Peter C Lind, Mikael F Vallentin, Asger Granfeldt, Lars W Andersen
{"title":"Re-evaluating intra-cardiac arrest adjunctive medications and routes of drug administration.","authors":"Peter C Lind, Mikael F Vallentin, Asger Granfeldt, Lars W Andersen","doi":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001206","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001206","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This narrative review summarizes the evidence for the most commonly used intra-cardiac arrest adjunctive medications and routes of administration and discusses promising new therapies from preclinical animal models.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Large trials on the administration of calcium as well as the combination of vasopressin and glucocorticoids during cardiac arrest have been published. Calcium administration during cardiopulmonary resuscitation does not improve outcomes and might cause harm. Vasopressin and glucocorticoid administration during cardiopulmonary resuscitation improve the chance of return of spontaneous circulation but has uncertain effects on survival. We identified a total of seven ongoing clinical trials investigating the potential role of bicarbonate, of vasopressin and glucocorticoids, and of intravenous versus intraosseous vascular access. Several medications such as levosimendan and inhaled nitric oxide show promise in preclinical studies, and clinical trials are either planned or actively recruiting.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Large trials on intra-cardiac arrest administration of calcium and vasopressin with glucocorticoids have been performed. Several trials are ongoing that will provide valuable insights into the potential benefit of other intra-cardiac arrest medications such as bicarbonate as well as the potential benefit of intravenous or intraosseous vascular access.</p>","PeriodicalId":10851,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142153356","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Spontaneous breathing trials: how and for how long?","authors":"Arnaud W Thille, François Arrivé, Sylvain Le Pape","doi":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001227","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000001227","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Guidelines recommend systematic performance of a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) before extubation in ICUs, the objective being to reduce the risk of reintubation. In theory, a more challenging SBT performed with a T-piece may further reduce the risk of reintubation, whereas a less challenging SBT performed with pressure-support ventilation (PSV) may hasten extubation.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent findings show that a more challenging SBT with a T-piece or for a prolonged duration do not help to reduce the risk of reintubation. In contrast, a less challenging SBT with PSV is easier to pass than a T-piece, and may hasten extubation without increased risk of reintubation. Although SBT with PSV and additional positive end-expiratory pressure is indeed a less challenging SBT, further studies are needed to generalize such an easy trial in daily practice. Earlier screening for a first SBT may also decrease time to extubation without increased risk of reintubation. Lastly, reconnection to the ventilator for a short period after successful SBT facilitates recovery from the SBT-induced alveolar derecruitment.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Several recent clinical trials have improved assessment of the most adequate way to perform SBT before extubation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10851,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142496659","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mattia Docci, Antenor Rodrigues, Sebastian Dubo, Matthew Ko, Laurent Brochard
{"title":"Does patient-ventilator asynchrony really matter?","authors":"Mattia Docci, Antenor Rodrigues, Sebastian Dubo, Matthew Ko, Laurent Brochard","doi":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001225","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000001225","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Past observational studies have reported the association between patient-ventilator asynchronies and poor clinical outcomes, namely longer duration of mechanical ventilation and higher mortality. But causality has remained undetermined. During the era of lung and diaphragm protective ventilation, should we revolutionize our clinical practice to detect and treat dyssynchrony?</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Clinicians' ability to recognize asynchronies is typically low. Automatized softwares based on artificial intelligence have been trained to largely outperform human eyesight and are close to be implemented at the bedside. There is growing evidence that in susceptible patients, dyssynchrony may lead to ventilation-induced lung injury (or patient self-inflicted lung injury) and that clusters of such dyssynchronous events have the highest association with poor outcomes. Dyssynchrony may also be associated with harm indirectly when it reflects over-assistance or over-sedation. However, the occurrence of reverse triggering by means of low inspiratory efforts during passive ventilation may prevent diaphragm dysfunction and atrophy and be beneficial.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Most recent evidence on the topic suggests that synchrony between the patient and the mechanical ventilator is a critical element for protecting lung and diaphragm during the time of invasive mechanical ventilation or may reflect inadequate settings or sedation. Therefore, it is a complex situation, and clinical trials are still needed to test the effectiveness of keeping patient-ventilator interaction synchronous on clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10851,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142496656","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Monitoring and modulating respiratory drive in mechanically ventilated patients.","authors":"Sebastián Consalvo, Matías Accoce, Irene Telias","doi":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001223","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000001223","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Respiratory drive is frequently deranged in the ICU, being associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Monitoring and modulating respiratory drive to prevent potentially injurious consequences merits attention. This review gives a general overview of the available monitoring tools and interventions to modulate drive.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Airway occlusion pressure (P0.1) is an excellent measure of drive and is displayed on ventilators. Respiratory drive can also be estimated based on the electrical activity of respiratory muscles and measures of respiratory effort; however, high respiratory drive might be present in the context of low effort with neuromuscular weakness. Modulating a deranged drive requires a multifaceted intervention, prioritizing treatment of the underlying cause and adjusting ventilator settings for comfort. Additional tools include changes in PEEP, peak inspiratory flow, fraction of inspired oxygen, and sweep gas flow (in patients receiving extracorporeal life-support). Sedatives and opioids have differential effects on drive according to drug category. Monitoring response to any intervention is warranted and modulating drive should not preclude readiness to wean assessment or delay ventilation liberation.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Monitoring and modulating respiratory drive are feasible based on physiological principles presented in this review. However, evidence arising from clinical trials will help determine precise thresholds and optimal interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10851,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142496658","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Acute diarrhea in the hospitalized immunocompromised patient: what is new on diagnostic and treatment?","authors":"Natalia E Castillo Almeida, Carlos A Gomez","doi":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001191","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001191","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This article aims to provide an intuitive framework for diagnosing and managing healthcare-associated diarrhea (HCAD) in the immunocompromised (IC) host.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Our understanding of diarrhea in hospitalized IC patients has significantly evolved. However, the challenge lies in distinguishing between these patients' numerous causes of diarrhea. The incorporation of gastrointestinal (GI) multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) panels has led to a paradigm shift in our approach to diarrhea. However, using these panels judiciously is of utmost importance, as their misuse can lead to over-testing, overtreatment, and increased hospital costs. We propose a stepwise diagnostic algorithm that ensures diagnostic stewardship, optimal patient care, and resource utilization.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Diarrhea is a common complication in hospitalized IC patients and is associated with significant morbidity and rare mortality. The advent of new diagnostics, such as GI multiplex PCR panels, holds promise in facilitating the detection of recognized pathogens and may allow for improved outcomes using pathogen-targeted therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10851,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11377059/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141733743","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Outcomes after acute kidney injury and critical illness.","authors":"Rachel Jeong, Ryan Haines, Marlies Ostermann","doi":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001183","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001183","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Acute kidney injury (AKI) in critical illness is common, and survivors are faced with a host of adverse outcomes. In this article, we review the current landscape of outcomes and care in survivors of AKI and critical illness.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Follow-up care of survivors of AKI and critical illness is prudent to monitor for and mitigate the risk of adverse outcomes. Observational data have suggested improvement in outcomes with nephrology-based follow-up care, and recent interventional studies demonstrate similar findings. However, current post-AKI care is suboptimal with various challenges, such as breakdowns in the transition of care during hospital episodes and into the community, barriers for patients in follow-up, and lack of identification of high-risk patients for nephrology-based follow-up. Tools predictive of renal nonrecovery and long-term outcomes may help to identify high-risk patients who may benefit the most from nephrology-based care post-AKI.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Follow-up care of survivors of AKI and critical illness may improve outcomes and there is a need to prioritize transitions of care into the community. Further research is needed to elucidate the best ways to risk-stratify and manage post-AKI survivors to improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10851,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141874432","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Patients with severe infections: how to improve their clinical management?","authors":"Andre C Kalil","doi":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001193","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000001193","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10851,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142153359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alexandra B Spicer, Alexandre B Cavalcanti, Fernando G Zampieri
{"title":"Subgroup analyses and heterogeneity of treatment effects in randomized trials: a primer for the clinician.","authors":"Alexandra B Spicer, Alexandre B Cavalcanti, Fernando G Zampieri","doi":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001186","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001186","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To date, most randomized clinical trials in critical care report neutral overall results. However, research as to whether heterogenous responses underlie these results and give opportunity for personalized care is gaining momentum but has yet to inform clinical practice guidance. Thus, we aim to provide an overview of methodological approaches to estimating heterogeneity of treatment effects in randomized trials and conjecture about future paths to application in patient care.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Despite their limitations, traditional subgroup analyses are still the most reported approach. More recent methods based on subphenotyping, risk modeling and effect modeling are still uncommonly embedded in primary reports of clinical trials but have provided useful insights in secondary analyses. However, further simulation studies and subsequent guidelines are needed to ascertain the most efficient and robust manner to validate these results for eventual use in practice.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>There is an increasing interest in approaches that can identify heterogeneity in treatment effects from randomized clinical trials, extending beyond traditional subgroup analyses. While prospective validation in further studies is still needed, these approaches are promising tools for design, interpretation, and implementation of clinical trial results.</p>","PeriodicalId":10851,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141987603","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"COVID-19 vs. non-COVID-19 related nosocomial pneumonias: any differences in etiology, prevalence, and mortality?","authors":"Ignacio Martin-Loeches, Marcos I Restrepo","doi":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001192","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001192","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review explores the similarities and differences between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related and non-COVID-related nosocomial pneumonia, particularly hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). It critically assesses the etiology, prevalence, and mortality among hospitalized patients, emphasizing the burden of these infections during the period before and after the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent studies highlight an increase in nosocomial infections during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a significant rise in cases involving severe bacterial and fungal superinfections among mechanically ventilated patients. These infections include a higher incidence of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs), complicating treatment and recovery. Notably, COVID-19 patients have shown a higher prevalence of VAP than those with influenza or other respiratory viruses, influenced by extended mechanical ventilation and immunosuppressive treatments like corticosteroids.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The findings suggest that COVID-19 has exacerbated the frequency and severity of nosocomial infections, particularly VAP. These complications not only extend hospital stays and increase healthcare costs but also lead to higher morbidity and mortality rates. Understanding these patterns is crucial for developing targeted preventive and therapeutic strategies to manage and mitigate nosocomial infections during regular or pandemic care.</p>","PeriodicalId":10851,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141987556","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Neuroprognostication, withdrawal of care and long-term outcomes after cardiopulmonary resuscitation.","authors":"Adela Bazbaz, Joseph Varon","doi":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001194","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001194","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Survivors of cardiac arrest often have increased long-term risks of mortality and disability that are primarily associated with hypoxic-ischemic brain injury (HIBI). This review aims to examine health-related long-term outcomes after cardiac arrest.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>A notable portion of cardiac arrest survivors face a decline in their quality of life, encountering persistent physical, cognitive, and mental health challenges emerging years after the initial event. Within the first-year postarrest, survivors are at elevated risk for stroke, epilepsy, and psychiatric conditions, along with a heightened susceptibility to developing dementia. Addressing these challenges necessitates establishing comprehensive, multidisciplinary care systems tailored to the needs of these individuals.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>HIBI remains the leading cause of disability among cardiac arrest survivors. No single strategy is likely to improve long term outcomes after cardiac arrest. A multimodal neuroprognostication approach (clinical examination, imaging, neurophysiology, and biomarkers) is recommended by guidelines, but fails to predict long-term outcomes. Cardiac arrest survivors often experience long-term disabilities that negatively impact their quality of life. The likelihood of such outcomes implements a multidisciplinary care an integral part of long-term recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":10851,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141987602","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}