Medical toxicology最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
The assessment of risks, benefits and availability of non-narcotic analgesics. A commonsense approach. 非麻醉性镇痛药的风险、获益和可得性评估。一个常识性的方法。
Medical toxicology Pub Date : 1986-01-01
I Darmansjah
{"title":"The assessment of risks, benefits and availability of non-narcotic analgesics. A commonsense approach.","authors":"I Darmansjah","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Indonesia, about 50% of all available non-narcotic analgesics are marketed as single drugs and the other half comprise fixed combination products. Each country should decide through a national drug policy which drugs are to be available, but it is important such policies be flexible and cognisant of the needs of the public and of the pharmaceutical industry. A drug should not be withdrawn from the market without an objective scientific assessment of its benefit-risk ratio. However, reevaluation of some drugs marketed previously should be undertaken, including combinations of non-narcotic analgesics. Although it is often said that evaluation of drugs should be left to experts in the established drug control agencies and that the third world countries should follow their decisions, there is a good argument for the developing countries to formulate and implement their own drug policies. In evaluating a non-narcotic analgesic, efficacy and safety must be carefully considered and a drug with marginal efficacy should not be approved for use. However, a non-narcotic analgesic with superior efficacy should probably be approved for use even if there is some risk associated with usual therapeutic dosages. Commonsense reasoning demands that drugs should be for the layperson to treat common ailments, although such drugs must fulfil exacting criteria of efficacy, safety and simplicity of use.</p>","PeriodicalId":77871,"journal":{"name":"Medical toxicology","volume":"1 Suppl 1 ","pages":"115-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1986-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"14938008","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Regulatory decisions and consumers. 监管决定和消费者。
Medical toxicology Pub Date : 1986-01-01
M D Rawlins
{"title":"Regulatory decisions and consumers.","authors":"M D Rawlins","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Consumers expect regulatory authorities to evaluate the risks and benefits of non-narcotic analgesics both before marketing and throughout their marketing life. In making their evaluation, regulatory authorities attempt to ensure that before a product is marketed it is of satisfactory quality, is efficacious, tested for likely toxicological hazards and that prescribers are provided with appropriate, objective information. After marketing of a drug, regulatory authorities use spontaneous adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting systems as their principal monitoring technique and use the data collected to help identify risk factors for human toxicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":77871,"journal":{"name":"Medical toxicology","volume":"1 Suppl 1 ","pages":"128-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1986-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"14938926","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书