Australian journal of primary health最新文献

{"title":"Primary healthcare providers' knowledge, practices and beliefs relating to preventive sexual and reproductive health care for women from refugee and asylum-seeking backgrounds in Australia: a national cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Natasha Davidson, Karin Hammarberg, Jane Fisher","doi":"10.1071/PY23171","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY23171","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Many refugee women and women seeking asylum arrive in high-income countries with unmet preventive sexual and reproductive health (SRH) care needs. Primary healthcare providers (HCPs) are usually refugee and asylum seekers' first point of care. This study aimed to identify HCP characteristics associated with initiating conversations and discussing SRH opportunistically during other health interactions. Methods An anonymous online survey was distributed nationally to representatives of health professional organisations and Primary Health Networks. Hierarchical logistic regression analysed factors including HCP demographics, knowledge and awareness, perceived need for training and professional experience with refugee women were included in the models. Results Among 163 HCPs, those initiating conversations ranged from 27.3% (contraceptive care) to 35.2% (cervical screening). Opportunistic discussions ranged from 26.9% (breast screening) to 40.3% (contraceptive care). Positively associated factors included offering care to refugee women or women seeking asylum at least once every 2months 7.64 (95% CI 2.41;24.22, P P P P P P Conclusions Direct professional experience, frequency of service provision, years of practice, and part time work positively influence HCPs' SRH care practices. Enhancing bilingual health worker programs, outreach, education, and support for SRH and cultural competency training are essential to improving the preventive SRH care of refugee women and women seeking asylum.</p>","PeriodicalId":93892,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of primary health","volume":"30 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142127598","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Providing a localised cervical cancer screening course for general practice nurses.","authors":"Joanne E Porter, Elizabeth M Miller, Valerie Prokopiv, Lauren Sewell, Kaye Borgelt, Vaughan Reimers","doi":"10.1071/PY24089","DOIUrl":"10.1071/PY24089","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cervical cancer screening programs in Australia have been developed to detect early precancerous changes in women with a cervix aged between 25 and 74. Yet, many barriers remain to the uptake of cervical screening. Barriers include a lack of culturally appropriate service provision, physical access, poor health literacy, emotional difficulties, socio-economic disadvantage and not having access to a female service provider. In remote and very remote areas of Australia, additional barriers experienced by Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander peoples include a distrust of healthcare providers and a lack of services, resulting in a much higher rate of diagnosis and death from cervical cancer. General practice nurses (GPNs) are well placed to conduct cervical screening tests (CSTs) after they have undertaken additional education and practical training. GPNs' increase in scope of practice is beneficial to general practice as it helps to remove some barriers to cervical screening. In addition, GPNs conducting CSTs reduce GP workload and burnout and increase teamwork. GPNs working in metropolitan clinics have greater access to training facilities, whereas those working in rural and remote clinics are required to travel potentially long distances to complete practical assessments. This highlights the need for training to be made available in rural and remote areas. The aim of this forum paper is therefore to generate further discussion on the need for training programs to be made available in rural and remote areas to aid the upskilling of GPNs.</p>","PeriodicalId":93892,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of primary health","volume":"30 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142121329","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A shared journey: evaluating a patient-assessed measure of self-management of chronic conditions in an Australian setting.","authors":"Phillip Davis, Joanne Bradbury, Kirstine Shrubsole, John Parke","doi":"10.1071/PY24003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY24003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Patient Assessment of Care in Chronic Conditions (PACIC+), included in some Australian guidelines, has been shown reliable for measuring patient engagement and perception of their care in primary care settings. Various studies have focussed on PACIC+ use in specific conditions. This study aims to expand PACIC+ to measure patient empowerment to self-manage their chronic condition and validate it in the broader Australian primary care population. This study aims to evaluate internal consistency and reliability of PACIC+ and six new supplementary items proposed to assess patient wellbeing and empowerment to self-manage their chronic condition. Methods A repeated-measures correlation design study assessed the expanded PACIC+ over three time-points. Particpants were patients with at least one chronic disease, referred by consultant physician, or recruited by advertisement posters in hospital clinic areas. Results PACIC+ (26-item) had acceptable internal consitency (Cronbach's alpha 0.96). Test-retest reliability (Time-1 and 2, P r (48)=0.43; and New supplementary items: Confidence r (48)=0.54; Understanding r (48)=0.62; Support r (48)=0.43; Overall Health r (48)=0.42; Overall Health Change r (48)=-0.31, P =0.03; and Acute Episodes of Care in 1-month r (48)=0.42, P Conclusions The expanded PACIC+ is an improved psychometric tool providing for the patient's voice in a shared health journey. It is a valid, reliable tool to monitor and measure self-management of chronic conditions in Australian population clinic and primary healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":93892,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of primary health","volume":"30 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142334252","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Supporting primary care practitioners to promote dementia risk reduction in Australian general practice: outcomes of a cross-sectional, non-randomised implementation pilot study.","authors":"Kali Godbee, Victoria J Palmer, Jane M Gunn, Nicole T Lautenschlager, Jill J Francis","doi":"10.1071/PY24063","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY24063","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Primary care practitioners worldwide are urged to promote dementia risk reduction as part of preventive care. To facilitate this in Australian primary care, we developed the Umbrella intervention, comprising a waiting room survey and patient information cards for use in consultations. Educational and relational strategies were employed to mitigate implementation barriers. Methods In this cross-sectional, non-randomised implementation study within the South East Melbourne Primary Health Network, we employed mixed-methods outcome evaluation. Antecedent outcomes (acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility) and actual outcomes (adoption, penetration, and fidelity) were assessed from the perspective of primary care practitioners and patients. Results Five practices piloted the intervention and implementation strategies, including 16 primary care practitioners engaging with 159 patients. The Umbrella intervention was deemed acceptable, appropriate, and feasible, but penetration was limited. Approximately half of eligible primary care practitioners used the intervention, with moderate fidelity. Engagement with implementation strategies was similarly limited. While most strategies were well-received, improvements in online peer discussions and staff readiness were desired. Conclusions The Umbrella intervention is a viable approach to promoting dementia risk reduction in Australian general practice, supported by educational and relational strategies. Stakeholder-informed refinements to enhance uptake are recommended before advancing to a definitive trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":93892,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of primary health","volume":"30 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142334254","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Community-based COVID-19 vaccination services improve user satisfaction: findings from a large household survey in Bali Province, Indonesia.","authors":"I Made Dwi Ariawan, Anak Agung Sagung Sawitri, Putu Cintya Denny Yuliyatni, Desak Nyoman Widyanthini, I Nyoman Sutarsa","doi":"10.1071/PY24014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY24014","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Understanding community preferences for vaccination services is crucial for improving coverage and satisfaction. There are three main approaches for COVID-19 vaccination in Indonesia: health facility-based, community-based, and outreach approaches. This study aims to assess how the vaccination approaches impact user satisfaction levels. Methods This study was part of a large household survey involving 12,120 respondents across nine districts in Bali Province. The study population comprised all residents aged ≥12years who had received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccination. Samples were selected through three stages of systematic random sampling. Data were collected through interviews using structured questionnaires, which included socio-demographic characteristics, vaccination services, and satisfaction levels. Analysis was performed using Chi Square test and logistic regression, with the entire process incorporating weighting factors. Results A total of 12,120 respondents reported receiving their first dose of COVID-19 vaccination. The satisfaction level among vaccine recipients (partial, complete, and booster doses) was high (84.31%). Satisfaction within each SERVQUAL dimension was highest in tangibles (96.10%), followed by responsiveness (93.25%), empathy (92.48%), assurance (92.35%), and reliability (92.32%). There was no significant difference in the overall SERVQUAL score between the health facility and community-based approaches. However, the latter slightly improved user satisfaction across three dimensions: tangibles (adjusted odds ratio, AOR=1.52, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.21-1.90), reliability (AOR=1.67, 95%CI=1.42-1.96), and assurance (AOR=1.26, 95%CI=1.07-1.48). Conclusion During the pandemic, both health facility and community-based approaches resulted in a high satisfaction level. It is recommended that the government prioritise and optimise community-based programs and health facility-based delivery in future vaccination initiatives, especially during public health emergencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":93892,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of primary health","volume":"30 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142115904","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"An In-Home Withdrawal Service for individuals with low-to-moderate substance dependence: implementation and program evaluation.","authors":"James Mussared, Helen Tosin Oni, Taylah Jacinta Gregory, Andrew Fernandes, Anna Mazzacano, Debby Kadarusman, Sarah Fraser","doi":"10.1071/PY23231","DOIUrl":"10.1071/PY23231","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Sonder's In-Home Withdrawal Service (IHWS) has been providing a unique home-based, multidisciplinary, wraparound withdrawal option for people with low-to-moderate levels of substance dependence since September 2019. This paper provides an evaluation of the service's overall impact on reducing substance use among clients through the delivery of this innovative service model. The evaluation explores the acceptability and feasibility of the service via client, stakeholder, and staff perspectives. Methods A mixed-method design was used to evaluate the IHWS. Descriptive analysis of quantitative data was conducted using clinical assessments from client records and online feedback surveys. Qualitative data from client, staff, and stakeholder feedback surveys were analysed thematically. Results Overall, 1166 referrals were received over the lifespan of the service, and a data set of 96 clients was included in the analysis. Self-reported measures showed that most clients decreased their substance use (89%), improved their psychological health status (75%), improved their physical health (65%), improved their quality of life (69%), and improved their understanding and ability to manage their alcohol and other drugs (AOD) use (84%). Client feedback suggests the service is providing a unique option for AOD withdrawal. Stakeholders commend the service's home-based setting, multidisciplinary and person-centred approach to care, and recommended expansion of the service to increase access for clients and reduce demand on inpatient settings. Conclusions The IHWS is having a significant impact in reducing substance use and highlights the need for increased access to holistic approaches to withdrawal. This includes pre- and post-withdrawal support and the inclusion of multidisciplinary teams, and engaging lived experience practitioners. A focus on funding primary-based services is required to meet the rising costs of tertiary-based care and to better meet the needs of consumers.</p>","PeriodicalId":93892,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of primary health","volume":"30 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141879898","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Oral health status and oral health-related quality of life: a cross-sectional study of clients in an Australian opioid treatment program.","authors":"Grace Wong, Venkatesha Venkatesha, Mark Enea Montebello, Angela Masoe, Kyle Cheng, Hannah Cook, Bonny Puszka, Anna Cheng","doi":"10.1071/PY24021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY24021","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Individuals with opioid dependence often experience poor oral health, including dental decay, periodontal disease and mucosal infection, frequently exacerbated by factors such as smoking, alcohol consumption, inadequate oral hygiene and low utilisation of oral health services. This study aimed to assess oral health status and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) among opioid-dependent individuals and explore their potential associations. Methods Participants enrolled in an opioid treatment program (OTP) at three Australian urban clinics were assessed using the validated Oral Health Assessment Tool (OHAT) and Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14). Results The average age of the 75 participants was 44.7years, with 45% receiving opioid treatment for over 5years. Dental decay and inadequate oral hygiene were prevalent. Mean OHAT and OHIP-14 scores were 6.93 and 20.95 respectively, indicating moderate oral health severity and poor OHRQoL. Physical pain and psychological discomfort significantly impacted participants' quality of life, with the effects being particularly pronounced for those aged 30 and above. An exploratory analysis revealed a strong correlation between OHAT and OHIP-14 severity scores, with a one-point increase in OHAT associated with 1.85times higher odds of a lower OHRQoL (odds ratio=1.85, 95% confidence interval: 1.38-2.49, P = Conclusions These findings underscore the multifaceted impact of oral health on the well-being of OTP clients. Routine dental check-ups, education on oral hygiene practices and timely treatment for oral health problems are crucial recommendations based on this study. Such measures hold the potential to enhance the quality of life for individuals attending OTPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":93892,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of primary health","volume":"30 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142115906","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Paramedic perceptions of conveying patients to an emergency department who were suitable for primary care: a cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Belinda Delardes, Meg Powell, Kelly-Ann Bowles, Samantha Chakraborty, Karen Smith, Alexander Olaussen","doi":"10.1071/PY23204","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY23204","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Ambulance callouts and conveyances continue to increase disproportionately to population growth. This is largely driven by low- and medium-acuity patients who do not require ambulance management. We aimed to estimate the proportion of patients paramedics have conveyed to an emergency department (ED) via ambulance whom they considered suitable for primary care, and understand the barriers that contributed to these decisions. Methods A cross-sectional survey of registered paramedics in Victoria, Australia, was undertaken using an online questionnaire during 2022. Responses are presented using descriptive statistics, and logistic regression was used to identify associations between paramedic characteristics and barriers influencing primary care pathway referral. Results A total of 367 responses were received. Of these, 70% of paramedics reported that at least half of the patients they conveyed to an ED were suitable for a primary care pathway. Paramedics reported high levels of confidence and support for primary care pathways in lieu of transport, however this had no correlation with their self-reported practice. The most common barrier to primary care pathway referral was limited access to a suitable primary care pathway (68%) followed by fear of an internal complaint, litigation or organisational pressure to convey patients to an ED (66%). Paramedics regarded themselves as more supportive of primary care pathway referral than those around them, including their peers, mentors, employers and university. They also reported that the COVID-19 pandemic had increased their personal support for primary care pathways, as well as organisational support from their employer, without corresponding increase in the broader medical and public communities. In fact, paramedics reported the COVID-19 pandemic had decreased support from the public and patients to refer patients to primary care pathways, and 57% of paramedics reported conveying a patient that had declined their primary care referral in the past week. Conclusions Paramedics frequently convey to an ED patients who they believe are appropriate for a primary care pathway. Paramedics face practical barriers such as a lack of available primary care providers and perceived lack of cultural support that contribute to this practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":93892,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of primary health","volume":"30 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142115907","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Efficacy of a structured audio-visual asthma care session during GP visit in Australia: a single GP centre intervention trial.","authors":"Md Imrose Hasan, K M Shahunja, Abdullah Mamun","doi":"10.1071/PY24026","DOIUrl":"10.1071/PY24026","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a structured audio-visual educational session for people on asthma symptoms management during a general practitioner visit. Methods We conducted this single-centre intervention study in a general practice clinic in Queensland, Australia. There were 78 intervention and 78 control participants in this study. We followed 1:1 randomisation to allocate study intervention between two groups of participants with asthma. The intervention group received an audio-visual demonstration of asthma, its symptoms, triggers, and how to use inhalers correctly, along with the standard asthma management by a physician on enrolment. The control group received only the standard asthma management by a physician. We assessed the 'Asthma Control Test' score on enrolment and after 90days and compared the changes across the groups. Results Participants were, on average, 28years old (range: 6-60, 60% women). The intervention group showed a 1.9-unit increment, and the control group showed a -0.5-unit increment in 'Asthma Control Test' score from baseline to endline. The difference of differences between the intervention and control groups was 2.4 units (P =0.016) after adjusting for potential confounders. In age-stratified analysis, the children (6-17years) showed a significant difference (mean difference of 2.5 between intervention and control groups) in their asthma control score. Conclusions Structured educational sessions involving audio-visual media along with standard management for people with asthma during general practice visits would be effective for better asthma control. However, a further multi-centre study with a larger sample is needed to see its efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":93892,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of primary health","volume":"30 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142115905","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Consensus Reporting Items for Studies in Primary Care (CRISP) checklist - the first research reporting guideline made by and for primary care.","authors":"Elizabeth A Sturgiss, William R Phillips","doi":"10.1071/PY24115","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY24115","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>sion=\"1.0\" encoding=\"utf-8\"?> PY Australian Journal of Primary Health Aust. J. Prim. Health 1448-7527 1836-7399 CSIRO Publishing 36 Gardiner Road Clayton 3168 Victoria Australia PY24115 10.1071/PY24115 Letter The Consensus Reporting Items for Studies in Primary Care (CRISP) checklist - the first research reporting guideline made by and for primary care E. A. Sturgiss and W. R. Phillips Sturgiss Elizabeth A. A * Phillips William R. B School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University , Melbourne , Vic , Australia . University of Washington , Seattle , WA , USA . * Correspondence to: Elizabeth A. Sturgiss School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia Email: liz.sturgiss@monash.edu 30 August 2024 30 5 PY24115 28 July 2024 Received: 28 July 2024 10 August 2024 Accepted: 10 August 2024 30 August 2024 Published: 30 August 2024 © 2024 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of La Trobe University 2024 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Here, we present the Consensus Reporting Items for Studies in Primary Care (CRISP) checklist, the first research reporting guide developed by and for the primary care research community.</p>","PeriodicalId":93892,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of primary health","volume":"30 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142115908","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}