{"title":"The infected implant.","authors":"L A Sorto","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In summary, I believe that when faced with a definitely diagnosed deep infection involving a joint replacement of the foot, the treatment of choice is incision and drainage of the wound with removal of the implant and all necrotic bone and soft tissue. Postoperatively, some form of drainage-promoting system should be instituted. Three techniques for promoting drainage have been discussed: open packing, which technically is the easiest to accomplish, but necessitates either delayed primary closure, healing by secondary intention, or in some cases skin grafting; this obviously increases disability time; standard closed suction irrigation, which has the advantage of primary wound closure but the disadvantage of requiring around-the-clock supervision to ensure against blockage of fluid flow, especially through the egress tube; and the Sorto modification of the one-tube in-out drainage system, which has the same advantage as closed suction irrigation (primary wound closure) without the risk of blockage of the egress tube. The key to successful management of an infected implant is immediate and aggressive treatment once a definitive diagnosis is made. Although the systemic use of antibiotics is an important adjunct in the total treatment plan, one must think in terms of altering the local environment in which the offending organisms grow and multiply. This is best accomplished by decompressing the infected wound by incision and drainage; removing all necrotic tissue or foreign bodies (that is, implants); and continuously promoting drainage postoperatively. Parenteral antibodies are only effective if the blood system through which they travel reaches the local site of infection. This cannot readily occur in the presence of increased soft-tissue tension created by an infectious process. In the words of Louis Pasteur, when dealing with an infection, \"The bacteria is nothing, it is the environment in which it grows that is everything.\"</p>","PeriodicalId":77837,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in podiatry","volume":"1 1","pages":"199-209"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1984-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"17592852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Biomechanics of implanted joints of the foot.","authors":"W P Orien","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Joint implants in the foot have contributed much to reducing deformity and pain. They can act as spacers to improve cosmetic appearance; they can increase or decrease motion in joints, while adding stability; and they can replace arthritic or diseased joints and reduce their associated symptoms. They cannot produce normal function of the foot. There is a great need to know more about the long-range effects of implanted joints on foot function and the associated compensations that invariably occur. This knowledge will lead to improved criteria for the existing implants and new designs and materials for the implants yet to come.</p>","PeriodicalId":77837,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in podiatry","volume":"1 1","pages":"29-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1984-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"17592855","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Hemi-implants in foot surgery.","authors":"B M Dobbs","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hemi-implants, when first marketed, seemed the answer for a shortened nonfunctional hallux that sometimes followed a Keller bunionectomy. Then a few years later, with the use of the total implant, the hemi- plant was all but forgotten. It is the author's opinion that there are still many situations in which the hemi-implant has advantages over a Keller bunionectomy or total implant.</p>","PeriodicalId":77837,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in podiatry","volume":"1 1","pages":"79-87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1984-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"17592857","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The angled great toe implant (Swanson design/Weil modification) in the surgical reconstruction of the first metatarsophalangeal joint.","authors":"D J Arenson","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article deals with implant arthroplasty using the angled great toe implant. Specific terminology is defined. Emphasis is on implant design, criteria for patient selection, and the operative procedure. Postoperative care and complications are briefly touched on.</p>","PeriodicalId":77837,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in podiatry","volume":"1 1","pages":"89-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1984-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"17592859","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Biomaterials in foot surgery.","authors":"E E Frisch","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Implants have become an important part of the foot surgeon's armamentarium. They have facilitated or improved the results in many reconstructive procedures. Understanding the concepts, applications, and characteristics of the various implants and biomaterials is important to providing maximal benefits to patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":77837,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in podiatry","volume":"1 1","pages":"11-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1984-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"17458932","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A new implant for the metatarsophalangeal joint.","authors":"T Sgarlato","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A double-stemmed metatarsophalangeal joint silicone implant has been designed to act as a flexible weightbearing spacer for a number of conditions that affect the metatarsophalangeal joint. The preliminary results show that surgical treatment is feasible for conditions that were previously only marginally successfully treatable. With the exception of lesser metatarsal osteotomies, the prognosis for metatarsophalangeal joint procedures has always been poor. This implant spacer warrants an expanded evaluation for the treatment of lesser metatarsal maladies. Longer-term results are necessary to evaluate those areas of greatest benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":77837,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in podiatry","volume":"1 1","pages":"69-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1984-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"17592856","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Total first joint replacement in hallux valgus and hallux rigidus. Long-term results in 484 cases.","authors":"L S Weil, R A Pollak, W L Goller","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Long-term results of 484 cases of Silastic total first joint replacement are presented. The history, discussion of other total first implants, and a descriptive surgical technique with a discussion of complications are also presented. The authors propose a new, universal grading system for assessment of results following bunion surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":77837,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in podiatry","volume":"1 1","pages":"103-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1984-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"17458929","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Symposium on implants in foot surgery.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":77837,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in podiatry","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-245"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1984-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"17592849","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The STA operation for the pronated foot in childhood.","authors":"S D Smith","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The STA operation is a modified subtalar arthroereisis that uses an endoprosthesis manufactured from ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene. It is fashioned into the shape of a small peg and implanted into the dorsal surface of the calcaneus. Its purpose is to eliminate abnormal pronation, correct heel valgus, and produce an increase of the medial longitudinal arch.</p>","PeriodicalId":77837,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in podiatry","volume":"1 1","pages":"165-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1984-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"17592851","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"History of implants.","authors":"E G Kaplan, G S Kaplan, D M Kaplan, R K Kaplan","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In summary, implants are highly successful because encapsulation occurs around the implant without rejection and no other fixation is necessary. There is relatively no shortening or instability of the toe, such as a floppy toe. This seems to prevent painful stiff pseudoarthrosis or arthritis because it acts as a spacer to prevent narrowing of the joint and allows for movement. It prevents a short first toe and prevents any undesired cosmetic results, as it provides the joint with a pain-free range of motion, allowing it to become more mobile and stable. Also, ulnar implants have been used with the same indications and contraindications. The most important consideration about implant surgery is that these implants, that is, the Silastic and the Swanson design, are nonabsorbable. They will not cause tissue reaction and the fibrous encapsulation forms all that is necessary to encapsulate the implant itself; therefore, there is very little bony rejection. From recent literature and through professional experience, it has been proved that implants act primarily as a spacer. They provide a pain-free range of motion but not as well as desired. Implants provide stability to the joint, which is of the utmost importance. The Silastic implants have stood the test of time in most cases. However, the search for better biomaterials, better results, and better functions is never ending. There is a great need for continued research into this field. Podiatry must continue to maintain, contribute, and improve this research.</p>","PeriodicalId":77837,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in podiatry","volume":"1 1","pages":"3-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1984-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"17457704","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}