Journal of librarianship and scholarly communication最新文献_第10页

Mapping the Scholarly Literature Found in Scopus on “Research Data Management”: A Bibliometric and Data Visualization Approach 对Scopus中“研究数据管理”的学术文献进行映射:一种文献计量学和数据可视化方法

Journal of librarianship and scholarly communication Pub Date : 2019-04-25 DOI: 10.7710/2162-3309.2266

Li Zhang, Nickoal Eichmann-Kalwara

{"title":"Mapping the Scholarly Literature Found in Scopus on “Research Data Management”: A Bibliometric and Data Visualization Approach","authors":"Li Zhang, Nickoal Eichmann-Kalwara","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2266","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2266","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION Since the 2000s, interest in research data management (RDM) has grown considerably. As a result, a large body of literature has discussed a broad variety of aspects related to data management. But, few studies have examined and also interpreted from visual perception the intellectual structure and progressive development of the existing literature on RDM. METHODS Guided by five research questions, this study employed bibliometric techniques and a visualization tool (CiteSpace) to identify and analyze the patterns of the scholarly publications about RDM. RESULTS Through CiteSpace’s modeling and computing, the knowledge (or network) structures, significant studies, notable topics, and development trends in the literature of RDM were revealed. DISCUSSION The majority of the literature pertinent to RDM was published after 2002. Major research clusters within this interdisciplinary field include “scientific collaboration,” “research support service,” and “data literacy,” while the “scientific collaboration” research cluster was the most active. Topics such as “digital curation” and “information processing” appeared most frequently in the RDM literature. Additionally, there was a sharp increase in several specific topics, such as “digital library,” “big data,” and “data sharing.” CONCLUSION By looking into the “profile” of the literature on RDM, in terms of knowledge structure, evolving trends, and important topics in the domain, this work will add new information to current discussions about RDM, new service development, and future research focuses in this area.","PeriodicalId":91322,"journal":{"name":"Journal of librarianship and scholarly communication","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42116353","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 21

Whose Research is it Anyway? Academic Social Networks Versus Institutional Repositories 到底是谁的研究?学术社交网络vs机构知识库

Journal of librarianship and scholarly communication Pub Date : 2019-04-25 DOI: 10.7710/2162-3309.2243

N. Eva, Tara A. Wiebe

{"title":"Whose Research is it Anyway? Academic Social Networks Versus Institutional Repositories","authors":"N. Eva, Tara A. Wiebe","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2243","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2243","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION Looking for ways to increase deposits into their institutional repository (IR), researchers at one institution started to mine academic social networks (ASNs) (namely, ResearchGate and Academia.edu) to discover which researchers might already be predisposed to providing open access to their work. METHODS Researchers compared the numbers of institutionally affiliated faculty members appearing in the ASNs to those appearing in their institutional repositories. They also looked at how these numbers compared to overall faculty numbers. RESULTS Faculty were much more likely to have deposited their work in an ASN than in the IR. However, the number of researchers who deposited in both the IR and at least one ASN exceeded that of those who deposited their research solely in an ASN. Unexpected findings occurred as well, such as numerous false or unverified accounts claiming affiliation with the institution. ResearchGate was found to be the favored ASN at this particular institution. DISCUSSION The results of this study confirm earlier studies’ findings indicating that those researchers who are willing to make their research open access are more disposed to do so over multiple channels, showing that those who already self-archive elsewhere are prime targets for inclusion in the IR. CONCLUSION Rather than seeing ASNs as a threat to IRs, they may be seen as a potential site of identifying likely contributors to the IR.","PeriodicalId":91322,"journal":{"name":"Journal of librarianship and scholarly communication","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44435592","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

Dynamic Research Support for Academic Libraries [Book Review] 高校图书馆的动态研究支持[书评]

Journal of librarianship and scholarly communication Pub Date : 2019-04-15 DOI: 10.7710/2162-3309.2307

Lucinda May

引用次数: 0

CopyrightX [Course Review] CopyrightX[课程回顾]

Journal of librarianship and scholarly communication Pub Date : 2019-04-11 DOI: 10.7710/2162-3309.2297

Jill Cirasella

引用次数: 0

Opening Up Open Access Institutional Repositories to Demonstrate Value: Two Universities’ Pilots on Including Metadata-Only Records 开放开放获取的机构存储库展示价值——两所大学的纯元数据记录试点

Journal of librarianship and scholarly communication Pub Date : 2019-03-08 DOI: 10.7710/2162-3309.2220

Karen Bjork, Rebel Cummings-Sauls, Ryan Otto

引用次数: 4

When a Repository Is Not Enough: Redesigning a Digital Ecosystem to Serve Scholarly Communication 当知识库还不够时：重新设计数字生态系统为学术交流服务

Journal of librarianship and scholarly communication Pub Date : 2019-02-26 DOI: 10.7710/2162-3309.2225

R. Sewell, Sarah Potvin, Pauline Melgoza, James S. Creel, Jeremy M. Huff, Gregory T. Bailey, John T. Bondurant, S. Buckner, A. duPlessis, Lisa Furubotten, Julie A. Mosbo Ballestro, Ian W. Muise, Brian J. Wright

{"title":"When a Repository Is Not Enough: Redesigning a Digital Ecosystem to Serve Scholarly Communication","authors":"R. Sewell, Sarah Potvin, Pauline Melgoza, James S. Creel, Jeremy M. Huff, Gregory T. Bailey, John T. Bondurant, S. Buckner, A. duPlessis, Lisa Furubotten, Julie A. Mosbo Ballestro, Ian W. Muise, Brian J. Wright","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2225","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2225","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION Our library’s digital asset management system (DAMS) was no longer meeting digital asset management requirements or expanding scholarly communication needs. We formed a multiunit task force (TF) to (1) survey and identify existing and emerging institutional needs; (2) research available DAMS (open source and proprietary) and assess their potential fit; and (3) deploy software locally for in-depth testing and evaluation. DESCRIPTION OF PROGRAM We winnowed a field of 25 potential DAMS down to 5 for deployment and evaluation. The process included selection and identification of test collections and the creation of a multipart task based rubric based on library and campus needs assessments. Time constraints and DAMS deployment limitations prompted a move toward a new evaluation iteration: a shorter criteria-based rubric. LESSONS LEARNED We discovered that no single DAMS was “just right,” nor was any single DAMS a static product. Changing and expanding scholarly communication and digital needs could only be met by the more flexible approach offered by a multicomponent digital asset management ecosystem (DAME), described in this study. We encountered obstacles related to testing complex, rapidly evolving software available in a range of configurations and flavors (including tiers of vendor-hosted functionality) and time and capacity constraints curtailed in-depth testing. While we anticipate long-term benefits from “going further together” by including university-wide representation in the task force, there were trade-offs in distributing responsibilities and diffusing priorities. NEXT STEPS Shifts in scholarly communication at multiple levels—institutional, regional, consortial, national, and international—have already necessitated continual review and adjustment of our digital systems.","PeriodicalId":91322,"journal":{"name":"Journal of librarianship and scholarly communication","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42758901","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Data Management Practices in Academic Library Learning Analytics: A Critical Review 学术图书馆学习分析中的数据管理实践:评论

Journal of librarianship and scholarly communication Pub Date : 2019-02-22 DOI: 10.7710/2162-3309.2268

Kristin A. Briney

引用次数: 17

Strategies for Supporting OER Adoption through Faculty and Instructor Use of a Federated Search Tool 通过教师和讲师使用联合搜索工具支持OER采用的策略

Journal of librarianship and scholarly communication Pub Date : 2019-02-22 DOI: 10.7710/2162-3309.2279

Talea Anderson, Chelsea Leachman

{"title":"Strategies for Supporting OER Adoption through Faculty and Instructor Use of a Federated Search Tool","authors":"Talea Anderson, Chelsea Leachman","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2279","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2279","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION Open educational resources (OER) are gaining traction in higher education and becoming accepted by academics as a viable means for delivering course content. However, these resources can be difficult to find and use, both due to low visibility and confusion about licensing. This article describes one university’s work with faculty members to identify barriers in their search process when they are looking to adopt OER. DESCRIPTION OF PROGRAM A scholarly communication librarian and science librarian partnered to collect faculty and instructor reactions to a particular OER search tool, with the intention of better understanding the difficulties encountered during the search process. Eight interviews were conducted as participants were asked about their preferences when it comes to locating OER, understanding licensing information, and adopting materials for class. NEXT STEPS From these interviews, the librarians identified practical recommendations for instruction/liaison librarians and technical services/systems librarians as they continue working to support faculty and instructors through the OER discovery and selection process. These recommendations relate to four themes uncovered in interviews with faculty and instructors: the need for increased transparency in search tools, the importance of intuitive narrowing and broadening features in search tools, the need for detailed and consistent metadata in OER records, and the need for clarity in intellectual property statements. The librarians note that these recommendations might best be pursued through wide-scale collaboration across library units and, more generally, between libraries, consortia, and institutions.","PeriodicalId":91322,"journal":{"name":"Journal of librarianship and scholarly communication","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46524650","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 7

Meaningful Metrics: A 21st Century Librarian's Guide to Bibliometrics, Altmetrics, and Research Impact [Book Review] 《有意义的指标:21世纪图书馆员的文献计量学、另类计量学和研究影响指南》

Journal of librarianship and scholarly communication Pub Date : 2019-01-15 DOI: 10.7710/2162-3309.2290

L. González

引用次数: 13

Online Safety and Academic Scholarship: Exploring Researchers’ Concerns from Ghana 网络安全和学术奖学金:探索加纳研究人员的关注点

Journal of librarianship and scholarly communication Pub Date : 2019-01-15 DOI: 10.7710/2162-3309.2263

Kodjo Atiso, Jenna Kammer

{"title":"Online Safety and Academic Scholarship: Exploring Researchers’ Concerns from Ghana","authors":"Kodjo Atiso, Jenna Kammer","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2263","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2263","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION This paper investigates factors, including fears of cybercrime, that may affect researchers’ willingness to share research in institutional repositories in Ghana. METHODS Qualitative research was conducted to understand more about the experiences of Ghanaian researchers when sharing research in institutional repositories. Interviews were conducted with 25 participants, documents related to policy and infrastructure in Ghana were examined, and observations were held in meetings of information technology committees. FINDINGS The findings indicate that researchers are specifically concerned about three areas when sharing research online: fraud, plagiarism, and identity theft. DISCUSSION This paper adds to research that examines barriers toward using institutional repositories, and highlights the lack of basic preventative strategies in Ghana—such as training, security, and infrastructure that are commonplace in developed countries. CONCLUSION This study draws on findings from Bossaller and Atiso (2015) that identified fears of cybercrime as one of the major barriers to sharing research online for Ghanaian researchers. While several other studies have found that fear of identity theft or plagiarism are barriers toward sharing work in the institutional repository, this is the first study that looks specifically at the experiences researchers have had with cybercrime to understand this barrier more fully.","PeriodicalId":91322,"journal":{"name":"Journal of librarianship and scholarly communication","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48984337","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2