British journal of clinical practice. Supplement最新文献

{"title":"Safety and tolerability of calcipotriol in psoriasis.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":77500,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical practice. Supplement","volume":"83 ","pages":"26-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1996-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"19837204","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Pharmacology, pharmacokinetics and metabolism.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":77500,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical practice. Supplement","volume":"83 ","pages":"3-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1996-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"19837202","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Safety profile of fluvastatin.","authors":"T K Peters","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Statins are regarded as a well-tolerated class of drugs, particularly when compared with some of the older lipid-modifying agents, which have poor rates of compliance. Despite some early concern, the incidence of lens opacities observed in clinical studies involving statin use is no different from that in a normal ageing population. Similarly, the occurrence of insomnia with lipophilic agents appears to have been overemphasised and is not a clinically significant problem, irrespective of the statin under study. Fluvastatin is the newest representative of this class of agents; it has already been evaluated in thousands of patients who have hyperlipidaemia with and without additional risk factors. In controlled clinical studies, the incidence of the majority of adverse events observed with fluvastatin therapy is no higher than that seen with placebo, with the exception of gastrointestinal disturbances (known to be common to all stains). Nonetheless, the incidence of these effects seen with fluvastatin treatment is noted to be lower than that associated with cholestyramine or fibrate use. Elevations in levels of liver transaminases (aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase) have been reported with fluvastatin therapy but have led to discontinuation of treatment with the same frequency as with placebo. Elevations in creatine kinase levels as a cause of discontinuing fluvastatin are not more frequent than with placebo. Drug-related myopathy and rhabdomyolysis have not been reported with fluvastatin therapy, and myalgia does not occur more frequently than with placebo. In terms of drug interactions, fluvastatin does not interfere with the efficacy of antihypertensive agents. In controlled clinical trials, the overall reported discontinuation rate due to adverse events noted with fluvastatin therapy is not significantly distinguishable from the rate associated with placebo.</p>","PeriodicalId":77500,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical practice. Supplement","volume":"77A ","pages":"20-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"19702225","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Development and pharmacology of fluvastatin.","authors":"L A Jokubaitis","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fluvastatin is the first synthetic 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMGCoA) reductase inhibitor to be approved for clinical use, and has been studied extensively in humans since 1986. It is structurally distinct from the other currently available HMGCoA reductase inhibitors (lovastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin), leading to unique biopharmaceutical properties relative to the other agents of this class. Absorption of fluvastatin is virtually complete across all species, including man, and is not affected by the presence of food. Systemic exposure is limited, as fluvastatin is subject to first-pass metabolism, and the plasma half-life of the drug is approximately 30 minutes. Some 95% of a single dosage of fluvastatin is excreted via the biliary route, with less than 2% of this being the parent compound. Additionally, there is no evidence of circulating active metabolites or accumulation during chronic dosing. Studies of the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of fluvastatin have demonstrated marked reductions in the rate of bioavailability--from 40% to 60%; however, a comparison of fluvastatin administration with the evening meal or at bedtime has revealed no significant differences in the extent of bioavailability (area under the curve) of these two regimens. Furthermore, no significant difference in pharmacodynamic effect (reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels) could be ascertained between mealtime dosing and bedtime dosing. The pharmacokinetics of fluvastatin have also been assessed in various demographic groups. Relative to the general population, plasma concentrations of fluvastatin do not vary as a function of either age or gender. In addition, administration to a patient population with hepatic insufficiency resulted in a 2.5-fold increase in both the rate and extent of bioavailability relative to controls. Also, although minimal alterations of fluvastatin clearance in patients with renal insufficiency are anticipated due to limited renal excretion (5%), a study in this patient group is currently underway to examine this further. Interaction studies have been performed with fluvastatin and several drugs with which it might be coadministered. Cholestyramine, an anionic-binding resin, has a considerable effect in lowering the rate and extent of fluvastatin bioavailability. Although this effect was noted even when cholestyramine was given 4 hours prior to fluvastatin, this regimen did not result in diminished efficacy. Further, no effects on either warfarin levels or prothrombin times were observed in a study involving concomitant administration of warfarin and fluvastatin. Moreover, additional interaction studies with niacin and propranolol have not demonstrated any effect on fluvastatin plasma levels, and administration to a patient population chronically receiving digoxin resulted in no difference in the extent of bioavailability of digoxin relative to control data. The results generated to date in clinic","PeriodicalId":77500,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical practice. Supplement","volume":"77A ","pages":"11-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"19702925","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Risk factor management: the cardiologist's perspective.","authors":"G Jackson","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Risk factors are associated with disease and are not necessarily causative; as they are additive they should not be judged in isolation. Thus, 'mild blood pressure' does not imply a 'mild' risk in a cigarette-smoking, hypertensive diabetic. Cardiologists are usually fortunate, in that they see patients when there is already evidence of disease (ie, when secondary prevention is the issue, which is much less contentious than primary prevention). In the 'whizz-bang' specialty of cardiology, a balloon can remove in a matter of seconds what a lipidologist has toiled over for years. Attention to detail may not come easily in a stressful world: it is the detail of prevention that is likely to slow the progression of disease and induce regression rather than angioplasty or bypass surgery. In the presence of coronary artery disease, the essence of management is the team approach, the patient being the most important member of the team. Furthermore, the factors that need the most concentrated effort include cigarette smoking, hypertension, and hyperlipidaemia. As risk factors are additive, treatment of one should not make another one worse. Some drugs for hypertension can exacerbate hyperlipidaemia or impair glucose tolerance (eg thiazides), while ACE inhibitors can beneficially decrease insulin resistance in diabetes. Therapy must be tailored to the individual, but the overall prognostic benefits of drugs that might have slightly adverse metabolic profiles (such as beta-blockers) must not be ignored. Science is often a loser when faced with the power of marketing. When one risk factor (eg hypertension) is present, it is important to be vigorous in treating other factors (eg hyperlipidaemia) with general advice and support, as well as with specific drug therapy if indicated. There are two individuals that tend to lack education in risk factors--the patient and the cardiologist. The patient is a victim of poor investment in prevention, while the cardiologist is put off by a perceived lack of balance from the medical protagonists.</p>","PeriodicalId":77500,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical practice. Supplement","volume":"77A ","pages":"33-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"19702228","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Lipid management: past, present, and future.","authors":"D J Betteridge","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The therapeutic compounds available to the clinician treating lipid disorders in the 1990s enable the effective management of many patients. The development of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors is a major advance, and for the first time benefit in terms of overall mortality has been demonstrated in the impressive 4S study. What is needed now is effective implementation of screening and treatment of high-risk individuals. The UK continues to lag behind in this area. LDL cholesterol is the major target for therapy, but it is likely that over the next few years other lipid and lipoprotein parameters (HDL cholesterol, remnant particles, small dense LDL etc) will become more generally accepted targets for specific therapeutic intervention. Research continues to develop novel compounds targeting new regulatory steps in lipoprotein metabolism. In addition much progress is likely in targeting the arterial wall and atherogenesis other than specifically modulating plasma lipids. In the meantime the task of the clinician is to put into practice what is now known particularly about the secondary prevention of CHD to ensure that patients benefit from recent advances in knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":77500,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical practice. Supplement","volume":"77A ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"19702924","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Fluvastatin in combination with other lipid-lowering agents.","authors":"L A Jokubaitis","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fluvastatin, a new synthetic inhibitor of HMGCoA (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A) reductase, has been studied in several models to examine its effects when used in combination with other lipid-modifying agents such as derivatives of fibric acid (bezafibrate), resins (cholestyramine), and niacin. The combination of fluvastatin with bezafibrate has been studied in a double-blind trial involving patients with well-documented familial hypercholesterolaemia. Fluvastatin 40 mg/day, combined with either bezafibrate 400 mg/day or cholestyramine 8 g/day, resulted in reductions in levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), these being indistinguishable between the groups; however, significantly greater increases in levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (21.3%) and reductions in levels of triglycerides (25.1%) were seen with the fluvastatin-bezafibrate combination. No notable increases were seen in levels of serum creatine kinase, aspartate aminotransferase, or alanine aminotransferase, and no cases of myopathy were observed. In a study model that examined low-dose combinations of fluvastatin with cholestyramine, reductions in levels of LDL-C of 15.8% and 19.3% were seen with fluvastatin 10 mg and 20 mg, respectively. After an 8-week interval in which a daily dosage of cholestyramine 8 g was added, from baseline, reductions of 26.3% in the 10 mg fluvastatin-cholestyramine group and 31.2% in the 20 mg fluvastatin-cholestyramine group were observed, whereas the placebo-cholestyramine group displayed a reduction of 14.9%. Doubling the resin dosage to 16 g/day for the final 8 weeks of the study provided little additional benefit. Myotoxicity has been observed when lovastatin is coadministered with niacin, and so the combination of niacin with fluvastatin has also been studied to examine the possibility of this effect occurring. Patients were randomised to either fluvastatin 20 mg or placebo for 6 weeks, after which time open-label niacin was administered to all patients and titrated to a final dosage of 3 g/day. After 6 weeks, fluvastatin produced a 20.8% reduction in LDL-C levels from baseline. When combined with niacin, a 43.7% reduction was noted at the week 15 endpoint, against the 26.5% reduction seen with niacin monotherapy. The combination was well tolerated, with no reports of myopathy or of significant elevations in creatine kinase or liver transaminase levels. Combinations of fluvastatin with a variety of other agents have been shown to have significant effects on lipid profiles, with no evidence to date of clinically remarkable safety findings. Thus, the use of combination therapies may result in optimal management of patients with moderately severe hypercholesterolaemia and mixed dyslipidaemic profiles.</p>","PeriodicalId":77500,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical practice. Supplement","volume":"77A ","pages":"28-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"19702227","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Fluvastatin for the prevention of restenosis after coronary balloon angioplasty: angiographic and methodological background of the fluvastatin angioplasty restenosis trial.","authors":"D P Foley,&nbsp;P W Serruys","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Luminal renarrowing (restenosis) is the major limitation of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), and the search for a 'magic bullet' to prevent this apparent biological healing response to vessel injury has thus far been unsuccessful. Large clinical trials using serial quantitative coronary angiography have, however, provided some valuable insight into this area. In particular, the restenosis process may be measured as the loss in minimal luminal diameter from post-PTCA to follow-up angiography, and is essentially ubiquitous and normally distributed. The angiographic outcome of clinical trials can thus be appropriately evaluated using a continuous rather than a categorical approach, which also considerably reduces the number of patients required. Fluvastatin, a synthetic 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, has been shown experimentally to reduce the neointimal proliferative response after PTCA, independent of its lipid-lowering action. The FLuvastatin Angioplasty REstenosis trial was designed to evaluate whether fluvastatin 40 mg twice daily, commencing at least 2 weeks before planned PTCA, can reduce luminal loss by 30% from successful PTCA to follow-up angiography at 26 +/- 2 weeks in 730 evaluable patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":77500,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical practice. Supplement","volume":"77A ","pages":"40-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"19702229","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The patient at risk: who should we be treating?","authors":"I Shviro,&nbsp;E Leitersdorf","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Both the European Atherosclerosis Society and the US National Cholesterol Education Program have issued revised guidelines for the prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD), based on a multitude of recent epidemiological and angiographic studies. Both authorities agree that a target plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level is the single most important parameter, this target level being different for primary and secondary prevention. The introduction of statins for the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia provides an important tool to enable target LDL-C levels to be reached in most cases of primary prevention. For secondary prevention, however, the target LDL-C levels--2.6 mmol/l (100 mg/dl)--may be achieved in only a fraction of cases. Others may require the concomitant administration of other cholesterol-lowering drugs, such as bile-acid sequestrants (resins) and/or derivatives of fibric acid (fibrates). The use of statin-fibrate combinations has been discouraged since the report by the US Food and Drug Administration of 12 sporadic cases of myositis or rhabdomyolysis. During the past 7 years, however, 21 clinical trials have examined the efficacy and safety of statin-fibrate combinations in a total of 486 patients with a variety of dyslipidaemias. Overall, the combinations were proven to be effective and safe, and the incidence of abnormalities in liver function tests and levels of creatine kinase (CK) was low. A double-blind study has been carried out at the Hadassah University Hospital to examine the efficacy and safety of fluvastatin when combined with either cholestyramine (group 1) or bezafibrate (group 2) for the treatment of 38 patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH). Patients in group 2 showed a reduction in plasma LDL-C levels of 35% and in LDL-C to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio of 45% compared with 32% and 38% respectively in group 1. Both cholestyramine and bezafibrate produced an additional benefit of a 13% reduction in LDL-C levels in comparison with fluvastatin as monotherapy. An open-label ongoing study on a larger cohort of FH patients reveals that a decrease in plasma LDL-C levels of up to 38.5% may be achieved with a combination of fluvastatin 80 mg/day and bezafibrate 400 mg/day. In both studies, biochemical safety analyses revealed no notable abnormalities in liver function tests or levels of CK. It was concluded that fluvastatin-bezafibrate is a very effective synergistic therapy for heterozygous FH and is superior to a fluvastatin-cholestyramine combination.</p>","PeriodicalId":77500,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical practice. Supplement","volume":"77A ","pages":"24-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"19702226","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Lipoprotein(a) as a marker for coronary heart disease.","authors":"P Duriez,&nbsp;J Dallongeville,&nbsp;J C Fruchart","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) resembles a low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particle, but with the addition of apolipoprotein(a). Apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) is homologous to plasminogen, and its similarity to plasminogen indicates a prothrombogenic role for Lp(a), whereas the similarity of Lp(a) to LDL suggests a proatherogenic role. Thus, Lp(a) is a link between atherosclerosis and thrombosis. The apo(a) gene is highly polymorphic, and a relationship exists between the different apo(a) alleles and plasma Lp(a) levels. There is also evidence to suggest an association between serum Lp(a) concentration and the frequency of cardiovascular atherosclerosis, particularly myocardial infarction in men, although some of the recently published epidemiological studies have been controversial. The heightened awareness of increased Lp(a) levels being a risk factor for coronary artery disease has led to the evaluation of the effects of lipid-lowering agents on Lp(a) levels. The data that have emerged, however, are conflicting, and are derived mostly from short-term studies involving the use of statins. Our group has studied the short- and long-term effect of fluvastatin on Lp(a) in hypercholesterolaemic patients; fluvastatin was found to have no effect in such patients as observed in the short-term studies, but significant reductions in Lp(a) levels were noted during long-term treatment. Although our findings are in agreement with those of a previously published report, there is still a great need to confirm the data that have been reported in separate studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":77500,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical practice. Supplement","volume":"77A ","pages":"54-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"19702230","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}