"167 2 1","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2026-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148416747","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}