{"title":"Which cardiovascular monitoring on veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.","authors":"Dieter F Dauwe, Bernd Saugel, Daniel De Backer","doi":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose review: </strong>To discuss the hemodynamic monitoring techniques to quantify cardiac output, to assess the adequacy of perfusion, and to evaluate cardiac as well as pump preload and fluid responsiveness in patients supported by veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). Echocardiography is essential in the hemodynamic assessment of VA-ECMO patients. However, intermittent echocardiography should be complemented by continuous, potentially nurse driven, monitoring techniques. We will focus on invasive and noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring methods beyond echocardiography.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Despite the importance of comprehensive hemodynamic monitoring in the provision of safe, adequate, and well balanced VA-ECMO support, limited data are currently available in this specific patient population. While some measurements (intravascular pressures, oxygen saturation) remain valid and provide important information on the hemodynamic state, measurements of cardiac output are invalid with many of the hemodynamic monitoring methods. Many of the routinely used monitoring methods must be interpreted with caution during VA-ECMO support.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>A thorough understanding of the various hemodynamic monitoring methods and the physiological interactions between VA-ECMO and patients is essential for selecting the optimal hemodynamic monitoring strategy and correctly interpreting the resulting hemodynamic measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":10851,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000001277","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose review: To discuss the hemodynamic monitoring techniques to quantify cardiac output, to assess the adequacy of perfusion, and to evaluate cardiac as well as pump preload and fluid responsiveness in patients supported by veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). Echocardiography is essential in the hemodynamic assessment of VA-ECMO patients. However, intermittent echocardiography should be complemented by continuous, potentially nurse driven, monitoring techniques. We will focus on invasive and noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring methods beyond echocardiography.
Recent findings: Despite the importance of comprehensive hemodynamic monitoring in the provision of safe, adequate, and well balanced VA-ECMO support, limited data are currently available in this specific patient population. While some measurements (intravascular pressures, oxygen saturation) remain valid and provide important information on the hemodynamic state, measurements of cardiac output are invalid with many of the hemodynamic monitoring methods. Many of the routinely used monitoring methods must be interpreted with caution during VA-ECMO support.
Summary: A thorough understanding of the various hemodynamic monitoring methods and the physiological interactions between VA-ECMO and patients is essential for selecting the optimal hemodynamic monitoring strategy and correctly interpreting the resulting hemodynamic measurements.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Critical Care delivers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and most exciting developments in critical care from across the world. Published bimonthly and featuring thirteen key topics – including the respiratory system, neuroscience, trauma and infectious diseases – the journal’s renowned team of guest editors ensure a balanced, expert assessment of the recently published literature in each respective field with insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews.