James L. Mills, Aggeliki Dimopoulos, Regan L. Bailey
{"title":"What is standing in the way of complete prevention of folate preventable neural tube defects?","authors":"James L. Mills, Aggeliki Dimopoulos, Regan L. Bailey","doi":"10.1002/bdra.23518","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bdra.23518","url":null,"abstract":"<p>It is well known that there is a large gap between the number of neural tube defects (NTDs) that could be prevented by folic acid and the number that are actually being prevented. Arth and colleagues demonstrate just how large that gap is (Arth et al., <span>2016</span>). The question is: why are so many potentially preventable NTDs not being prevented?</p><p>Campaigns recommending that women of childbearing age take folic acid supplements routinely and voluntary fortification programs have had only modest success at best (Khoshnood et al., <span>2015</span>). Therefore, mandatory fortification has been instituted in almost 80 countries (Food Fortification Initiative, 2016). As Arth et al. demonstrate, many countries have not embraced the mandatory fortification approach, despite the fact that it has prevented an average of 40 to 50% of NTDs (Castillo-Lancellotti et al., <span>2013</span>).</p><p>Concerns regarding the safety of folic acid fortification are one reason. Two major concerns are masking vitamin B12 deficiency and increasing cancer risk. It should be noted that the amount of folic acid people receive from fortified food in the United States, where fortification of enriched cereal grain products is mandatory, is an average of 163 micrograms per day in women of childbearing age, less than half the recommended dietary allowance (Tinker et al., <span>2010</span>). This is sufficient to prevent folate-related NTDs (Mosley et al., <span>2009</span>) but does not appear to cause masking of the hematological signs of vitamin B12 deficiency (Mills et al., <span>2003</span>). A large meta-analysis of participants in folic acid trials demonstrated that, after an average of 5 years of follow-up, the relative risk for incident cancer was 1.06 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.99 to 1.13 (Vollset et al., <span>2013</span>).</p><p>The authors noted that the 6% increase was not statistically significant and that trial participants were exposed to far higher doses than fortification would deliver. There was no significant increase in any individual cancers studied. Nonetheless, concerns persist regarding cancer risk (van Wijngaarden et al., <span>2014</span>) and other possible but unproved risks (National Toxicology Program, 2015). It is important to note that the amount of folic acid needed to prevent NTDs is far less than the amount likely to cause adverse effects (Mills and Dimopoulos, <span>2015</span>). Because NTDs are uncommon events and a small increase in cancer would affect a substantial number of people, some countries have been reluctant to require fortification. It should be noted, however, that mandatory fortification has caused a dramatic reduction in folate deficiency (Pfeiffer et al., <span>2012</span>); so the benefit is not limited to a small group.</p><p>Several other obstacles to mandatory fortification exist. Although European Union (EU) regulation No. 1925/2006 (European Commission, 2006) acknowledges the need for mandator","PeriodicalId":8983,"journal":{"name":"Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology","volume":"106 7","pages":"517-519"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/bdra.23518","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"34560361","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Johanna Klamt, Andrea Hofmann, Anne C. Böhmer, Ann-Kathrin Hoebel, Lina Gölz, Jessica Becker, Alexander M. Zink, Markus Draaken, Alexander Hemprich, Martin Scheer, Gül Schmidt, Markus Martini, Michael Knapp, Elisabeth Mangold, Franziska Degenhardt, Kerstin U. Ludwig
{"title":"Obituary: Dr. Ed Lammer.","authors":"R. Finnell, G. Shaw","doi":"10.1002/bdra.23524","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bdra.23524","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8983,"journal":{"name":"Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology","volume":"1 1","pages":"515-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79840233","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}