Agricultural Administration and Extension最新文献_第10页

Agricultural policy formation in the European community: the birth of milk quotas and CAP reform 欧共体农业政策的形成:牛奶配额的诞生和CAP改革

Agricultural Administration and Extension Pub Date : 1988-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/0269-7475(88)90105-5

E.L. Naylor

引用次数: 0

Shorter notice 较短的通知

Agricultural Administration and Extension Pub Date : 1988-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/0269-7475(88)90115-8

引用次数: 0

Rural banking in Nigeria: Lessons from other developing countries 尼日利亚农村银行业：其他发展中国家的经验教训

Agricultural Administration and Extension Pub Date : 1988-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/0269-7475(88)90063-3

Aja Okorie

引用次数: 2

National agricultural research programmes in Sahelian countries of West Africa: Problems and recommendations☆ 西非萨赫勒国家的国家农业研究计划:问题和建议

Agricultural Administration and Extension Pub Date : 1988-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/0269-7475(88)90038-4

K. Nwanze

引用次数: 3

Institution strengthening in rural development: The case of Djibouti 加强农村发展中的制度:以吉布提为例

Agricultural Administration and Extension Pub Date : 1988-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/0269-7475(88)90034-7

J. Mullen

引用次数: 3

A working framework for rapid rural appraisal: Lessons from a Fiji experience 快速农村评估的工作框架:斐济的经验教训

Agricultural Administration and Extension Pub Date : 1988-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/0269-7475(88)90125-0

Jennifer A. McCracken

引用次数: 5

Year Book of Agricultural Co-operation 1986 1986年农业合作年鉴

Agricultural Administration and Extension Pub Date : 1988-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/0269-7475(88)90005-0

S.R. Wragg

引用次数: 0

Administering agricultural exchanges 管理农业交流

Agricultural Administration and Extension Pub Date : 1988-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/0269-7475(88)90128-6

David Reimer, Robert Werge

引用次数: 0

The political, structural and managerial advantages of commodity-controlled agricultural research and development in South Africa 南非商品控制农业研究与发展的政治、结构和管理优势

Agricultural Administration and Extension Pub Date : 1988-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/0269-7475(88)90027-X

P.A. Donovan, M.G. Lynas

{"title":"The political, structural and managerial advantages of commodity-controlled agricultural research and development in South Africa","authors":"P.A. Donovan, M.G. Lynas","doi":"10.1016/0269-7475(88)90027-X","DOIUrl":"10.1016/0269-7475(88)90027-X","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Since the end of the nineteenth century the funding and control of agricultural research and development (R&D) has usually been assumed to be a State responsibility. The contention is that the State's share of agriculture's R & D costs is excessive and its control of R&D management is unsatisfactory. It is suggested that producer associations should be responsible for R&D on tradable agricultural commodities which are capable of generating private profit. The State should retain responsibility for R&D on agricultural resources and for legislative purposes, both of which can only generate social benefit. The political advantages of commodity responsibility for R&D are considered to be reduced dependence on State funds which now have higher priorities, greater relevance of R&D to producers' needs and depoliticisation of an economic activity without loss of its social benefits. Structurally, the advantages of commodity controlled R&D are claimed to be a reduction in institutional size and in centralised bureaucracy. This would permit more rapid response to changes in R&D requirements and the setting of unequivocal goals, which improve motivation and productivity. The managerial advantages of commodity controlled R&D include release from the equity principle inherent in bureaucracies which inhibits paying for performance; ‘closeness to the customer’ which improves the relevance of R&D projects; and the ability to use change to maintain personal and organisational effectiveness. Perhaps most important of all managerial advantages is the opportunity to use a specialised and integrated extension service to promote the profitability of producers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100060,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Administration and Extension","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1988-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0269-7475(88)90027-X","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81377194","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Agricultural production potentials Part II: Development support policies and strategies— from yield gaps to opportunity gaps 农业生产潜力第二部分:发展支持政策和战略——从产量差距到机会差距

Agricultural Administration and Extension Pub Date : 1988-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/0269-7475(88)90054-2

Bertus Haverkort

{"title":"Agricultural production potentials Part II: Development support policies and strategies— from yield gaps to opportunity gaps","authors":"Bertus Haverkort","doi":"10.1016/0269-7475(88)90054-2","DOIUrl":"10.1016/0269-7475(88)90054-2","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In Part I the conclusions were drawn that the potential of a certain area for agricultural production is, to a certain degree, the result of investments in technology development; that historic and economic factors have led to a comparative disadvantage of agricultural systems in the developing countries; and that the collective agricultural production potentials of the developing countries have not been assessed properly. As a result of differences in investments for technology development, differences in development opportunities have emerged.</p><p>This part explores some important aspects of development intervention strategies, looks at the national agricultural policies of developing countries as well as of international development agencies and presents the concept <em>opportunity gaps</em> as an alternative to the frequently used concept of <em>yield gaps</em>. Some approaches to agricultural development that may contribute to bridging the opportunity gaps are discussed: the systems approach; the use of indigenous knowledge; development of agro-ecological practices and the bottom-up approach. Included is a checklist for the analysis of opportunity gaps that could be used by planners of development interventions who want to narrow these gaps.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100060,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Administration and Extension","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1988-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0269-7475(88)90054-2","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83305097","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0