An overview of Medicaid managed care litigation.

S Rosenbaum, J Teitelbaum, C Kirby, L Priebe, T Klement
{"title":"An overview of Medicaid managed care litigation.","authors":"S Rosenbaum,&nbsp;J Teitelbaum,&nbsp;C Kirby,&nbsp;L Priebe,&nbsp;T Klement","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since the enactment of Medicaid in 1965, states have had the option of offering beneficiaries enrollment in managed care arrangements. With the advent of mandatory managed care reaching millions of beneficiaries (including a growing proportion of disabled recipients), the amount and scope of litigation involving Medicaid managed care plans can be expected to grow. A review of the current litigation regarding Medicaid managed care reveals two basic types of lawsuits: (1) those that challenge the practices of managed care companies under various federal and state laws that safeguard consumer rights, protect health care quality, and prohibit discrimination; and (2) suits that assert claims arising directly under the Medicaid statute and implementing regulations, as well as claims related to Constitutional safeguards that undergird the program. Lawsuits asserting claims arising under Medicaid tend to raise two basic questions: (1) the extent to which enrollment in a Medicaid managed care plan alters existing Medicaid beneficiary rights and state agency duties under federal or state Medicaid law; and (2) the extent to which managed care companies, as agents of the state, act under \"color of law\" (i.e., undertaking to perform official duties or acting with the imprimatur of state authority). Additionally, states might see an increase in litigation brought by prospective and current contractors who assert that they have been wrongfully denied contracts or improperly penalized for poor performance. These assertions may involve claims that are grounded in federal and state law, the Medicaid statute, and the Constitution. Moreover, in light of the consumer protection elements of the managed care reforms contained in the Balanced Budget Act, future managed care litigation may focus on the manner in which companies carry out states' obligations toward managed care enrollees. Resolution of Medicaid managed care cases involves the application of general principles of administrative and regulatory law. Thus, Medicaid managed care cases have implications for other public purchasers of managed care arrangements, including state mental health and alcohol and substance abuse agencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":84947,"journal":{"name":"Issue brief (George Washington University. Center for Health Services Research and Policy)","volume":" 2","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issue brief (George Washington University. Center for Health Services Research and Policy)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the enactment of Medicaid in 1965, states have had the option of offering beneficiaries enrollment in managed care arrangements. With the advent of mandatory managed care reaching millions of beneficiaries (including a growing proportion of disabled recipients), the amount and scope of litigation involving Medicaid managed care plans can be expected to grow. A review of the current litigation regarding Medicaid managed care reveals two basic types of lawsuits: (1) those that challenge the practices of managed care companies under various federal and state laws that safeguard consumer rights, protect health care quality, and prohibit discrimination; and (2) suits that assert claims arising directly under the Medicaid statute and implementing regulations, as well as claims related to Constitutional safeguards that undergird the program. Lawsuits asserting claims arising under Medicaid tend to raise two basic questions: (1) the extent to which enrollment in a Medicaid managed care plan alters existing Medicaid beneficiary rights and state agency duties under federal or state Medicaid law; and (2) the extent to which managed care companies, as agents of the state, act under "color of law" (i.e., undertaking to perform official duties or acting with the imprimatur of state authority). Additionally, states might see an increase in litigation brought by prospective and current contractors who assert that they have been wrongfully denied contracts or improperly penalized for poor performance. These assertions may involve claims that are grounded in federal and state law, the Medicaid statute, and the Constitution. Moreover, in light of the consumer protection elements of the managed care reforms contained in the Balanced Budget Act, future managed care litigation may focus on the manner in which companies carry out states' obligations toward managed care enrollees. Resolution of Medicaid managed care cases involves the application of general principles of administrative and regulatory law. Thus, Medicaid managed care cases have implications for other public purchasers of managed care arrangements, including state mental health and alcohol and substance abuse agencies.

医疗补助管理医疗诉讼概述。
自1965年颁布医疗补助计划以来,各州可以选择为受益人提供管理式医疗安排。随着强制性管理医疗的出现,数百万受益人(包括越来越多的残疾受益人),涉及医疗补助管理医疗计划的诉讼数量和范围预计会增长。对当前关于医疗补助管理式医疗的诉讼的回顾揭示了两种基本类型的诉讼:(1)根据各种保护消费者权利、保护医疗质量和禁止歧视的联邦和州法律,挑战管理式医疗公司的做法;(2)根据《医疗补助法》和实施条例直接提出索赔的诉讼,以及与支持该计划的宪法保障有关的索赔。在医疗补助计划下提出索赔的诉讼倾向于提出两个基本问题:(1)根据联邦或州医疗补助法,加入医疗补助管理计划在多大程度上改变了现有的医疗补助受益人的权利和州机构的职责;(2)管理式医疗公司作为国家的代理人,在多大程度上在“法律的色彩”下行事(即承诺履行官方职责或在国家当局的授权下行事)。此外,各州可能会看到潜在和现有承包商提起的诉讼增加,这些承包商声称他们被错误地拒绝了合同或因表现不佳而受到不当处罚。这些主张可能涉及以联邦和州法律、医疗补助法规和宪法为基础的主张。此外,鉴于《平衡预算法》中包含的管理式医疗改革的消费者保护要素,未来的管理式医疗诉讼可能会集中在公司履行国家对管理式医疗参保人义务的方式上。医疗补助管理医疗案件的解决涉及行政和监管法律的一般原则的应用。因此,医疗补助管理医疗案例对管理医疗安排的其他公共购买者有影响,包括州精神卫生和酒精和药物滥用机构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信