Annals of palliative medicine最新文献

{"title":"Palliative care interventional research in general practice: a narrative review of factors affecting research conduct.","authors":"Matthew Grant, Maike van der Waal, Tania Pastrana, Joel Rhee, Saskia Teunissen","doi":"10.21037/apm-23-587","DOIUrl":"10.21037/apm-23-587","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The majority of palliative care provision occurs in general practice, yet only 9% of palliative care clinical trials were conducted in this setting. Evidence from hospital and specialist settings is not readily transferable to general practice, as the population, context and care processes are vastly different. Conducting interventional palliative care research in general practice settings is subject to many challenges and barriers. This narrative review aims to describe the factors influencing the conduct of interventional research in general practice settings for patients with palliative care needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A narrative review was performed to identify factors affecting the conduct of palliative care interventional studies in general practice. A literature search of MEDLINE was conducted on 26 September 2023, and data were synthesised utilising a narrative approach.</p><p><strong>Key content and findings: </strong>Sixteen articles were identified. Five thematic groupings were identified from the literature that affected the interventions: factors related to health care professionals (HCPs), patients and carers, general practices, health systems, and research design. HCPs and practices were focused on providing clinical care and struggled to incorporate research into their workload. Staff and patients often had negative perceptions in palliative care combined with limited research experience, often resulting in unwillingness to engage in interventions and gatekeeping. Engaging with general practice staff to design, participate and champion research were key facilitators of successful interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Palliative care interventions in general practice are invariably complex and challenging, yet acutely needed to address the care needs of patients in the community setting. Working together with patients, carers and clinicians to design and implement interventions appropriate for general practice settings is fundamental to their success.</p>","PeriodicalId":7956,"journal":{"name":"Annals of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":"869-879"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140911079","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Re-irradiation practice and ESTRO/EORTC consensus recommendations: 2023 ASTRO education panel.","authors":"Shing Fung Lee, Peter J Hoskin","doi":"10.21037/apm-24-4","DOIUrl":"10.21037/apm-24-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Indications for re-irradiation are increasing both for palliation and potentially curative attempts to achieve durable local control. This has been in part driven by the technological advances in the last decade including image-guided brachytherapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy. These enable high dose focal irradiation to be delivered to a limited target volume with minimal normal tissue re-irradiation. The European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) have collaboratively developed a comprehensive consensus on re-irradiation practices, aiming to standardise definitions, reporting, and clinical decision-making processes. The document introduces a universally applicable definition for re-irradiation, categorised into two primary types based on the presence of geometric overlap of irradiated volumes and concerns for cumulative dose toxicity. It also identifies \"repeat organ irradiation\" and \"repeat irradiation\" for cases without such overlap, emphasising the need to consider toxicity risks associated with cumulative doses. Additionally, the document presents detailed reporting guidelines for re-irradiation studies, specifying essential patient and tumour characteristics, treatment planning and delivery details, and follow-up protocols. These guidelines are designed to improve the quality and reproducibility of clinical research, thus fostering a more robust evidence base for future re-irradiation practices. The consensus underscores the necessity of interdisciplinary collaboration and shared decision-making, highlighting performance status, patient survival estimates, and response to initial radiotherapy as critical factors in determining eligibility for re-irradiation. It advocates for a patient-centric approach, with transparent communication about treatment intent and potential risks. Radiobiological considerations, including the application of the linear-quadratic model, are recommended for assessing cumulative doses and guiding re-irradiation strategies. By providing these comprehensive recommendations, the ESTRO-EORTC consensus aims to enhance the safety, efficacy, and quality of life for patients undergoing re-irradiation, while paving the way for future research and refinement of treatment protocols in the field of oncology.</p>","PeriodicalId":7956,"journal":{"name":"Annals of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1150-1153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141299793","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Key factors for establishing and sustaining a successful palliative radiation oncology program: a survey of the Society for Palliative Radiation Oncology.","authors":"Deborah C Marshall, Kavita Dharmarajan, Randy Wei, Yolanda D Tseng, Jessica Schuster, Joshua A Jones, Candice Johnstone, Tracy Balboni, Simon S Lo, Jared R Robbins","doi":"10.21037/apm-23-499","DOIUrl":"10.21037/apm-23-499","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dedicated palliative radiation oncology programs (PROPs) within radiation oncology (RO) practices have been shown to improve quality and decrease costs of radiation therapy (RT) in advanced cancer patients. Despite this, relatively few PROPs currently exist, highlighting an unmet need to understand characteristics of the few existing PROPs and the potential barriers and facilitators that exist in starting and maintaining a successful PROP. We sought to assess the attributes of existing PROPs, the facilitators and barriers to establishing these programs, and the resources needed to create and maintain a successful program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 15-item online survey was sent to 157 members of the Society of Palliative Radiation Oncology (SPRO) in July 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 157 members, 48 (31%) responded. Most practiced in an academic center (71% at main center and 15% at satellite) and 75% were from a larger group practice (≥6 physicians). Most (89%) believed the development and growth of a dedicated PROPs was either important (50%) or most important (39%) to the field of RO. Only 36% of respondents had a PROP, 38% wanted to establish one, and 13% were currently developing one. Of those with PROPs (N=16), 75% perceived an increase in the number of referrals for palliative RT since starting the program. A majority had an ability to refer to an outside palliative care specialist (64%), an outpatient RO service (53%), and specialized clinical processes for managing palliative radiotherapy patients (53%), with 41% having an inpatient RO consult service. Resources considered most essential were access to specialist-level palliative care, advanced practice provider support, a radiation oncologist with an interest in palliative care, having an outpatient palliative RO clinic, an emphasis on administering short radiation courses, and opportunities for educational development. Of those with a PROP or those who have tried to start one, the greatest perceived barriers to initiating a PROP were committed resources (83%), blocked out clinical time (61%), challenges coordinating management of patients (61%), and support from leaders/colleagues (61%). Perceived barriers to sustaining a PROP were similar. For those without a PROP, the perceived most important resources for starting one included access to palliative care specialist by referral (83%), published guidelines with best practices (80%), educational materials for referring physicians and patients (80%), educational sessions for clinical staff (83%), and standardized clinical pathways (80%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PROPs are not widespread, exist mainly within academic centers, are outpatient, have access to palliative care specialists by referral, and have specialized clinical processes for palliative radiation patients. Lack of committed resources was the single most important perceived barrier for initiating or maintaining ","PeriodicalId":7956,"journal":{"name":"Annals of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":"754-765"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141299851","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Special considerations in managing pain and psychosocial distress in patients with opioid use disorder and cancer: the role of the supportive care and psycho-oncology interdisciplinary team","authors":"M. C. Trimbur, Bridget Sumser, Chelsea Brown, Timothy Steinhoff, Khaldoun Almhanna, Dana Guyer","doi":"10.21037/apm-22-1409","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21037/apm-22-1409","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7956,"journal":{"name":"Annals of palliative medicine","volume":"75 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141845294","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Physical, emotional, and practical symptom burden in patients with terminal illnesses","authors":"C. B. Simone II","doi":"10.21037/apm-24-103","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21037/apm-24-103","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7956,"journal":{"name":"Annals of palliative medicine","volume":"86 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141847051","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comprehensive care for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: insights from the 2022 San Antonio Liver Cancer Symposium.","authors":"Sukeshi Patel Arora, Sherri Rauenzahn Cervantez","doi":"10.21037/apm-24-36","DOIUrl":"10.21037/apm-24-36","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7956,"journal":{"name":"Annals of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":"747-748"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140911008","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Reirradiation of metastases of the central nervous system: part 2-metastatic epidural spinal cord compression.","authors":"Dirk Rades, Charles B Simone, Henry C Y Wong, Edward Chow, Shing Fung Lee, Peter A S Johnstone","doi":"10.21037/apm-23-594","DOIUrl":"10.21037/apm-23-594","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An increasing number of patients irradiated for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) experience an in-field recurrence and require a second course of radiotherapy. Reirradiation can be performed with conventional radiotherapy or highly-conformal techniques such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). When using conventional radiotherapy, a cumulative biologically effective dose (BED) ≤120 calculated with an α/β value of 2 Gy (Gy2) was not associated with radiation myelopathy in a retrospective study of 124 patients and is considered safe. In that study, conventional reirradiation led to improvements of motor deficits in 36% of patients and stopped further symptomatic progression in another 50% (overall response 86%). In four other studies, overall response rates were 82-89%. In addition to the cumulative BED or equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2), the interval between both radiotherapy courses <6 months and a BED per course ≥102 Gy2 (corresponding to an EQD2 ≥51 Gy2) were identified as risk factors for radiation myelopathy. Without these risk factors, a BED >120 Gy2 may be possible. Scoring tools have been developed that can assist physicians in estimating the risk of radiation myelopathy and selecting the appropriate dose-fractionation regimen of re-treatment. Reirradiation of MESCC may also be performed with highly-conformal radiotherapy. With IMRT or VMAT, rates of pain relief and improvement of neurologic symptoms of 60-93.5% and 42-73%, respectively, were achieved. One-year local control rates ranged between 55% and 88%. Rates of myelopathy or radiculopathy and vertebral compression fractures were 0% and 0-9.3%, respectively. With SBRT, rates of pain relief were 65-86%. Two studies reported improvements in neurologic symptoms of 0% and 82%, respectively. One-year local control rates were 74-83%. Rates of myelopathy or radiculopathy and vertebral compression fractures were 0-4.5% and 4.5-13.8%, respectively. For SBRT, a cumulative maximum EQD2 to thecal sac ≤70 Gy2, a maximum EQD2 of SBRT ≤25 Gy2, a ratio ≤0.5 of thecal sac maximum EQD2 of SBRT to maximum cumulative EQD2, and an interval between both courses ≥5 months were associated with a lower risk of myelopathy. Additional prospective trials are required to better define the options of reirradiation of MESCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":7956,"journal":{"name":"Annals of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1141-1149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140847348","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Implementation of kidney palliative care-lessons learned from the US Department of Veterans Affairs.","authors":"Paul M Palevsky, Scott Shreve, Susan P Y Wong","doi":"10.21037/apm-23-584","DOIUrl":"10.21037/apm-23-584","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advanced kidney disease is a progressive life-limiting illness associated with high symptom burden, disability, and highly intensive care near the end of life. There is growing interest in integrating palliative care principles into the care of patients with advanced kidney disease to improve care and outcomes for these patients. The United States (US) Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has been a leader in advancing palliative care initiatives across its health system and whose experience and approach may be instructive to other health systems seeking to develop kidney palliative care (KPC) services. Herein, we review current KPC programs in the VA and highlight the different models of care that programs have been adopted and how key components of goals of care conversations and advance care planning, symptom management, multidisciplinary care, patient selection, and quality improvement have been implemented across programs. VA KPC programs have adopted \"parallel\", \"merged\", and \"embedded\" models of KPC that reflect the different configurations of partnerships between nephrology and palliative care providers to deliver KPC. A primary service of VA KPC programs is providing goals of care conversations and advance care planning to referred patients and systematically documenting the outcomes of these discussions in standardized note templates in the electronic medical record. Symptom management is delivered by KPC providers through regular shared or sequential visits with patients' nephrology providers and is guided by patient responses to validated symptom surveys. Programs are staffed by allied health professionals, such as chaplains, pharmacists, social workers, and dieticians, to provide whole-person care and regularly huddle with nephrology staff to reach a shared understanding of each patient's care needs and plan. KPC programs implement champions who select patients in greatest need of KPC using a combination of clinical events that trigger referral for KPC and validated mortality risk prediction scores that are automatically generated in each patient's medical record. KPC programs also routinely collect clinical, patient-reported, process, and care quality measures to assess its services. The experiences of the VA highlight novel approaches that strive to close the care gaps in meeting the KPC needs of patients with advanced kidney disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":7956,"journal":{"name":"Annals of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":"858-868"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140911021","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Femoral artery occlusion induced vasculopathy following herpes zoster: a case report.","authors":"Yong Seok Jang, Hue Jung Park, Jiyoon Bhan, Jieun Kim, Woo Seog Sim, Jin Young Lee","doi":"10.21037/apm-24-20","DOIUrl":"10.21037/apm-24-20","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reactivation of the varicella zoster virus (VZV) results in herpes zoster (HZ), which is a painful unilateral rash with a typical dermatomal distribution. HZ may be followed by postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), vasculopathy, myelopathy, retinal necrosis, and cerebellitis. Vasculopathy can cause ischemic stroke, aneurysms, arterial dissection, transient ischemic attack, and rarely, peripheral arterial disease (PAD). The possible mechanism is that the VZV travels to the arteries through the sensory ganglia, leading to inflammation and pathological vascular remodeling, which result in vasculopathy.</p><p><strong>Case description: </strong>Here, we describe a rare case of femoral artery occlusion induced vasculopathy 5 years after HZ. A 65-year-old woman visited our pain clinic with persistent pain following HZ that occurred 3 months earlier. She had several rash scars on the right thigh along with a continuous throbbing, shooting, and sharp pain. The patient was diagnosed with PHN and prescribed with medications that relieved the leg pain. The symptoms remained stationary for almost 5 years. She presented again with complaints of a paroxysmal tingling sensation in the right thigh and claudication due to increased pain, which had begun 6 months prior. She reported leg pain after walking for 10 minutes. Lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed foraminal stenosis at the level of right L2, with no abnormality below L2. Subsequently, the patient was evaluated for vascular diseases. Lower extremity ultrasonography and computed tomography (CT) angiography revealed stenosis and thrombotic occlusions in the right superficial femoral and tibial arteries as well as the left middle femoral and tibial arteries. Surgical revascularization via percutaneous angioplasty was performed bilaterally. The leg pain was relieved after the procedure and the claudication improved.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Peripheral artery occlusion is a rare phenomenon following HZ. In cases involving changes in HZ symptoms, further evaluation is required for potential vasculopathy.</p>","PeriodicalId":7956,"journal":{"name":"Annals of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1166-1171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141578803","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Hemostatic radiotherapy: a narrative review of the literature.","authors":"Pieter Verschuren, Melissa Christiaens, Eva Oldenburger","doi":"10.21037/apm-24-26","DOIUrl":"10.21037/apm-24-26","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>In locally advanced cancer, bleeding is a common clinical presentation and radiotherapy (RT) provides a noninvasive, well-tolerated, cost-effective treatment. However, the choice for fractionation dose and schedule seem to merely depend on physician's preference rather than specific guidelines. We reviewed the available literature on palliative hemostatic RT for response rate (RR) and bleeding duration in relation with the given dose.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PubMed database was used to search for articles, which were assessed by predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of 54 articles, published over the last 20 years until December 2023 were analyzed for dose and/or fractionation regimen and their relation to the RR.</p><p><strong>Key content and findings: </strong>A variety of fractionation schedules are used for palliative symptom control, including hemostasis. Research focusing on hemostatic irradiation specifically and prospective studies are rare. Moreover, to our knowledge, there are no specific (prospective) studies ongoing. Both external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy lead to bleeding control and daily or weekly hypofractionated irradiation is safe and effective for both high and low biological equivalent dose (BED) regimens. If feasible, based on patient condition, some studies favor higher BED regimens to obtain more durable tumor/higher bleeding response. Higher radiation dose for thoracic irradiation may be indicative for simultaneous presentation of obstruction and/or dysphagia. Brachytherapy may be used solely or in combination with EBRT or in the setting of re-irradiation. Short-course regimens are preferred in patients in with low performance index scores. For future studies, multivariate analysis, including BED, can be important to assess efficacy of different fractionation schedules for a variety of tumor etiologies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hemostatic RT, both by EBRT and brachytherapy, appears to be a safe and effective palliative treatment that clinically and statistically significantly reduces bleeding in cancer patients. The available literature is limited regarding prospective and uniform evaluation of hemostatic RT, including fractionation schedules. BED seems to be indicative for a better RR for specific indications. Current evidence suggests that treatment decisions should be tailored according to the patients' condition, tumor etiology and other clinical symptoms. More (prospective) research focusing on hemostasis is necessary to develop clear guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":7956,"journal":{"name":"Annals of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1114-1132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141578804","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}