颈胃减压管:治疗无法手术的恶性肠梗阻的安全性和疗效。

4区 医学 Q2 Nursing
Annals of palliative medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-27 DOI:10.21037/apm-24-21
Sujay S Shankar, Min P Kim, Edward Y Chan, Ray K Chihara
{"title":"颈胃减压管:治疗无法手术的恶性肠梗阻的安全性和疗效。","authors":"Sujay S Shankar, Min P Kim, Edward Y Chan, Ray K Chihara","doi":"10.21037/apm-24-21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inoperable malignant bowel obstruction, which results in chronic nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain, often requires nasogastric tube decompression. However, these tubes are often uncomfortable for patients and require hospitalization during the end-of-life care. Cervical esophago-gastric (CEG) decompression tubes are a potential palliative solution. The objective of this study is to present the outcomes of CEG tubes in 11 patients with malignant bowel obstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective review of patients requiring nasogastric tube decompression who received CEG decompression tubes for inoperable malignant bowel obstructions between 2016-2022. CEG tube placement was performed percutaneously through the left neck using a guidewire and an endoscopic technique.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average age of patients was 58 years (31-72 years), with metastatic colorectal cancer (36.4%) and ovarian cancer (27.3%) being the most common causes of malignant bowel obstruction. All procedures were completed percutaneously, without requiring conversion to open procedures. The morbidity of the procedure was 27%, which included tube dislodgement, local cellulitis, or bleeding at the insertion site. None of the patients required reoperation, with most of the patients successfully treated conservatively. Most patients were discharged home after the procedure (82%); however, 45% were readmitted (mostly due to abdominal pain). Most patients (73%) were able to continue additional chemotherapy after tube placement. The average survival from cancer diagnosis was approximately six months, whereas the average survival after the procedure was about four months. No mortalities occurred due to CEG tube placement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A CEG decompression tube is safe for patients with malignant bowel obstruction. The procedure allows patients to undergo additional chemotherapy and be discharged home with a more comfortable tube.</p>","PeriodicalId":7956,"journal":{"name":"Annals of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1183-1188"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cervical gastric decompression tube: safety and efficacy outcomes for inoperable malignant bowel obstruction.\",\"authors\":\"Sujay S Shankar, Min P Kim, Edward Y Chan, Ray K Chihara\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/apm-24-21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inoperable malignant bowel obstruction, which results in chronic nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain, often requires nasogastric tube decompression. However, these tubes are often uncomfortable for patients and require hospitalization during the end-of-life care. Cervical esophago-gastric (CEG) decompression tubes are a potential palliative solution. The objective of this study is to present the outcomes of CEG tubes in 11 patients with malignant bowel obstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective review of patients requiring nasogastric tube decompression who received CEG decompression tubes for inoperable malignant bowel obstructions between 2016-2022. CEG tube placement was performed percutaneously through the left neck using a guidewire and an endoscopic technique.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average age of patients was 58 years (31-72 years), with metastatic colorectal cancer (36.4%) and ovarian cancer (27.3%) being the most common causes of malignant bowel obstruction. All procedures were completed percutaneously, without requiring conversion to open procedures. The morbidity of the procedure was 27%, which included tube dislodgement, local cellulitis, or bleeding at the insertion site. None of the patients required reoperation, with most of the patients successfully treated conservatively. Most patients were discharged home after the procedure (82%); however, 45% were readmitted (mostly due to abdominal pain). Most patients (73%) were able to continue additional chemotherapy after tube placement. The average survival from cancer diagnosis was approximately six months, whereas the average survival after the procedure was about four months. No mortalities occurred due to CEG tube placement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A CEG decompression tube is safe for patients with malignant bowel obstruction. The procedure allows patients to undergo additional chemotherapy and be discharged home with a more comfortable tube.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of palliative medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1183-1188\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of palliative medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/apm-24-21\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/apm-24-21","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:无法手术的恶性肠梗阻会导致长期恶心、呕吐和腹痛,通常需要鼻胃管减压。然而,这些管道通常会让患者感到不适,而且在临终关怀期间需要住院治疗。颈部食管胃减压管(CEG)是一种潜在的缓解方案。本研究旨在介绍 11 例恶性肠梗阻患者使用 CEG 管的结果:我们对2016-2022年间因无法手术的恶性肠梗阻而接受CEG减压管治疗的需要鼻胃管减压的患者进行了回顾性回顾。CEG管置入采用导丝和内窥镜技术,经由左颈部经皮置入:患者平均年龄为58岁(31-72岁),转移性结直肠癌(36.4%)和卵巢癌(27.3%)是导致恶性肠梗阻的最常见原因。所有手术均经皮完成,无需转为开放手术。手术的发病率为27%,包括管道脱落、局部蜂窝织炎或插入部位出血。没有一名患者需要再次手术,大多数患者都成功接受了保守治疗。大多数患者(82%)在术后出院回家,但也有 45% 的患者再次入院(主要是由于腹痛)。大多数患者(73%)在置管后能够继续接受化疗。癌症确诊后的平均生存期约为六个月,而手术后的平均生存期约为四个月。没有人因置入 CEG 管而死亡:结论:CEG减压管对恶性肠梗阻患者是安全的。结论:CEG减压管对恶性肠梗阻患者是安全的,患者可以接受额外的化疗,并带着更舒适的管道出院回家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cervical gastric decompression tube: safety and efficacy outcomes for inoperable malignant bowel obstruction.

Background: Inoperable malignant bowel obstruction, which results in chronic nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain, often requires nasogastric tube decompression. However, these tubes are often uncomfortable for patients and require hospitalization during the end-of-life care. Cervical esophago-gastric (CEG) decompression tubes are a potential palliative solution. The objective of this study is to present the outcomes of CEG tubes in 11 patients with malignant bowel obstruction.

Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients requiring nasogastric tube decompression who received CEG decompression tubes for inoperable malignant bowel obstructions between 2016-2022. CEG tube placement was performed percutaneously through the left neck using a guidewire and an endoscopic technique.

Results: The average age of patients was 58 years (31-72 years), with metastatic colorectal cancer (36.4%) and ovarian cancer (27.3%) being the most common causes of malignant bowel obstruction. All procedures were completed percutaneously, without requiring conversion to open procedures. The morbidity of the procedure was 27%, which included tube dislodgement, local cellulitis, or bleeding at the insertion site. None of the patients required reoperation, with most of the patients successfully treated conservatively. Most patients were discharged home after the procedure (82%); however, 45% were readmitted (mostly due to abdominal pain). Most patients (73%) were able to continue additional chemotherapy after tube placement. The average survival from cancer diagnosis was approximately six months, whereas the average survival after the procedure was about four months. No mortalities occurred due to CEG tube placement.

Conclusions: A CEG decompression tube is safe for patients with malignant bowel obstruction. The procedure allows patients to undergo additional chemotherapy and be discharged home with a more comfortable tube.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of palliative medicine
Annals of palliative medicine Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
231
期刊介绍: Annals of Palliative Medicine (Ann Palliat Med; Print ISSN 2224-5820; Online ISSN 2224-5839) is an open access, international, peer-reviewed journal published quarterly with both online and printed copies since 2012. The aim of the journal is to provide up-to-date and cutting-edge information and professional support for health care providers in palliative medicine disciplines to improve the quality of life for patients and their families and caregivers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信