Nursing law's Regan report最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
PA: Wheelchair bound pt. transported to Dr.: no foot rest or belt--fall & death resulted. Setlock v. Pinebrook Personal Care & Retirement Center, 2012 PA Super 232 (10/23/2012)-PA. PA:被轮椅束缚的病人被送到医生那里:没有脚凳或安全带——导致跌倒和死亡。Setlock诉Pinebrook个人护理和退休中心,2012 PA Super 232(2012年10月23日)-PA。
Nursing law's Regan report Pub Date : 2012-12-01
{"title":"PA: Wheelchair bound pt. transported to Dr.: no foot rest or belt--fall & death resulted. Setlock v. Pinebrook Personal Care & Retirement Center, 2012 PA Super 232 (10/23/2012)-PA.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":83833,"journal":{"name":"Nursing law's Regan report","volume":"53 7","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31216814","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sponge left in pt. - Dr. settled: hospital sued for OR nurses' negligence. Savage v. Three Rivers Medical Center, C-000348-DG KYSC---S.W.3d---(10/25/2012)-KY. 海绵落在床上——医生和解:医院起诉手术室护士疏忽。萨维奇诉三河医疗中心,C-000348-DG KYSC- S.W.3d-(2012年10月25日)-KY。
Nursing law's Regan report Pub Date : 2012-12-01
{"title":"Sponge left in pt. - Dr. settled: hospital sued for OR nurses' negligence. Savage v. Three Rivers Medical Center, C-000348-DG KYSC---S.W.3d---(10/25/2012)-KY.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":83833,"journal":{"name":"Nursing law's Regan report","volume":"53 7","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31216811","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
NJ: Rescue delayed transporting for 30 minutes: would patient have survived but for the delay? Murray v. Plainfield Rescue Squad, A-128 NJSC (7/17/2012)-NJ. NJ:救援延误了30分钟,如果没有延误,病人能活下来吗?Murray诉Plainfield救援队,A-128 NJSC(2012年7月17日)-NJ
Nursing law's Regan report Pub Date : 2012-12-01
{"title":"NJ: Rescue delayed transporting for 30 minutes: would patient have survived but for the delay? Murray v. Plainfield Rescue Squad, A-128 NJSC (7/17/2012)-NJ.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":83833,"journal":{"name":"Nursing law's Regan report","volume":"53 7","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31216813","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Would you want to be a patient in this facility? Case on point: Forum Grp. at Moran Lake Nsg. & Rehab. Ctr, LLC v. Terhune, (10/31/2012)-GA. 你想成为这里的病人吗?一个恰当的例子:论坛集团。在莫兰湖Nsg和康复。Ctr, LLC诉Terhune, (2012.10.31)-GA。
Nursing law's Regan report Pub Date : 2012-12-01
{"title":"Would you want to be a patient in this facility? Case on point: Forum Grp. at Moran Lake Nsg. & Rehab. Ctr, LLC v. Terhune, (10/31/2012)-GA.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":83833,"journal":{"name":"Nursing law's Regan report","volume":"53 7","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31216815","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Know the standing orders in your ED & whether you need Dr.'s OK. Case on point: A12A1872 (10/30/2012)-GA. 了解你的急诊科的常规医嘱,以及你是否需要医生的确认。例子:A12A1872(2012年10月30日)-GA。
Nursing law's Regan report Pub Date : 2012-12-01
{"title":"Know the standing orders in your ED & whether you need Dr.'s OK. Case on point: A12A1872 (10/30/2012)-GA.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":83833,"journal":{"name":"Nursing law's Regan report","volume":"53 7","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31216812","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
'Fraud' & 'concealment' are exceptions to the statute of limitations. Notley v. Friscia, EO53916 CAAPP4-2 (11/9/2012)-CA. “欺诈”和“隐瞒”是诉讼时效的例外。Notley v. Friscia, EO53916 CAAPP4-2 (11/9/2012)-CA。
Nursing law's Regan report Pub Date : 2012-11-01
{"title":"'Fraud' & 'concealment' are exceptions to the statute of limitations. Notley v. Friscia, EO53916 CAAPP4-2 (11/9/2012)-CA.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":83833,"journal":{"name":"Nursing law's Regan report","volume":"53 6","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31303337","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Failure to notify Dr. of positive test for allergy: death resulted. Case on point: Aragon v. Issa, 4D10-3993 (FLCA4) (10/17/2012)-FL. 没有通知医生过敏测试呈阳性:导致死亡。案例:Aragon诉Issa, 4D10-3993 (FLCA4)(2012年10月17日)-FL。
Nursing law's Regan report Pub Date : 2012-11-01
{"title":"Failure to notify Dr. of positive test for allergy: death resulted. Case on point: Aragon v. Issa, 4D10-3993 (FLCA4) (10/17/2012)-FL.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":83833,"journal":{"name":"Nursing law's Regan report","volume":"53 6","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31303338","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Failure to hold stillborn's remains for funeral home as directed. Case on point: McAllen Hospitals, L.P v. Ontiveros, 13-11-00512 TXCA 13 8/30/2012)-TX. 没有按照要求将死胎遗体送到殡仪馆。案例:McAllen Hospitals, l.p.诉Ontiveros, 13-11-00512 TXCA 13 8/30/2012)-TX。
Nursing law's Regan report Pub Date : 2012-11-01
{"title":"Failure to hold stillborn's remains for funeral home as directed. Case on point: McAllen Hospitals, L.P v. Ontiveros, 13-11-00512 TXCA 13 8/30/2012)-TX.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":83833,"journal":{"name":"Nursing law's Regan report","volume":"53 6","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31303344","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
MN: Drunk driving/death-resulting conviction: decedent's DNR order did not impact guilt. State v. Smith, 819 N.W.2d 724 Minn. App. (9/4/2012)-MN. MN:酒后驾驶/导致死亡的定罪:死者的DNR命令不影响有罪。州诉史密斯案,819 n.w.d 2 724明尼苏达州。应用。(9/4/2012)锰。
Nursing law's Regan report Pub Date : 2012-11-01
{"title":"MN: Drunk driving/death-resulting conviction: decedent's DNR order did not impact guilt. State v. Smith, 819 N.W.2d 724 Minn. App. (9/4/2012)-MN.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":83833,"journal":{"name":"Nursing law's Regan report","volume":"53 6","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31303342","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
OH: RN & physician not named in federal suit: state court held limitations barred state suit. Shade v. Kaiser, 212-Ohio-4079, C.A. 24974 OHCA2 (10/26/2012)-OH. OH:联邦诉讼中没有提到注册护士和医生的名字:州法院限制了州诉讼。Shade诉Kaiser, 212-Ohio-4079, C.A. 24974 OHCA2 (10/26/2012)-OH。
Nursing law's Regan report Pub Date : 2012-11-01
{"title":"OH: RN & physician not named in federal suit: state court held limitations barred state suit. Shade v. Kaiser, 212-Ohio-4079, C.A. 24974 OHCA2 (10/26/2012)-OH.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":83833,"journal":{"name":"Nursing law's Regan report","volume":"53 6","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31303343","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书