发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Hospital law newsletter最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
OIG's special advisory--offering gifts and other inducements to beneficiaries. 监察长办公室的特别咨询——向受益人提供礼物和其他诱因。
Hospital law newsletter Pub Date : 2003-02-01
{"title":"OIG's special advisory--offering gifts and other inducements to beneficiaries.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":79634,"journal":{"name":"Hospital law newsletter","volume":"20 4","pages":"7-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"22251075","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Antitrust suit by St. Luke's surgicenter unsuccessful. Surgery Center of Hammond v. the Hospital Service District No. 1 of Tangipahoa. 圣卢克外科中心的反垄断诉讼不成功。哈蒙德外科中心诉唐吉帕霍阿第一医院服务区案。
Hospital law newsletter Pub Date : 2003-02-01
{"title":"Antitrust suit by St. Luke's surgicenter unsuccessful. Surgery Center of Hammond v. the Hospital Service District No. 1 of Tangipahoa.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":79634,"journal":{"name":"Hospital law newsletter","volume":"20 4","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"22251073","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Critic of operation of public facility protected by First Amendment. Springer v. Henry. 批评受第一修正案保护的公共设施的运作。斯普林格诉亨利案。
Hospital law newsletter Pub Date : 2003-02-01
{"title":"Critic of operation of public facility protected by First Amendment. Springer v. Henry.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":79634,"journal":{"name":"Hospital law newsletter","volume":"20 4","pages":"4-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"22251074","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Illinois court wrestles with consent issue. Curtis v. Jaskey. 伊利诺斯州法院就同意问题进行了辩论。柯蒂斯诉杰斯基案。
Hospital law newsletter Pub Date : 2003-01-01
{"title":"Illinois court wrestles with consent issue. Curtis v. Jaskey.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":79634,"journal":{"name":"Hospital law newsletter","volume":"20 3","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"22210981","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
On-call physician responsibility examined by Indiana court. Miller v. Martig. 印第安纳法院审查了值班医生的责任。米勒诉马丁案。
Hospital law newsletter Pub Date : 2003-01-01
{"title":"On-call physician responsibility examined by Indiana court. Miller v. Martig.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":79634,"journal":{"name":"Hospital law newsletter","volume":"20 3","pages":"3-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"22210982","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Flawed credentialing procedures create potential for hospital liability. Megrelishvili v. Our Lady of Mercy Medical Center. 有缺陷的认证程序可能会给医院带来责任。megreishvili诉圣母仁慈医疗中心案。
Hospital law newsletter Pub Date : 2003-01-01
{"title":"Flawed credentialing procedures create potential for hospital liability. Megrelishvili v. Our Lady of Mercy Medical Center.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":79634,"journal":{"name":"Hospital law newsletter","volume":"20 3","pages":"6-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"22210983","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Liability for administering unwanted treatment. Harvey v. Strickland. 实施不必要治疗的责任。哈维诉思特里克兰德案。
Hospital law newsletter Pub Date : 2002-12-01
Donald T Ridley
{"title":"Liability for administering unwanted treatment. Harvey v. Strickland.","authors":"Donald T Ridley","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":79634,"journal":{"name":"Hospital law newsletter","volume":"20 2","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"22131797","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Drug prescribing authority for psychologists: a trend continues. 心理学家的药物处方权威:一种趋势在继续。
Hospital law newsletter Pub Date : 2002-12-01
{"title":"Drug prescribing authority for psychologists: a trend continues.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":79634,"journal":{"name":"Hospital law newsletter","volume":"20 2","pages":"6-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"22131798","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Maryland Court rejects challenge to peer review processes. Sadler v. Dimensions Health Corporation. 马里兰法院拒绝挑战同行评议程序。萨德勒诉维兹健康公司案。
Hospital law newsletter Pub Date : 2002-11-01
{"title":"Maryland Court rejects challenge to peer review processes. Sadler v. Dimensions Health Corporation.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":79634,"journal":{"name":"Hospital law newsletter","volume":"20 1","pages":"5-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"22093235","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Supreme Court rejects preemption in ERISA benefits dispute. Rush Prudential, Inc. v. Moran. 最高法院驳回了ERISA福利纠纷中的优先购买权。拉什保诚公司诉莫兰公司案。
Hospital law newsletter Pub Date : 2002-11-01
E Haavi Morreim
{"title":"Supreme Court rejects preemption in ERISA benefits dispute. Rush Prudential, Inc. v. Moran.","authors":"E Haavi Morreim","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":79634,"journal":{"name":"Hospital law newsletter","volume":"20 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"22093234","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：604180095
Book学术官方微信