BMC DermatologyPub Date : 2018-12-12DOI: 10.1186/s12895-018-0080-2
Annika Wilke, Günther Gediga, Andreas Goergens, Andreas Hansen, Anja Hübner, Swen Malte John, Kathrin Nordheider, Marc Rocholl, Sabine Weddeling, Britta Wulfhorst, Dorothée Nashan
{"title":"Interdisciplinary and multiprofessional outpatient secondary individual prevention of work-related skin diseases in the metalworking industry: 1-year follow-up of a patient cohort.","authors":"Annika Wilke, Günther Gediga, Andreas Goergens, Andreas Hansen, Anja Hübner, Swen Malte John, Kathrin Nordheider, Marc Rocholl, Sabine Weddeling, Britta Wulfhorst, Dorothée Nashan","doi":"10.1186/s12895-018-0080-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12895-018-0080-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Germany, work-related skin diseases are predominant within the spectrum of reported occupational diseases. Metal workers are among the high-risk professions. Offering effective prevention programs to affected patients is of utmost importance to avoid deterioration of the disease and job loss. We conducted a 1-year follow-up in patients who participated in a multidisciplinary, complex outpatient prevention program representing a standard procedure of patient care by the respective statutory accident insurance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The multi-component prevention program consists of multiprofessional individual patient counseling, a structured skin protection seminar in a group, as well as workplace visits and on-site counseling in terms of appropriate skin protection (e.g. gloves). An observational study with a 1-year follow-up and four measurements (T1-T4, longitudinal pre/post-test design) including dermatological examinations and standardized written questionnaires was conducted between 2013 and 2016 to assess changes over time regarding job loss and disease severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 94 patients (87 male, mean age: 45.4 years) were included in the analysis. One year after the skin protection seminar (T4), 83 patients (88.3%) remained in their original professional metalworking activity and four patients (4.3%) had given up their profession because of their skin disease. At baseline (T1), irritant contact dermatitis of the hands was the most frequent diagnosis (80.7%). Methods for self-reported disease severity showed good correlation with the clinical gold standard at T1 and T2 (dermatological examination with the Osnabrück Hand Eczema Severity Index / OHSI), and a significant decrease of the self-reported disease severity was found over time from T1 to T4 (p < 0.001). Further results indicate an improved self-perceived disease control and an overall satisfaction with the prevention program.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this observational study demonstrate that the comprehensive prevention program positively influences the course of work-related skin diseases, increases the possibility to continue working in a \"high-risk\" profession and improves the disease management of metal workers. In the long term, the prevention program may lead to cost savings by preventing high therapy costs or professional retraining.</p>","PeriodicalId":9014,"journal":{"name":"BMC Dermatology","volume":"18 1","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12895-018-0080-2","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36818696","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
BMC DermatologyPub Date : 2018-12-04DOI: 10.1186/s12895-018-0079-8
C I Wootton, S Bell, A Philavanh, K Phommachack, M Soukavong, S Kidoikhammouan, S L Walker, M Mayxay
{"title":"Assessing skin disease and associated health-related quality of life in a rural Lao community.","authors":"C I Wootton, S Bell, A Philavanh, K Phommachack, M Soukavong, S Kidoikhammouan, S L Walker, M Mayxay","doi":"10.1186/s12895-018-0079-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12895-018-0079-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Skin diseases are common and often have an impact on an individual's health-related quality of life. In rural communities where access to healthcare may be limited and individuals rely on farming for food and income, the impact of skin diseases may be greater. The objectives for this study were to perform an assessment of skin disease prevalence in a rural village in Laos and assess the associated impact of any skin disease found using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A rural village was purposively selected and 340 participants examined by dermatologists over a four day period. Brief questionnaires were performed, followed by full body skin examinations and DLQI questionnaires completed were relevant. The data were analysed using chi square and Wilcoxon signed rank tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and eighty-one participants were found to have a skin disease (53%). The six most common skin diseases were: eczema (22%), dermatophyte infections (19%), acne (10%), scabies infestation (9%), melasma (8%) and pityriasis versicolor (4%). Just over half of those with skin disease (51%) completed the DLQI, with scores ranging from 0 to 24. Those with skin problems on examination were significantly more likely to be farmers, have had a previous skin problem, be older or live in a smaller family. Conclusions This study represents the first formal documentation of skin disease prevalence in Laos and establishes the high rate of skin disease in the rural community and the associated impact these diseases have on health-related quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":9014,"journal":{"name":"BMC Dermatology","volume":"18 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12895-018-0079-8","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36744998","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
BMC DermatologyPub Date : 2018-11-06DOI: 10.1186/s12895-018-0078-9
Martha Fors, Santiago Palacios, Kirsten Falcon, Karla Ventimilla, Lilia Simbaña, Carlos Lagos, Nélida Lasso, Carlos Navas
{"title":"Exploratory study of the reproducibility of the SCore for INtrinsic and EXtrinsic skin aging (SCINEXA) scale in \"Ruta Escondida de la Mitad del Mundo\", Ecuador, 2017.","authors":"Martha Fors, Santiago Palacios, Kirsten Falcon, Karla Ventimilla, Lilia Simbaña, Carlos Lagos, Nélida Lasso, Carlos Navas","doi":"10.1186/s12895-018-0078-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12895-018-0078-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Few studies have been published related to the analysis of different skin aging parameters for whole-body skin using the SCINEXA scale for skin damage. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility of the SCINEXA scale (SCore for INtrinsic and EXtrinsic skin Aging) in South-Americans non-Caucasian population of a region of Ecuador.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Exploratory observational study. Thirty subjects of both genders, over 40 years old and living in a rural area with particular characteristics regarding sun exposure were included. The SCINEXA scale was applied at three different time points to assess its reproducibility. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used for comparison of mean SCINEXA scores. Intraclass correlation coefficient, 95% CI and \"Cronbach's alpha\" coefficient were performed to measure reproducibility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among participants, 86.7% were female; mean age was over 67 years old, with mainly low educational level, and almost half had more than six hours of sun exposure per day. Test-retest reproducibility of this scale demonstrated almost perfect agreement. The SCINEXA score was greater than 2 points in half of the subjects, reflecting aging due to sun exposure.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Most participants were women from one town in a particular geographical area, and the sample size was small. Genetic determinants of skin phenotypes were not assessed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SCINEXA score is reproducible in South American non-Caucasian subjects of a particular region of the country. Damage from sun exposure was evident in participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":9014,"journal":{"name":"BMC Dermatology","volume":"18 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12895-018-0078-9","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36651612","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
BMC DermatologyPub Date : 2018-10-29DOI: 10.1186/s12895-018-0076-y
George Moncrieff, Annie Lied-Lied, Gill Nelson, Chantal E Holy, Rachel Weinstein, David Wei, Simon Rowe
{"title":"Cost and effectiveness of prescribing emollient therapy for atopic eczema in UK primary care in children and adults: a large retrospective analysis of the Clinical Practice Research Datalink.","authors":"George Moncrieff, Annie Lied-Lied, Gill Nelson, Chantal E Holy, Rachel Weinstein, David Wei, Simon Rowe","doi":"10.1186/s12895-018-0076-y","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12895-018-0076-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) was used to evaluate the overall costs to the National Health Service, including healthcare utilisation, of prescribing emollients in UK primary care for dry skin and atopic eczema (DS&E).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Primary care patients in the UK were identified using the CPRD and their records were interrogated for the 2 years following first diagnosis of DS&E. Data from patients with (n = 45,218) and without emollient prescriptions (n = 9780) were evaluated. Multivariate regression models were used to compare healthcare utilisation and cost in the two matched groups (age, sex, diagnosis). Two sub-analyses of the Emollient group were performed between matched groups receiving (1) a colloidal oatmeal emollient (Aveeno-First) versus non-colloidal oatmeal emollients (Aveeno-Never) and (2) Aveeno prescribed first-line (Aveeno-First) versus prescribed Aveeno later (Aveeno-Subsequently). Logistic regression models calculated the odds of prescription with either potent / very potent topical corticosteroids (TCS) or skin-related antimicrobials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Costs per patient were £125.80 in Emollient (n = 7846) versus £128.13 in Non-Emollient (n = 7846) matched groups (p = 0.08). The Emollient group had fewer visits/patient (2.44 vs. 2.66; p < 0.0001) and lower mean per-visit costs (£104.15 vs. £113.25; p < 0.0001), compared with the Non-Emollient group. Non-Emollient patients had 18% greater odds of being prescribed TCS and 13% greater odds of being prescribed an antimicrobial than Emollient patients. In the Aveeno-First (n = 1943) versus Aveeno-Never (n = 1943) sub-analysis, costs per patient were lower in the Aveeno-First compared with the Aveeno-Never groups (£133.46 vs. £141.11; p = 0.0069). The Aveeno-Never group had ≥21% greater odds of being prescribed TCS or antimicrobial than the Aveeno-First group. In the Aveeno-First (n = 1357) versus Aveeno-Subsequently (n = 1357) sub-analysis, total costs were lower in the Aveeno-First group (£140.35 vs. £206.43; p < 0.001). Patients in the Aveeno-Subsequently group had 91% greater odds of being prescribed TCS and 75% greater odds of being prescribed an antimicrobial than the Aveeno-First group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Acknowledging limitations from unknown disease severity in the CRPD, the prescription of emollients to treat DS&E was associated with fewer primary care visits, reduced healthcare utilisation and reduced cost. Prescribing emollients, especially those containing colloidal oatmeal, was associated with fewer TCS and antimicrobial prescriptions.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study is registered at http://isrctn.com/ISRCTN91126037 .</p>","PeriodicalId":9014,"journal":{"name":"BMC Dermatology","volume":"18 1","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6206824/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36628074","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
BMC DermatologyPub Date : 2018-10-25DOI: 10.1186/s12895-018-0077-x
Ivan Cherrez-Ojeda, Emanuel Vanegas, Miguel Felix, Valeria L Mata, Annia Cherrez
{"title":"Patient-reported outcomes in urticarial vasculitis treated with omalizumab: case report.","authors":"Ivan Cherrez-Ojeda, Emanuel Vanegas, Miguel Felix, Valeria L Mata, Annia Cherrez","doi":"10.1186/s12895-018-0077-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12895-018-0077-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the current knowledge of UV, there is a lack of consensus among diagnostic criteria and management. In general, antihistamine therapy is regularly used for the symptomatic management of pruritus but does not control inflammation or alter the course of the disease. Monoclonal antibodies such as omalizumab (anti-IgE) have been proposed as a potential treatment for urticarial vasculitis. A few studies have reported the benefits of omalizumab in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Herein we describe a female patient with urticarial vasculitis who was treated with omalizumab. We discuss the response to treatment and possible implications of PROMs in guiding the management of the disease.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>We describe the case of a 57-year-old woman with a diagnosis of urticarial vasculitis. Due to lack of response to first-line treatment and the severity of the disease, treatment with omalizumab was initiated. Omalizumab 150 mg was administered every four weeks for three months. Second-generation antihistamines were used as needed. Both CU-Q2oL and UAS 7 improved. After three-month therapy with omalizumab, disease severity improved from moderate severity (UAS7 = 19) to well controlled (UAS7 = 6). However, 5 months after the last administration of omalizumab, the patient complained of worsening symptoms and active disease with quality of life impairment. A single dose of omalizumab (150 mg) was prescribed with corticosteroids. Thereafter, the patient presented a disease activity and quality of life with a fluctuating pattern that was controlled with additional doses of omalizumab.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In chronic urticaria, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are important for assessing disease status and the impact of symptoms on patients' lives. However, to our knowledge, there is no validated tool to measure such outcomes in UV patients. Although UAS7 and CU-Q2oL were not designed for UV assessment, they might be useful in the clinical setting as objective measures to determine treatment efficacy. However, some domains in the CU-Q2oL questionnaires do not correlate well with UAS7, which might serve as a relative indication to continue treatment despite disease severity improvement. Based on our observations, we believe omalizumab 150 mg might be a feasible therapeutic alternative when first-line treatment is unsuccessful.</p>","PeriodicalId":9014,"journal":{"name":"BMC Dermatology","volume":"18 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12895-018-0077-x","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36616903","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Acne in Lomé, Togo: clinical aspects and quality of life of patients.","authors":"Bayaki Saka, Abla Séfako Akakpo, Julienne Noude Téclessou, Abas Mouhari-Toure, Garba Mahamadou, Piham Gnossike, Waguéna Gnassingbé, Aurel Abilogoun-Chokki, Adjalamotom Tawelessi, Koussake Kombaté, Palokinam Pitché","doi":"10.1186/s12895-018-0075-z","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12895-018-0075-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acne is a chronic inflammatory condition affecting the pilosebaceous follicle that mainly affects adolescents and young adults. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of life (QOL) of patients with acne, and to determine the correlation between the QOL and the severity of acne, in Lomé (Togo).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>From July 2017 to February 2018, we conducted a study in three dermatology departments of Lomé. The clinical evaluation of acne and assessment of the QOL were done using the ECLA (Echelle de Cotation des Lésions d'acné) and CADI (Cardiff Acne Disability Index) scores respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 300 patients aged 12 to 52 years; 71.3% of whom were female. The face was affected by acne in 100% of cases and papulopustular acne was the most common clinical form (66.7%). Acne was mild to moderate in 162 patients (54%) and severe in 138 (46%). Impairment was observed in all patients' QOL (scores ranged from 1 to 14 points). There was a positive correlation between severity of acne and QOL impairment in the patients (r = 0.21; p = 0.0002). We also found a positive correlation between overall CADI score and factors F1 and F3 of the ECLA scale: the severity of facial acne (r = 0.15; p = 0.0073) and the presence of scars (r = 0.21; p = 0.0002). In contrast, the global ECLA score was significantly correlated with items 2, 3, and 5 of the CADI questionnaire: the patient's relationship (r = 0.13; p = 0.0241), avoidance behaviors (r = 0.21; p = 0.0002) and perception of acne (r = 0.16; p = 0.0067).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Acne negatively impacts the QOL of patients. The severity of acne has an impact on the patient's relationships, avoidance behaviors and perception of the acne.</p>","PeriodicalId":9014,"journal":{"name":"BMC Dermatology","volume":"18 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12895-018-0075-z","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36421406","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
BMC DermatologyPub Date : 2018-07-24DOI: 10.1186/s12895-018-0073-1
Murlidhar Rajagopalan, Arun Inamadar, Asit Mittal, Autar K Miskeen, C R Srinivas, Kabir Sardana, Kiran Godse, Krina Patel, Madhu Rengasamy, Shivaprakash Rudramurthy, Sunil Dogra
{"title":"Expert Consensus on The Management of Dermatophytosis in India (ECTODERM India).","authors":"Murlidhar Rajagopalan, Arun Inamadar, Asit Mittal, Autar K Miskeen, C R Srinivas, Kabir Sardana, Kiran Godse, Krina Patel, Madhu Rengasamy, Shivaprakash Rudramurthy, Sunil Dogra","doi":"10.1186/s12895-018-0073-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12895-018-0073-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dermatophytosis management has become an important public health issue, with a large void in research in the area of disease pathophysiology and management. Current treatment recommendations appear to lose their relevance in the current clinical scenario. The objective of the current consensus was to provide an experience-driven approach regarding the diagnosis and management of tinea corporis, cruris and pedis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven experts in the field of clinical dermatology and mycology participated in the modified Delphi process consisting of two workshops and five rounds of questionnaires, elaborating definitions, diagnosis and management. Panel members were asked to mark \"agree\" or \"disagree\" beside each statement, and provide comments. More than 75% of concordance in response was set to reach the consensus.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>KOH mount microscopy was recommended as a point of care testing. Fungal culture was recommended in chronic, recurrent, relapse, recalcitrant and multisite tinea cases. Topical monotherapy was recommended for naïve tinea cruris and corporis (localised) cases, while a combination of systemic and topical antifungals was recommended for naïve and recalcitrant tinea pedis, extensive lesions of corporis and recalcitrant cases of cruris and corporis. Because of the anti-inflammatory, antibacterial and broad spectrum activity, topical azoles should be preferred. Terbinafine and itraconazole should be the preferred systemic drugs. Minimum duration of treatment should be 2-4 weeks in naïve cases and > 4 weeks in recalcitrant cases. Topical corticosteroid use in the clinical practice of tinea management was strongly discouraged.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This consensus guideline will help to standardise care, provide guidance on the management, and assist in clinical decision-making for healthcare professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":9014,"journal":{"name":"BMC Dermatology","volume":"18 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12895-018-0073-1","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36340293","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Persistence rates and medical costs of biological therapies for psoriasis treatment in Japan: a real-world data study using a claims database.","authors":"Rosarin Sruamsiri, Kosuke Iwasaki, Wentao Tang, Jörg Mahlich","doi":"10.1186/s12895-018-0074-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12895-018-0074-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biological therapies (BTs) including infliximab (IFX), adalimumab (ADL), secukinumab (SCK) and ustekinumab (UST) are approved in Japan for the treatment of psoriasis. Although the persistence rates and medical costs of BTs treatment have been investigated in multiple foreign studies in recent years, few such studies have been conducted in Japan and the differences between patients who adhered to treatment and those who did not have not been reported. This study is aimed at investigating the persistence rates and medical costs of BTs in the treatment of psoriasis in Japan, using the real-world data from a large-scale claims database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Claims data from the JMDC database (August 2009 to December 2016) were used for this analysis. Patient data were extracted using the ICD10 code for psoriasis and claims records of BT injections. Twelve-month and 24-month persistence rates of BTs were estimated by Kaplan-Meier methodology, and 12-month-medical costs before and after BT initiation were compared between persistent and non-persistent patient groups at 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 205 psoriasis patients treated with BTs (BT-naïve patients: 177) were identified. The 12-month/24-month persistence rates for ADL, IFX, SCK, and UST in BT-naïve patients were 46.8% ± 16.6%/46.8 ± 16.6%, 53.0% ± 14.9%/41.0% ± 15.5%, 55.4%/55.4% (95% CI not available) and 79.4% ± 9.9%/71.9% ± 12.2%, respectively. Statistically significant differences in persistence were found among different BT treatments, and UST was found to have the highest persistence rate. The total medical costs during the 12 months after BT initiation in BT-naïve patients were (in 1000 Japanese Yen): 2218 for ADL, 3409 for IFX, 465 for SCK, 2824 for UST (average: 2828). Compared with the 12-month persistent patient group, the total medical costs in the persistent group was higher (Δ:+ 118), but for some medications such as IFX or UST cost increases were lower for persistent patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>UST was found to have the highest persistence rate among all BTs for psoriasis treatment in Japan. The 12-month medical costs after BT initiation in the persistent patient group may not have increased as much as in the non-persistent patient group for some medications.</p>","PeriodicalId":9014,"journal":{"name":"BMC Dermatology","volume":"18 1","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12895-018-0074-0","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36305568","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
BMC DermatologyPub Date : 2018-06-28DOI: 10.1186/s12895-018-0072-2
April W Armstrong, Shonda A Foster, Brian S Comer, Chen-Yen Lin, William Malatestinic, Russel Burge, Orin Goldblum
{"title":"Real-world health outcomes in adults with moderate-to-severe psoriasis in the United States: a population study using electronic health records to examine patient-perceived treatment effectiveness, medication use, and healthcare resource utilization.","authors":"April W Armstrong, Shonda A Foster, Brian S Comer, Chen-Yen Lin, William Malatestinic, Russel Burge, Orin Goldblum","doi":"10.1186/s12895-018-0072-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12895-018-0072-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Little is known regarding real-world health outcomes data among US psoriasis patients, but electronic health records (EHR) that collect structured data at point-of-care may provide opportunities to investigate real-world health outcomes among psoriasis patients. Our objective was to investigate patient-perceived treatment effectiveness, patterns of medication use (duration, switching, and/or discontinuation), healthcare resource utilization, and medication costs using real-world data from psoriasis patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data for adults (≥18-years) with a dermatology provider-given diagnosis of psoriasis from 9/2014-9/2015 were obtained from dermatology practices using a widely used US dermatology-specific EHR containing over 500,000 psoriasis patients. Disease severity was captured by static physician's global assessment and body surface area. Patient-perceived treatment effectiveness was assessed by a pre-defined question. Treatment switching and duration were documented. Reasons for discontinuations were assessed using pre-defined selections. Healthcare resource utilization was defined by visit frequency and complexity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 82,621 patients with psoriasis during the study period, patient-perceived treatment effectiveness was investigated in 2200 patients. The proportion of patients reporting \"strongly agree\" when asked if their treatment was effective was highest for biologics (73%) and those reporting treatment adherence (55%). In 16,000 patients who received oral systemics and 21,087 patients who received biologics, median treatment duration was longer for those who received biologics (160 vs. 113 days, respectively). Treatment switching was less frequent among patients on systemic monotherapies compared to those on combination therapies. The most common reason for discontinuing biologics was loss of efficacy; the most common reason for discontinuing orals was side effects. In 28,754 patients, higher disease severity was associated with increased healthcare resource utilization (increased visit frequency and complexity). When compared between treatment groups (n = 10,454), healthcare resource utilization was highest for phototherapy. Annual medication costs were higher for biologics ($21,977) than oral systemics ($3413).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Real-world research using a widely implemented dermatology EHR provided valuable insights on patient perceived treatment effectiveness, patterns of medication usage, healthcare resource utilization, and medication costs for psoriasis patients in the US. This study and others utilizing EHRs for real-world research may assist clinical and payer decisions regarding the management of psoriasis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9014,"journal":{"name":"BMC Dermatology","volume":"18 1","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12895-018-0072-2","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36267797","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
BMC DermatologyPub Date : 2018-02-07DOI: 10.1186/s12895-018-0070-4
Indhupriya Subramanian, Vivek K Singh, Abhay Jere
{"title":"Elucidating mechanistic insights into drug action for atopic dermatitis: a systems biology approach.","authors":"Indhupriya Subramanian, Vivek K Singh, Abhay Jere","doi":"10.1186/s12895-018-0070-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12895-018-0070-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Topical Betamethasone (BM) and Pimecrolimus (PC) are widely used drugs in the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD). Though the biomolecules and biological pathways affected by the drugs are known, the causal inter-relationships among these pathways in the context of skin is not available. We aim to derive this insight by using transcriptomic data of AD skin samples treated with BM and PC using systems biology approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Transcriptomic datasets of 10 AD patients treated with Betamethasone and Pimecrolimus were obtained from GEO datasets. We used a novel computational platform, eSkIN ( www.persistent.com/eskin ), to perform pathway enrichment analysis for the given datasets. eSkIN consists of 35 skin specific pathways, thus allowing skin-centric analysis of transcriptomic data. Fisher's exact test was used to compute the significance of the pathway enrichment. The enriched pathways were further analyzed to gain mechanistic insights into the action of these drugs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis highlighted the molecular details of the mechanism of action of the drugs and corroborated the known facts about these drugs i.e. BM is more effective in triggering anti-inflammatory response but also causes more adverse effect on skin barrier than PC. In particular, eSkIN helped enunciate the biological pathways activated by these drugs to trigger anti-inflammatory response and its effect on skin barrier. BM suppresses pathways like TNF and TLRs, thus inhibiting NF-κB while PC targets inflammatory genes like IL13 and IL6 via known calcineurin-NFAT pathway. Furthermore, we show that the reduced skin barrier function by BM is due to the suppression of activators like AP1 transcription factors, CEBPs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We thus demonstrate the detailed mechanistic insight into drug action of AD using a novel computational approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":9014,"journal":{"name":"BMC Dermatology","volume":"18 1","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12895-018-0070-4","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35806489","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}