{"title":"Improving the Performance of the Cheap Transition Metal Phosphide Catalyst in the Alkaline Solution for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction—Nickel–Cobalt phosphide supported on Ni foam","authors":"Chuchen Yu","doi":"10.14264/2f4f2b0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14264/2f4f2b0","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":83293,"journal":{"name":"The University of Queensland law journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147915647","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"To Whom Does Australian Corporate and Consumer Legislation Speak?","authors":"Ross B. Grantham","doi":"10.38127/UQLJ.V37I1.4133","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.38127/UQLJ.V37I1.4133","url":null,"abstract":"Is it feasible for regulation (and particularly legislation) effectively to communicate to the participants the rights, duties, processes, and procedures that embody the regulatory goals upon which they are meant to act. Looking at attempts in Australia to implement this regulatory strategy in the fields of corporate law andconsumer law, this article suggests that a more profound change would need to occur in the form and style of Australian legislation before such an approach is viable.","PeriodicalId":83293,"journal":{"name":"The University of Queensland law journal","volume":"247 1","pages":"57-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74061845","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Redress Facilitation Orders as a Sanction Against Corporations","authors":"Brent Fisse","doi":"10.38127/UQLJ.V37I1.4137","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.38127/UQLJ.V37I1.4137","url":null,"abstract":"The PhD thesis upon which Laura was working before her tragic death sought to resolve the intractable question of whether two key goals of anti-cartel enforcement, namely (a) deterrence and (b) compensation, can be achieved more effectively by integrating their pursuit. The potential capacity of redress facilitation orders both to facilitate compensation and to enhance deterrence is one aspect of that question. This article canvasses the possibility of redress facilitation orders designed to facilitate compensation for loss caused by cartel and other unlawful conduct and at the same time to enhance deterrence. It advances a statutory model for redress facilitation orders under the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) (CCA). The model advanced is Australian in legislative style but could readily be adapted elsewhere.","PeriodicalId":83293,"journal":{"name":"The University of Queensland law journal","volume":"4 1","pages":"85-106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87104572","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Modelling Public and Private Enforcement","authors":"K. Barker","doi":"10.38127/UQLJ.V37I1.4127","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.38127/UQLJ.V37I1.4127","url":null,"abstract":"Achieving a workable, hybrid model of competition law enforcement that is sensitive to both instrumental and non-instrumental ends and which commands broad, cross-jurisdictional support always struck me as a tall order. For one thing, it required a keen understanding of the nature of competition law wrongs, which sit awkwardly at the turnstile between public and private law. The enforcement processes of competition law have also evolved in very different social and historical contexts, the United States being an environment in which regulatory agencies have historically been regarded with scepticism (if not downright distrust) and Europe being a centralised bureaucracy in which they have tended to be regarded as the paradigm. Most challengingly of all, the project required a theory of ‘holism’ capable of explaining how it is possible to reconcile complex moral, economic and social objectives within a singular enforcement system, or (more accurately) within a linked network of distinct law enforcement systems.","PeriodicalId":83293,"journal":{"name":"The University of Queensland law journal","volume":"13 1","pages":"9-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83178246","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Mediating Between Public and Private Enforcement in Multi-Jurisdiction Settings","authors":"C. Noonan","doi":"10.38127/UQLJ.V37I1.4129","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.38127/UQLJ.V37I1.4129","url":null,"abstract":"Private enforcement was built into many competition statutes from the start, or uncovered by the courts early in the life of the regime. Many aspects of private cartel enforcement impact on public enforcement, and vice versa. The relationship between public and private enforcement is complex and multifaceted. However, most examinations of the relationship tend to take public enforcement as given and examine the additional role that private enforcement can and should play. The answer is usually greater deterrence of cartel conduct or compensation for harms suffered by the victims of cartel conduct.","PeriodicalId":83293,"journal":{"name":"The University of Queensland law journal","volume":"22 1","pages":"25-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87046615","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Fighting Cartels and Corporate Corruption - Public versus Private Enforcement Models","authors":"S. Bronitt, A. D'amico","doi":"10.38127/UQLJ.V37I1.4135","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.38127/UQLJ.V37I1.4135","url":null,"abstract":"Our ambition is to examine the legal responses to cartel wrongdoing, drawing insights and parallels with new and emerging models of corporate responsibility applied to deal with other white-collar crimes. Our article traces how traditional legal binaries — public versus private law, and criminal versus civil law — are being increasingly challenged by legal hybridity, and the emergence of a range of new regulatory tools that meld together a wide range of purposes including prevention, deterrence, retribution, incapacitation, restorative justice, restitution and compensation.","PeriodicalId":83293,"journal":{"name":"The University of Queensland law journal","volume":"74 1","pages":"69-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74308979","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Does the EU's Drive for Private Enforcement of Competition Law Have a Coherent Purpose?","authors":"Andreas Stephan","doi":"10.38127/UQLJ.V37I1.4145","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.38127/UQLJ.V37I1.4145","url":null,"abstract":"This paper argues that the EU’s efforts to promote private enforcement in competition law, lack a coherent purpose. The drive to facilitate actions for damages was originally a response to the underdeveloped and diverging nature of private enforcement rules across its Member States. Enhancing deterrence (especially through stand-alone actions) constituted a primary objective at first, but was later abandoned for an emphasis on compensating injured parties. It is argued that the 2014 Damages Directive fails on both counts and may be harming enforcement overall.","PeriodicalId":83293,"journal":{"name":"The University of Queensland law journal","volume":"24 1","pages":"153-168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83218224","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Temple of Leniency","authors":"S. Waller","doi":"10.38127/uqlj.v37i1.4147","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.38127/uqlj.v37i1.4147","url":null,"abstract":"This short article mourns the loss of Laura Guttuso, celebrates her contributions and accomplishments as a scholar, and comments on one of her final publications which appeared as a chapter in a fascinating book entitled Anti-Cartel Enforcement in a Contemporary Age: Leniency Religion (‘Leniency Religion’). In this article, I discuss many of the general themes presented in the book as a whole and then turn to the specifics of Laura’s chapter on the role of leniency and the intersection of private and public enforcement of competition law.","PeriodicalId":83293,"journal":{"name":"The University of Queensland law journal","volume":"17 1","pages":"169-177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75321555","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Antitrust Damages in EU Law","authors":"Albertina Albors-Llorens","doi":"10.38127/uqlj.v37i1.4143","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.38127/uqlj.v37i1.4143","url":null,"abstract":"The adoption of Directive 2014/104/EU on actions for damages for infringements of the competition rules has marked the beginning of a new era in the field of the private enforcement of the EU competition rules. The arduous legislative journey leading to the adoption of the Directive, the specific aspects pertaining to the exercise of damages actions covered by it and its attempt to establish an effective coordination between the systems of public and private enforcement have already received intense attention by antitrust scholars. However, this contribution will focus on the study of the Directive’s significance as a novel legal instrument in both the fields of EU competition law and EU law in general.","PeriodicalId":83293,"journal":{"name":"The University of Queensland law journal","volume":"80 1","pages":"139-151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80793081","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Deterrent Penalties for Corporate Colluders","authors":"Caron Beaton-Wells, J. Clarke","doi":"10.38127/uqlj.v37i1.4139","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.38127/uqlj.v37i1.4139","url":null,"abstract":"A critical review of corporate pecuniary penalties for cartel conduct in Australia is timely if not overdue. Debates about the role of individual sanctions notwithstanding, financial penalties against corporations remain the predominant means of sanctioning cartel conduct in this country as elsewhere. These sanctions are therefore the primary mechanism by which deterrence is sought to be achieved. Consistent with the international position, deterrence has long been accepted as the primary, if not exclusive, rationale for cartel sanctions in Australia.","PeriodicalId":83293,"journal":{"name":"The University of Queensland law journal","volume":"8 1","pages":"107-125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78119041","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}