{"title":"Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects.","authors":"David Hailey, Leigh-Ann Topfer","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Until recently, surgical repair was the standard treatment for an ostium secundum atrial septal defect (ASD), a common congenital heart defect. Closing ASDs using a device inserted via a catheter now offers another option for some patients. Limited comparative data indicate that newer approaches to transcatheter repair have a higher failure rate than that for surgery, but short-term complication rates are lower. Evidence from long-term follow-up of patients with device closure of ASDs is not yet available. Equipment and procedure costs may be higher for transcatheter closure than for surgery, but overall costs may be reduced through avoiding intensive care unit costs and through shorter hospital stays.</p>","PeriodicalId":83756,"journal":{"name":"Issues in emerging health technologies","volume":" 47","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"22418840","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Atomoxetine for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder.","authors":"Kirsten Garces","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Seven randomized, double-blinded, controlled trials in children, adolescents and adults have shown that atomoxetine improves attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms compared to placebo. There is no evidence that atomoxetine has greater efficacy or a better safety profile than currently used therapy. Atomoxetine has been submitted for regulatory approval in Canada and is currently approved in the US. The price of atomoxetine in Canada has not been established.</p>","PeriodicalId":83756,"journal":{"name":"Issues in emerging health technologies","volume":" 46","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"22389610","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Alefacept: potential new therapy for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.","authors":"Vijay K Shukla","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Alefacept is a new biotechnology product designed for the treatment of patients with chronic plaque-type psoriasis who have disease severe enough to make them eligible for phototherapy or systemic therapy. In two randomized controlled phase III trials of patients with moderate-to-severe disease, alefacept showed a modest but statistically significant increase in the number of responders compared to placebo. Alefacept's dose-dependent CD4+ T lymphocyte-depleting effect requires monitoring; however, no association has been found between this adverse effect and serious adverse events, particularly infection. Due to lack of direct comparative data, it is difficult to predict exactly how alefacept will fit into the current rotational psoriasis therapy paradigm.</p>","PeriodicalId":83756,"journal":{"name":"Issues in emerging health technologies","volume":" 45","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"22328415","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Vacuum assisted wound closure therapy.","authors":"Andrea Fisher, Bruce Brady","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vacuum assisted closure (VAC) therapy is designed to promote the formation of granulation tissue for faster healing in the wound beds of patients with acute and chronic wounds. Four controlled trials and one interim analysis provide poor quality data and weak evidence that VAC therapy may be superior to conventional methods used in healing wounds. Complications with VAC therapy are uncommon. Studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of VAC therapy when the types of dressings are the same for patients in the groups being compared and VAC therapy is the only differing intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":83756,"journal":{"name":"Issues in emerging health technologies","volume":" 44","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"22304696","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Multislice/spiral computed tomography for screening for coronary artery disease.","authors":"Keng Ho Pwee","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multislice computed tomography (MSCT) and spiral (or helical) computed tomography (CT) are designed to provide faster images with better resolution than conventional CT scanning. MSCT and spiral CT have been used to quantify calcification in the coronary arteries, in an effort to link this to coronary artery disease. Long-term studies on clinical outcomes of people screened with MSCT or spiral CT are lacking, as are comparisons with established screening modalities like risk factor algorithms. Low specificity gives rise to concern over false positive results. False positives may cause harm (and expense) due to inappropriate and invasive follow-up. One study was identified in which spiral CT was compared with electron beam CT (EBCT) to evaluate coronary calcifications in 33 asymptomatic individuals, giving a sensitivity of 74% and a specificity of 70%. There is insufficient evidence at this time to suggest that asymptomatic people derive clinical benefit from undergoing coronary calcification screening using MSCT or spiral CT scanning.</p>","PeriodicalId":83756,"journal":{"name":"Issues in emerging health technologies","volume":" 43","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"22274841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Imatinib mesylate for chronic myeloid leukemia: what do we really know?","authors":"Don Husereau","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Imatinib mesylate (GleevecTM) is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, one of a new class of anticancer drugs called signal transduction inhibitors. A systematic review of case-series reports shows imatinib, when indirectly compared to conventional therapy, improves overall 12-month survival, but not surrogate outcomes, in individuals with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (Ph+ CML) in myeloid-blast crisis, and accelerated phase. Surrogate outcomes, but not overall survival, were improved in chronic phase disease. Preliminary data from one randomized controlled trial suggest imatinib has a greater impact on surrogate outcomes compared to the combination of interferonalpha and cytarabine in patients undergoing treatment for chronic phase Ph+CML, however, it is not yet known whether it prolongs or improves quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":83756,"journal":{"name":"Issues in emerging health technologies","volume":" 42","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"22164850","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Hand-carried ultrasound units for point-of-care cardiac examinations.","authors":"David Hailey, Leigh-Ann Topfer","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Several hand-carried ultrasound units have been developed for point-of-care cardiac examination. Limited small comparative studies indicate that these devices are more accurate than physical examination. Though their diagnostic performance is generally inferior to standard echocardiography, there appears to be close agreement for some conditions. Operator training in the performance and interpretation of tests using these ultrasound devices is vitally important. The place of these devices in health care will depend on their compatibility with individual practice, their cost, reimbursement decisions and further technical developments.</p>","PeriodicalId":83756,"journal":{"name":"Issues in emerging health technologies","volume":" 41","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"22074419","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Drug eluting stents: managing coronary artery stenosis following PTCA.","authors":"Kirsten Garces","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Drug eluting stents (DES) release drugs that inhibit tissue growth in narrowed coronary arteries in an effort to prevent restenosis, a renarrowing of the artery. Several types of DES are under investigation in clinical trials; however, none are currently approved for use in Canada. Preliminary trial data are encouraging, demonstrating greater lumen diameter and reduced restenosis with DES versus uncoated stents. If DES prove to be more effective than uncoated stents in the treatment and/or prevention of restenosis, this technology may diffuse rapidly. The total health care costs, including the cost of the stents, post-intervention therapy and possible re-intervention costs, will require assessment to determine the ultimate impact of DES.</p>","PeriodicalId":83756,"journal":{"name":"Issues in emerging health technologies","volume":" 40","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"22071252","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Heart failure: is there a role for angiotensin II receptor blockers?","authors":"Michel Boucher, Johnny Ma","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) directly inhibit the angiotensin II type 1 receptors, which suppresses the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS). Six ARBs are approved in Canada for the treatment of hypertension, none are yet approved for the treatment of heart failure (HF). Evidence comparing ARBs to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) in HF is still limited. A recent meta-analysis of 17 clinical trials could not confirm that ARBs are superior to ACEIs in reducing either mortality or hospitalization in HF patients. ARBs may be used as an alternative in HF patients intolerant of ACEIs. A meta-analysis indicates that, compared to using an ACEI alone, adding an ARB to an ACEI carries the potential for additional benefits in terms of reduced hospitalization, but not mortality. However, the FDA determined there is currently insufficient evidence of such additional benefit when valsartan is combined to an ACEI in patients with HF.</p>","PeriodicalId":83756,"journal":{"name":"Issues in emerging health technologies","volume":" 38","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"22000507","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Heart failure: is there a role for angiotensin II receptor blockers?","authors":"M. Boucher, J. Ma","doi":"10.4212/CJHP.V56I2.414","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4212/CJHP.V56I2.414","url":null,"abstract":"Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) directly inhibit the angiotensin II type 1 receptors, which suppresses the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS). Six ARBs are approved in Canada for the treatment of hypertension, none are yet approved for the treatment of heart failure (HF). Evidence comparing ARBs to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) in HF is still limited. A recent meta-analysis of 17 clinical trials could not confirm that ARBs are superior to ACEIs in reducing either mortality or hospitalization in HF patients. ARBs may be used as an alternative in HF patients intolerant of ACEIs. A meta-analysis indicates that, compared to using an ACEI alone, adding an ARB to an ACEI carries the potential for additional benefits in terms of reduced hospitalization, but not mortality. However, the FDA determined there is currently insufficient evidence of such additional benefit when valsartan is combined to an ACEI in patients with HF.","PeriodicalId":83756,"journal":{"name":"Issues in emerging health technologies","volume":"38 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"70309851","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}