Policy studies (Policy Studies Institute)最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
An ecosystem approach to governing commercial actors in healthcare AI. 管理医疗人工智能商业参与者的生态系统方法。
IF 2.3
Policy studies (Policy Studies Institute) Pub Date : 2025-04-28 DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2025.2497539
Quinn Waeiss, Mildred K Cho
{"title":"An ecosystem approach to governing commercial actors in healthcare AI.","authors":"Quinn Waeiss, Mildred K Cho","doi":"10.1080/01442872.2025.2497539","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2025.2497539","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The ever-increasing attention to artificial intelligence applications in medicine and healthcare requires us to critically evaluate the effectiveness of the current U.S. regulatory environment in this arena. We outline a series of challenges facing the governance of healthcare AI, including an overreliance on self-regulation when many AI developers lack knowledge of relevant regulation or acknowledge their role in preventing harms, lack of shared responsibility for healthcare AI harms, and the lack of transparency and availability of evidence to assess healthcare AI's safety and effectiveness. We advocate for an ecosystem approach to developing potential solutions to these governance challenges. In particular, we identify actions that civil society organizations, funders, healthcare system purchasers, and payers can take to advance healthcare AI governance. We argue that these actors should make coordinated efforts toward advancing transparency and independent assessment of healthcare AI, and therefore can help fill gaps created by the emphasis on self-regulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":93043,"journal":{"name":"Policy studies (Policy Studies Institute)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12380082/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144982098","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Private commercial companies sharing health-relevant consumer data with health researchers in sub-Saharan Africa: an ethical exploration. 私营商业公司与撒哈拉以南非洲的卫生研究人员共享与卫生有关的消费者数据:伦理探索。
IF 2.3
Policy studies (Policy Studies Institute) Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2024.2403506
Rennie Stuart, Litewka Sergio, Vayena Effy, Chingarande George, Mtande Tiwonge, Cengiz Nezerith, Singh Jerome, Jaoko Walter, Moodley Keymanthri
{"title":"Private commercial companies sharing health-relevant consumer data with health researchers in sub-Saharan Africa: an ethical exploration.","authors":"Rennie Stuart, Litewka Sergio, Vayena Effy, Chingarande George, Mtande Tiwonge, Cengiz Nezerith, Singh Jerome, Jaoko Walter, Moodley Keymanthri","doi":"10.1080/01442872.2024.2403506","DOIUrl":"10.1080/01442872.2024.2403506","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sharing large digital-first datasets, including for purposes for which they were not originally intended, is a hallmark of the 'big data revolution'. Through their routine operations, private commercial companies collect massive amounts of diverse data from their customers, some of which may interest those working in the public sector, such as health researchers. Researchers and government agencies worldwide have been increasingly using data from commercial entities (such as Google, Microsoft, Apple, Facebook/Meta, Twitter/X and Amazon, among others) to generate health-related insights. This article explores ethical issues raised by the practice of commercial companies sharing consumer data with third-parties for the purposes of promoting health in the sub-Saharan African (SSA) context. First, as an illustrative example, it examines some of the ways telecommunication (telecom) companies in SSA shared mobility data from cellphone users with public health researchers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Second, it examines a recent debate about the ethical responsibilities of companies that collect, process and share user-generated data, drawing implications for the SSA context. Finally, since this is a relatively understudied subject, we point out some areas where future conceptual and empirical work could contribute to the development of relevant ethics guidance and regulatory governance in SSA.</p>","PeriodicalId":93043,"journal":{"name":"Policy studies (Policy Studies Institute)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12356098/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144982125","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction. 修正。
Policy studies (Policy Studies Institute) Pub Date : 2019-04-15 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2019.1602296
{"title":"Correction.","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/01442872.2019.1602296","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2019.1602296","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2019.1577375.].</p>","PeriodicalId":93043,"journal":{"name":"Policy studies (Policy Studies Institute)","volume":"41 1","pages":"I-II"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01442872.2019.1602296","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37933267","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The impact of powerful authorities and trustful taxpayers: evidence for the extended slippery slope framework from Austria, Finland, and Hungary. 强势当局和守信纳税人的影响:来自奥地利、芬兰和匈牙利的扩展滑坡框架证据。
Policy studies (Policy Studies Institute) Pub Date : 2019-02-11 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2019.1577375
Katharina Gangl, Eva Hofmann, Barbara Hartl, Mihály Berkics
{"title":"The impact of powerful authorities and trustful taxpayers: evidence for the extended slippery slope framework from Austria, Finland, and Hungary.","authors":"Katharina Gangl, Eva Hofmann, Barbara Hartl, Mihály Berkics","doi":"10.1080/01442872.2019.1577375","DOIUrl":"10.1080/01442872.2019.1577375","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tax authorities utilize a wide range of instruments to motivate honest taxpaying ranging from strict audits to fair procedures or personalized support, differing from country to country. However, little is known about how these different instruments and taxpayers' trust influence the generation of interaction climates between tax authorities and taxpayers, motivations to comply, and particularly, tax compliance. The present research examines the extended slippery slope framework (eSSF), which distinguishes tax authorities' instruments into different qualities of power of authority (coercive and legitimate) and trust in authorities (reason-based and implicit), to shed light on the effect of differences between power and trust. We test eSSF assumptions with survey data from taxpayers from three culturally different countries (<i>N</i> = 700) who also vary concerning their perceptions of power, trust, interaction climates, and tax motivations. Results support assumptions of the eSSF. Across all countries, the relation of coercive power and tax compliance was mediated by implicit trust. The connection from legitimate power to tax compliance is partially mediated by reason-based trust. The relationship between implicit trust and tax compliance is mediated by a confidence climate and committed cooperation. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":93043,"journal":{"name":"Policy studies (Policy Studies Institute)","volume":"41 1","pages":"98-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7194257/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37935135","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信