Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology最新文献_第8页

Static Posters 静态海报

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Pub Date : 2019-10-01 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13066

引用次数: 0

Sleep in multiple pregnancy: Obstructive sleep apnoea and beyond 多胎妊娠期的睡眠:阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停及其他

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Pub Date : 2019-10-01 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12985

Y. Bin, J. Ford, P. Cistulli

{"title":"Sleep in multiple pregnancy: Obstructive sleep apnoea and beyond","authors":"Y. Bin, J. Ford, P. Cistulli","doi":"10.1111/ajo.12985","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.12985","url":null,"abstract":"Dear Editor, We read with great interest a most engaging and pragmatic clinical guideline for decreased fetal movements (DFM).1 Between 30– 55% of women who experience a stillbirth retrospectively noted DFM in the preceding week.2 This presumed negative clinical incident has long been perceived as opportunity for intervention. The AFFIRM study, recently published (November, 2018), was to be the first randomised trial involving 409 175 pregnancies that used a similar intervention package as in Norway (subjective perception of DFM by a patient in a contemporaneous setting) and was expected to deliver a 30% reduction in the rate of stillbirths.2 The results of the AFFIRM study have been disappointing to the supporters of intervention for reduced fetal movements. There was no statistically significant reduction in the stillbirth rate but rather an increase in induction and caesarean section rates, and average neonatal length of stay in neonatal intensive care.2 Also, in the intervention group there was a higher rate of post neonatal deaths. In our exuberance to prevent stillbirths, have we violated the principle of nonmaleficence? Alternatively, as suggested by Walker and Thornton, it might be safer to retain our current approach but rather place limits on awareness campaigns to gestations greater than 37 weeks.3 Reflecting upon the negative or null findings of the AFFIRM study, should the local guideline have an immediate addendum to clarify that there is no robust scientific approach to reduced fetal movements while awaiting further evidence?","PeriodicalId":8599,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86006746","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Reduced fetal movements – First do no harm 胎动减少-首先对胎儿无害

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Pub Date : 2019-10-01 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12976

A. Saunders, C. Griffin

{"title":"Reduced fetal movements – First do no harm","authors":"A. Saunders, C. Griffin","doi":"10.1111/ajo.12976","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.12976","url":null,"abstract":"Dear Editor, We read with great interest a most engaging and pragmatic clinical guideline for decreased fetal movements (DFM).1 Between 30– 55% of women who experience a stillbirth retrospectively noted DFM in the preceding week.2 This presumed negative clinical incident has long been perceived as opportunity for intervention. The AFFIRM study, recently published (November, 2018), was to be the first randomised trial involving 409 175 pregnancies that used a similar intervention package as in Norway (subjective perception of DFM by a patient in a contemporaneous setting) and was expected to deliver a 30% reduction in the rate of stillbirths.2 The results of the AFFIRM study have been disappointing to the supporters of intervention for reduced fetal movements. There was no statistically significant reduction in the stillbirth rate but rather an increase in induction and caesarean section rates, and average neonatal length of stay in neonatal intensive care.2 Also, in the intervention group there was a higher rate of post neonatal deaths. In our exuberance to prevent stillbirths, have we violated the principle of nonmaleficence? Alternatively, as suggested by Walker and Thornton, it might be safer to retain our current approach but rather place limits on awareness campaigns to gestations greater than 37 weeks.3 Reflecting upon the negative or null findings of the AFFIRM study, should the local guideline have an immediate addendum to clarify that there is no robust scientific approach to reduced fetal movements while awaiting further evidence?","PeriodicalId":8599,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85294294","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Journal Editorial Board 期刊编辑委员会

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Pub Date : 2019-10-01 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12860

引用次数: 0

A Reply to: Sleep in multiple pregnancy: Obstructive sleep apnoea and beyond 多胎妊娠中的睡眠:阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停及其他

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Pub Date : 2019-10-01 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13007

M. Rees

引用次数: 1

ANZSREI consensus statement on elective oocyte cryopreservation ANZSREI关于选择性卵母细胞冷冻保存的共识声明

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Pub Date : 2019-10-01 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13028

Raelia Lew, J. Foo, Ben Kroon, C. Boothroyd, M. Chapman

引用次数: 8

Men's lived experiences of perinatal loss: A review of the literature 男性围产期损失的生活经历:文献综述

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Pub Date : 2019-08-15 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13041

Van Nguyen, M. Temple-Smith, J. Bilardi

引用次数: 19

Journal Editorial Board 期刊编辑委员会

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Pub Date : 2019-08-01 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12858

引用次数: 0

Response to letter re: Consent for vaginal delivery 回复:同意阴道分娩

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Pub Date : 2019-08-01 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13033

Rodney W Petersen

引用次数: 1

Informed consent for vaginal birth 知情同意阴道分娩

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Pub Date : 2019-08-01 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13037

G. Blanchette

引用次数: 2