An ecosystem approach to governing commercial actors in healthcare AI.

IF 2.3
Quinn Waeiss, Mildred K Cho
{"title":"An ecosystem approach to governing commercial actors in healthcare AI.","authors":"Quinn Waeiss, Mildred K Cho","doi":"10.1080/01442872.2025.2497539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The ever-increasing attention to artificial intelligence applications in medicine and healthcare requires us to critically evaluate the effectiveness of the current U.S. regulatory environment in this arena. We outline a series of challenges facing the governance of healthcare AI, including an overreliance on self-regulation when many AI developers lack knowledge of relevant regulation or acknowledge their role in preventing harms, lack of shared responsibility for healthcare AI harms, and the lack of transparency and availability of evidence to assess healthcare AI's safety and effectiveness. We advocate for an ecosystem approach to developing potential solutions to these governance challenges. In particular, we identify actions that civil society organizations, funders, healthcare system purchasers, and payers can take to advance healthcare AI governance. We argue that these actors should make coordinated efforts toward advancing transparency and independent assessment of healthcare AI, and therefore can help fill gaps created by the emphasis on self-regulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":93043,"journal":{"name":"Policy studies (Policy Studies Institute)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12380082/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy studies (Policy Studies Institute)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2025.2497539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ever-increasing attention to artificial intelligence applications in medicine and healthcare requires us to critically evaluate the effectiveness of the current U.S. regulatory environment in this arena. We outline a series of challenges facing the governance of healthcare AI, including an overreliance on self-regulation when many AI developers lack knowledge of relevant regulation or acknowledge their role in preventing harms, lack of shared responsibility for healthcare AI harms, and the lack of transparency and availability of evidence to assess healthcare AI's safety and effectiveness. We advocate for an ecosystem approach to developing potential solutions to these governance challenges. In particular, we identify actions that civil society organizations, funders, healthcare system purchasers, and payers can take to advance healthcare AI governance. We argue that these actors should make coordinated efforts toward advancing transparency and independent assessment of healthcare AI, and therefore can help fill gaps created by the emphasis on self-regulation.

管理医疗人工智能商业参与者的生态系统方法。
对人工智能在医学和医疗保健领域应用的日益关注,要求我们批判性地评估当前美国在这一领域的监管环境的有效性。我们概述了医疗人工智能治理面临的一系列挑战,包括当许多人工智能开发人员缺乏相关法规知识或承认他们在预防危害方面的作用时,过度依赖自我监管,缺乏对医疗人工智能危害的共同责任,以及缺乏透明度和可用的证据来评估医疗人工智能的安全性和有效性。我们提倡采用生态系统方法来开发针对这些治理挑战的潜在解决方案。特别是,我们确定了民间社会组织、资助者、医疗保健系统购买者和支付方可以采取的行动,以推进医疗保健人工智能治理。我们认为,这些参与者应该做出协调一致的努力,以提高医疗保健人工智能的透明度和独立评估,因此可以帮助填补由于强调自我监管而造成的空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信