为土著居民和托雷斯海峡岛民儿童健康服务提供资金的参考因素:决策者的观点。

Shingisai Chando, Shingisai Chando, Martin Howell, Martin Howell, Michelle Dickson, Michelle Dickson, Allison Jaure, Allison Jaure, Jonathan C Craig, Jonathan C Craig, Sandra J Eades, Sandra J Eades, Kirsten Howard, Kirsten Howard
{"title":"为土著居民和托雷斯海峡岛民儿童健康服务提供资金的参考因素:决策者的观点。","authors":"Shingisai Chando, Shingisai Chando, Martin Howell, Martin Howell, Michelle Dickson, Michelle Dickson, Allison Jaure, Allison Jaure, Jonathan C Craig, Jonathan C Craig, Sandra J Eades, Sandra J Eades, Kirsten Howard, Kirsten Howard","doi":"10.1071/PY24054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background The factors informing decisions to fund health services for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children are unclear. This study's objective aimed to describe decision-makers' perspectives on factors informing decisions to fund health services for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children. Methods We conducted semi-structured interviews with 13 participants experienced in making funding decisions at organisational, state, territory and national levels. Decision-makers were from New South Wales, Northern Territory, Queensland, Victoria and Western Australia. Transcripts were analysed thematically following the principles of grounded theory. Results We identified five themes, each with subthemes. First, prioritising engagement for authentic partnerships (opportunities to build relationships and mutual understanding, co-design and co-evaluation for implementation). Second, valuing participant experiences to secure receptiveness (cultivating culturally safe environments to facilitate acceptability, empowering for self-determination and sustainability, strengthening connectedness and collaboration for holistic care, restoring confidence and generational trust through long-term commitments). Third, comprehensive approaches to promote health and wellbeing (linking impacts to developmental milestones, maintaining access to health care, broadening conceptualisations of child health). Fourth, threats to optimal service delivery (fractured and outdated technology systems amplify data access difficulties, failure to 'truly listen' fuelling redundant policy, rigid funding models undermining innovation). Fifth, navigating political and ideological hurdles to advance community priorities (negotiating politicians' willingness to support community-driven objectives, pressure to satisfy economic and policy considerations, countering entrenched hesitancy to community-controlled governance). Conclusion Decision-makers viewed participation, engagement, trust, empowerment and community acceptance as important indicators of service performance. This study highlights factors that influence decisions to fund health services for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children.</p>","PeriodicalId":93892,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of primary health","volume":"30 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors informing funding of health services for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children: perspectives of decision-makers.\",\"authors\":\"Shingisai Chando, Shingisai Chando, Martin Howell, Martin Howell, Michelle Dickson, Michelle Dickson, Allison Jaure, Allison Jaure, Jonathan C Craig, Jonathan C Craig, Sandra J Eades, Sandra J Eades, Kirsten Howard, Kirsten Howard\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/PY24054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background The factors informing decisions to fund health services for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children are unclear. This study's objective aimed to describe decision-makers' perspectives on factors informing decisions to fund health services for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children. Methods We conducted semi-structured interviews with 13 participants experienced in making funding decisions at organisational, state, territory and national levels. Decision-makers were from New South Wales, Northern Territory, Queensland, Victoria and Western Australia. Transcripts were analysed thematically following the principles of grounded theory. Results We identified five themes, each with subthemes. First, prioritising engagement for authentic partnerships (opportunities to build relationships and mutual understanding, co-design and co-evaluation for implementation). Second, valuing participant experiences to secure receptiveness (cultivating culturally safe environments to facilitate acceptability, empowering for self-determination and sustainability, strengthening connectedness and collaboration for holistic care, restoring confidence and generational trust through long-term commitments). Third, comprehensive approaches to promote health and wellbeing (linking impacts to developmental milestones, maintaining access to health care, broadening conceptualisations of child health). Fourth, threats to optimal service delivery (fractured and outdated technology systems amplify data access difficulties, failure to 'truly listen' fuelling redundant policy, rigid funding models undermining innovation). Fifth, navigating political and ideological hurdles to advance community priorities (negotiating politicians' willingness to support community-driven objectives, pressure to satisfy economic and policy considerations, countering entrenched hesitancy to community-controlled governance). Conclusion Decision-makers viewed participation, engagement, trust, empowerment and community acceptance as important indicators of service performance. This study highlights factors that influence decisions to fund health services for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian journal of primary health\",\"volume\":\"30 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian journal of primary health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY24054\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian journal of primary health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY24054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 为土著居民和托雷斯海峡岛民儿童的医疗服务提供资金的决策因素尚不明确。本研究旨在描述决策者对土著居民和托雷斯海峡岛民儿童健康服务资助决策因素的看法。方法 我们对 13 位在组织、州、地区和国家层面上有过资助决策经验的参与者进行了半结构化访谈。决策者来自新南威尔士州、北部地区、昆士兰州、维多利亚州和西澳大利亚州。我们按照基础理论的原则对记录誊本进行了专题分析。结果 我们确定了五个主题,每个主题都有副主题。第一,优先考虑真实伙伴关系的参与(建立关系和相互理解的机会、共同设计和共同评估实施)。第二,重视参与者的经验以确保其接受能力(营造文化上安全的环境以促进可接受性、增强自决和可持续能力、加强联系与合作以提供全面护理、通过长期承诺恢复信心和代际信任)。第三,促进健康和福祉的综合方法(将影响与发展里程碑联系起来,保持获得医疗保健的机会,拓宽儿童健康的概念)。第四,对提供最佳服务的威胁(支离破碎和过时的技术系统扩大了数据获取的困难,未能 "真正倾听 "助长了多余的政策,僵化的筹资模式破坏了创新)。第五,克服政治和意识形态障碍,推进社区优先事项(谈判政治家是否愿意支持社区驱动的目标、满足经济和政策考虑的压力、对抗对社区控制治理的根深蒂固的犹豫不决)。结论 决策者将参与、投入、信任、授权和社区接受度视为服务绩效的重要指标。本研究强调了影响为土著居民和托雷斯海峡岛民儿童提供医疗服务资金决策的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors informing funding of health services for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children: perspectives of decision-makers.

Background The factors informing decisions to fund health services for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children are unclear. This study's objective aimed to describe decision-makers' perspectives on factors informing decisions to fund health services for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children. Methods We conducted semi-structured interviews with 13 participants experienced in making funding decisions at organisational, state, territory and national levels. Decision-makers were from New South Wales, Northern Territory, Queensland, Victoria and Western Australia. Transcripts were analysed thematically following the principles of grounded theory. Results We identified five themes, each with subthemes. First, prioritising engagement for authentic partnerships (opportunities to build relationships and mutual understanding, co-design and co-evaluation for implementation). Second, valuing participant experiences to secure receptiveness (cultivating culturally safe environments to facilitate acceptability, empowering for self-determination and sustainability, strengthening connectedness and collaboration for holistic care, restoring confidence and generational trust through long-term commitments). Third, comprehensive approaches to promote health and wellbeing (linking impacts to developmental milestones, maintaining access to health care, broadening conceptualisations of child health). Fourth, threats to optimal service delivery (fractured and outdated technology systems amplify data access difficulties, failure to 'truly listen' fuelling redundant policy, rigid funding models undermining innovation). Fifth, navigating political and ideological hurdles to advance community priorities (negotiating politicians' willingness to support community-driven objectives, pressure to satisfy economic and policy considerations, countering entrenched hesitancy to community-controlled governance). Conclusion Decision-makers viewed participation, engagement, trust, empowerment and community acceptance as important indicators of service performance. This study highlights factors that influence decisions to fund health services for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信