Theoretical medicine最新文献

{"title":"Moral integrity and values in medicine: Inaugurating a new section","authors":"D. Self","doi":"10.1007/BF00998144","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00998144","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":77444,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical medicine","volume":"16 1","pages":"253-264"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1995-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF00998144","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"51484990","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Method and methodology in medical ethics: inaugurating another new section.","authors":"E L Erde","doi":"10.1007/BF00998142","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00998142","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This essay announces the inauguration of a section of Theoretical Medicine and invites submissions on the topic \"Method and Methodology in Medical Ethics.\" It offers some sketches of plausible meanings of \"method\" and \"methodology\" and their relationships as these might apply to work in biomedical ethics. It suggests a broad range of issues, dilemmas or conflicts that may be addressed for help via method and/or methodology.</p>","PeriodicalId":77444,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical medicine","volume":"16 3","pages":"235-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1995-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF00998142","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"19513103","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Philip Roth's Patrimony: narrative and ethics in a case study.","authors":"E L Erde","doi":"10.1007/BF00998143","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00998143","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>I assess the ethical content of Philip Roth's account of his father's final years with, and death from a tumor. I apply this to criticisms of the nature and content of case reports in medicine. I also draw some implications about modernism, postmodernism and narrative understandings.</p>","PeriodicalId":77444,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical medicine","volume":"16 3","pages":"239-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1995-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF00998143","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"19513104","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Moral integrity and values in medicine: inaugurating a new section.","authors":"D J Self","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":77444,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical medicine","volume":"16 3","pages":"256-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1995-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"19513105","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Response to Michael Ruse","authors":"K. Schaffner","doi":"10.1007/BF00998148","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00998148","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":77444,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical medicine","volume":"16 1","pages":"317-319"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1995-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF00998148","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"51485086","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Environmental risks: scientific concepts and social perception.","authors":"P Vineis","doi":"10.1007/BF00998542","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00998542","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Using the example of air pollution, I criticize a restricted utilitarian view of environmental risks. It is likely that damage to health due to environmental pollution in Western countries is relatively modest in quantitative terms (especially when considering cancer and comparing such damage to the effects of some life-style exposures). However, a strictly quantitative approach, which ranks priorities according to the burden of disease attributable to single causes, is questionable because it does not consider such aspects as inequalities in the distribution of risks. Secondly, the ability of epidemiological research to identify some health effects is limited. Third, the environment has symbolic and aesthetic components that overcome a strict evaluation of damage based on the impairment of human health. It is not acceptable that priorities be set just balancing the burden of disease caused by pollution in the environment against economic constraints. As an example of a computation that inherently includes economic analysis, I refer to the proposal of an estimator of mortality in coal mining, i.e., a rate which puts deaths in the numerator and tons of coal extracted in the denominator. According to this estimator, mortality due to accidents decreased from 1.15 to 0.42 in the period 1950-1970 in the United States, for each million tons of coal extracted. However, considering the steep decline in the workforce in the same period, the traditional mortality rate (deaths over persons-time) actually increased. The proposal of a measure of mortality based on the amount of coal extracted is just one example of the attempts to influence decisions by including an economic element (productivity) in risk assessment. This paper has three purposes: One, to describe empirical research concerning the health effects of environmental pollutants; two, to discuss the scientific principles and methods used in the identification of environmental hazards; and three, to critically discuss some of the ethical principles which are applied in medicine and in the assessment and management of risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":77444,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical medicine","volume":"16 2","pages":"153-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1995-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF00998542","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"18575510","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The legitimacy of clinical knowledge: towards a medical epistemology embracing the art of medicine.","authors":"K Malterud","doi":"10.1007/BF00998544","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00998544","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The traditional medical epistemology, resting on a biomedical paradigmatic monopoly, fails to display an adequate representation of medical knowledge. Clinical knowledge, including the complexities of human interaction, is not available for inquiry by means of biomedical approaches, and consequently is denied legitimacy within a scientific context. A gap results between medical research and clinical practice. Theories of knowledge, especially the concept of tacit knowing, seem suitable for description and discussion of clinical knowledge, commonly denoted \"the art of medicine.\" A metaposition allows for inquiry of clinical knowledge, inviting an expansion of the traditional medical epistemology, provided that relevant criteria for scientific knowledge within this field are developed and applied. The consequences of such approaches are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":77444,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical medicine","volume":"16 2","pages":"183-98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1995-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF00998544","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"18575512","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Kant, health care and justification.","authors":"E H Loewy","doi":"10.1007/BF00998546","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00998546","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An argument based on Kant for access to health-care for all is a most helpful addition to prior discussions. My paper argues that while such a point of view is helpful it fails to be persuasive. What is needed, in addition to a notion of the legislative will, is a viewpoint of community which sees justice as originating not merely from considerations of reason alone but from a notion of community and from a framework of common human experiences and capabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":77444,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical medicine","volume":"16 2","pages":"215-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1995-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF00998546","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"18575514","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Placebo effect and randomized clinical trials.","authors":"G Elander,&nbsp;G Hermerén","doi":"10.1007/BF00998543","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00998543","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The achievement of optimal therapeutic results presupposes the use of appropriate treatment combined with maximal utilization of placebo effects. These aims may sometimes be difficult to satisfy in randomized clinical trials (RCTs). The question thus arises whether there is a conflict between the goals of therapy and those of experimental research; and if so, to what extent, and how is it handled in practice by clinicians and researchers. Various ethical problems have been discussed in several reports connected with RCTs. But we have found no discussion concerning the conflict between obtaining informed consent and promoting optimal placebo effects. Information about RCTs can be given in various ways. Sometimes appropriate information about RCTs to patients involves non-optimal utilization of placebo effects. This gives rise to ethical and methodological problems, which are discussed in this article.</p>","PeriodicalId":77444,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical medicine","volume":"16 2","pages":"171-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1995-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF00998543","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"18575511","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"To test or not to test: a clinical dilemma.","authors":"D B Resnik","doi":"10.1007/BF00998541","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00998541","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper argues that clinicians are sometimes justified in not testing diagnoses or in not subjecting them to a full battery of tests. In deciding whether to conduct a test, a clinician may consider and weigh several different factors, including her confidence in her initial diagnosis, the specificity and sensitivity of the test, the consequences of making a false diagnosis, the pain, harm, and inconvenience caused by the test, and the costs of the test to the patient and society. This view suggests that diagnoses are fundamentally different from scientific hypotheses in that they are not always subjected to the same evidential standards.</p>","PeriodicalId":77444,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical medicine","volume":"16 2","pages":"141-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1995-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF00998541","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"18575508","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}