发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Max Weber Studies最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
List of Contributors 贡献者名单
Max Weber Studies Pub Date : 2018-07-15 DOI: 10.7765/9781526137609.00005
S. Whimster, D. Kaesler, R. Button, L. Kaelber, Niall Bond, E. Hanke, Gangolf Hübinger, Wolfgang Schwentker, Hubert Treiber, M. R. Lepsius, Gerhard Wagner
{"title":"List of Contributors","authors":"S. Whimster, D. Kaesler, R. Button, L. Kaelber, Niall Bond, E. Hanke, Gangolf Hübinger, Wolfgang Schwentker, Hubert Treiber, M. R. Lepsius, Gerhard Wagner","doi":"10.7765/9781526137609.00005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526137609.00005","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This 'note' constitutes a study of thematic affinities in the work of the German poet Heinrich Heine (1797–1856) and Max Weber (1864–1920). With an emphasis on Weber's reference to Heine in the footnotes of The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, we seek to respond to and explore Gregory Höhn's (2002) observation that in the philosophy of history expressed in Heine's poetry and prose, Heine anticipates Weber's understanding of the process of disenchantment and its existential consequences. This discussion is the site for a consideration of the Enlightenment-mythology relation. A particular emphasis is placed on devaluing reversal as a motif of the disenchantment-rationalization narrative in Heine and Weber, and how this motif relates to a condition of alienation. We explore the way in which devaluing reversal as an inner motif of the development of modern capitalist society finds an apposite expression in the religious image of the demonic.","PeriodicalId":103306,"journal":{"name":"Max Weber Studies","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132357644","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
List of Contributors 贡献者名单
Max Weber Studies Pub Date : 2018-07-12 DOI: 10.7765/9781526137975.00003
J. Green, S. Whimster, G. Poggi, Hubert Treiber, H. Orihara, G. Dilcher
{"title":"List of Contributors","authors":"J. Green, S. Whimster, G. Poggi, Hubert Treiber, H. Orihara, G. Dilcher","doi":"10.7765/9781526137975.00003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526137975.00003","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Political scientists are not generally accustomed to treating Max Weber's unusual account of democracy–plebiscitary leader democracy–as a genuine democratic theory. The typical objection is that Weber's account of democracy in terms of the generation of charismatic leadership is not really a democratic theory at all, because it contains no positive account of popular power: specifically, that it presents democracy in such a fashion that there is no capacity for the People to participate in the articulation and ratification of the norms, laws and policies governing the conduct of public life. This essay argues that Weber's theory of plebiscitary leader democracy ought to be interpreted as rejecting, not any account of popular power, but only a traditional and still dominant vocal paradigm of popular power: one which assumes that popular power must refer to an authorial power to self-legislate the norms and conditions of public life, or at least to express substantive opinions, values and preferences about what kinds of decisions political leaders ought to be making. Properly understood, plebiscitary leader democracy embodies a novel, ocular paradigm of popular power according to which the object of popular power is the leader (not the law), the organ of popular power is the People's gaze (not its voice), and the critical ideal associated with popular empowerment is the candor of leaders (not the autonomous authorship of laws). Thus, rather than abandon the concept of popular power, Weber's theory of democracy reinvents its meaning under conditions of mass society.","PeriodicalId":103306,"journal":{"name":"Max Weber Studies","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128360576","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Max Weber and International Relations (review) 马克斯·韦伯与国际关系(回顾)
Max Weber Studies Pub Date : 2018-07-01 DOI: 10.1353/max.2018.0016
W. Scheuerman
{"title":"Max Weber and International Relations (review)","authors":"W. Scheuerman","doi":"10.1353/max.2018.0016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/max.2018.0016","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":103306,"journal":{"name":"Max Weber Studies","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127684778","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Weber's use of the ideal type of patrimonialism for Indic rulership 韦伯对印度统治的世袭制理想类型的运用
Max Weber Studies Pub Date : 2018-07-01 DOI: 10.15543/MWS/2018/2/4
S. Whimster
{"title":"Weber's use of the ideal type of patrimonialism for Indic rulership","authors":"S. Whimster","doi":"10.15543/MWS/2018/2/4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15543/MWS/2018/2/4","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Criticisms of Weber's over-emphasis on Indic civilization in terms of an unchanging Vedic caste order have to be tempered by the contingent role given to political rulerships, which Weber theorizes in term of patrimonialism and the legitimating role of religion in Indic rulerships. The article considers whether the ideal type of patrimonialism is vulnerable to Dipesh Chakrabarty's provincializing Europe critique. The article makes two points: firstly, Weber recognizes the situatedness of academic thought and the ideal type is his answer to the value-relatedness of all academic study in the human and social sciences. Secondly, academic discourse is open to the deployment of other ideal types, such as the segmental state, alongside patrimonialism. Weber's ideal-typical approach in his study of Hinduism and Buddhism has to be separated from the historical approach to India in his General Economic History where the role of colonialism is crucial to the rise of colonial capitalism and to the critical path dependency of western modern industrial capitalism.","PeriodicalId":103306,"journal":{"name":"Max Weber Studies","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115856484","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
The Max Weber Dictionary: Key Words and Central Concepts (review) 马克斯·韦伯词典:关键词和中心概念(复习)
Max Weber Studies Pub Date : 2018-07-01 DOI: 10.1353/max.2018.0005
A. Sica
{"title":"The Max Weber Dictionary: Key Words and Central Concepts (review)","authors":"A. Sica","doi":"10.1353/max.2018.0005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/max.2018.0005","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":103306,"journal":{"name":"Max Weber Studies","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122030070","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Social-Differentiation and Self-Differentiation: The Jaina Concept of the Individual and Sociological Individualisation-Paradigms 社会分化与自我分化:耆那教的个体观与社会学个体化范式
Max Weber Studies Pub Date : 2018-07-01 DOI: 10.15543/MWS/2018/2/5
P. Flügel
{"title":"Social-Differentiation and Self-Differentiation: The Jaina Concept of the Individual and Sociological Individualisation-Paradigms","authors":"P. Flügel","doi":"10.15543/MWS/2018/2/5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15543/MWS/2018/2/5","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:While ‘individuality’ is regarded as a cultural construct, this article argues that its trans-cultural investigation has hardly begun, both empirically and theoretically. Comparative work to date has been confined to euro-centric approaches. South Asian models of the individual, though amongst the earliest on record, have not been taken seriously as credible alternatives to European models, other than under the label of ‘ethnosociology’. The present article seeks to redress the balance, by offering a sociological reconstruction of the classical concept of the individual in Jaina philosophy and of its social implications. It argues that previously opaque aspects of the dualistic conception of individuality of the Jainas can be freshly understood, and analysed, with the help of the sociological concepts of G. Simmel and N. Luhmann, which in turn are interpreted as variations of broader transcultural themes.","PeriodicalId":103306,"journal":{"name":"Max Weber Studies","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129581338","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Versions of Vocation: Max Weber's ‘Wissenschaft als Beruf’ in Translation 职业的不同版本:马克斯·韦伯的“生命也是生命”的翻译
Max Weber Studies Pub Date : 2018-07-01 DOI: 10.15543/mws/2018/2/6
F. Lechner
{"title":"Versions of Vocation: Max Weber's ‘Wissenschaft als Beruf’ in Translation","authors":"F. Lechner","doi":"10.15543/mws/2018/2/6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15543/mws/2018/2/6","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Expanding on prior discussion of the perils in translating the work of Max Weber, this paper compares five English versions of ‘Science as a Vocation’ (‘Wissenschaft als Beruf’) to show that none achieves maximum fidelity. The contrasting versions reflect divergent translation strategies that make the anglicized Weber a protean figure whose voice and meaning come through unevenly. The comparison points to a need for broader scholarly attention to problems of translation and suggests a different approach to future translations of classic texts in social science.","PeriodicalId":103306,"journal":{"name":"Max Weber Studies","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125063081","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Traditional Action and Traditional Authority 传统行为和传统权威
Max Weber Studies Pub Date : 2018-07-01 DOI: 10.1353/max.2018.0000
Joshua Rust
{"title":"Traditional Action and Traditional Authority","authors":"Joshua Rust","doi":"10.1353/max.2018.0000","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/max.2018.0000","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Two standard interpretations of traditional action are rejected. Traditional action is not subjectively meaningful in the sense of having what Talcott Parsons calls a ‘normative orientation’. But nor is traditional action a matter of blind habit. I contend, instead, that traditional action is subjectively meaningful insofar as the actor's seemingly aberrant behavior can be rendered intelligible by appeal to shared exemplars. I provide further evidence for the proposed interpretation of traditional action by showing how it illuminates Weber's account of traditional authority. The traditions that legitimize a traditional master consist, not just in rules or decisions, but in exemplars and precedents as found in the ‘documents of tradition’. I conclude with a discussion of how the proposed account of traditional action and authority illuminates charismatic authority and Weber's notion of the irrational.","PeriodicalId":103306,"journal":{"name":"Max Weber Studies","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127482892","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Max Weber's Vision for Bureaucracy: A Casualty of World War I (review) 马克斯·韦伯的官僚主义观:一战的牺牲品(评论)
Max Weber Studies Pub Date : 2018-07-01 DOI: 10.1353/max.2018.0011
C. Adair‐Toteff
{"title":"Max Weber's Vision for Bureaucracy: A Casualty of World War I (review)","authors":"C. Adair‐Toteff","doi":"10.1353/max.2018.0011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/max.2018.0011","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":103306,"journal":{"name":"Max Weber Studies","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121872352","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Max Weber's theory of personality: individuation, politics and orientalism in the sociology of religion (review) 马克斯·韦伯的人格理论:个体化、政治与宗教社会学中的东方主义(述评)
Max Weber Studies Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.1353/max.2018.0012
C. Turner
{"title":"Max Weber's theory of personality: individuation, politics and orientalism in the sociology of religion (review)","authors":"C. Turner","doi":"10.1353/max.2018.0012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/max.2018.0012","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":103306,"journal":{"name":"Max Weber Studies","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121726105","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信