Nursing law's Regan report最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Court held police had no liability for attack on RN. Ginapp v. City of Bellvue, 282 Neb. 1027 S-11-193 N.W. 2d (1/6/2012)-NE. 法院认为警察对袭击RN没有责任。Ginapp诉Bellvue City, 282 Neb. 1027 S-11-193 N.W. 2d(2012年6月1日)-NE。
Nursing law's Regan report Pub Date : 2012-04-01
{"title":"Court held police had no liability for attack on RN. Ginapp v. City of Bellvue, 282 Neb. 1027 S-11-193 N.W. 2d (1/6/2012)-NE.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":83833,"journal":{"name":"Nursing law's Regan report","volume":"52 11","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"30997449","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Court affirmed trial court's judgment for defendant on jury verdict. Case on point: Perry v. Gilotra-Mallik, A11A2099 GACA (3/13/2012)-GA. 法院根据陪审团的裁决维持了初审法院对被告的判决。例子:Perry诉Gilotra-Mallik案,A11A2099 GACA(2012年3月13日)-GA。
Nursing law's Regan report Pub Date : 2012-04-01
{"title":"Court affirmed trial court's judgment for defendant on jury verdict. Case on point: Perry v. Gilotra-Mallik, A11A2099 GACA (3/13/2012)-GA.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":83833,"journal":{"name":"Nursing law's Regan report","volume":"52 11","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"30997450","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
NY: Patient sues for negligent IV infiltrations: hospital's motion for summary judgment denied. Kalstein v. County of Nassau, 2012-30569 NYMISC(2/27/2012)-NY. 纽约:病人起诉静脉输液疏忽:医院驳回了即决判决的动议。Kalstein诉拿骚县案,2012-30569
Nursing law's Regan report Pub Date : 2012-04-01
{"title":"NY: Patient sues for negligent IV infiltrations: hospital's motion for summary judgment denied. Kalstein v. County of Nassau, 2012-30569 NYMISC(2/27/2012)-NY.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":83833,"journal":{"name":"Nursing law's Regan report","volume":"52 11","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"30997452","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Staffing agency liable for death due to failure to monitor B/P. Case on point: Medical Staffing Network Inc. v. Connors, A11A1927 GACA (1/24/2012)-GA. 因未能监测收支情况而造成死亡的人事机构。一个恰当的案例:医疗人员网络公司诉康纳斯,A11A1927 GACA(2012年1月24日)-GA。
Nursing law's Regan report Pub Date : 2012-04-01
{"title":"Staffing agency liable for death due to failure to monitor B/P. Case on point: Medical Staffing Network Inc. v. Connors, A11A1927 GACA (1/24/2012)-GA.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":83833,"journal":{"name":"Nursing law's Regan report","volume":"52 11","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"30997453","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
MO: City employee failed to follow protocols: act negated application of sovereign immunity. Richardson v. Burrow, ED97002 MOCAE (2/21/2012)-MO. 莫:市政府雇员没有遵守协议:主权豁免无效。Richardson诉Burrow, ED97002 MOCAE (2/21/2012)-MO。
Nursing law's Regan report Pub Date : 2012-04-01
{"title":"MO: City employee failed to follow protocols: act negated application of sovereign immunity. Richardson v. Burrow, ED97002 MOCAE (2/21/2012)-MO.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":83833,"journal":{"name":"Nursing law's Regan report","volume":"52 11","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"30997451","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cerebral palsy does not mean nurse or Dr. negligent. Case on point: Trudeau v. Physicians Ins. Co. of Wisconsin, Inc., 201AP2615 (3/6/2012)-WI. 脑瘫并不意味着护士或医生玩忽职守。一个很好的例子:特鲁多诉内科医生协会。Co. of Wisconsin, Inc., 201AP2615 (3/6/2012)-WI。
Nursing law's Regan report Pub Date : 2012-03-01
{"title":"Cerebral palsy does not mean nurse or Dr. negligent. Case on point: Trudeau v. Physicians Ins. Co. of Wisconsin, Inc., 201AP2615 (3/6/2012)-WI.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":83833,"journal":{"name":"Nursing law's Regan report","volume":"52 10","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40169650","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
PACU refused to aid ventilator-dependent pt.: death resulted. Case on point: Dixon-Gates v. Brooklyn Hospial Center, 2012-22063 (3/7/2012)-NY. PACU拒绝帮助依赖呼吸机的病人:导致死亡。案例:Dixon-Gates诉Brooklyn hospital Center, 2012-22063 (3/7/2012)-NY。
Nursing law's Regan report Pub Date : 2012-03-01
{"title":"PACU refused to aid ventilator-dependent pt.: death resulted. Case on point: Dixon-Gates v. Brooklyn Hospial Center, 2012-22063 (3/7/2012)-NY.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":83833,"journal":{"name":"Nursing law's Regan report","volume":"52 10","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40169653","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Hospital could be held liable for nursing negligence in failing to use leg cuffs. Tisdale. v. Toledo Hospital, 2012-Ohio 1110 L-15-1005 (3/16/2012)-OH. 医院可能因护理疏忽未能使用脚镣而被追究责任。蒂斯达尔。诉托莱多医院,2012-Ohio 1110 L-15-1005(2012年3月16日)
Nursing law's Regan report Pub Date : 2012-03-01
{"title":"Hospital could be held liable for nursing negligence in failing to use leg cuffs. Tisdale. v. Toledo Hospital, 2012-Ohio 1110 L-15-1005 (3/16/2012)-OH.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":83833,"journal":{"name":"Nursing law's Regan report","volume":"52 10","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40169649","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
OH: Plaintiff failed to identify unknown parties: dismissal of suit vs. RN & MD affirmed. Henik V. Robinson Memorial Hospital, 2012-Ohio-1169 C.A. 25701 (3/21/2012)-OH. 原告未能识别未知方:驳回对RN & MD的诉讼。Henik V. Robinson纪念医院,2012-Ohio-1169 C.A. 25701(3/21/2012)-噢。
Nursing law's Regan report Pub Date : 2012-03-01
{"title":"OH: Plaintiff failed to identify unknown parties: dismissal of suit vs. RN & MD affirmed. Henik V. Robinson Memorial Hospital, 2012-Ohio-1169 C.A. 25701 (3/21/2012)-OH.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":83833,"journal":{"name":"Nursing law's Regan report","volume":"52 10","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40169651","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
FL: Could stroke victim have survived? Verdict for estate reversed for lack of causation. Hollywood Medical Center v. Alfred, 4D09-4878, 4D10-1003 (2/1/2012)-FL. FL:中风患者能活下来吗?财产判决因缺乏因果关系而被推翻。好莱坞医疗中心诉阿尔弗雷德,4D09-4878, 4D10-1003 (2/1/2012)-FL。
Nursing law's Regan report Pub Date : 2012-03-01
{"title":"FL: Could stroke victim have survived? Verdict for estate reversed for lack of causation. Hollywood Medical Center v. Alfred, 4D09-4878, 4D10-1003 (2/1/2012)-FL.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":83833,"journal":{"name":"Nursing law's Regan report","volume":"52 10","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40169652","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书