发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Hospital law newsletter最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Ethical standard provides basis for exception to employment-at-will doctrine. Horn v. The New York Times. 道德标准为随意雇佣原则的例外提供了依据。霍恩诉纽约时报案。
Hospital law newsletter Pub Date : 2002-10-01
{"title":"Ethical standard provides basis for exception to employment-at-will doctrine. Horn v. The New York Times.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":79634,"journal":{"name":"Hospital law newsletter","volume":"19 12","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"22066151","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Federal district court requires trial of sexual harassment and retaliation claims. Matheny v. Reid Hospital & Health Care Services. 联邦地区法院要求对性骚扰和报复索赔进行审判。马西尼诉里德医院和保健服务。
Hospital law newsletter Pub Date : 2002-10-01
{"title":"Federal district court requires trial of sexual harassment and retaliation claims. Matheny v. Reid Hospital & Health Care Services.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":79634,"journal":{"name":"Hospital law newsletter","volume":"19 12","pages":"4-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"22066152","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Appeals Court affirms trial court's refusal to grant preliminary injunction to enforce restrictive covenant. Premier Health Care Services v. Schneiderman. 上诉法院确认初审法院拒绝颁发强制令以执行限制性契约。第一医疗保健服务诉施奈德曼案
Hospital law newsletter Pub Date : 2002-09-01
{"title":"Appeals Court affirms trial court's refusal to grant preliminary injunction to enforce restrictive covenant. Premier Health Care Services v. Schneiderman.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":79634,"journal":{"name":"Hospital law newsletter","volume":"19 11","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21994355","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Dismissal of informed consent claim upheld by California Appellate Court. Schiff v. Prados. 加州上诉法院驳回知情同意诉讼。希夫诉普拉多斯案
Hospital law newsletter Pub Date : 2002-09-01
{"title":"Dismissal of informed consent claim upheld by California Appellate Court. Schiff v. Prados.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":79634,"journal":{"name":"Hospital law newsletter","volume":"19 11","pages":"5-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21994356","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Statutory privileges ruled inapplicable. Babcock v. Bridgeport Hospital. 法定特权不适用。巴布科克诉布里奇波特医院案。
Hospital law newsletter Pub Date : 2001-01-01
{"title":"Statutory privileges ruled inapplicable. Babcock v. Bridgeport Hospital.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":79634,"journal":{"name":"Hospital law newsletter","volume":"18 3","pages":"4-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21964157","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Tennessee court recognizes the fiscal problems of academic medicine. Medical Education Assistance Corp. v. State. 田纳西州法院承认学术医学的财政问题。医学教育援助公司诉州。
Hospital law newsletter Pub Date : 2001-01-01
{"title":"Tennessee court recognizes the fiscal problems of academic medicine. Medical Education Assistance Corp. v. State.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":79634,"journal":{"name":"Hospital law newsletter","volume":"18 3","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21964156","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
California Supreme Court finds right to fair procedure in physician--managed care organization dispute. Potvin v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. 加州最高法院在医生管理的医疗机构纠纷中发现公平程序的权利。波特曼诉大都会人寿保险公司案。有限公司
Hospital law newsletter Pub Date : 2000-11-01
{"title":"California Supreme Court finds right to fair procedure in physician--managed care organization dispute. Potvin v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":79634,"journal":{"name":"Hospital law newsletter","volume":"18 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21964158","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Courts examine on-call hospital emergency department coverage. 法院审查随叫随到的医院急诊科的覆盖率。
Hospital law newsletter Pub Date : 2000-10-01
{"title":"Courts examine on-call hospital emergency department coverage.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":79634,"journal":{"name":"Hospital law newsletter","volume":"17 12","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21963780","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Maine Supreme Court unwilling to adopt corporate liability doctrine. Gafner v. Down East Community Hospital. 缅因州最高法院不愿采用公司责任原则。加夫纳诉唐东社区医院案
Hospital law newsletter Pub Date : 2000-10-01
{"title":"Maine Supreme Court unwilling to adopt corporate liability doctrine. Gafner v. Down East Community Hospital.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":79634,"journal":{"name":"Hospital law newsletter","volume":"17 12","pages":"7-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21963781","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Erosion of employment-at-will doctrine continues. Deerman v. Beverly California Corp. 随意就业原则的侵蚀仍在继续。迪尔曼诉贝弗利加州公司案
Hospital law newsletter Pub Date : 2000-07-01
{"title":"Erosion of employment-at-will doctrine continues. Deerman v. Beverly California Corp.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":79634,"journal":{"name":"Hospital law newsletter","volume":"17 9","pages":"5-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21893246","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：604180095
Book学术官方微信