Issue brief (George Washington University. Center for Health Services Research and Policy)最新文献

{"title":"Coverage decisions versus the quality of care: an analysis of recent ERISA judicial decisions and their implications for employer-insured individuals.","authors":"S Rosenbaum, J Teitelbaum","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":84947,"journal":{"name":"Issue brief (George Washington University. Center for Health Services Research and Policy)","volume":" 8","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"22106892","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"An evaluation of agreements between managed care organizations and community-based mental illness and addiction disorder treatment and prevention providers.","authors":"S Rosenbaum,&nbsp;J Teitelbaum,&nbsp;D R Mauery,&nbsp;M Zakheim,&nbsp;M Golde","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This Issue Brief, prepared for the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), examines contracts between managed care organizations (MCOs) and community-based providers of mental illness and addiction disorder treatment and prevention services (MI/AD providers). Building upon initial research published in 1997, this brief explores in depth one of the most hidden aspects of managed care: the relationship between the managed care organizations and health care providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":84947,"journal":{"name":"Issue brief (George Washington University. Center for Health Services Research and Policy)","volume":" 9","pages":"1-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"22106893","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Designing a complaint and grievance system and other member assistance services under Medicaid managed care.","authors":"S Rosenbaum,&nbsp;J Teitelbaum","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":84947,"journal":{"name":"Issue brief (George Washington University. Center for Health Services Research and Policy)","volume":" 7","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"22106891","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Americans with Disabilities Act: implications for managed care for persons with mental illness and addiction disorders.","authors":"S Rosenbaum,&nbsp;J Teitelbaum,&nbsp;R Silverstein","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This Issue Brief, prepared for the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, examines the Americans with Disabilities Act (\"the ADA\") and its application to managed care. The ADA provides important protections for persons with disabilities who are members of managed care arrangements, regardless of whether their membership is sponsored by an employer, Medicare, or Medicaid or is purchased privately. The interaction between the ADA and managed care is complex, and different issues can arise under publicly and privately sponsored plans.</p>","PeriodicalId":84947,"journal":{"name":"Issue brief (George Washington University. Center for Health Services Research and Policy)","volume":" 5-6","pages":"1-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1999-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"22106886","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Cultural competence in Medicaid managed care purchasing: general and behavioral health services for persons with mental and addiction-related illnesses and disorders.","authors":"S Rosenbaum,&nbsp;J Teitelbaum","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":84947,"journal":{"name":"Issue brief (George Washington University. Center for Health Services Research and Policy)","volume":" 4","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1999-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"22106890","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Selected key issues in the development and drafting of public managed behavioral health care carve-out contracts.","authors":"J Teitelbaum,&nbsp;S Rosenbaum,&nbsp;W Burgess,&nbsp;L DeCourcy","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The development of managed behavioral health care carve-out contracts covering a discrete subset of benefits available for use by persons with mental health and/or substance abuse disorders poses major challenges for public purchasers. This Issue Brief explores several key issues that arise when drafting such agreements. Many of the issues that arise in the drafting of carve-out agreements will require the public purchaser to resolve basic policy questions well before the drafting of requests for proposals or contracts can proceed. Analyses of public sector managed behavioral health care contracts by attorneys at the Center for Health Policy Research suggest that there are four essential areas that must be addressed if mental health and substance abuse services are carved-out (either by the purchaser or by a comprehensive managed health care entity): (1) what population is eligible for enrollment; (2) what services is the contractor expected to furnish; (3) what triggers a duty on the part of the mental health or substance abuse carve-out contractor to provide services; and (4) how are services furnished by the managed behavioral health care contractor integrated with or coordinated with services furnished by a beneficiary's primary health care provider, with pharmaceutical benefits, and with other services that may be available to a beneficiary through a fee-for-service or other mechanism. However a purchaser chooses to resolve these four issues, it is essential that parallel clarifying clauses are also built into the contracts of primary health care providers and other entities providing needed services for persons whose mental health and substance abuse service needs are covered by the carve-out. Underlying all of these issues is the fact that ambiguity, vagueness, or failure to define terms and responsibilities can create unexpected and unwelcome clinical and financial liabilities to purchasers.</p>","PeriodicalId":84947,"journal":{"name":"Issue brief (George Washington University. Center for Health Services Research and Policy)","volume":" 3","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1998-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"22106888","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"An overview of Medicaid managed care litigation.","authors":"S Rosenbaum,&nbsp;J Teitelbaum,&nbsp;C Kirby,&nbsp;L Priebe,&nbsp;T Klement","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since the enactment of Medicaid in 1965, states have had the option of offering beneficiaries enrollment in managed care arrangements. With the advent of mandatory managed care reaching millions of beneficiaries (including a growing proportion of disabled recipients), the amount and scope of litigation involving Medicaid managed care plans can be expected to grow. A review of the current litigation regarding Medicaid managed care reveals two basic types of lawsuits: (1) those that challenge the practices of managed care companies under various federal and state laws that safeguard consumer rights, protect health care quality, and prohibit discrimination; and (2) suits that assert claims arising directly under the Medicaid statute and implementing regulations, as well as claims related to Constitutional safeguards that undergird the program. Lawsuits asserting claims arising under Medicaid tend to raise two basic questions: (1) the extent to which enrollment in a Medicaid managed care plan alters existing Medicaid beneficiary rights and state agency duties under federal or state Medicaid law; and (2) the extent to which managed care companies, as agents of the state, act under \"color of law\" (i.e., undertaking to perform official duties or acting with the imprimatur of state authority). Additionally, states might see an increase in litigation brought by prospective and current contractors who assert that they have been wrongfully denied contracts or improperly penalized for poor performance. These assertions may involve claims that are grounded in federal and state law, the Medicaid statute, and the Constitution. Moreover, in light of the consumer protection elements of the managed care reforms contained in the Balanced Budget Act, future managed care litigation may focus on the manner in which companies carry out states' obligations toward managed care enrollees. Resolution of Medicaid managed care cases involves the application of general principles of administrative and regulatory law. Thus, Medicaid managed care cases have implications for other public purchasers of managed care arrangements, including state mental health and alcohol and substance abuse agencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":84947,"journal":{"name":"Issue brief (George Washington University. Center for Health Services Research and Policy)","volume":" 2","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1998-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"22104803","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Coverage decision-making in Medicaid managed care: key issues in developing managed care contracts.","authors":"S Rosenbaum,&nbsp;J B Teitelbaum","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Coverage provisions are the most complex part of any managed care contract. This is particularly true for Medicaid agencies, because of important differences between Medicaid and insurance. This Issue Brief identifies general issues that should be addressed by States as managed care contracts are developed and drafted, and it specifically explores the challenges faced by public purchasers when drafting managed care coverage provisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":84947,"journal":{"name":"Issue brief (George Washington University. Center for Health Services Research and Policy)","volume":" 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1998-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"22104802","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}